Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

There are 14655 comments on the News24 story from Aug 27, 2012, titled Why Atheism Will Replace Religion. In it, News24 reports that:

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

Brit Expat

Juvignac, France

#13593 Jul 22, 2013
atheism is evil wrote:
<quoted text>
Hopefully your death will involve your head being decapitated in a fiery car crash. One would hope.

What a very Christian/Religious post. You sum up your beliefs perfectly. How very sad. But for religious types pure ignorance is pure bliss.

Cyril.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#13595 Jul 22, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
"I went to an atheist convention of satanic rituals and converted them all to Christianity."
I bet that'll be his next claim.
lol...that is most certainly not beyond his reach of wild claims.
PINCH111

Torquay, UK

#13596 Jul 23, 2013
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
simple... atheism is real... religion is mythical superstition..... see that was easy
And agnosticism ??

“I'm out hunting”

Since: Jan 10

For your mind and soul

#13597 Jul 24, 2013
PINCH111 wrote:
<quoted text>And agnosticism ??
Just a more cautious form of atheism.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#13598 Jul 24, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Just a more cautious form of atheism.
agnosticism is ignorance of the highest order. Its definitely wrong because it equates religion with science, two inequatable things - one based in facts and reality, the other in the egotistical mental illness and self righteousness of the human species.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13599 Jul 24, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
agnosticism is ignorance of the highest order. Its definitely wrong because it equates religion with science, two inequatable things - one based in facts and reality, the other in the egotistical mental illness and self righteousness of the human species.
I don't believe I've ever heard it stated quite so well!! Agnostics make me sick ... fence setters, Pascal Wagerers, indecisive middle-of-the-roaders. This is a matter where 'doubt' only fuels the fantasies, it makes no contribution to the side of Reason, despite pandering their doubts in it's name! Atheists, like their godbot neighbors on the other side of the fence, have at least come to a decision and carry the burden of their knowledge as best they can. Agnostics are members of the 'feel good, politically correct' cancer that permeates and weakens everything it touches. Agnostics need to hit the books, sip a few more gallons of Holy Water, come to some kind of a decision or STFU!! We are ARGUING HERE and their wishy-washy BS is NOT HELPING!!!

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#13600 Jul 24, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>Just a more cautious form of atheism.
There is also agnostic atheism.
I am of that.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#13601 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>I don't believe I've ever heard it stated quite so well!! Agnostics make me sick ... fence setters, Pascal Wagerers, indecisive middle-of-the-roaders. This is a matter where 'doubt' only fuels the fantasies, it makes no contribution to the side of Reason, despite pandering their doubts in it's name! Atheists, like their godbot neighbors on the other side of the fence, have at least come to a decision and carry the burden of their knowledge as best they can. Agnostics are members of the 'feel good, politically correct' cancer that permeates and weakens everything it touches. Agnostics need to hit the books, sip a few more gallons of Holy Water, come to some kind of a decision or STFU!! We are ARGUING HERE and their wishy-washy BS is NOT HELPING!!!
I agree, full agnostics do tend to annoy me, but to each their own.
As an agnostic atheist, I do not believe in any god, but will not make a positive claim (or not a serious positive claim) that there is no god, for I never know.
I would look foolish if one actually existed, however unlikely that seems.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#13602 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe I've ever heard it stated quite so well!! Agnostics make me sick ... fence setters, Pascal Wagerers, indecisive middle-of-the-roaders. This is a matter where 'doubt' only fuels the fantasies, it makes no contribution to the side of Reason, despite pandering their doubts in it's name! Atheists, like their godbot neighbors on the other side of the fence, have at least come to a decision and carry the burden of their knowledge as best they can. Agnostics are members of the 'feel good, politically correct' cancer that permeates and weakens everything it touches. Agnostics need to hit the books, sip a few more gallons of Holy Water, come to some kind of a decision or STFU!! We are ARGUING HERE and their wishy-washy BS is NOT HELPING!!!
What is interesting is that the word 'agnostic' was coined by TH Huxley, also known as Darwin's Bulldog. He defined it by stating, essentially, that if the data is not sufficient to make a conclusion, then no conclusion should be reached. This is a good position to take in many scientific endeavors and, coming from a scientific background, it was natural for him to take this position.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Hux...

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13603 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe I've ever heard it stated quite so well!! Agnostics make me sick ... fence setters, Pascal Wagerers, indecisive middle-of-the-roaders. This is a matter where 'doubt' only fuels the fantasies, it makes no contribution to the side of Reason, despite pandering their doubts in it's name! Atheists, like their godbot neighbors on the other side of the fence, have at least come to a decision and carry the burden of their knowledge as best they can. Agnostics are members of the 'feel good, politically correct' cancer that permeates and weakens everything it touches. Agnostics need to hit the books, sip a few more gallons of Holy Water, come to some kind of a decision or STFU!! We are ARGUING HERE and their wishy-washy BS is NOT HELPING!!!
There is nothing "fence sitting" about saying "you have no evidence, therefore you know nothing". This is a correct assessment of both sides of the "is there ANY god" question. As for the Christian God, that is obvious bull crap.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13604 Jul 24, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, full agnostics do tend to annoy me, but to each their own.
As an agnostic atheist, I do not believe in any god, but will not make a positive claim (or not a serious positive claim) that there is no god, for I never know.
I would look foolish if one actually existed, however unlikely that seems.
Well ... if some kind of god shows up, we're all gonna look a little foolish. I know that in what may well be an Infinite Multiverse, assigning something a 0% probability might not be 100% reasonable, but ... I'm willing to go out on a limb on this matter. Besides, looking foolish ain't so bad.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13605 Jul 24, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
What is interesting is that the word 'agnostic' was coined by TH Huxley, also known as Darwin's Bulldog. He defined it by stating, essentially, that if the data is not sufficient to make a conclusion, then no conclusion should be reached. This is a good position to take in many scientific endeavors and, coming from a scientific background, it was natural for him to take this position.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Hux...
An excellent component, no doubt of good science! I like this quote stolen from your link ...

