“Psalms 47:1-9”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#351 Apr 11, 2012
array wrote:
<quoted text>they don't even care, they have to have a punching bag of some sorts, even if the person is not even here, they make things up as they go, its all sport to them.
Apparently they have gotten bored and this is the new idea to play with.
I bet poor CCC's thread is going to bite the dust.

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#352 Apr 11, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, is she trying to use social security numbers for real?
Can we do that as well to her?
Im sending an email to key them know.

“Psalms 47:1-9”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#353 Apr 11, 2012
TPMP wrote:
<quoted text> ROTFLMAO!
This is FUNNY!
MM just keeps it coming!
Amazing!
What is amazingis how out of the loop you are. You have no ideawhat went on. No clue why she made her goodbye trip to her relatives. Think hard now, it will come to you.

“Psalms 47:1-9”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#354 Apr 11, 2012
Arellius wrote:
<quoted text>
You dressed appropriately according to whose standards? It's amazing how you people have no problem conforming to Mickey Mouse, but will scoff at the idea of adorning yourselves repsectfully when worshipping the Almighty. No wonder you prefer the hippy and gangsta rap churches of pagan christendom.
https://www.disneyinternationalprograms.com/c...
I think a black and white pant suit is way more classy that some of the garbage dresses and skirt and blouse outfits I have seen in the halls.

“Psalms 47:1-9”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#355 Apr 11, 2012
Nedoba wrote:
<quoted text>
Do YOU eagerly await the latest WT magazine to tell you what "God" requires now and show what mistakes HE made while authoring the WTS literature?
Do YOU feel that this statement is correct?
"The Watchtower is a magazine without equal on earth because God is the author." (WT 4/15/43)
How can God be the author of false light? I know it is called "old light" but it is still false.
lise

Reston, VA

#356 Apr 11, 2012
bystander no more wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this what you're talking about?
Pantsuit, also pants suit: a woman's suit having trousers instead of a skirt.
This is considered as casual dress, inappropriate for meetings at the Kingdom Hall.
If you want to dress casually at your place of worship, you should go to some non-denominational church. They don't care what you look like.
Some pant suits are more dressy then dresses how can you make such a blanket statement. Personally I have seen them go after women for this issue and the women gave it right back at them did you ever stop to think that that dress pant suit is more modest then some of the dresses the so called sisters wear to the KH. Just saying no man should judge a woman if she is in a "dress Pant suit" If you are saying that is not dressy enough then a mans "dress suit should be equally not dressy enough. Are you saying that unless a woman has nuts between the legs she can't wear a suit. FYI casual is pants and a tee not a dress suit.

“Psalms 47:1-9”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#357 Apr 11, 2012
JWForever wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like they need to get up to date ones...these are old publications.
Is it old flse light again then?

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#358 Apr 11, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>Is it old flse light again then?
No no you got it all wrong. It's the old understanding of the previous new light that is now more accurately understood to be the original light that was just a bit dim at the time.

“New one man.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#359 Apr 11, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently they have gotten bored and this is the new idea to play with.
I bet poor CCC's thread is going to bite the dust.
she's bombing it with catholic stuff. She can only attack as she has no defense for her claimed religion. She's all alone there now.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#360 Apr 11, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>This reminds me of when they said they didn't feel jeans skirts or dresses were approriate for meetings. And the elders wife of our book study wore them all the time. Even after they announced it from the platform.
So did their 2 daughters.
Not all the time, mostly at the book study.
But occasionaly to the hall as well.
I couldn't understand the double standard.
it always seem to me that its the single sisters that are always tageted, if one is an elders wife or their kids, they get away with things others don't. Like out in field service if two sisters without husbands are talking standing in the street they get reprimanded and told to move on, and I have seen many times married sisters stand and talk for longer periods and nothing is ever said, I call it bullying.

