Comments
101 - 120 of 180 Comments Last updated Nov 28, 2012

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
So-called "theocratic warfare" does NOT include lying as has already been proved.
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that they must always tell the truth.
HOWEVER, if someone is seeking to use what they say to harm them or fellow Christians then, LIKE JESUS DID, they are permitted to not speak.
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that they do not have to VOLUNTEER information that will cause another Christian to suffer harm.
But they are NOT allowed to lie (utter a falsehood).
you are not a JW never have been you are out, not part of the congregation along with the rest of your phony topix WT sect you have made up on here, you have nothing to do with JW in experience, you are not part of the Christian congregation everything you post is balony because you have not even bothered to become part of the very organization you even lie for.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#115
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aneirin wrote:
They are attacking Nomi because they don't like her cat picture and because they don't like it that she's too sick to attend meetings.
You do recall (assuming that you've been at least peripherally associated) that phone-ins are marked as part of the attendance, right?

I mean, I don't know her situation and haven't judged or commented on it at all. But I've recently been bedridden myself and have done the phone-in. I don't consider, nor am considered, to have missed the meeting when I do that.

As for the cat picture, in all fairness, the first one, with the green melon, is easily obtainable by going to Google Images and doing a single word search on "cat". The 7th or so image is the one with the green melon, and it's not a Halloween site that posts it. So that was harmless imo.

The pumpkin one is a stretch, as I only see it on Halloween related sites/blogs. And, given that she specifically lit into people for posting in a JW forum with a Halloween related pic for their avatar..well, she kindof asked for it. Just calling it fairly.

“Bustin' Myths”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#116
Nov 17, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
Approve? LOL, more like I just don't care.
The only way I was able tell it had anything to do with Halloween was to do a google search on the image. That's probably what Mr Myth did looking for some excuse to harass Noomi with. I would never have known of he had not pointed it out and even then I had to search to check.
I an sure that Nomi just picked it because it looks cute, no other reason.
And if you were being honest you would admit it rather then trying to make out she has some dark, sinister plot going on.
I'm glad she put it back up after having removed it once when it was brought to her attention that it was a halloween image.

It really shows where her heart is.

Those "Readers" you are always appealing to can see that she has a rebellious attitude to what your leaders in ny tell you what to do and what not to do. Halloween is a "not to do" and she is blatantly spitting in their face.

She's doing much to show that "jws" don't really pay much heed to what the gb require of them.

KEEP THE HALLOWEEN PICTURE THERE NOMI! You tell those gb they have no right to control what you do in life!

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Mythbusters wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad she put it back up after having removed it once when it was brought to her attention that it was a halloween image.
It really shows where her heart is.
Those "Readers" you are always appealing to can see that she has a rebellious attitude to what your leaders in ny tell you what to do and what not to do. Halloween is a "not to do" and she is blatantly spitting in their face.
She's doing much to show that "jws" don't really pay much heed to what the gb require of them.
KEEP THE HALLOWEEN PICTURE THERE NOMI! You tell those gb they have no right to control what you do in life!
You're being a real cry baby over nothing. Pull yourself together!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118
Nov 17, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
You're being a real cry baby over nothing. Pull yourself together!
If you don't like the alleged apostate crybabies, why not talk to a Witness who actually made a reasoned and thought out response to you? Or maybe you're too busy to respond to me?

I think I know why, I mean I'm beginning to see a pattern with this board, but I'll wait to read a bit more of you before jumping to conclusions.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#119
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

acrobat wrote:
<quoted text>
If you don't like the alleged apostate crybabies, why not talk to a Witness who actually made a reasoned and thought out response to you?
You are a Witness?

Then why does Nomi's pumpkin cat interest you more than the fact that Nomi YOUR SPIRITUAL SISTER is being hen-pecked and criticised such silly and petty reasons?

Sorry, but you don't sound like someone who cares about your spiritual brothers and sisters at all.

This is the person they keep harassing/attacking:

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/jehovahs-...

If you have a problem with Nomi YOUR SPIRITUAL SISTER then why not send her a PM? Surely that is far better than siding with those who are clearly trying to intimidate her and make her feel uncomfortable?
Sammy

Hamilton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#120
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

array wrote:
<quoted text>do you agree with this post from acrobac
The irony of the double standard is insane:
They don't realize just how "unJW" they appear!
A real JW doesn't care if a non-JW uses a worldly avatar - they know that person is worldly, and that person isn't even trying to live to the same beliefs.
A real JW is so busy and concerned with their real-life witnessing, that whether or not some anonymous internet poster uses a worldly avatar truly doesn't matter, because the small amount of time they spend online is miniscule in comparison to the larger fellowship they enjoy in real life, and that small time online does not inform their belief or experience as a Witness.
The FauxPro-JWs, however, do *not* have a spiritual life and association in the congregation in real life. Their entire "Witness" persona, their very being one of JWs, is mostly informed and influenced by the time they spend online. Therefore, every little thing on the sites where they grovel for attention as allegedly belonging to the truth bothers them...because online JW life is all the JW life they've got.
And they have this foolhardy expectation that it's going to mean *anything* when it all comes down...man they are in for a shock.
So, I take it you are not a REAL Jehovah's Witness because here you are when you should be out witnessing to people.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#122
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a Witness?
Then why does Nomi's pumpkin cat interest you more than the fact that Nomi YOUR SPIRITUAL SISTER is being hen-pecked and criticised such silly and petty reasons?
You're starting to display a gross lack of basic reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.

