Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Aug 27, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: News24

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.
Comments
6,761 - 6,780 of 14,385 Comments Last updated Nov 23, 2013

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7013
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
The Catholics had the first Canonized Bible. Your protestant Bible came about hundreds of years later. You don't appear to know any of the historical circumstances surrounding the Bible do you.
Grazie...Bravo! Well put. Plus it's "ta biblia", the books.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7014
Mar 10, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I used a 1.2% constant and made no allowance for Culture, infant mortality, quality of health care, life expectancy, availability of birth control, illiteracy, education, war and/or pestilence.
my numbers were generous, but what I`ll do just to be polite is to put the rate of increase at a CONSTANT level of the 1950-60`s during the baby boomer years and no one will die OF ANYTHING.
The GLOBAL population would be *drumroll*...
15,559
Why not use the real number of the Middle East where it all happened, the 1950 and 1960 were still a time of decline in human birth rates world wide. You are narrowly focused on your own backyard. Do you even know there is a world out there.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7015
Mar 10, 2013
 
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Grazie...Bravo! Well put. Plus it's "ta biblia", the books.
The original was call "Ha Tanach"

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7016
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I believe the BIBLE.
How does light prove actual age, it does not, light travels to earth form a distant planet at a set speed, so by the lie you promote that plant must be really really far away.
Wrong. We can measure, by various methods how far away other galaxies are. For example, the Large Magellanic Cloud is about 160,000 light years away. We can verify this by looking at the brightness of the individual stars in that galaxy and comparing them to stars that are closer and using the differences in brightness to show the differences in distance. In doing so, we can make sure that the stars are of intrinsically the same brightness by making sure they are at the same temperature (determined by which elements are emitting light at what wavelengths).

Furthermore, we can tell that the speed of light is the same now as 160,000 years ago because we saw a supernova (an exploding star) and watched its reflection from nearby gas clouds. The time it took for that reflection shows how long it took light to travel between the nova and the gas clouds. We can measure how far the two are away from each other by actually looking through out telescopes.

The point? It is all consistent with a distance and time of 160,000 years, and definitely NOT consistent with a time of less than 10,000 years.

Conclusion: The Bible is wrong.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7017
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
We JEWS had our BIBLE long before your RCC perversion was dreamed up by anyone.
"Bible" is an English word, a language not one of the original languages in which snybof the biblical books were written in. Plus it doesn't appear in the Bible itself.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7018
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php...
You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
The original was call "Ha Tanach"
The word "Bible" is from "ta biblia".

Bible (n.)
early 14c., from Anglo-Latin biblia, Old French bible (13c.) "the Bible," also any large book generally, from Medieval and Late Latin biblia (neuter plural interpreted as feminine singular), in phrase biblia sacra "holy books," a translation of Greek ta biblia to hagia "the holy books," from Greek biblion "paper, scroll," the ordinary word for "book," originally a diminutive of byblos "Egyptian papyrus," possibly so called from Byblos (modern Jebeil, Lebanon), the name of the Phoenician port from which Egyptian papyrus was exported to Greece (cf. parchment). Or the place name might be from the Greek word, which then would be probably of Egyptian origin. The Christian scripture was referred to in Greek as Ta Biblia as early as c.223. Bible replaced Old English bibliođece (see bibliothek) as the ordinary word for "the Scriptures."

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7019
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I believe the BIBLE.
How does light prove actual age, it does not, light travels to earth form a distant planet at a set speed, so by the lie you promote that plant must be really really far away. However GOD put the planets in the sky for us to be able to see, enjoy, navigate by and tell time by therefore he put them there plus he put the light for us to see.
The BIBLE is not wrong you are.
Belief is irrelevant.

Light travels at a definite speed. The distance is measurable, quantifiable and verifiable. You are welcome to your delusions about the Bible, but please don't expect intelligent people to join you.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7020
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
We JEWS had our BIBLE long before your RCC perversion was dreamed up by anyone.
There was no bible before the 5th century. There was Hebrew Scripture, the Pentateuch, and Torah to name a few; no Bible.

Since: May 11

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7021
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not use the real number of the Middle East where it all happened, the 1950 and 1960 were still a time of decline in human birth rates world wide. You are narrowly focused on your own backyard. Do you even know there is a world out there.
I do and I would even go so far as to say that 10000 years BCE the global population was 4million people.

At the time of the alleged flood it was 12 million people, but you can`t cancel everyone out except 8 and then recover to have functioning civilisations all over the globe in 300 years.

