|
wheres the peace
Bossier City, LA
|
Judged:
1
1
Reality wrote: <quoted text> Always that 'but' comes into view, when the fingers point in your direction, eh hypocrite. http://www.youtube.com/watch... seems as good ole America has some bones if its own in the closet.... No bigger hypocryte then your and your devil worshiping ISLAM , http://truthtube.tv/ no bigger blood thirstier more sadistic brutal people in the world then you devil worshiping people who strap bombs to little children and call it good and praise suicide bombs as though they were gods! http://truthtube.tv/
|
Since: Aug 09
Saint Louis, MO
|
Good-bye, Nuts and Sickos. I have better things to do.
|
|
Reality
Pittsfield, MA
|
wheres the peace wrote: <quoted text>No bigger hypocryte then your and your devil worshiping ISLAM , http://truthtube.tv/ no bigger blood thirstier more sadistic brutal people in the world then you devil worshiping people who strap bombs to little children and call it good and praise suicide bombs as though they were gods! http://truthtube.tv/ I DISAGREE..... The USA has one of the bloodiest trails going, in the world.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflict... ========= http://www.youtube.com/watch...
|
|
Reality
Pittsfield, MA
|
|
|
wheres the peace
Bossier City, LA
|
Reality wrote: <quoted text> I DISAGREE..... The USA has one of the bloodiest trails going, in the world.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflict... ========= http://www.youtube.com/watch... Thats because your a liar you defend islams evil at all costs, So no matter what evils islam does you just help it do it and never have the nerve to see the wrong even as the child victims of islam scream and cry and beg for mercy! I mean hey part of your religion is worshiping the ancient dead barbarian above all humanity! http://www.truthtube.tv/
|
|
Reality
Pittsfield, MA
|
wheres the peace wrote: <quoted text> Thats because your a liar you defend islams evil at all costs, So no matter what evils islam does you just help it do it and never have the nerve to see the wrong even as the child victims of islam scream and cry and beg for mercy! I mean hey part of your religion is worshiping the ancient dead barbarian above all humanity! http://www.truthtube.tv/ Thats because your a liar you defend the evil Zionists at all costs, So no matter what evils Zionists do, you just help it do it and never have the nerve to see the wrong even as the child victims of The Zionists scream and cry and beg for mercy! I mean hey part of your religion is worshiping the barbarian, Zionists above all humanity! THAT WORKS BETTER FOR ME.......
|
|
JESUS is
Seven Hills, Australia
|
Abdurratln wrote: <quoted text>
Seems to me that King James and his queer companion Shakespehere had a lot to do with which books were taken out and which were kept in. Why do you have discrepancies between the Catholic Bible and the Kings James Version? Because GOD wanted it that way to confuse people? Gio somewhere else with that stupid nonsense. KING JAMES DID NOT TAKE ANY BOOKS OUT OF THE BIBLE! Let me educate you: The King James Version was translated by 54 scholars (although only 51 are known) working in six committees, two based in each of Oxford University, Cambridge University, and Westminster. The New Testament was translated from the Textus Receptus (Received Text) series of the Greek texts. The Old Testament was translated from the Masoretic Hebrew text, while the Apocrypha were translated from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), except for 2 Esdras, which was translated from the Latin Vulgate. No Books were taken out! They worked on certain parts separately; then the drafts produced were compared. In January 1609 a General Committee of Review met at Stationers' Hall, London to review the completed manuscripts from the six companies. Some have claimed that the renowned playwright William Shakespeare was involved in the translation, pointing to Psalms 46 as proof, where, counting 46 words from the beginning, one comes upon the word "shake", and counting 46 words backwards from the end, one comes upon the word "spear". But most scholars dismiss claims of Shakespeare's involvement because earlier translations contained the same coincidence, despite several of them being published before or just shortly after Shakespeare's birth.
|
|
JESUS is
Seven Hills, Australia
|
WHY ARE THE CATHOLIC AND PROTESTANT BIBLES DIFFERENT
The Bibles used by members of the Roman Catholic Church and those used by Protestants are, for the most part, VERY SIMILAR. They contain most of the same material presented in a fairly similar way. However, the way that their canons formed, some of the books included and which translations and interpretations are used do vary between Catholics and Protestants.
CATHOLIC BIBLES
During the foundation of the Christian religion in the first century A.D., much of the Jewish population, exiled from their homeland, had forgotten how to read and write Hebrew. Because of this, in common usage was the Septuagint. The Septuagint is a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures that the Catholic Church still uses.
PROTESTANT BIBLES
The Protestant branch of Christianity originated in the 16th century through the Protestant Reformation. At this time, Protestant leaders decided to base their organization of the Old Testament on the canon accepted by Judaism instead of the Greek Septuagint. None of the books was removed then, but they were rearranged, so those books that had been included which were not in the Masoretic Text were shifted to another section, typically placed between the Old Testament and New Testament, called the Apocrypha. These books were then generally held to be less important and, by the 19th century, they gradually began to be left out of most Protestant versions of the Bible.
