Kendrick in Court
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
TPMP

New York, NY

#61 Oct 1, 2012
unlisted wrote:
her past record had nothing to do with her being molested.. and for those of you who are men, you are showing everyone here that a man who molests a jw child is not a criminal. period
mr chandler.. have you ever been molested as a child?/ do you know the offender will threaten the lives of a child? the child's siblings? the parents? if they say a word?
are you educated enough to go to west law and Lexus Nexus to read real cases about molestation. rape victims and why they do not ask for help? or why they wait so long to receive help? do you understand even when victims receive help. it never goes away? it remains with them the rest of their lives? yes they can move on but they do not forget.
after reading about how a woman is hit by her jw husband and then some sister says what SHE should do to prevent it in the future is no different.
a man who hits a woman is not a man.. never should they be forgiven because the abuse accelerates, just as a child who is placed over and over again with a molester. so many here can come to the conclusion that men in this org are free to do whatever they want and get a way with it.
as for you teary from reading your posts and others saying you are another person who posted on other forums, your words mean nothing in putting me down. if it makes you feel like a big man in putting a woman down so be it..
you and jw men would never last under my roof. the first time a man hits a woman he is out!
there is a retired detective called Ann Rule. she writes books there are books that she followed a woman who met a man who swept her off her feet. little by little many did not notice, how he began to keep her from her family, hit her then what happened at the end. it is different than a jw man who thinks he has the right to hit a woman or molest or rape a child and think he will get away with it..
i praise her and her mother for going public and suing. and this is the problem your big shot men in Ny were not able to hide this and more will go forward. have a good day to yet another person who hides under several other names.
You are out of your league, UL.

Go back and sit on the porch.

LOL!

“Surprised By Love”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#62 Oct 1, 2012
I am not responding to posts on this thread anymore. The posters here are making a very good case for why the Watchtower was found guilty. They show that they, like the Watchtower, prefer to protect pedophiles at the expense of children. Any honest hearted person can see that, so there is no need for me to respond. Excuse me, I have to go take a shower now.
TPMP

New York, NY

#63 Oct 1, 2012
much happier now wrote:
I am not responding to posts on this thread anymore. The posters here are making a very good case for why the Watchtower was found guilty. They show that they, like the Watchtower, prefer to protect pedophiles at the expense of children. Any honest hearted person can see that, so there is no need for me to respond. Excuse me, I have to go take a shower now.
Well, then go ahead right now.

I see nobody posting with you. I DO see YOU being nosey.

If you feel the pressing to go bathe then you probably stink.
unlisted

Greensboro, NC

#64 Oct 1, 2012
much happier... take care many of us understand your feelings. but please go to the MM a New Emglander thread. take care.
unlisted

Greensboro, NC

#65 Oct 1, 2012
no ypmp you are. your not a jw you do not know what goes on. your a man who beats up on women here -but everyone sees through you. leave me alone.

after what you did to shel by posting so called public records and you and Nevada rose calling her a drug addict and saying she is using again..

you two are no different than a pimp or drug lord.. they keep going after them to get them to use again or to prostitute again just the way you two are doing to her. maybe you should go with Nevada and sit in on a criminal justice class you may learn something. please dont post to me anymore. you make people want to vomit what you to say.. have a good life and please find a religion before the world ends because if your not a jw you will be going nowhere.. take care.

you are a want to be man who thinks he knows all and thinks he is a intelligent person. oh well. all you and your three lady friends are ---stalkers and god haters... i will pry for your family because they have you ... please dont post to me anymore. your posts are juvenile and all you are doing is looking for fights.

as far as what you said to much happier now... you stoop lower each time you post. some call it desperate.
TPMP

