Anonymous?

Posted in the Jehovah's Witness Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18

Since: Feb 07

RI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 14, 2012
 

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jul 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hello Citizens of the world. We are Anonymous.

Dear brothers and sisters,

Now is the time to open your eyes and expose the truth!

Operation Pedo Chat has commenced with a great deal of success and enthusiasm to protect the innocent from these disgusting pedophiles that roam the internet. While this war on internet Pedophilia has only just begun, more cries for help has gained the attention of Anonymous.

A cult under the umbrella of Jehovah’s Witnesses has 23,000 plus pedophiles names and their offenses on this list within Watchtower Head quarters which is not available to the public. The Watchtower headquarters is located at 100 Watchtower Drive, Patterson, New York, 12563. Jehovah’s Witnesses official website is www.watchtower.org

When a Jehovah’s Witness is faced with being victim to a pedophile, the accusing parents and the child are told to go to the elders first, not the police, and then let the elders make the decision. When they bring their child to the elders to explain, the elders hear the story and then bring in the pedophile. If the pedophile denies the charges, they leave it up to “Jehovah” to bring it out and go no further, unless there are witnesses.

Anonymous calls on the 99% to infiltrate this group and uncover any data pertaining to these cultish pedophilia crimes and expose this cult for who and what it is. Anonymous must get this pedophile list and submit it to the following:

The Pirate Bay, Wikileaks, and www.silentlambs.org

Anonymous will expose the vile pedophiles and free the silent lambs.

We are anonymous.

We are Legion.

We do not forgive.

We do not forget.

Expect us.
UGETTHAT

Melbourne, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jul 14, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh Dear, this may cause a HUGE headache to the WTBTS and the GB? Anonymous have broken into many a database of secure organisations. Good Luck fellows

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jul 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

Jehovah will protect them.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jul 15, 2012
 
sidgi wrote:
Jehovah will protect them.
protect who?

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jul 15, 2012
 
array wrote:
<quoted text>protect who?
the keepers of the pedophiles

sidgi

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jul 15, 2012
 
sidgi wrote:
<quoted text>
the keepers of the pedophiles
sidgi
well of course you are being facetious.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jul 15, 2012
 
array wrote:
<quoted text>well of course you are being facetious.
it's pronounced fess-i-tous when I do it. I don't have the education to pronounce it facetious.

sidgi

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jul 15, 2012
 
sidgi wrote:
<quoted text>
it's pronounced fess-i-tous when I do it. I don't have the education to pronounce it facetious.
sidgi
sounds the same without the dictionary to help.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jul 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ReligiousWatch wrote:
A cult under the umbrella of Jehovah’s Witnesses has 23,000 plus pedophiles names and their offenses on this list within Watchtower Head quarters which is not available to the public.
Eventually Anonymous is going to figure out that SilentLambs lied to them and is using them to further their own personal religious agenda against Jehovah's Witnesses. Just like they are using many genuine victims of abuse.

== Quote:==

http://thirdwitness.com/childabuse/Database.h...

Would you like to see what the database really entails? Lets look at a May 9, 2002 fax to Betsan Powys of the BBC from the Watchtower Society...

...

You have been told that here in the United States we have compiled a list of 23,720 names of child abusers. That is false. First of all, the total number of names in our records is considerably lower than that. In addition, it is not meaningful to focus on the number of names we have in our records. This is because our figures include the names of many persons who have only been accused of child abuse whereas the charges have not been substantiated...

...

Then there are the names of persons who have been accused of abusing children before becoming Jehovah’s Witnesses as well as individuals who have never been baptized Witnesses ...

...

To be safe, we also list the names of persons who may or may not be considered as child abusers, depending upon the jurisdiction where they live (for example, that 16-year-old boy who had sexual relations with the consenting 15-year-old girl).

...

We do not apologize for keeping such records here in the United States . Apart from being legally needed, they have been very helpful to us in our efforts to protect the flock from harm.(Isaiah 32:2) Christian parents can rightly feel secure in the knowledge that SUCH EFFORTS ARE MADE TO SCREEN OUT possible child abusers FROM APPOINTMENT to responsible positions within the congregation.

== End Quote:===

Exposing the myths:

http://thirdwitness.com/childabuse/default.ht...