"In a letter of September 23, 1860, to Charles Kingsley, Huxley discussed his views extensively:

It is no use to talk to me of analogies and probabilities. I know what I mean when I say I believe in the law of the inverse squares, and I will not rest my life and my hopes upon weaker convictions..."

He doesn't sound very 'agnostic' there.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13606 Jul 24, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing "fence sitting" about saying "you have no evidence, therefore you know nothing". This is a correct assessment of both sides of the "is there ANY god" question. As for the Christian God, that is obvious bull crap.
But you must admit, as Skeptic points out, it therefore 'equates' Knowledge and Faith where no such equality exists. In a way, our doubts are the only 'evidence' godbots have, whereas evidence of a tangible reality grows with each passing second.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13607 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
But you must admit, as Skeptic points out, it therefore 'equates' Knowledge and Faith where no such equality exists. In a way, our doubts are the only 'evidence' godbots have, whereas evidence of a tangible reality grows with each passing second.
No, I don't agree. Knowledge requires evidence, faith actually requires there be NO evidence. How can they be equated? If anything, they are opposites. I call "Bull Crap" on this proposition as well.

How's that for "fence sitting"?

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13608 Jul 24, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I don't agree. Knowledge requires evidence, faith actually requires there be NO evidence. How can they be equated? If anything, they are opposites. I call "Bull Crap" on this proposition as well.
How's that for "fence sitting"?
It is not I who is equating Faith and Knowledge, rather the Agnostic who declares 'we cannot know'. It is only here, on this particular thread where "Atheism" has liberally been defined as "includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans" etc. In fact, Atheism does not include or encompass these lessor or philosophically ambiguous divergences.

I know there is no God because I have looked, admittedly through other's eyes, at our reality from dancing sub-atomics to filigreed galaxies and he's not there. Anyone who says different best come up with some evidence beyond mere longing. If you relish the 'fog of uncertainty', so be it. Sounds a lot like "fence setting" to me. We're here to argue the one side or the other, not the gray area in-between. Hell, it's so small it's more like an infinitely fine line connecting two points ... not an "area" at all.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13609 Jul 24, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Knowledge requires evidence, faith actually requires there be NO evidence. How can they be equated? If anything, they are opposites.
Just FYI ... I agree completely with your core statement, shorn of it's emotional content.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13610 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not I who is equating Faith and Knowledge, rather the Agnostic who declares 'we cannot know'. It is only here, on this particular thread where "Atheism" has liberally been defined as "includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans" etc. In fact, Atheism does not include or encompass these lessor or philosophically ambiguous divergences.
I know there is no God because I have looked, admittedly through other's eyes, at our reality from dancing sub-atomics to filigreed galaxies and he's not there. Anyone who says different best come up with some evidence beyond mere longing. If you relish the 'fog of uncertainty', so be it. Sounds a lot like "fence setting" to me. We're here to argue the one side or the other, not the gray area in-between. Hell, it's so small it's more like an infinitely fine line connecting two points ... not an "area" at all.
So let's see you prove Spinoza's God does not exist. Let's see how long you sit on that fence.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13611 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Just FYI ... I agree completely with your core statement, shorn of it's emotional content.
Yes, I am an emotional being! I am also a sexual and sensual being! That does not mean I can not be a logical being as well. These things are not mutually exclusive. I pity the fool who would try to be only one or the other.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#13612 Jul 24, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not I who is equating Faith and Knowledge, rather the Agnostic who declares 'we cannot know'. It is only here, on this particular thread where "Atheism" has liberally been defined as "includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans" etc. In fact, Atheism does not include or encompass these lessor or philosophically ambiguous divergences.
I know there is no God because I have looked, admittedly through other's eyes, at our reality from dancing sub-atomics to filigreed galaxies and he's not there. Anyone who says different best come up with some evidence beyond mere longing. If you relish the 'fog of uncertainty', so be it. Sounds a lot like "fence setting" to me. We're here to argue the one side or the other, not the gray area in-between. Hell, it's so small it's more like an infinitely fine line connecting two points ... not an "area" at all.
But you are the one who proclaimed "I must admit ..." .... I must do no such thing!!!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13613 Jul 24, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
So let's see you prove Spinoza's God does not exist. Let's see how long you sit on that fence.
I believe in Nature, as I pointed out in an earlier post.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pagan/Wiccan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Who Is Allah? (Aug '07) 2 min Eric 225,504
News Sorry Witches, You Won't Be Able to Buy Spells ... Jun 23 Drake_Burrwood 1
News Illogical Religious Positions? Jun 15 Looney Tunes 1
omens of dead animals (Aug '08) Jun 14 Davglix 107
News Iowa woman to make history with nation's first ... Jun 12 MakesUBeGone 2
Jesus Christ, the Son of God Jun 5 Son of man 1
HELP Wicca Covens in my area! (Jun '09) Jun 4 isis 63
More from around the web