New York, NY

#66 Oct 1, 2012
unlisted wrote:
no ypmp you are. your not a jw you do not know what goes on. your a man who beats up on women here -but everyone sees through you. leave me alone.
after what you did to shel by posting so called public records and you and Nevada rose calling her a drug addict and saying she is using again..
you two are no different than a pimp or drug lord.. they keep going after them to get them to use again or to prostitute again just the way you two are doing to her. maybe you should go with Nevada and sit in on a criminal justice class you may learn something. please dont post to me anymore. you make people want to vomit what you to say.. have a good life and please find a religion before the world ends because if your not a jw you will be going nowhere.. take care.
you are a want to be man who thinks he knows all and thinks he is a intelligent person. oh well. all you and your three lady friends are ---stalkers and god haters... i will pry for your family because they have you ... please dont post to me anymore. your posts are juvenile and all you are doing is looking for fights.
as far as what you said to much happier now... you stoop lower each time you post. some call it desperate.
ROTFLMAO!

What happened?.

I thought you were leaving?

You have left here umpteen times only to return the very next day.

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#67 Oct 1, 2012
TPMP wrote:
<quoted text>Well, then go ahead right now.

I see nobody posting with you. I DO see YOU being nosey.

If you feel the pressing to go bathe then you probably stink.
Says the biggest busy body on the forum.
TPMP

New York, NY

#68 Oct 1, 2012
MixedMedia wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the biggest busy body on the forum.
Yap, yap..

Typical "MM" lies and hyped up exaggeration.

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#69 Oct 1, 2012
TPMP wrote:
<quoted text>Yap, yap..

Typical "MM" lies and hyped up exaggeration.
Hahaha it's no lie or exaggeration. You are like and old village babushka.

“A VERY BAD MAN”

Since: Dec 06

Republic of Elbonia

#70 Oct 2, 2012
unlisted wrote:
her past record had nothing to do with her being molested..
Her "past record" is, indeed, a testament to her credibility. Or, in this case, her lack of credibility.

Troll: and for those of you who are men, you are showing everyone here that a man who molests a jw child is not a criminal. period

Reply: Any person, male or female, who molests any child is a criminal. That was neither in doubt, nor has anyone here suggested otherwise.

By throwing it out there as though it were a legitimate topic for conversation, you're illustrating my point about how persons like yourself care about the Conti case, and the issue of child molestation in general, only to the degree you can use it as a propaganda piece.

Troll: mr chandler.. have you ever been molested as a child?/

Reply: To the extent a response is necessary, no, and it doesn't matter.

Troll: do you know the offender will threaten the lives of a child? the child's siblings? the parents? if they say a word?

Reply: Yes, I am aware of that. Insofar as it concerns my comments about the Kendrick-Conti affair, it also doesn't matter.

Troll: are you educated enough to go to west law and Lexus Nexus to read real cases about molestation. rape victims and why they do not ask for help?

Reply: Typically, when I read of instances of such things - regardless of the source - I either find the victims to be credible or that there is tangible proof of their molestation.

Where it concerns the fraud artist and multiple Candice Conti, it remains that there is neither tangible - or even circumstantial - evidence that proves she was abused, nor is she personally credible.

Troll: or why they wait so long to receive help? do you understand even when victims receive help. it never goes away? it remains with them the rest of their lives? yes they can move on but they do not forget.

Reply: None of that makes one bit of difference where it concerns the Conti case; it remains an indisputable fact that she began proclaiming that she'd been abused in 2002, yet she, mandated reporters to whom she reported the abuse, her friends, her family and any number of other people did not report that alleged abuse to the PROPER authorities until, at the earliest, sometime shortly before she brought her CIVIL action in January of 2011.

Troll: after reading about how a woman is hit by her jw husband...

Reply: Which has nothing to do with the Kendrick-Conti affair...

Troll: so many here can come to the conclusion that men in this org are free to do whatever they want and get a way with it.

Reply: Who, specifically, has ever made such claims, or anything even remotely similar?

Troll: you and jw men would never last under my roof. the first time a man hits a woman he is out!

Reply: Mmmmkay.

