I've been slandered by a JW on this f...

I've been slandered by a JW on this forum

Posted in the Jehovah's Witness Forum

First Prev
of 16
Next Last
Hoodwinked

Yorba Linda, CA

#1 Jun 26, 2010
The Real Yuni took it upon herself to go at me with guns blazing on the Shame! Shame! Shame! forum
here....
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#750 19 hrs ago Judged: 2 2 2When hoodie doesn't want to answer a question she runs hides and eats a gallon of ice-cream.I won't forget to answer the question again when she comes back.Hoodie why did you lie and say that Semintal wasn't df?
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#740 20 hrs ago Judged: 2 2 2 Why are you going around telling lies that Semintal wasn't DF?
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#742 20 hrs ago Judged: 1 Why did you lie and say Semintal wasn't DF?
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#753 19 hrs ago Judged: Why did you go around lying, telling people that Semintal wasn't df?She's now pretending she did not see my questions..;o)
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#756 19 hrs ago Judged: 1 1 1StandFirm wrote: <quoted text>He was? That's news to me. Real Yuni wrote:Yes he was. I have the news story that was sent to me via email today. I don't know how to link it on here on my cell phone.I will have to ask the person who sent it if they will post it on here.I don't believe anything that comes out of hoodie's mouth.
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#764 19 hrs ago Judged: 1 1 1She keeps slipping in her lies.Eventualy she will be found out for the kind of manipulating person that she is.Jehovah is not one to be mocked. She will have a lot of explaining to do.
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#769 19 hrs ago Judged: 1 1 1StandFirm wrote: <quoted text>He was? That's news to me. Real Yuni wrote:I will NEVER trust a word that she says. I tried giving her the benefit of the doupt when she 1st came here but when I saw how she was exploiting her kid for manipulation purposes I was done!!Fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me.She's an emotional blackmailer.
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#795 19 hrs ago Real Yuni wrote: <quoted text>Just wait....It will posted on my time not yours. Correction: I will post it on my time.Moral of the story is that you are a big fat liar.You got caught. I have NO respect for you.Now stop talking to me I won't respond. I'm done with you for today.
Real Yuni Since: Aug 09 3,821 Location hidden Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#822 18 hrs ago The world doesn't use the word DF We us it.They call it dismissed or removed.Just giving you a heads up because I know you will use that against the story.

Cont
Hoodwinked

Yorba Linda, CA

#2 Jun 26, 2010
Then here comes the 2008 story Yuni was talking about….

Interesting Clayton, NC Reply »|Report Abuse | Judge it!|#832 17 hrs ago Real Yuni wrote: <quoted text>Just wait....It will posted on my time not yours. Are you talking about this story? The Judge's ruling included the fact that he was "REMOVED from the Jehovah's Witnesses", that can only mean DISFELLOWSHIPED, then he stated in his ruling that there were no clergy privileges/confidential statements because in a committee meeting/DF there would be information that would be sent to NY Headquarters after the person is DISMISSED. If he wasn't DF'd then there would be no "removal or Dismissal". Wendy in Illinois wrote: Here is an update regarding the JW elders who are being forced to testify on what they know about a child molestation case. The elders and their attorney and the attorney for the molestor are still fighting the fact that the elders have to testify. Funny how the child molester and the elders are on the same side. Makes me ill, something legally needs to be done with any organization who thinks they can protect criminals.http://www.pe.com/lo calnews/inland/stories/PE...** **In his ruling, Dickerson said that with three elders involved, their judicial committee became a fact-finding body, not one focused on confidentiality.When someone is removed from the Jehovah's Witnesses, notes from a judicial committee meeting are passed on to another committee that handles the appeal. The elders must send paperwork explaining evidence presented to the Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters in New York after the person is dismissed.***Strunsky, the prosecutor, declined to comment on the appellate court's ruling.****

Which of course proved nothing!!
Yuni went on and on slandering me saying I lied about what I knew about that case and I answered by putting up the part in the actual Appeal in 2009 that said CLEARLY that he wasn’t disfellowshipped. Here is the important information.
The Appeal from the Superior Court of Riverside County filed 8/10/09 case # E046303. The People v. Gilbert Simental

on page 15 half way down where it says

" The fact that defendant was not disfellowed and the branch office in New York was not notified is of no consequence as the evidence showed that confidentially was neither required nor expected by the parties.

