Gravity does not address the origin mass because gravity and mass are not related, if you remove the origin of life form the myth of evolution you have no beginning therfroe no evolution which would be a good thing. Germ and disease have nothing to do with evolution so you once again shoot amiss.<quoted text>
Evolution needs a beginning, yes. But since evolution happens then we know something started it. However the THEORY of evolution need not address abiogenesis. The theory of gravity works without having to reference the origin of mass. The germ theory of disease works without having to reference the origin of germs (which technically would also be abiogenesis). The theory of evolution works without having to reference the origin of life. Hence the theory of evolution does not rely on abiogenesis.
Now there is at least one thing that both supporters of science AND creationists agree on - the universe is finite. Therefore the Earth is finite. Therefore life is finite. Therefore it had a beginning: Abiogenesis. Now, there are currently four possibilities as to how this happened:
1 - Naturally occurring chemical processes.
2 - Aliens.
3 - Goddidit with magic.
4 - An unknown fourth option which no-one has thought of yet.
None of which is relevant to the scientific veracity of the current modern evolutionary synthesis. As long as any one of these four options occurred, then evolution can occur. Since life IS here we know that at least one of these has occurred. The question is which one.
So far the only option that provides a testable hypothesis is option 1.
Your attempt to belittle creation by calling it magic and using the other term you use to belittle GOD proves that you have no grounding in truth and no matter how much is presented you will never accept the fact that GOD created everything. Evolution cannot occur within the frame work of creation as it does not need to.
I love it when I see the words testable hypothesis that really says I will test what I think I know to find out that I think I am right, thinking what I dont know. What a lovely example of circular reasoning.
By the way I am still waiting for my 100% factual proof for evolution you have now responded 5 times since I asked yet have produced none.