It might be that YOU only view threads that have to do with sexual abuse, as I'm actively posting in several other threads that have nothing to do with the topic.I wonder why FHC that you only come on threads concerned with JW sexual abuse...
Troll:...are you not interested in [defending] other [JW teachings]?
Reply: I have no interest in defending ANY JW teaching.
Troll:...some strange folk here and DW has shown without a doubt that she has no concern for JW child sexual abuse victims, nor do you...
Reply: I am concerned with any and ALL sexual abuse victims, without regard for the religious label either the victim or the abuser place on himself.
The simple FACT is, where it concerns Candice Conti, that I do not believe she is a victim of sexual abuse, at least not at the hands of Jonathan Kendrick.
And I [don't] believe as I do for very good reasons - her claims are so outrageous as to be logistically impossible, for reasons oft repeated by me, and NEVER refuted.
I [don't] believe as do for no other reason than that Candice Conti filed a civil action against JW legal entities and, for the moment, won.
A frivolous lawsuit is a frivolous lawsuit is a frivolous lawsuit; the failings, real or imagined, of either the party bringing suit or the party being sued means very little - to me - compared to the FACTS [or lack thereof] of the case.
You are happy because legal entities used by the JW sect lost [for the moment] and will suffer financially because of it, and because you can spin a bastardized version of the story to further your antiJW propaganda.
The actual FACTS of the case are the last thing that mean anything to you.
Not being so morally bankrupt I have no frame of reference; are you really proud of yourself?