Scared Dr. Zakir Naik running from de...

Scared Dr. Zakir Naik running from debate for so long. Why?

Posted in the Islam Forum

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
arya

Los Angeles, CA

#2 Feb 25, 2010
2.

In 2006, again a detailed letter was written to Zakir Naik questioning his fraudulent negative publicity of Vedas and other Hindu texts. He ignored as usual.

3.

On 27 March, 2007, we organized a debate between Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya and Tariq Murtaza, a professor of Aligarh Muslim University and a core member of Zakir Naik’s team. The debate was recorded on video as well. When Tariq Murtaza was forced to turn speechless, he gave lame excuses for the same. He then suggested that his teacher, Abdullah Tariq of Rampur would be able to debate better. Now this gentleman Abdullah Tariq is another right-hand of Zakir Naik and supposed to be the expert on comparative religions. His Taqiah belief (search on google to discover yourself what is Taqiah) is that Vedas are first message of Allah and Quran the final one. So all should go by the latest edition of His message.

4.

On 8 February, 2008, after a tiresome management of logistics, considering the busy schedule of both Mahendra Pal Arya and Abdullah Tariq (both are involved in conversion activities primarily and hence keep traveling), we could finally schedule a public debate in Bulandshahar, UP. Abdullah Tariq, very confident about his conversion and conversation skills, claimed in very beginning that he would be willing to come each day to explain about Quran if he gets such a crowd to hear. But as the debate progressed, one could see droplets of sweat on forehead of Abdullah Tariq. By the time debate was over, he had to cry foul that Mahendra Pal Arya deviated from core topic. The debate ended on a peaceful note though and Abdullah Tariq reiterated his willingness to come for discussions again and again.
arya

Los Angeles, CA

#3 Feb 25, 2010
5.

That was the last we saw of Abdullah Tariq. Meanwhile we continued our efforts to contact Zakir Naik directly and invite him for a debate. But Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) would simply not respond. Sometime in
mid of 2008, we uploaded videos of Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya on youtube. You can check them at http://youtube.com/truthwisdom2008 . The quality is bit dismal because it is difficult to get funds for such activities from Hindus who are more busy wasting time and money on lavish festivals and costly idols. But that did create an impact. We started getting hate mails and abuses, and also voices of support. Many disciples of Zakir Naik came to intermediate and stated that we have never ever issued an invitation for debate in first place. IRF also denied having received any such invitation from any person ever.

6.

Meanwhile two fanatics filed a petition in Court to put a ban on Satyarth Prakash, the book by Swami Dayanand Saraswati that is severely critical of the neo-Islamic beliefs. It was a matter of surprise that our secular court admitted such a petition in first place. And while rest of the Samaj was busy holding protest rallies and holding press conferences, we filed a counter-petition in High Court challenging the authority of lower court to even take up this case. We presented a detailed petition highlighting importance of Satyarth Prakash and how the points made in this book regarding Islam are authentic and without malice. High Court had to use its special powers to bring the case to High Court for hearing. In second hearing, the Court dismissed the case warning the petitioners to not file such frivolous cases in future. This added to our notorious fame in eyes of the Zakir cohort.
rex arya

Los Angeles, CA

#6 Feb 25, 2010
10.

That was the last ever communication we could make with IRF. Meanwhile the blabbering of Zakir Naik continued and I could see his messengers simply copy-pasting his writings to sway non-Muslims. We were thus left with no recourse but to prepare rebuttals to Zakir Naik’s demagoguery so as to prevent both Muslims and non-Muslims to fall in trap and develop completely wrong notions about Islam and Hinduism.
Ever since then, Abdullah Tariq has even refused to take calls if they come from our phones. IRF is dead silent as usual. But the covert activities are going in full pace. Its obvious that Zakir Naik does not want to debate us publicly. At best, he would allow outsiders to ask a question to which he could reply by a one-liner and have his followers clap to their heart’s content. Or he would deliberately choose debaters who he knows are not trained in his covert methods.

He refused written debate with Al Sina because written debates expose everything. He knows that his Qadiyani source of plagiarism is already exposed. And he knows that Arya Samaj has been a thorn in eyes of Muslim evangelists for last 125 years. He knows that this group is thoroughly well-versed with Quran, his ways and the blatant loopholes. He knows that to give a stage show among semi-literate blind followers scared of Hell is not same as debating with those whose history lies in Shuddhi movement.

