Again, what's wrong is your representation of what Genesis 1 says.<quoted text>
If there's something wrong with my representation then there's something wrong with Genesis 1. Which is NOT my problem. Plants day 3, sun day 4.
Now, the Bible does mention OTHER lights which some fundies claim that were also capable of sustaining plant life on Earth, HOWEVER, this goes AGAINST the current scientific view of Earth's history period. Meaning that science is NOT supporting the Bible in this case.
Now go ahead and get Jastrow to agree to plants day 3, sun day 4 or admit you were just lying for Jesus and reaching REAAAAAAAALLY long when you were attempting to claim that science supports the Bible.
No other name used on this thread. I am simply The Dude. When I was talking about fundies being disingenuous I was referring to creationists like yourself. And as daft as you are I'm sure you understood that.
Penzias got it right and Jastrow got it right and you got it wrong, bubba. Deal with it.