Converts to Islam 70,000 every year in France

Posted in the Islam Forum

Comments (Page 4)

Showing posts 61 - 77 of77
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

“She has become like a wife to him”

Father Zakaria is trying to fool us. He is claiming Muhammad had sex with Fatima in order for her to have a status of a wife of Muhammad and thus the title of “mother of the believers”.

Zakaria is either ignorant or dishonest.

Muhammad could NOT possibly have taken Fatima Bint Asad as a wife as Islamic Law dictates consent be given by BOTH parties in a marriage; of course marrying a dead person would not be allowed simply based on this injunction. Father Zakaria knows this but continues with his fanciful claim because it suits his agenda to besmirch the reputation of the Prophet Muhammad

So the point here is that Fatima could never have become his wife through such an act, despite Father Zakaria’s nonsensical pleadings. Thus Father Zakaria is looking even more foolish in his claim. It gets more embarrassing for Father Zakaria

“Muhammad did this to save her from the torment of the grave”?

Father Zakaria is showing signs of a fertile imagination and utter ignorance.

If we consult Ahadith literature we will realise Muhammad’s PRAYER made the grave a better abode for people (Hadith) through the grace of God. This shows us if Muhammad seriously felt Fatima Bint Asad was in danger of the punishment of the grave he would have simply PRAYED for her grave to be a better dwelling.[9]

Thus we realise Zakaria’s debauched idea that sex (or marriage) is required to save a person from the punishment of the grave is warped and fallacious to say the least. It gets worse for Father Zakaria.

“Muslims believed that as people wait for the Judgment Day they will be tormented in the grave”

Zakaria is showing signs of clear ignorance. Muslims of course believe in the punishment of the grave but those whom Allah is pleased with are NOT punished. Fatima Bint Asad is considered a saintly woman thus Muslims do not believe she is subjected to the punishment of the grave.

In fact the Muslim belief concerning pious people (such as Fatima Bint Asad) is that their graves will reflect Paradise and will be very comfortable and blissful indeed.

'The grave is a garden of paradise or a pit of hell." (Mishkat)

Rasulullah said,'The grave is a garden of paradise or a pit of hell.'(Mishkat).
Concerning the pious people (such as Fatima Bint Asad)“A believer will answer all three questions and he will be honored with the clothing of Jannah. The window of Jannah will be opened for him and he will enjoy the sight of Jannah”(Mishkat)(appendix 1)

Thus we realise the grave of a saintly woman (i.e. Fatima Bint Asad) would not be one of torment but of splendour, peace and bliss. She will also see Jannah (Paradise).

This just illustrates Father Zakaria’s ignorance and shows his crackpot idea of Muhammad having sex with his foster mother in order to save her from torment is unadulterated nonsense and a product of a very strange mind indeed.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Father Zakaria’s Hypocrisy

The one making this odd claim is a Christian and it just goes to reveal his hypocritical nature because the same word (a construct of Idtaja) is used in the Arabic Bible and it is not translated as sex but is translated as “LAID”. Does Father Zakaria want to be consistent now and withdraw his silly claims?

Please also bear in mind the dictionary references (given earlier) which disprove Father Zakaria’s malicious claims, well the Bible is now disproving hm.

The same Arabic word is used in the Bible (2Kings 4:32) and it is translated as “laid” and not sex or anything of that nature:

وَ&#15 83;َخ& #1614;لَ أَ&#16 04;ِي& #1588;َع ُ ال&#16 18;بَ& #1610;ْت َ وَ&#15 73;ِذ& #1614;ا بِ&#15 75;لص& #1614;ّب ِي&#16 16;ّ مَ&#16 10;ْت& #1612; وَ&#16 05;ُض& #1618;طَ جع&#16 12; عَ&#16 04;َى سَ&#15 85;ِي& #1585;ِه ِ.

English Translation: And when Elisha was come into the house, behold, the child was dead, and laid upon his bed.(KJV)

This along with the dictionary references shown earlier just further indicates the narration in question has nothing to do with sex.

Clarification: Why Do You Say There Was No Sex?

