Story: New DNA Science Research Confi...

Story: New DNA Science Research Confirms...Jews Are Not Descendents of Abraham

There are 356 comments on the Palo Alto Weekly story from Apr 2, 2013, titled Story: New DNA Science Research Confirms...Jews Are Not Descendents of Abraham. In it, Palo Alto Weekly reports that:

'I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.' Who should possess the land of Israel? Christian evangelicals say it should be the descendants of Abraham.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Palo Alto Weekly.

First Prev
of 18
Next Last
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#1 Apr 2, 2013
this has got to be the most ignorant statement, i have ever heard.

of course all the multitudes, that left Egypt were not all the descendants of Avraham. there were representatives, from every known nation at the time.

and thus indicating that TheTorah, is given to TheWhole world from G-D and not just TheEevareem.

how can this world, be so ignorant of ThisSame Story, we are all here in again from G-D?
justice

Godalming, UK

#2 Apr 2, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
this has got to be the most ignorant statement, i have ever heard.
of course all the multitudes, that left Egypt were not all the descendants of Avraham. there were representatives, from every known nation at the time.
and thus indicating that TheTorah, is given to TheWhole world from G-D and not just TheEevareem.
how can this world, be so ignorant of ThisSame Story, we are all here in again from G-D?
Abraam's native land was Mesopotamia.
He went into Canaan land.
Then he went into Egypt, not as a slave, but ruled as a King in Lower Egypt. He was one of those who the Egyptians called Hyksos (foreign rulers.)
Abraam was an anagram of his throne name Maabra = Ab ra am = Ma ab ra.
He was told his descendants would rule from Egypt to the Euphrates.
The true descendants should have Amorite and Egyptian and Canaan DNA.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#3 Apr 2, 2013
justice wrote:
<quoted text>
Abraam's native land was Mesopotamia.
He went into Canaan land.
Then he went into Egypt, not as a slave, but ruled as a King in Lower Egypt. He was one of those who the Egyptians called Hyksos (foreign rulers.)
Abraam was an anagram of his throne name Maabra = Ab ra am = Ma ab ra.
He was told his descendants would rule from Egypt to the Euphrates.
The true descendants should have Amorite and Egyptian and Canaan DNA.
rabbee: well what the heck does, that have to do with the subject?

G-D gave TheWhole Torah Prophecy, to the multitudes that left Egypt. in this world that has not been right yet, with anything here in The Prophetic Torah Accounting again.

TheTorah is not just prophecy of the past, but the prophecy of the present, and of the future always here in TheTorah. and TheTorah is meant to be given to the whole world at large.

TheTorah was given to the many linages of the multitude. not just to, the Evareem alleged as jews* expletive.

none of you even recognize your, grandfather adam and grandmother -chaooah, actually here and now in The-Prophetic Torah Happening again.

for nearly six days, HaShem G-D - has toiled in the giving of TheTorah. with the day of rest, soon to be again. when G-D places adam and his assigned mate in charge of the whole shebang again. just like it forever says is true, actually here in TheTorah just again.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#4 Apr 3, 2013
Was there a need of a new Dna test to confirm the obvious and the known?
justice

Godalming, UK

#5 Apr 3, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: well what the heck does, that have to do with the subject?
G-D gave TheWhole Torah Prophecy, to the multitudes that left Egypt. in this world that has not been right yet, with anything here in The Prophetic Torah Accounting again.
TheTorah is not just prophecy of the past, but the prophecy of the present, and of the future always here in TheTorah. and TheTorah is meant to be given to the whole world at large.
TheTorah was given to the many linages of the multitude. not just to, the Evareem alleged as jews* expletive.
none of you even recognize your, grandfather adam and grandmother -chaooah, actually here and now in The-Prophetic Torah Happening again.
for nearly six days, HaShem G-D - has toiled in the giving of TheTorah. with the day of rest, soon to be again. when G-D places adam and his assigned mate in charge of the whole shebang again. just like it forever says is true, actually here in TheTorah just again.
Just what are you trying to say. You jump from one thing to another.
6 days of rest etc., are you telling me that God created everything in 6 days then rested.
Are you aware that the Universe is 13.5 billion years of age.
And our planet earth is 4.5 billion years of age.
And you are trying to tell us this was all done in 6 days.
With all due respect you are in the dark ages.
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#6 Apr 3, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
Was there a need of a new Dna test to confirm the obvious and the known?
rabbee: well i have not ever seen any dna test, that could confirm ones true belief in G-D. but it does help one, lose sight of what is really important. since linage is no insurance, of true belief in G-D, here in TheTorah Accounting again.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#7 Apr 3, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: well i have not ever seen any dna test, that could confirm ones true belief in G-D. but it does help one, lose sight of what is really important. since linage is no insurance, of true belief in G-D, here in TheTorah Accounting again.
What the Dna test said is that Hebrews doesnt have a common ancestors that lived 4000 years ago. This is may be due because of continous migration and mxing of people, and/or because Avraham was only a person among the people who lived around them, and the early hebrews have different forefathers.