Troll: there is a retired detective called Ann Rule. she writes books there are books that she followed a woman who met a man who swept her off her feet. little by little many did not notice, how he began to keep her from her family, hit her then what happened at the end.

Reply: What a story, Mark.

Troll: it is different than a jw man who thinks he has the right to hit a woman or molest or rape a child and think he will get away with it..

Reply: Do, please, provide a reference to the JW publication wherein it states, "A JW man has the right to hit a woman or molest a child and get away with it," or any variation thereof.

Since: Feb 08

Trenton, MI

#71 Oct 2, 2012
lol ....so your saying this young woman deserved to be molested based on her past wow what a loser. Isn't that like saying a woman derserved to be raped based on how she dressed.You are in the dark.

“A VERY BAD MAN”

Since: Dec 06

Republic of Elbonia

#72 Oct 2, 2012
lies2468 wrote:
lol ....so your saying this young woman deserved to be molested...
Do, please, quote the post of mine wherein I said that.

Since: Jan 09

The lost city of Shangri La

#73 Oct 2, 2012
Hmm...

Has Chandler ever considered creating a blog to store all of his good comments on, for the sake of those who actually do want to read your posts? Because it seems to Teary like Chandler's time and well crafted thoughts are completely wasted here on users who can't be bothered with trivial things like truth and facts.

Just a thought :)

Since: Oct 10

Homebush, Australia

#74 Oct 2, 2012
Tears of Oberon wrote:
Hmm...
Has Chandler ever considered creating a blog to store all of his good comments on, for the sake of those who actually do want to read your posts? Because it seems to Teary like Chandler's time and well crafted thoughts are completely wasted here on users who can't be bothered with trivial things like truth and facts.
Just a thought :)
hmmm he can't say slut said, troll said and so and so on. I mean thats enough to turn anyone of reading what he has to say.

“A VERY BAD MAN”

Since: Dec 06

Republic of Elbonia

#75 Oct 3, 2012
array wrote:
hmmm he can't say slut said, troll said and so and so on. I mean thats enough to turn anyone of reading what he has to say.
It seems, like your little buddy LIES2468, you can't back up your ridiculous assertions about the Conti case - which, on your BEST day, can't stand against my FACTS - so you've chosen to, instead, bellyache about me referring to spiritual prostitutes - sluts - as spiritual prostitutes.

I think I've made clear in the past that the term is not wasted on either gender but, again, we wouldn't want FACTS to get in the way of good BAWWWWing...
unlisted

Greensboro, NC

#76 Oct 3, 2012
sorry i agree with Lisa that is the impression you are giving in your post. many know here who are or were jws that women are playtoys and nothing else to the men

when a child is molested it may take until she is an adult to turn them in. this sir is what happened at penn state. your arguments are nothing. this woman was molested she went to the police. period.

maybe you need to a police station and speak with a police officer who deals with rape and molestation women and men. maybe you can then understand what happened.
i am happy and hopefully this case will be made more public to show more women and jehovah witness women there is a way out. they do not have to live in fear or shame. you know nothing about rape and molestation your words are cold and that of a jw man you just do not understand sir if you had a daughter what would you do?

if anyone touched my children they had better lock them up and keep them away from me. i love my children you dont mess with my family

“A VERY BAD MAN”

Since: Dec 06

Republic of Elbonia

#77 Oct 3, 2012
unlisted wrote:
many know here who are or were jws that women are playtoys and nothing else to the men
Mmmmkay.

Troll: when a child is molested it may take until she is an adult to turn them in.

Reply: That may or may not be. It remains, where it concerns Candice Conti, that she did NOT wait until she was an "adult" to turn them in, but began alleging she'd been abused starting in 2002, and continued to do so through 2011; it was only at THAT point that she brought the allegation she'd been making since 2002 to the PROPER authorities.

Troll: this sir is what happened at penn state.