I think this point needs reiteration and summarizing so nobody is in any doubt. It is a silly, unfair and false claim to say sex was involved, consider the following:

*The word used (Idtaja’) does not infer sex. It simply refers to lying down or sleeping. The meaning of lying down is further highlighted by the context. There is NO way it refers to sex. NO authority would consider it meaning sex. In fact if the narrator wanted to convey the idea of sex/marriage taking place he would have used a totally DIFFERENT Arabic word (i.e. a construct of nikah).

*The same Arabic word is used in the Bible (2Kings 4:32) and it is translated as “laid” and NOT “sex” or “sleep”.

*Islam does not allow sex with dead people (already mentioned above). Islam is based on the deeds and actions of the Prophet as well as the Quran. Thus if Muhammad did involve himself in this type of activity it would be allowed within Islam. This just goes to show Muhammad never committed such an act.

*Fiqh (Jurisprudence) tells us it is not allowed to touch the nakedness of the deceased, as most Fiqh is also based upon Muhammad’s actions we can realize Muhammad did not touch any deceased body in a sexual manner.

*Fatima Bint Asad was deceased, thus meaning a marriage between Muhammad and her or any subsequent conjugal (sexual) relations would be rejected by Islam

*The burying of a deceased person is a community effort thus Muhammad would not have been alone whilst at the grave side. Thus it would be absurd to suggest somebody had sex with a deceased woman whilst everybody sat and watched

* Muhammad’s enemies would have mentioned it and used it against him if he did commit such an act. Muhammad’s enemies never accused him of necrophilia. This further shows this allegation of necrophilia is false and baseless.

*As we have already mentioned, the dictionary references do not indicate sex but lying down/sleeping (the context of which simply refers to lying down). These references are further strengthened by the context.

*Also, the two grave types (Lahd/Shaqq) would physically render the grave as unsuitable for sex.

*The body of the deceased is meant to be handled with care [10] so much so that a bone of the body must not be broken. Of course it goes without saying this would mean sex would be out of the question.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

*Fatima bint Asad was the foster mother of Muhammad.“When Muhammad heard Fatima Bint Asad had died, he immediately went to her house sat beside her body and prayed for her soul”

*“When the grave was prepared Muhammad himself examined it and placed her into the grave. Thus, she was one of the few people whose graves were examined by Muhammad”. Examination of a grave does involve lying down in a grave but does NOT involve sex.

* It is dehumanizing and a disconnection from reality to believe a world religion of nearly 2 billion will be founded by a man who involved himself in necrophilia

Conclusion

Muhammad was doing what any loving and caring person should do; that was focussing on the well being of his relative (foster mother and aunt, Fatima bint Asad)) both in this life and the hereafter. There was no sex or wrong doing involved.

This heart warming story of compassion and love for one’s family member is now being hijacked by the debauched and hateful mind of a few who are motivated by hatred and destruction.

Father Zakaria should be ashamed with himself; this man has a poor reputation in the Arab world, both Christians and Muslims will see him as a man looking for controversy and attention whilst viewing him as a crackpot figure.

I have had some dealings with the English speaking version of Father Zakaria and he, too, is seen as a man motivated by deviance and outright deception. This man’s deception extends to making up his own BIBLICAL verses up!(Appendix 2)

Fair people (both Muslims and Christians) should be wary of such characters and help fight their misinformation. If you happen to be somebody who dislikes Islam or a supporter of such perpetuators of outrage and dishonesty then I urge you to have a rethink and refrain from supporting such individuals financially as they will ultimately be laughing all the way to the bank at the expense of the truth.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The False Allegation of Muhammad having sex with a dead body http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.com/2010/0...
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

1

Sex with a corpse......sex with a child......sex with his daughter-in-law....sex with boys.....cross-dressing.....

No wonder muslims are so fck'd up.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Truth About tongue Sucking of Hassan and Hussein
Explaining the Tongue-Sucking Hadith

It appears Islamophobic rabble-rousers on the internet have been distorting the reason behind Prophet Muhammad allowing his grandchildren (Hassan and Husayn, ra) to suck his tongue.[1]
Sadly, these folk have very little research behind them and even less desire for the truth. They have twisted these actions of genuine devotion and concern for these boys to reflect their debauched minds by accusing the Prophet of homosexuality.

