For all we know you could have written that right now, please provide a source.<quoted text>
"None of the stories in the bible have any evidence to support them besides the existence of a geological location."
When I debunk this then you are completely debunked.
You use words like "None" and 100%
That leaves you no room to back peddle. You atheist make this way to easy!
"Until very recently, there was no evidence outside the Bible for the existence of King David. There are no references to him in Egyptian, Syrian or Assyrian documents of the time, and the many archaeological digs in the City of David failed to turn up so much as a mention of his name. Then, on July 21, 1993, a team of archaeologists led by Prof. Avraham Biran, excavating Tel Dan in the northern Galilee, found a triangular piece of basalt rock, measuring 23 x 36 cm. inscribed in Aramaic. It was subsequently identified as part of a victory pillar erected by the king of Syria and later smashed by an Israelite ruler. The inscription, which dates to the ninth century BC, that is to say, about a century after David was thought to have ruled Israel, includes the words Beit David ("House" or "Dynasty" of David"). It is the first near-contemporaneous reference to David ever found. It is conclusive; it does strongly indicate that a king called David established a dynasty in Israel during the relevant period as stated in the Bible. Archaeologist continue to find the evidence to substantiate the story's in the Bible as accurate."
Also, for all we know, you could have a source that is religiously biased and doesn't actually have evidence...such as the last guy who gave a link.
"This guy that we can't prove existed says that Jesus existed and therefore Jesus existed."
That's not evidence.
Also, I wrote the above before actually reading what you wrote.
Now, after reading it, I see you ARE insane.
A guy in a story exists, therefore the story itself is true?
So Abraham Lincoln really WAS a vampire hunter!