You can't get more CLEAR then that!
Now I'm asking only for her to do is the Christian thing and apologize for all them hateful posts and admit she made a mistake.

Is that asking too much?

“EXPOSING CHURCHianity!”

Since: Oct 07

Seattle, WA

#3 Jun 26, 2010
HMMMM! Know you know how all of US feel! heh
Hoodwinked

Yorba Linda, CA

#4 Jun 26, 2010
the Mad JW wrote:
HMMMM! Know you know how all of US feel! heh
Your a smart man..research it yourself Mad JW.

I'm sick and tired of being lied about and slandered by them girls..especially when they never prove a thing and have to eat their words.

She got really quite after I posted that appeal as did her leaders.

All I'm asking for is... I'm sorry, is that wrong?
Topsy Crett

Houston, TX

#5 Jun 26, 2010
HW, still doesnt answer simple questions like if the elders knew about Simental before her daughter was molested.

She led many to believe this, and of course anyone reading those documents can see that DOE 3, HW's daughter, was at the same pool party that the other two girls were molested.

HW knew this, but for many months on here she allowed people to believe otherwise.

Why is that HW?

Also, HW, did you allow the elders to follow the organizational procedure they needed in order to mete out their specific organizational sanctions?

Your daughter was questioned by police, and others, but you didnt allow the elders to question your daughter in the controlled atmosphere of a JC, and instead only allowed it on an informal basis.

When it came down to the elders going through teh process of DFing him, you decided to not let your daughter answer the same questions she had already been asked so they could officially record it in a JC.

Why would you do this HW?

HW why have you chosen to play games, allow others to speculate, and play out vicarious victim to stay relevant, and then whine when someone does exactly what your game playing has left us up to.

Speculation...

You were happy to let JW bashers fill in the blank without correction.

Now the shoe is on teh foot you are all up in arms.

I mean yesterday you said Simental might not even be your daughter's molestor.

Admit, at this point, this is all an attention ploy isnt it.

The little games you play make it clear you are not really interested in resolution or in actual truth.

You are interested in attention.

And your using your daughter's victimization to satisfy that attention you need.

That isnt slander, that is sick...

You have created this atmosphere by playing yoru games, and now when it doesnt go in your favor on a religious debate board with highly polorized sides, you whine about it?
bystander no more

Sacramento, CA

#6 Jun 26, 2010
Hoodwinked wrote:
<quoted text>
Your a smart man..research it yourself Mad JW.
I'm sick and tired of being lied about and slandered by them girls..especially when they never prove a thing and have to eat their words.
She got really quite after I posted that appeal as did her leaders.
All I'm asking for is... I'm sorry, is that wrong?
And when are you going to apologize to your former Elders and former congregation for slandering THEM on this forum?
Hoodwinked

Yorba Linda, CA

#7 Jun 26, 2010
Topsy Crett wrote:
HW, still doesnt answer simple questions like if the elders knew about Simental before her daughter was molested.
She led many to believe this, and of course anyone reading those documents can see that DOE 3, HW's daughter, was at the same pool party that the other two girls were molested.
HW knew this, but for many months on here she allowed people to believe otherwise.
Why is that HW?
Also, HW, did you allow the elders to follow the organizational procedure they needed in order to mete out their specific organizational sanctions?
Your daughter was questioned by police, and others, but you didnt allow the elders to question your daughter in the controlled atmosphere of a JC, and instead only allowed it on an informal basis.
When it came down to the elders going through teh process of DFing him, you decided to not let your daughter answer the same questions she had already been asked so they could officially record it in a JC.
Why would you do this HW?
HW why have you chosen to play games, allow others to speculate, and play out vicarious victim to stay relevant, and then whine when someone does exactly what your game playing has left us up to.
Speculation...
You were happy to let JW bashers fill in the blank without correction.
Now the shoe is on teh foot you are all up in arms.
I mean yesterday you said Simental might not even be your daughter's molestor.
Admit, at this point, this is all an attention ploy isnt it.
The little games you play make it clear you are not really interested in resolution or in actual truth.
You are interested in attention.
And your using your daughter's victimization to satisfy that attention you need.
That isnt slander, that is sick...
You have created this atmosphere by playing yoru games, and now when it doesnt go in your favor on a religious debate board with highly polorized sides, you whine about it?
HW has never said who her child's molester is... and HW refuses to talk to those who love molesters and want to protect them with their lives so go talk to a wall Tipsy.