BOTH SETTLED ON THE SAME NEW TESTAMENT!!!!!
|
|
|
|
JESUS is
Seven Hills, Australia
|
BECAUSE GOD WANTED IT THAT WAY TO CONFUSE PEOPLE?
Please point out the verses that confuse you.
|
|
“Evil Atheist :-)”
Since: Mar 07
Chelmsford, UK
|
Abdurratln wrote: <quoted text>
That sinners and loosers will burn is not the word of Quran only. Ask Sound Doc. I am sure he will tell you that the Bible promises hell to sinners, as well. But, it is your decision to choose sin over good, hell over heaven. This is true in both the Bible and Quran. The sin being not believing in Islam which is the word of just one man.
|
Since: Aug 08
Stockholm, Sweden
|
Mahmood wrote: <quoted text>
My point if you take whole Koran & not just part of it, the booze is not forbidden in Islam. Peace Why do you think it would not be forbidden when it clearly says in a verse that its forbidden and in the verses you talk about it doesnt say its allowed? Mahmood if you don't have anything to say then my advice is not to say it. I mean even if you don't have an argument to seek to find one against God. There was a poet in Syria called BoAlaa. In the beginning he didnt believe in God but then he wrote in a poem; Sientists and doctors don't believe in God but I believe in God. If they are right and Im wrong then noone has lost but if Im right and they are wrong then they have lost. Think about it you are not succeding with anything but worsening it for you. My advice. Pray God for forgivness and convert. The pary of God will be the winners. Peace Peace
|
|
Since: Aug 08
Stockholm, Sweden
|
gods wrote: <quoted text>
And doing good in YOUR proud opinion is pointing your ass in a certain direction for prayer, putting the right leg in your pants and bathroom, killing Jews and other creations of God, denying yourself pork and wine and eating camel which is also unclean, and many other like minded rituals that do not change your motives of selfishness and greed and hate. Yet God the whole law is fulfilled in one word,''LOVE'' Islam does not even have the word compassion in their language except for selfish partiality for one's own.
How many times is the word,''LOVE'' in your book when referring to Allah? The only time I saw anything close is mercy which only applies to sins you commit and excusing them without penalty, mostly for Mohammad's sake so he can get whetever he wants for the moment. His book is all changing everytime he saw something he desired, how quickly his god changed the laws to suit his situation for that moment. A timeless book filled with so many excuses for his sins. Peace Doing good is simply to obey God and to fear him. Peace
|
|
Since: Aug 08
Stockholm, Sweden
|
Gods Seer wrote: <quoted text>
Which verses? The first ones that say Christians and Jews will go to hell, or the last ones that say they will not? Peace The whole Quran is right. Read the verese again slowly. Peace
|
|
Since: Aug 08
Stockholm, Sweden
|
Gods Seer wrote: <quoted text>
Mohammad's book is loaded with gross abnormal contradictions.
The 2nd surah begins with a contradiction: Qur'an 2:1 "Alif-Lam-Min.(These letters are a miracle of the Qur'an and only Allah knows what they mean.) This is the Book free of doubt, a guidance to those who ward off (evil), who believe in the Unknown, fulfill their devotional obligations, and pay (zakat) out of what We have provided." There is no doubt: these uninspired rantings have guided more evil than they have warded off.
Allah's "Book" is asking people to believe in the "Unknown." Unable to produce a miracle, prophecy, or even a sane depiction of God, Muhammad just gives up and says, "believe in the unknown." We're ninety-one surahs into the Qur'an, and what little is known about this spirit is demonic. He spends his days torturing unbelievers in hell, and he spends his nights leading believers astray. He supports immorality when it serves his prophet's interests, and he doesn't want his true identity to be known.
But the dark spirit wants to be worshiped. The passage defines Muslims as those who "fulfill their devotional obligations." Although this may sound pious, it's wrong too. Devotion and obligation are incompatible, mutually exclusive concepts. Devotion - love - requires choice. The lack of choice is Islam's greatest deficiency, as the word "obligation" suggests. Peace You are just a fraud. Peace
|
|
Since: Aug 08
Stockholm, Sweden
|
Gods Seer wrote: <quoted text>
Do you really want to go to Heaven? You MUST receive a love of truth then;
Qur'an 2:4 "Whoever believes in (the Qur'an and Sunnah) which has been sent down to you (Muhammad) and in that which was sent to those before your time (the Torah and Gospel), have the assurance of the Hereafter." Although there are a thousand reasons to discard the Qur'an, this is one of the best. Allah is taking credit for prior scripture, saying that it should also be believed. Since the Torah and Qur'an are irreconcilably different, the order is impossible. It's like telling someone to be a democratic capitalist and a totalitarian communist at the same time.
Qur'an 2:6 "As for the disbelievers, it is the same whether you warn them or not; they will not believe. Allah has set a seal upon their hearts, upon their hearing, and a covering over their eyes. There is a great torment for them." It's another Islamic first: a spirit so perverse, so evil, he precludes people from knowing him. And he does it so that he can torture them. The concept is demonic; the words are Satanic. Peace You are just a fraud. Peace
|
|
Mahmood
Mississauga, Canada
|
hpesc wrote: <quoted text>
Peace
Mahmood if you don't have anything to say then my advice is not to say it. I mean even if you don't have an argument to seek to find one against God.