If god wants to be worshiped then it's time that he reveal itself to all humanity and not secretly to few individuals.
justice

Godalming, UK

#8 Apr 3, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
What the Dna test said is that Hebrews doesnt have a common ancestors that lived 4000 years ago. This is may be due because of continous migration and mxing of people, and/or because Avraham was only a person among the people who lived around them, and the early hebrews have different forefathers.
If god wants to be worshiped then it's time that he reveal itself to all humanity and not secretly to few individuals.
We must understand that Abram was a native of Mesopotamia, he was an `Amorite', he was of a high position. He was not an Hebrew that was inserted to bring him into Judaism, when in actual fact at the time of Abram, neither Judaism, not Christianity or Islam were established in Abram's day.
Ezekiel wrote to Jerusalem,'your father was an Amorite you mother was an Hittite.'
You may find this hard to believe but Abraam was a ruler an Amorite/Hyksos in Egypt.
It was the Exodus of the Hyksos ruler and people that were chased out of Egypt. They had been there about 400 years or so.
They had even accepted many of the Egyptian ways.
For example circumcision came out of Egypt. See the wall painting in tomb of Ankhmahor of two 13 year old youths being circumcised.
Another Amorite/Hyksos ruler was Yaqubel. Read in Genesis chapter 50, how we had an Egyptian embalming as a mummy and also had an Egyptian state funeral. Read also how Joseph also was embalmed and placed in a coffin in Egypt.
Please check these things out - I know the Rabeee will not he is too set in is Torah ways.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#9 Apr 3, 2013
justice wrote:
<quoted text>
We must understand that Abram was a native of Mesopotamia, he was an `Amorite', he was of a high position. He was not an Hebrew that was inserted to bring him into Judaism, when in actual fact at the time of Abram, neither Judaism, not Christianity or Islam were established in Abram's day.
Ezekiel wrote to Jerusalem,'your father was an Amorite you mother was an Hittite.'
You may find this hard to believe but Abraam was a ruler an Amorite/Hyksos in Egypt.
It was the Exodus of the Hyksos ruler and people that were chased out of Egypt. They had been there about 400 years or so.
They had even accepted many of the Egyptian ways.
For example circumcision came out of Egypt. See the wall painting in tomb of Ankhmahor of two 13 year old youths being circumcised.
Another Amorite/Hyksos ruler was Yaqubel. Read in Genesis chapter 50, how we had an Egyptian embalming as a mummy and also had an Egyptian state funeral. Read also how Joseph also was embalmed and placed in a coffin in Egypt.
Please check these things out - I know the Rabeee will not he is too set in is Torah ways.
I have different problems to accept your version of the story:

1) Abraham was only an individual and not a group of people

2) He stayed in Egypt for a short period while Hyksos for 240 years.

3) It was not found in Egypt that the first ruler of Hyksos was called Avram or Avraham.

4) If he ruled part of Egypt, we would have read it yet in the Bible.

5)Ezekiel 16:45 spoke to the people of Jerusalem about their forefather and foremother, and not the forefather/mother of Hebrews.