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#361 Apr 12, 2012
eagleeye2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it possible to stalk a dead person?
Anyway, I didn't need that kind of proof. I have other ways of knowing the page is bogus.
I did look up my mother's death and my son's death. Both came up. Nothing for AHK, though.
No it's not possible to stalk or harass a dead person, just Verifying another one of AHK/MM stories.

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#362 Apr 12, 2012
eagleeye2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you test with some of your relatives' deaths like I did?
BTW, what is wrong with Supertroll? She seems out of control.
Diid you notice AHK/MM has stopped promoting the original story on this thread?
yes, I did test it. As far as the mysterious "Laura Daniels", I think the reason there are no other info on her "death" is proof that she only exists on Topix. MM/Amy is alive but she had exposed herself as AHK too many times, so she had to get rid of that name. She couldn't have her go peacefully and just stop posting...that isn't her way as we have seen the "Jolindenberry Hoax Saga". She's has to have her "drama". This time she has all the board helping her, lying for her.

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#363 Apr 12, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, I am hearing that you are now looking up peoples social security numbers. what is up qwith that?
Isn't that illegal?
Sounds like you are going to do some identy theft or other crooked adventure.
Lying as usual. No one is looking up any SS# numbers, only verifying a "death" that you say happened.
Cult Defenders are Liars

Lexington, KY

#364 Apr 12, 2012
JWForever wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying as usual. No one is looking up any SS# numbers, only verifying a "death" that you say happened.
Yeah, we all know that's public information.

Just ask your pretend cousin who works in a funeral home and knows all the people who work in funeral homes and can get a license revoked.

Yeah, I remember that ignorant lie of yours.

I also remember Carolyn's illegitimate son, BJ, who took his own life.

And how his "privacy" was violated according to you and other ignorant bitches who hang out here and lie all day long.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#365 Apr 12, 2012
Hoodwinked wrote:
<quoted text> We just lost a loved one to cancer..it was a very fast moving:( Very sad...Cancer stinks!!
I am so sorry to hear that. My prayers are with you and the family.:(

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#366 Apr 12, 2012
Old Lady Pam wrote:
<quoted text>I find that amazing! Because the only people that ever wore pants were studies and those who came from a call during house to house that didn't realize the dress code.
Karen, I love you, but I find this really hard to believe if you were a baptised member of the congregation.
Unless you had something wrong that required you to not show your legs, I canlt imagine the elders wouldn't have a word with you about it.
It isn't done.
No more than wearing shorts would be allowed.
I swear to God above that I wore pants all the time, I had nothing wrong that made me wear them. I was never once spoken to about it at all. I wore them to the meetings, I wore them out in service, I wore them to assemblies, I wore them to the memorial. That is why I am so shocked to hear that there was something said to others about them wearing pants, nothing was ever said to me about it at all. There were other sisters who wore them as well. Not all the time as I did, but they did. I would not lie about something this small. Now wearing shorts I would never do as I can see how that would be disrespectful. The pants I wore were not bluejeans or torn up pants, but nice slacks that looked neat and clean and fit nicely with a nice blouse. Never once was I spoken to about it.

“BIBLE TRUTHS *NEVER* CHANGE”

Since: Aug 09

LET GO AND LET GOD

#367 Apr 12, 2012
The Real Karen wrote:
<quoted text>
I am so sorry to hear that. My prayers are with you and the family.:(
Aren't you going to at least demand to see a death certificate before you believe her? She COULD be making this all up to make a fool out of you, don't you know.

This is the trend for the WTS followers that believe each and every bit of foolish and changing drivel that their "spiritual misleaders" continue to hand out to them.....yet they scoff and make light of what anyone else says and ask to see PROOF, SS#s and death certificates.

On second thought.....how much more warm and HUMAN it is to offer words of condolence and demonstrate a godly heart towards those that we have no reason to doubt.

I guess the obvious question would then be....which attitude towards others is the one that Christ would ask us to follow?

Can you even imagine a "new world" filled with nothing but cold, hard, cynical and unfeeling JWs?{shudder}

Can you imagine God SELECTIVELY CHOOSING ones like this to replace those now living in this old world?