Yes, Zakir may have access to petrodollars and funds sourcing Osama Bin Laden. Yes, another bomb blasted in Pune killing innocents. True that Osama brand of terrorism ably supported by Zakir
Naik continues. But Aurangzeb was scared of Shivaji despite his massive army and Ravan was scared of Ram despite he being Lankesh. After all, truth is more powerful than the strongest weapon.

And thus Zakir Naik is so scared!
rex arya

Los Angeles, CA

#7 Feb 25, 2010
http:// www . scribd . com/ doc/ 8142696/ Official-Challenge-to-Dr-Zakir -Naik-by-Sarvdeshik-Arya-Prati nidhi-Sabha-

http://www .aryasamaj .org /newsite /node /717

Remove spaces.
hey u

Nilai, Malaysia

#8 Mar 6, 2010
u idiots arya samaj people if u wana debate zakir naik and he is not agreeing ( which is a lie made up by u bastards ) then come on indian news cahnnels and invite him through tv media . whole of india will see that. if u got gutts do it. well see what DR. zakir naik says. if u people are of any worth ie if u have a huge following then he will surely debate.
george whyte

Ballymena, UK

#9 Mar 6, 2010
zakir naik exposed.

http://www.google.co.uk/search...
Truths

Ballymena, UK

#10 Mar 6, 2010
i realy fancy zakir naik i think hes lush

death to isreal
troll crusher

Queensbury, NY

#11 Mar 6, 2010
Parties over,trolls
Truths

Ballymena, UK

#12 Mar 6, 2010
i once kissed zakir naik on the lips, no tounges thou. i was very sad

death to israel

ta ta
yreshi

Pune, India

#13 Mar 17, 2010
have the guts challenge him in media u wl definitely ha rss to help u in reaching indian media
ravikishen

Birmingham, UK

#15 Jun 28, 2010
Bhag maderchod..
arya wrote:
2.
In 2006, again a detailed letter was written to Zakir Naik questioning his fraudulent negative publicity of Vedas and other Hindu texts. He ignored as usual.
3.
On 27 March, 2007, we organized a debate between Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya and Tariq Murtaza, a professor of Aligarh Muslim University and a core member of Zakir Naik’s team. The debate was recorded on video as well. When Tariq Murtaza was forced to turn speechless, he gave lame excuses for the same. He then suggested that his teacher, Abdullah Tariq of Rampur would be able to debate better. Now this gentleman Abdullah Tariq is another right-hand of Zakir Naik and supposed to be the expert on comparative religions. His Taqiah belief (search on google to discover yourself what is Taqiah) is that Vedas are first message of Allah and Quran the final one. So all should go by the latest edition of His message.
4.
On 8 February, 2008, after a tiresome management of logistics, considering the busy schedule of both Mahendra Pal Arya and Abdullah Tariq (both are involved in conversion activities primarily and hence keep traveling), we could finally schedule a public debate in Bulandshahar, UP. Abdullah Tariq, very confident about his conversion and conversation skills, claimed in very beginning that he would be willing to come each day to explain about Quran if he gets such a crowd to hear. But as the debate progressed, one could see droplets of sweat on forehead of Abdullah Tariq. By the time debate was over, he had to cry foul that Mahendra Pal Arya deviated from core topic. The debate ended on a peaceful note though and Abdullah Tariq reiterated his willingness to come for discussions again and again.
Abdul

North Vancouver, Canada

#16 Jun 28, 2010
Naik is a lying piece of shit

Islam was spread by the sword

amal

Central District, Hong Kong

#17 Jul 12, 2010
Abdul wrote:
Naik is a lying piece of shit
Islam was spread by the sword
What a piece of Junk ur Either you don't know Islam
or trying to show ur hatred in Islam name by hiding your identity.
Nevermind.. There is Judgement day where Almighty will show what punishement is waiting for nonbelievers..
Its not too far so keep waiting.. That day no one allow to speak except those god order him to speak. His Mouth will be shut & His parts (hand,leg,eye,ear...) will speak the truth..
Its not too far its nearing oh! man kind beware .. & fear god..
Bashir

Oman

#18 Aug 10, 2010
There are thousands of people in this world who challenge Dr. Zakir Naik but even they do not qualify to debate with even his student. So how he can do the time pass where as he too much busy.