6) There are not archeological evidences of any Avraham that lived in the 2nd millenia in either eastern Egypt, or Palestine, until now. So all you came out with are simple affermations backed up by nothing.
justice

Godalming, UK

#10 Apr 3, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
I have different problems to accept your version of the story:
1) Abraham was only an individual and not a group of people
2) He stayed in Egypt for a short period while Hyksos for 240 years.
3) It was not found in Egypt that the first ruler of Hyksos was called Avram or Avraham.
4) If he ruled part of Egypt, we would have read it yet in the Bible.
5)Ezekiel 16:45 spoke to the people of Jerusalem about their forefather and foremother, and not the forefather/mother of Hebrews.
6) There are not archeological evidences of any Avraham that lived in the 2nd millenia in either eastern Egypt, or Palestine, until now. So all you came out with are simple affermations backed up by nothing.
Abraam was a ruling king in Egypt

First of all I will trace Abram who was a native of Mesopotamia, that was his native country he was born there.

Now the LORD said to Abram,“Leave your country, and your relatives, and your father’s house, and go to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation. I will bless you and make your name great. You will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you. All the families of the earth will be blessed through you.” Genesis chapter 12 verses 1-4 World English bible.

'As for me, behold, my covenant is with you. You will be the father of a multitude of nations.' Genesis chapter 17 verse 4 World English bible.

The word nations meant goyim - it was that simple until it became a derogatory word.

It is more clearly stated in the Orthodox Jewish Bible,'As for Me, hinei, My brit (covenant) is with thee, and thou shalt be an Av of many Goyim' Bereshis 17 verse 4

Abram was to become a father of goyim/nations. He was never told that he would become a father of three main religions. As that would have been impossible in Abram's day; because those main religions were not in existence. So how could Abram be the father of those religions?

His Lord El Shaddia clearly informed him that he would be a Father to nations (goyim). Therefore do not add words what was not there.

When Abram was 99 years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him,“I am El Shaddai. Walk with me and be trustworthy. Genesis chapter 17 verse Common English Bible.(El Shaddai was Lord of the mountain that was one of the gods in the land Mesopotamia where Abram was born.)

Abram was not 99 years of age before El Shaddia introduced himself. Those ancient Hebrew scribes played about with peoples ages, in fact at times it became ridiculous.( I will give examples in a later articles)

"Because Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my requirements, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.” Genesis chapter 26 verse 5 World English Bible. to be continued
justice

Godalming, UK

#11 Apr 3, 2013
continuation
Abram obeyed the laws of Mesopotamia. They were good laws full of justice, laws for both wealthy and poor, widows and orphans etc. Those laws that Abram obeyed were the laws of Mesopotamia, long before the Hebrew scribes brought into existence the Mosaic laws.
Abram served gods, that was his Mesopotamian background. The invention of the Hebrew god Yahweh was unknown to him.
And I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Shaddai, but by my name Yahweh I was not known to them. Exodus chapter 6 verse 3 Lexham English Bible.
The One God doctrine of Yahweh began many centuries after Abram with the reformation of the kings of Judah, King Hezekiah, and King Josiah. The people at that time were serving gods and goddesses - until the reformation of Josiah.
When the Hebrew scribes began to compile the Old Testament, that knowledge would create a problem for them. The knowledge that Abram serve gods what could they do? They wanted him to serve only one god Yahweh. And how their imagination ran away with them trying to prove that point. Please read the following, taken from the Jewish Encyclopedia 1906; Abraham opposes Idolatry.
Read below the nonsense that they wrote to try and convince the world Abram served one god.
'Concerning his religious awakening in his father's house, the Book of Jubilees, written probably in the time of John Hyrcanus, relates (xi.) that, in order not to participate in the idolatry practised in connection with astrology by the whole house of Nahor, Abraham, when he was fourteen years of age, left his father, and prayed to God to save him from the errors of men. Abraham became an inventor of better modes of agriculture, showing the people how to save the seeds in the field from the ravens that devoured them. He then tried to persuade his father to renounce idol-worship, but Terah was afraid of the people and told him to keep silent. Finally, when Abraham met with the opposition of his brothers also, he arose one night and set fire to the house in which the idols were kept. In an attempt to save these, his brother Haran was burned to death.
justice