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#368 Apr 12, 2012
Nedoba wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you going to at least demand to see a death certificate before you believe her? She COULD be making this all up to make a fool out of you, don't you know.
This is the trend for the WTS followers that believe each and every bit of foolish and changing drivel that their "spiritual misleaders" continue to hand out to them.....yet they scoff and make light of what anyone else says and ask to see PROOF, SS#s and death certificates.
On second thought.....how much more warm and HUMAN it is to offer words of condolence and demonstrate a godly heart towards those that we have no reason to doubt.
I guess the obvious question would then be....which attitude towards others is the one that Christ would ask us to follow?
Can you even imagine a "new world" filled with nothing but cold, hard, cynical and unfeeling JWs?{shudder}
Can you imagine God SELECTIVELY CHOOSING ones like this to replace those now living in this old world?
The funny thing about this Nedoba is that if a obituary show on the INTERNET is required to prove that someone has passed away, then my mother is not dead. Her obituary is no where on the Internet. Only if it is posted in a newspaper that is online will it show up. The town that showed her obit, is not online.

We do not know this person, we have no idea what has truly taken place. We can say all day long that it is not true, but if we are not there or part of this persons real life, we truly have no idea.

Christ would want us to be kind and loving toward this kind of thing.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#369 Apr 12, 2012
The Real Karen wrote:
<quoted text>
I swear to God above that I wore pants all the time, I had nothing wrong that made me wear them. I was never once spoken to about it at all. I wore them to the meetings, I wore them out in service, I wore them to assemblies, I wore them to the memorial. That is why I am so shocked to hear that there was something said to others about them wearing pants, nothing was ever said to me about it at all. There were other sisters who wore them as well. Not all the time as I did, but they did. I would not lie about something this small. Now wearing shorts I would never do as I can see how that would be disrespectful. The pants I wore were not bluejeans or torn up pants, but nice slacks that looked neat and clean and fit nicely with a nice blouse. Never once was I spoken to about it.
I should not have said I swear to God, I should have said, I am speaking the truth when I say. Please forgive me for using the "swear to God" words again. I only want you to realize I am not lying about this at all.

“BIBLE TRUTHS *NEVER* CHANGE”

Since: Aug 09

LET GO AND LET GOD

#370 Apr 12, 2012
The Real Karen wrote:
<quoted text>
The funny thing about this Nedoba is that if a obituary show on the INTERNET is required to prove that someone has passed away, then my mother is not dead. Her obituary is no where on the Internet. Only if it is posted in a newspaper that is online will it show up. The town that showed her obit, is not online.
We do not know this person, we have no idea what has truly taken place. We can say all day long that it is not true, but if we are not there or part of this persons real life, we truly have no idea.
Christ would want us to be kind and loving toward this kind of thing.
Of course.....and thanks for clearing that up concerning obits that do not appear online...as in your mom's case.

Between us, you and I have a combined number of 80 years that were devoted to clinging to the misleading and ever-changing opinions of men that WE believed were telling the "truth" and they were proven to be dead wrong on so many things.....yet we are not so jaded and cynical as to disbelieve when posters share their personal sorrows with us and we can offer a kind word when we wish to do so.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jehovah's Witness Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Does "One" REALLY mean THREE? Seriously! 17 min happy to be here 488
Why do Churchoids claim we art "Unhappy"? 44 min aadrivers 8
Join School of Kingdom Evangelizers! 1 hr aadrivers 2
What is Armageddon.. an actual future event? 1 hr CIA Free 122
Christian Trucker and OSAS Doctrine 4 hr little lamb 360
Little Lamb and the context of James 2 5 hr little lamb 81
What are the new heavens and the new earth? (Mar '13) 6 hr joe 2,233
News How to Witness to a Jehovah's Witness Ray Comfo... 6 hr little lamb 1,147
YES-Jesus WAS once known as Michael (Sep '14) 6 hr BetheljudgmentDan... 3,277
Candace Conti/WT Update 7 hr covered 279
More from around the web