This thread is about Yuni's lies.

Since: Aug 07

Location hidden

#8 Jun 26, 2010
you didn't answered her post Topsy.

How does it feel to be siding with the likes of Yuni and others that have lied to protect pedophiles. That give the benifit of the doubt to pedophiles while they gang up and bash victims.

Your attitude on this forum is certainly always for the renegades DF, DA and unbaptised trouble making so called JW's, with no consideration for the wicked example they have given in Gods name.

You care neither for Gods name only bringing down and ripping into anyone that you think may have a good point against the WTBTS.

shame on you.

Since: Aug 07

Location hidden

#9 Jun 26, 2010
bystander no more wrote:
<quoted text>
And when are you going to apologize to your former Elders and former congregation for slandering THEM on this forum?
she spoke on of a few in her congregation and gave credit to some that were kind. You carry on like she slandered all elders.

now answer her post you coward.
Hoodwinked

Yorba Linda, CA

#10 Jun 26, 2010
bystander no more wrote:
<quoted text>
And when are you going to apologize to your former Elders and former congregation for slandering THEM on this forum?
How did I do that? By saying they didn't help us..well they didn't..go look up the word slander and come back.

By the way have you apologized for giving Yuni bad information? We all know she isn't capable of putting a few sentences together let alone finding an old news story for herself..poor girl gets used by you guys all the time.
letsbetotallyhon est

Flint Hill, VA

#11 Jun 26, 2010
Hoodwinked wrote:
<quoted text> How did I do that? By saying they didn't help us..well they didn't..go look up the word slander and come back.
By the way have you apologized for giving Yuni bad information? We all know she isn't capable of putting a few sentences together let alone finding an old news story for herself..poor girl gets used by you guys all the time.
Since you are now wanting full disclosure about Simental, how about admitting that the court case you are citing is not about your daughter's molestation. It is about the other two girls who were molested by the same man.

Isn't it true that the elders did not even know about your daughter's molestation at the time they judged Simental for what he did to these two girls? Didn't it take a year for you to learn that your daughter had been molested and didn't that become a separate matter with a separate trial date?

Now be totally honest and tell us what reason your elders gave you for not disfellowshipping Simental in connection with your daughter's molestation?
Mardana

Sacramento, CA

#12 Jun 26, 2010
letsbetotallyhonest wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you are now wanting full disclosure about Simental, how about admitting that the court case you are citing is not about your daughter's molestation. It is about the other two girls who were molested by the same man.
Isn't it true that the elders did not even know about your daughter's molestation at the time they judged Simental for what he did to these two girls? Didn't it take a year for you to learn that your daughter had been molested and didn't that become a separate matter with a separate trial date?
Now be totally honest and tell us what reason your elders gave you for not disfellowshipping Simental in connection with your daughter's molestation?
.
"Letsbetotallyhonest " -- You sound very familiar.
:-)

Why in the world would the elders NOT disfellowship someone guilty of child molestation?

Don't they disfellowship people for smoking cigarettes?

Since he was not DF'd, does that mean that he is currently a Jehovah's Witness?