...but you can keep entertaining me with fantastic stories if you like. lol
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7022
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. We can measure, by various methods how far away other galaxies are. For example, the Large Magellanic Cloud is about 160,000 light years away. We can verify this by looking at the brightness of the individual stars in that galaxy and comparing them to stars that are closer and using the differences in brightness to show the differences in distance. In doing so, we can make sure that the stars are of intrinsically the same brightness by making sure they are at the same temperature (determined by which elements are emitting light at what wavelengths).
Furthermore, we can tell that the speed of light is the same now as 160,000 years ago because we saw a supernova (an exploding star) and watched its reflection from nearby gas clouds. The time it took for that reflection shows how long it took light to travel between the nova and the gas clouds. We can measure how far the two are away from each other by actually looking through out telescopes.
The point? It is all consistent with a distance and time of 160,000 years, and definitely NOT consistent with a time of less than 10,000 years.
Conclusion: The Bible is wrong.
ERROR 1:“using the differences in brightness to show the differences in distance” who is to say they present the same luminosity.
ERROR 2:” we can make sure that the stars are of intrinsically the same brightness by making sure they are at the same temperature” Temperature is defined by colour, colour is defined by the type of gas burning to make the colour, no comparison can accurately be made by colour unless the exact gas type and concentration is known.(Have you been there to tale a sample?)
ERROR 3:“determined by which elements are emitting light at what wavelengths” see above for explanation
ERROR 4:“because we saw a supernova (an exploding star) and watched its reflection from nearby gas clouds” that same light would have taken too many light years to reach earth to measure in our time so you are using speculation and extrapolation not factual measurement.
ERROR 5:“? It is all consistent with a distance and time of 160,000 years, and definitely NOT consistent with a time of less than 10,000 years” as I stated GOD put the stars in the heavens for us to use in various ways He would not have put them there without showing us their light or they would have been useless to us. So 6000 years is perfectly feasible.
ERROR 6:“Conclusion: The Bible is wrong” no the BIBLE is not wrong you are.
So many obvious errors in one such small post you really should do better than that.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7023
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Pietro Armando wrote:
http://www.etymonline.com/inde x.php?term=bible
<quoted text>
The word "Bible" is from "ta biblia".
Bible (n.)
early 14c., from Anglo-Latin biblia, Old French bible (13c.) "the Bible," also any large book generally, from Medieval and Late Latin biblia (neuter plural interpreted as feminine singular), in phrase biblia sacra "holy books," a translation of Greek ta biblia to hagia "the holy books," from Greek biblion "paper, scroll," the ordinary word for "book," originally a diminutive of byblos "Egyptian papyrus," possibly so called from Byblos (modern Jebeil, Lebanon), the name of the Phoenician port from which Egyptian papyrus was exported to Greece (cf. parchment). Or the place name might be from the Greek word, which then would be probably of Egyptian origin. The Christian scripture was referred to in Greek as Ta Biblia as early as c.223. Bible replaced Old English bibliođece (see bibliothek) as the ordinary word for "the Scriptures."
Yes I know but the Tanach was there long before the BIBLE.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7024
Mar 10, 2013
 
MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I do and I would even go so far as to say that 10000 years BCE the global population was 4million people.
At the time of the alleged flood it was 12 million people, but you can`t cancel everyone out except 8 and then recover to have functioning civilisations all over the globe in 300 years.
...but you can keep entertaining me with fantastic stories if you like. lol
The roots of the Bible are in the birth of civilization in the area between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This occurred around 6,000 years ago.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7025
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
Belief is irrelevant.
Light travels at a definite speed. The distance is measurable, quantifiable and verifiable. You are welcome to your delusions about the Bible, but please don't expect intelligent people to join you.
If intelligence is measured and defined by ignoring the obvious facts then you are more than welcome to it.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7026
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
There was no bible before the 5th century. There was Hebrew Scripture, the Pentateuch, and Torah to name a few; no Bible.
You are oh so very stupid, the Pentateuch and Torah are the same thing you fool. The Tanach is the Hebrew scripture. The BIBLE is just the name for a collection of book.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7027
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

MisterCharrington wrote:
<quoted text>
I do and I would even go so far as to say that 10000 years BCE the global population was 4million people.
At the time of the alleged flood it was 12 million people, but you can`t cancel everyone out except 8 and then recover to have functioning civilisations all over the globe in 300 years.
...but you can keep entertaining me with fantastic stories if you like. lol
Your first error is to presume there was a 10000 BCE there was no. You second error is to try to calculate the population grown on modern figures as you have been doing very inaccurate and non-representative of historical figures.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7028
Mar 10, 2013
 
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Chuckle....funny...movie trivia time....what movie was that from?
Full Metal Jacket
Officer and a Gentleman

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7029
Mar 10, 2013
 
You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>As a wise man once said "Stupid is as stupid does", or on your case "stupid is as stupid posts".

Carry on making yourself look stupid it is fun to watch you degrading yourself like this.
Hey, you're the one asking people to evi-dance.

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7030
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>So you don't know how to read an atlas, it makes sense stupid.
You keep refusing to answer this simple question that my 14 year old sister could answer:
How many planets are in our solar system?

If you refuse to answer again, you obviously don't know how many planets are even in THIS solar system.
You gotta be kidding

Auckland, New Zealand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7031
Mar 10, 2013
 
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, you're the one asking people to evi-dance.
Get real fool.

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7032
Mar 10, 2013
 
You gotta be kidding wrote:
<quoted text>Get real fool.
So you didn't say "evidance"?
You're horrible at lying and even worse at keeping your story straight.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••