Just how do unborn children abstain f...

Just how do unborn children abstain from blood?

Posted in the Jehovah's Witness Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#1 Jun 23, 2014
Unborn babies share the blood of their mother, in effect their mothers transfuse their blood into the fetus's growing with in them. Since Jehovah demands that all abstain from blood, does that not mean that jw potential mothers must abort their fetus's since the fetus is not abstaining from blood, the fetus is actually living off the blood of another.

I guess jw's believe in abortion.
little lamb

South Yarra, Australia

#2 Jun 24, 2014
No the mother does not transfuse their blood into the fetus

The fetus is fed through the placenta ..where the food is taken out of the mothers blood and then fed to the child

You know Matt , it is quite possible for a child in the womb to have a different blood type then its mother ...interesting isn't it?

You know Matt if you repent ..God forgives you.
DR SOS

Cheyenne, WY

#3 Jun 24, 2014
little lamb wrote:
No the mother does not transfuse their blood into the fetus
The fetus is fed through the placenta ..where the food is taken out of the mothers blood and then fed to the child
You know Matt , it is quite possible for a child in the womb to have a different blood type then its mother ...interesting isn't it?
You know Matt if you repent ..God forgives you.
"if you repent"

You repent first then we will follow.
ohreally

Raleigh, NC

#4 Jun 24, 2014
DR SOS wrote:
<quoted text>"if you repent"
You repent first then we will follow.
Unborn children are major hypocrites. They are Jehovah's Witnesses in that they are testimony to the wisdom and power of the creator.

Yet they routinely take blood fractions extracted from whole blood, hiding behind some gibberish excuse about "the placenta" or some other kr_p.

Why don't you join me in demanding answers from the next one that shows up on your doorstep? Prob'ly have em gasping like a fish out of water- too funny -lol
Flame

Washington, DC

#5 Jun 25, 2014
Matt9969 wrote:
Unborn babies share the blood of their mother, in effect their mothers transfuse their blood into the fetus's growing with in them. Since Jehovah demands that all abstain from blood, does that not mean that jw potential mothers must abort their fetus's since the fetus is not abstaining from blood, the fetus is actually living off the blood of another.
I guess jw's believe in abortion.
You are clueles in this subject.
Stick to apostasy. You are better at it

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#6 Jun 25, 2014
Flame wrote:
<quoted text>
You are clueles in this subject.
Stick to apostasy. You are better at it
Ah, the answer of a clueless idiot.
Candice B

Kettering, UK

#7 Jun 25, 2014
little lamb wrote:
No the mother does not transfuse their blood into the fetus
The fetus is fed through the placenta ..where the food is taken out of the mothers blood and then fed to the child
You know Matt , it is quite possible for a child in the womb to have a different blood type then its mother ...interesting isn't it?
You know Matt if you repent ..God forgives you.
And you know when the blood is different to the mother we end up having anti RhD injections after so as not to make the white cells attack future pregnancies? Then if they attack a fetus we get offered in utro transfusions?

I don't think you realise the risks or consequences and are in no way medically trained to give advice on transfusions to babies or mothers carrying them.

Lamby, don't spout watchtower rubbish when dealing with lives.

I'm one happy blood donating mother of 3, with rh neg.

Stop wishing death and pain on others to suit your own agenda.

Jeez, you'll not be happy til the crows are pecking.

*shakes head*



little lamb

South Yarra, Australia

#8 Jun 25, 2014
Candice B wrote:
<quoted text>
And you know when the blood is different to the mother we end up having anti RhD injections after so as not to make the white cells attack future pregnancies? Then if they attack a fetus we get offered in utro transfusions?
I don't think you realise the risks or consequences and are in no way medically trained to give advice on transfusions to babies or mothers carrying them.
Lamby, don't spout watchtower rubbish when dealing with lives.
I'm one happy blood donating mother of 3, with rh neg.
Stop wishing death and pain on others to suit your own agenda.
Jeez, you'll not be happy til the crows are pecking.
*shakes head*
Its Jehovah God who has it written in his word to ' keep abstaining from blood'

All authority , including medical practitioners are relative to God

And a Christian that follows the spirit's leading , does not allow any man however educated he thinks he is in a special field ..take preeminence in a Christians conscience.

However yourself as an apparent unbeliever , you leave yourself to the mercy of the knowledge of men, rather then the knowledge of God...

and as one wise person once said " Doctors bury their mistakes'

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#9 Jun 25, 2014
Candice B wrote:
<quoted text>
And you know when the blood is different to the mother we end up having anti RhD injections after so as not to make the white cells attack future pregnancies? Then if they attack a fetus we get offered in utro transfusions?
I don't think you realise the risks or consequences and are in no way medically trained to give advice on transfusions to babies or mothers carrying them.
Lamby, don't spout watchtower rubbish when dealing with lives.
I'm one happy blood donating mother of 3, with rh neg.
Stop wishing death and pain on others to suit your own agenda.
Jeez, you'll not be happy til the crows are pecking.
*shakes head*
That is really really interesting, how a unborn fetus can have a different blood type that his/her mother. Creation amazes me every day.
UNchained

Kingsport, TN

#10 Jun 25, 2014
little lamb wrote:
<quoted text>
Its Jehovah God who has it written in his word to ' keep abstaining from blood'
All authority , including medical practitioners are relative to God
And a Christian that follows the spirit's leading , does not allow any man however educated he thinks he is in a special field ..take preeminence in a Christians conscience.
However yourself as an apparent unbeliever , you leave yourself to the mercy of the knowledge of men, rather then the knowledge of God...
and as one wise person once said " Doctors bury their mistakes'
You have wrongly interpreted Acts 15:28-29 because you first heard about blood from reading a Watchtower and from listening to incorrect, useless, destructive, damaging and potentially life threatening information provided to you by untrained, uneducated, evil religious fanatics who claim to speak for God.