Godalming, UK

#12 Apr 3, 2013
continuation
Comment:- All in the writers imagination, they knew Abram served gods, and this erroneous writing was done to try and show that Abram embraced Yahweh. When in reality Abram never knew him. So he could not have been the god that spoke with Abram in his land of Mesopotamia.
Abram could be found at the sacred site, sitting under the oak of Mamre. And his gods knew where to find him. They would appear to Abram at those sites. Those holy places were dedicated to the Lord. It was at those sacred sites that the Lord met with him face to face, and blessed him, furthermore the Lord approved of those sacred sites.
But the big question is why would the Lord meet Abram at the oak of Mamre?
The Oak of Mamre (also called the Oak of Sibta), at Hirbet es-Sibte, two kilometres southwest of Mamre in the West Bank, also called The Oak of Abraham is an ancient tree which, in tradition, is said to mark the place where Abraham entertained the three angels or where Abraham pitched his tent. It is estimated that this oak is approximately 5,000 years old. Taken from Wikipedia the free encyclopedia.
How very interesting that the the oak of Mamre, was also called the oak of Abraham.
I wanted to look up about Mamre, and I used the Septuagint bible, which was produced for Greek speaking Jews in Egypt. The following verse written in the book of Genesis,‘And God appeared to him by the oak of Mambre. Septuagint bible Genesis chapter 18 verse 1.
I then looked up the same verse in a different version.'And the Lord appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day. Chapter 18 verse 1 King James version
I have used bold lettering to stress the point I want to make.
What I noticed immediately when I compared the two different versions, I noticed a subtle change. The 'b' was missing in one of them.
I then decided to write the names side-by-side, which read Mambre and Mamre, and I saw that within the name Mambre it was practically an anagram for the name Abram.
Whereas the name Mamre without the ‘b’ could not make the name Abram. Which made me ask the question why the subtle change? Were those ancient Hebrew scribes trying to conceal something? By their action it only made me more curious! And another thing why did his god El, always appear to Abram by the trees of Mambre?
Could it be that Mambre and Abram were one and the same person?
justice

Godalming, UK

#13 Apr 3, 2013
Abram was a Mesopotamian Amorite. Mambre was an Amorite leader.
My search led me to knowledge that I did not know existed. I went back in time to the history of a people whom the Egyptians called the Heka Khasewet, also known as the Hyksos, which meant rulers of foreign lands. Those rulers of foreign lands were the invading Amorites. These Amorites brought into Egypt the chariot and horse and the composite bow. History states that they invaded Egypt and began to rule during the 15-17 dynasties, or even before that time period, they ruled in lower Egypt and middle Egypt. Their Capital was Memphis, and their Summer residence was in Avaris Lower Egypt.
Those foreign rulers were Amorites who came from Mesopotamia, into Canaan land and finally into Egypt.
It is very interesting to take note that all those three countries were connected to Abram, Mesopotamia was his native land - Canaan was the land of promise - and Abram went down into Egypt.
The Amorites ruled in Mesopotamia, Canaan, and Egypt - coincidence or what? In fact Canaan was called the land of the Amorites!
Read what Ezekiel wrote,'writing about Jerusalem.'Your father was an Amorite, and your mother was an Hittite.
Abram was told that kings would come out of him; therefore he had to be a person of royalty for that to feed through his bloodline. Whilst living in Egypt he married Agar who was an Egyptian princess, and definitely not an Egyptian slave. Both the Koran, and Torah, agree that Agar was an Egyptian princess. It was a royal wedding - a wedding between a ruling King of Lower Egypt and Agar an Egyptian princess.
In due time a son was born to them.' And Agar bore a son to Abram; and Abram called the name of his son which Agar bore to him, Ismael. Septuagint Genesis chapter 16 verse 15.
'And thy name shall no more be called, Abram but thy name shall be called Abraam, for I have made thee a father of many nations. Septuagint Genesis chapter 17 verse 5.
Three very important clues were in that verse,--
(1) A name changed occurred.
(2) The Lord made Abram a father of many nations (goyim)
(3) And why the double ‘aa’ in his name? It may seem like a small thing, but why do it? Why was it necessary? And where did the name change take place?
The name change took place in Egypt - it was his Egyptian throne name.
In that time period in lower Egypt, there was a Hyksos king who ruled by the name of MA AB RA which is an exact anagram of AB RA AM.
I also believe that MAMBRE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MAMBRA.
Therefore making them one and the same person! That is as clear as daylight if you truly want to see it.
They do not want to show that Abraam and Maabra are one and the same person, because if Abraam/Maabra was a king in Egypt, then that makes Ismail a prince.