.
letsbetotallyhon est

Flint Hill, VA

#13 Jun 26, 2010
Mardana wrote:
<quoted text>
.
"Letsbetotallyhonest " -- You sound very familiar.
:-)
Why in the world would the elders NOT disfellowship someone guilty of child molestation?
Don't they disfellowship people for smoking cigarettes?
Since he was not DF'd, does that mean that he is currently a Jehovah's Witness?
.
You can be sure that there is a scriptural reason, and you can also be sure that Hoodwinked knows what that reason is. It is not possible that she has not asked them why he is not disfellowshipped, and it is not possible that they wouldn't give her an answer.

The fact that she runs and hides or starts some diversion when asked to share what the elders told her is very revealing. She tells only what she wants people to know and hides the rest while lyingly accusing others of being evil for asking her such questions. By refusing to answer, she feels free to say that she has not lied, but she is very deceptive in many ways, and that is why she is no longer serving Jehovah.
bystander no more

Sacramento, CA

#14 Jun 26, 2010
noahsday wrote:
<quoted text>she spoke on of a few in her congregation and gave credit to some that were kind. You carry on like she slandered all elders.
now answer her post you coward.
Coward? I'm not the wolf lurking in the local congregation who's afraid to tell her elders how much she despises the GB, you are. You're the coward, not me.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#15 Jun 26, 2010
Isn't Noahsday DF?

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#16 Jun 26, 2010
the Mad JW wrote:
HMMMM! Know you know how all of US feel! heh
Fer sure!

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#17 Jun 26, 2010
letsbetotallyhonest wrote:
<quoted text>
You can be sure that there is a scriptural reason, and you can also be sure that Hoodwinked knows what that reason is. It is not possible that she has not asked them why he is not disfellowshipped, and it is not possible that they wouldn't give her an answer.
The fact that she runs and hides or starts some diversion when asked to share what the elders told her is very revealing. She tells only what she wants people to know and hides the rest while lyingly accusing others of being evil for asking her such questions. By refusing to answer, she feels free to say that she has not lied, but she is very deceptive in many ways, and that is why she is no longer serving Jehovah.
Maybe she doesn't answer because she thinks she's playing the Scooby Doo mystery game?

Kind of like the game Family Feud.
bystander no more

Sacramento, CA

#18 Jun 26, 2010
Real Yuni wrote:
Isn't Noahsday DF?
If she isn't, she will be, just like Hoody.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#19 Jun 26, 2010
I am not 100% I remember her telling Topsy a while back that she was.

Maybe I'm wrong.

She was a strong sister when I 1st came to topix. She disapeared for about 6 months and did a complete 360..She's not even the same person. Back in the days she use to post some profound words like EE. I admired many of her posts but now she's always angry and yelling at someone.

You can totaly tell she doesnt have holy spirit anymore. Its kind of sad.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

#20 Jun 26, 2010
Hoodwinked wrote:
<quoted text>
HW has never said who her child's molester is... and HW refuses to talk to those who love molesters and want to protect them with their lives so go talk to a wall Tipsy.
This thread is about Yuni's lies.
You see, this is exactly what the coven does.
They take a shred and then hunt you down. they look up all they can and closely examine it all to get your real name and your daughters and then turn it all around to make you look like the bad guy.

Topsy and the others he represents, the coven, are heaping coals on their own heads.
Please, stop responding to their baiting you and accussing you of anything.
They are taking a sad molestation and running wild trying to make the molester and those who protect him still look like the victims.
I have told you before not to respond to these idiots.
This is why.
They expect you to be a trial lawyer and present your case in that way.
Stop please taking their bait and discussing this with any of them.
Ignore these sharks, please.
They only want your blood and your tears.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 16
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Jehovah's Witness Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Jehovah's Witnesses look in other direction 4 min Bobby 237
Who is Jesus? 7 min red blood relative 189
News Victims 'told not to report' Jehovah's Witness ... 8 min PrufSammy 59
WT must pay $4,000 a day. 11 min Bobby 138
Another REASON why the NWT is the best Bible ever! 25 min PrufSammy 1,332
News Hate campaign against Jehovah's Witnesses - why? (Aug '06) 1 hr red blood relative 2,326
Are JWs Catholic? 2 hr ihveit 44
More from around the web