In net you will find so many people challenging him but all for PUBLICITY only, Dr. Zakir naik does not need publicity. he is well known universal scholar.
TRUE LOVER

Saudi Arabia

#19 Aug 10, 2010
And what u think when Dr Zakir Naik debated Dr William chmpble of Christianity and Sri sri ravisanker of Hinduism on topics Quran and Bible in light of science and Concept of God in Islam and Hinduism.And he defeated both of them.U can see video recorded proves on You tube.Watch these debates for yourself u losers.............

“Evil Atheist :-)”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#20 Aug 10, 2010
TRUE LOVER wrote:
And what u think when Dr Zakir Naik debated Dr William chmpble of Christianity and Sri sri ravisanker of Hinduism on topics Quran and Bible in light of science and Concept of God in Islam and Hinduism.And he defeated both of them.U can see video recorded proves on You tube.Watch these debates for yourself u losers..........
Dr Naik is a fool and a liar.
If Dr Campbell had been a better debater he would have slaughtered him.

Here’s an example of why.

(Dr. Naik) When I was in school, I had learned that the Sun in respect to the Earth - it was stationary - the Earth and the Moon, they rotated about in axis, but the sun was stationary. But when I read a Verse of the Qur'an saying, in Surah Al-Ambiya, Ch.. 21 Verse No. 33, it says....(Arabic)....'It is Allah who has created the night and the day.'....(Arabic).... The sun and the moon....(Arabic).... Each one traveling in an orbit with its own motion. Now Alhamdulillah, modern science has confirmed the Qur'anic statement. The Arabic word used in the Qur'an is 'Yasbahoon', which describes the motion of a moving body. When it refers to a celestial body, it means it is rotating about its own axis. So Qur'an says the sun and the Moon, they revolve as well as rotate about their own axis. Today we have come to know that the Sun takes approximately 25 days to complete one rotation.

This argument is split between these two YouTube videos.
&fe ature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The problem is that he is saying the Arabic word Yasbahoon' when used in relation to the stars means they rotate.
But that can’t be true because the Arabs didn’t know the stars rotate so they couldn’t possible have a word for the stars rotating!

How can there be an Arabic word for rotating stars when they didn’t know they did?
It's a nonsense!

The word actually means ‘floating’ not rotating.
http://corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp...
raman

Sweden

#21 Aug 19, 2010
Its not about wining or losing. Islam is completly different to other religions and thats y there are so many fights beteen muslim and non muslims.
shaizy

Europe

#22 Dec 9, 2010
4get everythng wat zakir says take a bath in a islamic way only ul feel da truth.. Try it.. U dont need 2study i swear ul feel god da way u never did !
sick of it

Cleburne, TX

#23 Dec 9, 2010
It sounds to me that this Dr. Naik is a chicken, and a typical Muslim babbler of b*llsh*t. While I didn't see the debate, I would suspect that Dr. Chicken... whoops, I meant Dr. Naik... was backed into a corner with something regarding the total illogic nature of Islam. It's easy enough to back Muslims into a corner over the ridiculous nature of their beliefs. Once that happens, the Muslim typically goes silent, tries to change the subject, tries to baffle with BS, or just turns hostile. Muslims hate questions. So did their founder. It's not surprising that this doctor turned out to be a big Chicken Bawk-Bawk. No one can argue illogical nonsense for long without cracking, if a logical mind is probing them. I'm your Socrates, Muslims. And I'm NOT drinking your wine. So deal with it.
Big B

Dearborn, MI

#24 Dec 9, 2010
He's been debating in Urdu language. What do you mean hes running from debate? Just last month he went on a 10 day Q&A session. http://www.youtube.com/user/IslamAndZakirNaik
@Igor Trip
Study the Quran in ARABIC is all I gotta say bro. Imma revert, ex atheist, Dr Naik inspired me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Islam Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 32 min chazmo 512,808
Impeach Donald Trump 39 min kennedy_christian 90
News Detroit's Muslim community promises it - will n... 50 min Mikey 13
News No Time For Fear 2 hr Faith Michigan 2
Vladimir Putin is an Enemy of the American People. 2 hr Khan 11
Islam is incompatible with Western values 3 hr Inbred - R - muzis 1
News What's Wrong with Slavery and Rape? 3 hr I appreciate ur f... 5
More from around the web