We also can read where the lord gave Abram the land from the River Nile, to the great River Euphrates.'In that day the lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, to thy seed I will give this land from the river of Egypt, to the great River Euphrates. Genesis chapter 15 verse 18 Septuagint bible.
Comment:- Very interesting from Egypt to the Euphrates? So was the promise given in the land of Egypt?
Are you struggling is it too difficult to grasp that Abraam/Maabra was an Egyptian king, who adopted the customs of the Egyptians of circumcision.
The articles on circumcision and mummification will provide that evidence for you.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#14 Apr 3, 2013
justice wrote:
Abram was a Mesopotamian Amorite. Mambre was an Amorite leader.
My search led me to knowledge that I did not know existed. I went back in time to the history of a people whom the Egyptians called the Heka Khasewet, also known as the Hyksos, which meant rulers of foreign lands. Those rulers of foreign lands were the invading Amorites. These Amorites brought into Egypt the chariot and horse and the composite bow. History states that they invaded Egypt and began to rule during the 15-17 dynasties, or even before that time period, they ruled in lower Egypt and middle Egypt. Their Capital was Memphis, and their Summer residence was in Avaris Lower Egypt.
Those foreign rulers were Amorites who came from Mesopotamia, into Canaan land and finally into Egypt.
It is very interesting to take note that all those three countries were connected to Abram, Mesopotamia was his native land - Canaan was the land of promise - and Abram went down into Egypt.
The Amorites ruled in Mesopotamia, Canaan, and Egypt - coincidence or what? In fact Canaan was called the land of the Amorites!
Read what Ezekiel wrote,'writing about Jerusalem.'Your father was an Amorite, and your mother was an Hittite.
Abram was told that kings would come out of him; therefore he had to be a person of royalty for that to feed through his bloodline. Whilst living in Egypt he married Agar who was an Egyptian princess, and definitely not an Egyptian slave. Both the Koran, and Torah, agree that Agar was an Egyptian princess. It was a royal wedding - a wedding between a ruling King of Lower Egypt and Agar an Egyptian princess.
In due time a son was born to them.' And Agar bore a son to Abram; and Abram called the name of his son which Agar bore to him, Ismael. Septuagint Genesis chapter 16 verse 15.
'And thy name shall no more be called, Abram but thy name shall be called Abraam, for I have made thee a father of many nations. Septuagint Genesis chapter 17 verse 5.
Three very important clues were in that verse,--
(1) A name changed occurred.
(2) The Lord made Abram a father of many nations (goyim)
(3) And why the double ‘aa’ in his name? It may seem like a small thing, but why do it? Why was it necessary? And where did the name change take place?
The name change took place in Egypt - it was his Egyptian throne name.
In that time period in lower Egypt, there was a Hyksos king who ruled by the name of MA AB RA which is an exact anagram of AB RA AM.
I also believe that MAMBRE SHOULD HAVE BEEN MAMBRA.
Therefore making them one and the same person! That is as clear as daylight if you truly want to see it.
They do not want to show that Abraam and Maabra are one and the same person, because if Abraam/Maabra was a king in Egypt, then that makes Ismail a prince.
We also can read where the lord gave Abram the land from the River Nile, to the great River Euphrates.'In that day the lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, to thy seed I will give this land from the river of Egypt, to the great River Euphrates. Genesis chapter 15 verse 18 Septuagint bible.
Comment:- Very interesting from Egypt to the Euphrates? So was the promise given in the land of Egypt?
Are you struggling is it too difficult to grasp that Abraam/Maabra was an Egyptian king, who adopted the customs of the Egyptians of circumcision.
The articles on circumcision and mummification will provide that evidence for you.
All I see is assumption on one hand and distortion of words on the other hand to get your points.
justice

Godalming, UK

#15 Apr 3, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
All I see is assumption on one hand and distortion of words on the other hand to get your points.
I did not distort the words, but the ancient scribes did that.