Reply: Um, no, that's NOT what happened at Penn State. At Penn State a child's mother - one who was more observant and concerned for her child's welfare than Neal & Kathleen Conti - brought her allegation to the PROPER authorities from the very first minute. Those allegations were investigated by four different agencies - two police departments, the PA Dept. of Public Welfare and Centre County CYS - that, together, constitute the PROPER authorities. Those allegations were found, at the time, to NOT have merit.

Presently, Penn State is being held liable based, in part, because they did not take action against Sandusky at that time - based on nothing more than what was an allegation that was investigated and deemed to have no merit.

I would tell you that holding someone responsible for something that, at that time, they were not found to be guilty of is both irresponsible, immoral and illegal - not that you'd care, as you're a person who cares nothing for whether an allegation is true, and everything for how "serious" it is.

One hopes you are never judged according to the standard you espouse.

Troll: your arguments are nothing.

Reply: Except the truth - not that such matters to you.

Troll: this woman was molested she went to the police. period.

Reply: Ten years after the fact, and no more than seven years after publicly alleging the abuse.

Troll: maybe you need to a police station and speak with a police officer who deals with rape and molestation women and men.

Reply: I don't, actually. I have several friends in local law enforcement. I know what the standards are for both reporting and taking action in regard to those reports. I also know that police can take NO action against ANYONE where they have no knowledge of a situation.

They're a lot like JW elders that way.

Troll: i am happy and hopefully this case will be made more public to show more women and jehovah witness women there is a way out. they do not have to live in fear or shame.

Reply: The Conti Case has nothing to do with "women" having a "way out" or "living in fear or shame."

The Conti Case has everything to do with yet another unsubstantiated allegation being treated as indisputable fact, and liability being assigned for alleged breach of duty where no such duty ACTUALLY exists - and mentally diseased, morally bankrupt, intellectually crippled online ex/antiJW misinformation artists, like yourself, using such as propaganda.

Troll: you just do not understand sir if you had a daughter what would you do?

Reply: Not that it matters, but if I had a daughter, I would not be in a position where I was unable to account for her whereabouts such that she was in a position to be molested, "several times a month" for a "couple years" after leaving either the KH or a field service group, alone, with a single man.

As it is, Neal Conti testified that he didn't either.

That not one individual on that jury called the "victim's" credibility into question on THAT POINT ALONE - and that's ignoring that there were half a dozen OTHER reasons to do so - suggests that there is little hope for California.

Since: Oct 10

Homebush, Australia

#78 Oct 3, 2012
FH Chandler wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems, like your little buddy LIES2468, you can't back up your ridiculous assertions about the Conti case - which, on your BEST day, can't stand against my FACTS - so you've chosen to, instead, bellyache about me referring to spiritual prostitutes - sluts - as spiritual prostitutes.
I think I've made clear in the past that the term is not wasted on either gender but, again, we wouldn't want FACTS to get in the way of good BAWWWWing...
so does that mean your not going to make a blog?

“Bustin' Myths”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#79 Oct 3, 2012
array wrote:
<quoted text>so does that mean your not going to make a blog?
YAY!

:)
dr of religion

Chicago, IL

#80 Oct 3, 2012
array wrote:
<quoted text>so does that mean your not going to make a blog?
Whats you talkin bout willis!!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jehovah's Witness Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What does "abstain from blood" mean? 2 min Newtonian 256
Gays should be eliminated 4 min Newtonian 1
The Most Accurate of ALL Translations! 8 min Newtonian 239
ONE God 11 min Newtonian 2,058
Hissy's Church: The Foursquare Church (Pentecos... (Jul '17) 19 min the Mad JW 104
Shadow banned 1975 reason list 22 min Newtonian 4
Fallibility of the WT/GB 38 min the Mad JW 51
Is God our high priest pleading before God for... 1 hr CIA Agent 142
YES-Jesus WAS once known as Michael (Sep '14) 3 hr rsss11 11,813