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jul 15, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
Eventually Anonymous is going to figure out that SilentLambs lied to them and is using them to further their own personal religious agenda against Jehovah's Witnesses. Just like they are using many genuine victims of abuse.
== Quote:==
http://thirdwitness.com/childabuse/Database.h...
Would you like to see what the database really entails? Lets look at a May 9, 2002 fax to Betsan Powys of the BBC from the Watchtower Society...
...
You have been told that here in the United States we have compiled a list of 23,720 names of child abusers. That is false. First of all, the total number of names in our records is considerably lower than that. In addition, it is not meaningful to focus on the number of names we have in our records. This is because our figures include the names of many persons who have only been accused of child abuse whereas the charges have not been substantiated...
...
Then there are the names of persons who have been accused of abusing children before becoming Jehovah’s Witnesses as well as individuals who have never been baptized Witnesses ...
...
To be safe, we also list the names of persons who may or may not be considered as child abusers, depending upon the jurisdiction where they live (for example, that 16-year-old boy who had sexual relations with the consenting 15-year-old girl).
...
We do not apologize for keeping such records here in the United States . Apart from being legally needed, they have been very helpful to us in our efforts to protect the flock from harm.(Isaiah 32:2) Christian parents can rightly feel secure in the knowledge that SUCH EFFORTS ARE MADE TO SCREEN OUT possible child abusers FROM APPOINTMENT to responsible positions within the congregation.
== End Quote:===
Exposing the myths:
http://thirdwitness.com/childabuse/default.ht...
I doubt anonymous is so naive as you think. I believe anonymous knows that everyone has an agenda, as do they. I think it is wishful thinking to believe there isn't some bright coals under all of that WTBTS smoke. Thirdwitness is, of course, an unbiased presenter of facts, and all of the lies and twisting thirdwitness has done on this site, would never creep into her own site.

Probably the biggest problem the WTBTS has, is all of the unrequited cases of child abuse in their domain. I personally know of two cases, the first dealt with three young boys in one family, and the other with two girls in another congregation, and that one was an elder, still in good standing. The occurrences were years apart. They all went along with the WTBTS policy of the day, and no one was protected. That is more than coincidence, and is the two or three witnesses I need to convict.

That sounds like "spirit directed" organization to me.

sidgi
unlisted

Mebane, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jul 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

so gareth you admit they are having problems as far back as 2002 keeping lists and hiding it from the public as tho who is knocking on peoples doors.. thanks for posting the date..

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Jul 15, 2012
 
sidgi wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt anonymous is so naive as you think. I believe anonymous knows that everyone has an agenda, as do they. I think it is wishful thinking to believe there isn't some bright coals under all of that WTBTS smoke. Thirdwitness is, of course, an unbiased presenter of facts, and all of the lies and twisting thirdwitness has done on this site, would never creep into her own site.
Probably the biggest problem the WTBTS has, is all of the unrequited cases of child abuse in their domain. I personally know of two cases, the first dealt with three young boys in one family, and the other with two girls in another congregation, and that one was an elder, still in good standing. The occurrences were years apart. They all went along with the WTBTS policy of the day, and no one was protected. That is more than coincidence, and is the two or three witnesses I need to convict.
That sounds like "spirit directed" organization to me.
sidgi
you have referred thirdwitness to being a she?

the rest of you post I do agree.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jul 15, 2012
 
sidgi wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt anonymous is so naive as you think. I believe anonymous knows that everyone has an agenda, as do they. I think it is wishful thinking to believe there isn't some bright coals under all of that WTBTS smoke. Thirdwitness is, of course, an unbiased presenter of facts, and all of the lies and twisting thirdwitness has done on this site, would never creep into her own site.
Probably the biggest problem the WTBTS has, is all of the unrequited cases of child abuse in their domain. I personally know of two cases, the first dealt with three young boys in one family, and the other with two girls in another congregation, and that one was an elder, still in good standing. The occurrences were years apart. They all went along with the WTBTS policy of the day, and no one was protected. That is more than coincidence, and is the two or three witnesses I need to convict.
That sounds like "spirit directed" organization to me.
sidgi
Your story doesn't make sense. You say there are THREE witnesses in one case and TWO witnesses in the other case and yet you lack the two witnesses needed to take action?

Its all very well making various claims. No one denies that people have been molested. But how these cases get reported is subject to serious religious bias.

You are well known for being an enemy of Jehovah's Witnesses' beliefs and so I can hardly take your anecdotal testimony any proof of anything.

“GOD'S TRUTHS *NEVER* CHANGE”

Since: Aug 09

A SMALL VILLAGE IN UPSTATE NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jul 15, 2012
 
A new use for the WTS' own Theocratic Warfare tactics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“GOD'S TRUTHS *NEVER* CHANGE”

Since: Aug 09

A SMALL VILLAGE IN UPSTATE NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jul 15, 2012
 
The WTS victimizes youngsters to protect the Org. CRIMINALS SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES TO DEAL WITH ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF THE LAND.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jul 15, 2012
 
array wrote:
<quoted text>you have referred thirdwitness to being a she?
the rest of you post I do agree.
I honestly don't know if thirdwitness is a she, I have seen the identity referred to as a she on this site. I made a bit of an attempt to get her or him to reveal the gender, and was ignored. I guess it doesn't matter. either way he or she is how I've described.

sidgi

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jul 15, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
Your story doesn't make sense. You say there are THREE witnesses in one case and TWO witnesses in the other case and yet you lack the two witnesses needed to take action?
Its all very well making various claims. No one denies that people have been molested. But how these cases get reported is subject to serious religious bias.
You are well known for being an enemy of Jehovah's Witnesses' beliefs and so I can hardly take your anecdotal testimony any proof of anything.
I'm sorry, I guess I didn't make it clear enough for you. I was using the two separate instances as one witness each against WTBTS policy. Since WTBTS policy was followed in each case, years and geographical regions apart, and the victims were treated as less important than the WTBTS' reputation in each case.

sidgi

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••