You have the freedom to accept or reject what I write.
You need to see youtubethebibleunearthed

These are Israeli archaeologist, that clearly say that the Exodus of Hebrew slaves never happened, not one scrap of evidence. Israel Finkelstein, and others well known in that field.
They also state that archaeology shows that the great united kingdon of David and Solomon never existed.
They go as far to say that Abram, Isaac and Yaqub were not related.
And the Old testament was written in the 7th century.
You need to go on that site and you will be taken on the digs for you to see the evidence for yourself.
Max

Montréal, Canada

#18 Apr 3, 2013
Jews only represent 0.25 % of the earth. Who cares?
rabbee yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#19 Apr 3, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
<quoted text>
What the Dna test said is that Hebrews doesnt have a common ancestors that lived 4000 years ago. This is may be due because of continous migration and mxing of people, and/or because Avraham was only a person among the people who lived around them, and the early hebrews have different forefathers.
If god wants to be worshiped then it's time that he reveal itself to all humanity and not secretly to few individuals.
rabbee: well i find that hard to believe, since even Adam's blood type is fairly common in the world. and blood type and dna, are closely associated with each other. even if everyone on earth, must have some dna association with Adam.

so therefore i would not expect, anything different for the linage of Avraham and Sarah. and in order to be of the linage of Evareem, one would have to have the large letter of the father, and the small letter type of the mother. and i am sure there are some around. cause there has not, been that much intermixing. so i suspect that there are some, who are fudging data the way they want to see. so i would not rule out, those with some evil agenda.

but it is still irrelevant, since we do not have enough data. for the multitudes that left Egypt, to know who was there at mt seeanee and who was not. since the multitudes were the basis, of who were The Ysralees. and they were a conglomerate.
justice

Godalming, UK

#20 Apr 3, 2013
rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: well i find that hard to believe, since even Adam's blood type is fairly common in the world. and blood type and dna, are closely associated with each other. even if everyone on earth, must have some dna association with Adam.
so therefore i would not expect, anything different for the linage of Avraham and Sarah. and in order to be of the linage of Evareem, one would have to have the large letter of the father, and the small letter type of the mother. and i am sure there are some around. cause there has not, been that much intermixing. so i suspect that there are some, who are fudging data the way they want to see. so i would not rule out, those with some evil agenda.
but it is still irrelevant, since we do not have enough data. for the multitudes that left Egypt, to know who was there at mt seeanee and who was not. since the multitudes were the basis, of who were The Ysralees. and they were a conglomerate.
It does not start from Adam, it begins after the flood with Noah (Ziusudra) in the Sumerian texts, which were before Hebrew texts.
But we are all Goyim = nations.
Hence a temple for all nations.
justice

Godalming, UK

#21 Apr 3, 2013
Max wrote:
Jews only represent 0.25 % of the earth. Who cares?
A lot of people care, many people are suffering because of the Zionist movements.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#22 Apr 3, 2013
justice wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not distort the words, but the ancient scribes did that.
You have the freedom to accept or reject what I write.
You need to see youtubethebibleunearthed
These are Israeli archaeologist, that clearly say that the Exodus of Hebrew slaves never happened, not one scrap of evidence. Israel Finkelstein, and others well known in that field.
They also state that archaeology shows that the great united kingdon of David and Solomon never existed.
They go as far to say that Abram, Isaac and Yaqub were not related.
And the Old testament was written in the 7th century.
You need to go on that site and you will be taken on the digs for you to see the evidence for yourself.
Out of institution authority that tell you how to interprete the things written in the Bible, I read it by myself and I understood that book is in a big mess where mainly priestly class first and the Judah tribe leaders later messed the entire Tanakh up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 18
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Judaism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Converting to Judaism (Jan '13) Thu USS LIBERTY 12
News Is healthcare a Jewish value? NEW Thu Trent Howdy 83
News Netanyahu Infuriates Israeli Leaders With Unusu... Thu Trent Howdy 2
News Does 'Are You Jewish?' Hasidic Outreach Build I... Oct 15 Tenenbaum 2
News Who Is Allah? (Aug '07) Oct 14 The Worlds Bigges... 256,291
News Relive the Six Day War: Immediate aftermath Oct 14 HILLARY Blu Bibi 5
News Transparent S4 E1-3: Off to Israel Oct 14 YIDFELLAS Rule 2
More from around the web