Jesus fulfilled EVERY aspect of the law on the cross...

For through the law I have died to the law, that I might live to God. I have been crucified with Christ; and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me. I do not set aside the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.
Galatians 2:19-21
Flame

Washington, DC

#11 Jun 26, 2014
Matt9969 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, the answer of a clueless idiot.
Matt, you are such an idiot you are an embarrassment to yourself.
Look at some of the threads that you started lately, where you have no ideas of what you're talking about and shown yourself to be a clueless idiot.

As I said, stick to apostasy, hatred and lying. You definitely master these.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#12 Jun 26, 2014
Flame wrote:
<quoted text>
Matt, you are such an idiot you are an embarrassment to yourself.
Look at some of the threads that you started lately, where you have no ideas of what you're talking about and shown yourself to be a clueless idiot.
As I said, stick to apostasy, hatred and lying. You definitely master these.
So blabbermouth, prove me wrong if you are so right.
Flame

Silver Spring, MD

#13 Jun 26, 2014
Matt9969 wrote:
<quoted text. So blabbermouth, prove me wrong if you are so right.
LOL!!
Seriously??
In the thread "Apostle Paul was never a Christian..." You said:

'he never met any of Christ apostles'- Wrong
'And yet he came up with this law to abstain from blood.'- again wrong.
See, you are clueless

Look at this very thread you started, you have no clue of what you're talking about.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#14 Jun 26, 2014
Matt9969 wrote:
Unborn babies share the blood of their mother, in effect their mothers transfuse their blood into the fetus's growing with in them. Since Jehovah demands that all abstain from blood, does that not mean that jw potential mothers must abort their fetus's since the fetus is not abstaining from blood, the fetus is actually living off the blood of another.
I guess jw's believe in abortion.
This is not true. As usual you are just making stuff up.

The placenta ensures that whilst neutruants and other things contained in blood are passed from motehr to child the blood itself is not:

== Quote: What is the placenta? NHS ==

http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/2309.aspx...

The placenta is an organ attached to the lining of your womb during pregnancy.

It keeps your unborn baby’s blood supply separate from your own blood supply, as well as providing a link between the two. The link enables the placenta to carry out functions that your unborn baby can’t perform for itself.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#15 Jun 26, 2014
But the baby is still receiving whole blood from his/her mother?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#16 Jun 26, 2014
Jehovahs witnesses either need to stop having children of disassociate unborn fetus's for not abstaining from the blood of others.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#17 Jun 26, 2014
or disassociate unborn fetus's for not abstaining from the blood of others.

“Paradise Earth”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#18 Jun 27, 2014
Matt9969 wrote:
But the baby is still receiving whole blood from his/her mother?
No the Baby's blood is ISOLATED from the mother's blood. Can't you read?
Eloise

Lexington, KY

#19 Jun 27, 2014
little lamb wrote:
You know Matt , it is quite possible for a child in the womb to have a different blood type then its mother ...interesting isn't it?
It is interesting that you frequently use THEN for THAN!
Candice B

Kettering, UK

#20 Jun 27, 2014
Aneirin wrote:
<quoted text>
No the Baby's blood is ISOLATED from the mother's blood. Can't you read?
Gaz, if it's so ISOLATED then why the need for anti D and in womb transfusions. You telling me you're more qualified than obstetricians?

You'd rather children die following your stupid made up rules than seeing sense. Feel free to knock my door, Gareth. Your stance on not helping others is really quite outrageous.

It's a food/eating instruction - you lot add commas and full stops to make it fit.

Do not eat meat from a strangled animal! You know this makes sense as meat that is eaten is bled out even now. If you leave blood in a carcass it taints and ruins the meat.

I know there are other lines, same thing, meat prep.

Simple cooking instruction!

The watchtower instructs obedience on simple food cleanliness to justify throwing lives away.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jehovah's Witness Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
For rsss1 Zechariah 2 4 min PrufSammy 25
Why we JWs are so HAPPY! (Apr '15) 5 min Dogen 2,498
ONE God 8 min PrufSammy 71
TORTURE- a Godly Virtue? 9 min PrufSammy 577
newt and others.. i will go real slow so your m... 1 hr ihveit 67
Does anybody have a testimony to share? 1 hr ihveit 564
Some have lived through hell, literally! 1 hr wow 226
Another REASON why the NWT is the best Bible ever! 5 hr rsss1 1,860
If Jesus is God 5 hr Holy dr Shrink 532
More from around the web