I mean, frankly, I can't think of anything else, I just refuse to be insulted enough to believe that this is actually what you take out of what I said.

I'll spell it out more plainly:

I'm talking about you. I'm talking about your refusal to directly answer what I spoke to you about earlier. You'd rather fight and bicker over this stupid avatar "issue".

Now, just in case you feel the need to clarify in your mind my *personal* stance on the avatar, I have said the following:

- a real JW doesn't have time to worry about someone's avatar.

- Nomi made this issue her own by attacking someone over their avatar which she felt promoted Halloween.

- Ironically, she did so from an account that uses a cat dressed up for Halloween.

This is not about me attacking Nomi, or attacking others who attack Nomi, it's simply a logical look at how the argument started, period.

I believe I was more than fair in my comments.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#123
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

acrobat wrote:
<quoted text>
You're starting to display a gross lack of basic reading comprehension and critical thinking skills.
I mean, frankly, I can't think of anything else, I just refuse to be insulted enough to believe that this is actually what you take out of what I said.
I'll spell it out more plainly:
I'm talking about you. I'm talking about your refusal to directly answer what I spoke to you about earlier. You'd rather fight and bicker over this stupid avatar "issue".
Now, just in case you feel the need to clarify in your mind my *personal* stance on the avatar, I have said the following:
- a real JW doesn't have time to worry about someone's avatar.
- Nomi made this issue her own by attacking someone over their avatar which she felt promoted Halloween.
- Ironically, she did so from an account that uses a cat dressed up for Halloween.
This is not about me attacking Nomi, or attacking others who attack Nomi, it's simply a logical look at how the argument started, period.
I believe I was more than fair in my comments.
I think you have made your colors very clear indeed.

Since: Mar 09

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#124
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Anyone who thinks I had a halloween cat pic...it didn't look anything like that to me. It just looked cute. I don't, and never have been incline to promote any holiday...I just use pics of cats I think are cute, in themselves. However, I have changed it.

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125
Nov 17, 2012
 
Nomi wrote:
Anyone who thinks I had a halloween cat pic...it didn't look anything like that to me. It just looked cute. I don't, and never have been incline to promote any holiday...I just use pics of cats I think are cute, in themselves. However, I have changed it.
Nomi check out a site called andmycat dot com
You will love it. Lots of kitties.

Since: Mar 09

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thanks MM...will do. I love cats so I always look for more.
dr fill

Wheeling, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#127
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Nomi wrote:
Thanks MM...will do. I love cats so I always look for more.
Nomi,The foundation of your cult is based on a lie.

Since: Mar 09

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#128
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

No doubt the "cult" you follow is based on lies...IE the Trinity Doctrine etc.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#129
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nomi wrote:
Anyone who thinks I had a halloween cat pic...it didn't look anything like that to me. It just looked cute. I don't, and never have been incline to promote any holiday...I just use pics of cats I think are cute, in themselves. However, I have changed it.
you knew what it was.

“Bustin' Myths”

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#130
Nov 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
You're being a real cry baby over nothing. Pull yourself together!
Hey, it's her religion that poo poos on halloween. As a life long study, you should have already covered that in the bible teach book.

Sad that you defend her glorifying halloween. Keep on studying though.

“Delivering the Gospel”

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#131
Nov 18, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
As we can see, still nothing but lies from the anti-JW propaganda crowd.
They have homed in on a very old article from the 1950s which is simply explaining to Christians how they should behave when their lives are in danger and they use that to promote the idea that Jehovah's Witnesses are "tought to lie".
Wonder why these guys didn't do that?

Rev.20:4 [nkjv]
And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God

“Delivering the Gospel”

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#132
Nov 18, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
It is utter nonsense. Only a tiny fraction of Jehovah's Witnesses even know of the article's existence. It is not something that people are taught at the meetings.
Yet they try to make it look like it is part of the mandatory learning material that every JW is instructed with.
They are totally and utterly lying about this.
Could this be "old light" now?
Remnant143999

Rio Rancho, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#133
Nov 18, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
So-called "theocratic warfare" does NOT include lying as has already been proved.
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that they must always tell the truth.
HOWEVER, if someone is seeking to use what they say to harm them or fellow Christians then, LIKE JESUS DID, they are permitted to not speak.
Jehovah's Witnesses are taught that they do not have to VOLUNTEER information that will cause another Christian to suffer harm.
But they are NOT allowed to lie (utter a falsehood).
Do jw's threaten to disfellowship a brother or sister if they vote for President of the US? Yes or NO?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137
Nov 18, 2012
 
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have made your colors very clear indeed.
Good grief.

I guess I was right!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••