YOU GUYS FOOLISHLY QUOTE DANIEL!Because it’s referring to a figure that Jews recognized as divine. Here’s what the Jewish prophet Daniel wrote (7:13-14):
In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all peoples, nations and men of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
Here’s the point: The “Son of Man” in Daniel’s vision is rightful heir to the divine throne. According to the prophecy, He’ll rule forever. Nations will worship Him and His kingdom will be unstoppable.
Jesus claimed to be the Divine Messiah
That son of man was brought to the Ancient of Days. So, Jesus was not the Ancient of days.
Please tell this to the ignorant fool, who wrote that article.
I am the Son of Man, you are the Son of Man and every man is the Son of man. Son of man, simply means MAN!
In the verse that you quoted, it is written "son of man". Writing it as Son of Man does not make it any special.
Son of Man has not been patented for Jesus.