There was a poet in Syria called BoAlaa. In the beginning he didnt believe in God but then he wrote in a poem;
Sientists and doctors don't believe in God but I believe in God. If they are right and Im wrong then noone has lost but if Im right and they are wrong then they have lost.
Think about it you are not succeding with anything but worsening it for you.
My advice. Pray God for forgivness and convert. The pary of God will be the winners.
Peace
Peace God is not the monopoly of organized religion. Just because a person rejects those Abrahamic faiths does not mean that he/she does not believe in God. What makes you so sure that if there is god, it happens to be your Koranic allah? Koran endorses allah, allah endorses Mohammad, Mohammad endorses the Koran, & the loop continues with zero evidence from eihter one of them.
|
|
Mahmood
Mississauga, Canada
|
hpesc wrote: <quoted text>
Peace
Why do you think it would not be forbidden when it clearly says in a verse that its forbidden and in the verses you talk about it doesnt say its allowed?
Peace
Peace Because the other two verses of the Koran do not forbid driking. You are the advocate of the whole Koran, not others. There are verses which cancel each other out (abrogation) according to most muslims jurits & scholars, you are the only exception & you are nowhere near a scholar. Its you who says "I take the whole Koran & not part of it". Well if you take the whole Koran, then driking is not forbidden.
|
|
Since: Aug 09
Saint Louis, MO
|
|
|
Since: Aug 09
Saint Louis, MO
|
JESUS is wrote: <quoted text>
KING JAMES DID NOT TAKE ANY BOOKS OUT OF THE BIBLE! Let me educate you:
The King James Version was translated by 54 scholars (although only 51 are known) working in six committees, two based in each of Oxford University, Cambridge University, and Westminster.
The New Testament was translated from the Textus Receptus (Received Text) series of the Greek texts. The Old Testament was translated from the Masoretic Hebrew text, while the Apocrypha were translated from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), except for 2 Esdras, which was translated from the Latin Vulgate. No Books were taken out!
They worked on certain parts separately; then the drafts produced were compared. In January 1609 a General Committee of Review met at Stationers' Hall, London to review the completed manuscripts from the six companies.
Some have claimed that the renowned playwright William Shakespeare was involved in the translation, pointing to Psalms 46 as proof, where, counting 46 words from the beginning, one comes upon the word "shake", and counting 46 words backwards from the end, one comes upon the word "spear". But most scholars dismiss claims of Shakespeare's involvement because earlier translations contained the same coincidence, despite several of them being published before or just shortly after Shakespeare's birth. Okay. If you say so, boss. Whatever you say, master. While you are saying stuff, please explain the following: Books not included in the "King James version": Tobit Judith Additions to Esther Wisdom of Solomon Ecclesiasticus Baruch Epistle of Jeremiah Song of the Three Children Story of Susanna Bel and the Dragon Prayer of Manasseh 1 Maccabees 2 Maccabees 3 Maccabees 4 Maccabees Psalm 151 Books not included in the Catholic Bible: 1 Esdras 3 Maccabees 4 Maccabees Psalm 151 The following Books are, ARE, A-R-E ARE included in the Greek Orthodox Bible: 1 Esdras Tobit Judith Additions to Esther Wisdom of Solomon Ecclesiasticus Baruch Epistle of Jeremiah Song of the Three Children Story of Susanna Bel and the Dragon Prayer of Manasseh 1 Maccabees 2 Maccabees 3 Maccabees 4 Maccabees Psalm 151 So, it would seem that not all Christians are necessarily too lazy to read. The Greek Orthodox has more books than the Catholics or the non-Catholic Protestants such as ther glorious Church of England. So, start explaining the discerepancies, boss. I am sure that you did not take any books out BECASUSE Muhammd's name is in some of them. Now, did you? So, what gives, master. Speak for yourself and for your fellow corrupters and tricksters.
|
|
Since: Aug 09
Saint Louis, MO
|
JESUS is wrote: These books were then generally held to be less important and, by the 19th century, they gradually began to be left out of most Protestant versions of the Bible.
BOTH SETTLED ON THE SAME NEW TESTAMENT!!!!! Wow! That was an education! I mean mis-education. lol Now I know you are the boss and master and all. But, do you realy think we are going to believe such a wishy-washy lie? Well, boss, I have some bad news for you. I do not buy it. How can a mere mortal being like you and me, with two legs, warm blood (except those who live in Canada who have cold blood) a head on our shoulders, tongue to speak with (except those who have fork-tongues) have the audacity to decide on behalf of GOD ALMIGHTY that some "books were then generally held to be less important"? How dare you! Err I mean boss. What is wrong with you, master? What authority do you have to "gradually began to be left out of most Protestant versions of the Bible." It is GOD's Word. Or it ain't GOD'sd Word. Do not try to confuse us with clever rhetoric. I ain't buying it. Y'all just crooked liars, plain and simple. Err, I mean master.
|
|
|
Judge it!
1,352
Search the Islam Forum:
Sagittarius