What is the actual reason behind the tongue-sucking?

The answer lies in Ash-Shifa of Qadi Iyad. The reason behind the tongue-sucking was to quench their thirst and help settle them down. We must remember this was an arid environment (desert) where water was scarce, thus loving parents/guardians did go to such lengths in caring for children:

He gave al-Hasan and al-Husayn his tongue to suck. They had been weeping from thirst and upon this they became quiet.[2]

This was a genuine act of devotion; had Jesus (p), Gandi, Guru Nanak or Mother Theresa carried out such an act of devotion to children they would have been praised for it. Sadly, this is not the case for Prophet Muhammad (p) as malicious folk on the internet have dark agendas they are pursuing assiduously.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Outrageous Islamophobic spin on a genuine act of devotion!

Islamophobes who present Ahadith (narrations) of such a nature in order to promote the idea of homosexuality or child abuse should desist immediately as their spin amounts to nothing more than a fallacious and fanciful attempt at character assassination.

May Allah guide these people. Ameen.

Muslims and Non-Muslims should be alert…

If a hater does present a claim where this occurred between the Prophet (p) and his grandchildren or his daughter (Fatima) please realise there is nothing untoward and the action was a genuine act of devotion that any caring person would undertake for the betterment of the infants. Do not be swayed by such hollow and outrageous distortions.

We must also remember homosexuality is forbidden and sinful in Islam.[3]

The Prophet’s saliva

Muslims drew blessing and miracles via the Prophet’s saliva (by the will of Allah) in such desert conditions so much so that the Prophet even used to spit in the mouths of suckling children in order to satisfy them until nightfall [4]. Further examples of the blessings within the Prophet’s saliva are given in footnotes [5],[6].
MUSLIM refutes the homosexual allegation alleged at Prophet Jesus (p)

Christian hater’s immature cross-dressing allegation is refuted

Become a Muslim today http://yahyasnow.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/tru...
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Basically, Muhammad was such a predatory sexual deviant, that he would have fck'd a wood pile if he thought there were a snake in it.
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Faith wrote:
Basically, Muhammad was such a predatory sexual deviant, that he would have fck'd a wood pile if he thought there were a snake in it.
it also ur own words which r lies.
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

ashkarlives4ALLAH wrote:
<quoted text>it also ur own words which r lies.
No....It was straight from the hadiths. If Muhammad was alive today, he would be locked away for life with the vilest of sexual criminals. He was a monster!
ashkarlives4ALLA H

Yemen

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Jan 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Faith wrote:
<quoted text>No....It was straight from the hadiths. If Muhammad was alive today, he would be locked away for life with the vilest of sexual criminals. He was a monster!
vilest of sexual criminals in the west so u sould be first locked people we do not support gays marriage or sex films man with men or women with men we do not support girl friend or gay friend HERE the concept of muslim ALLAH said [ Certainly will the believers have succeeded: They who are during their prayer humbly submissive And they who turn away from ill speech And they who are observant of zakah And they who guard their private parts Except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed -But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors -And they who are to their trusts and their promises attentive And they who carefully maintain their prayers - Those are the inheritors Who will inherit al-Firdaus. They will abide therein eternally.]

Since: Aug 12

Adana, Turkey

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

FaithUSA wrote:
<quoted text>I do too. It would take 48 hours for the USA to completely annihilate Turkey's feeble army of queers.
I love the way Turks beg to be let into the EU....As if that will magically make them human. LOL! Monkeys!
48 hours :P:D:D wowww nice dream, go back to sleep :D

Turkiye want to join Eu for money, alot of Turkish citizen dont want it. Eu dont accept us to Eu , because if they removed visas many Turks will move to Europe, will increase the speed of propagation of Islam , and Europe will be Turk :) so the door are closed :D fear.
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

B_Girl_Turco wrote:
<quoted text>
48 hours :P:D:D wowww nice dream, go back to sleep :D
Turkiye want to join Eu for money, alot of Turkish citizen dont want it. Eu dont accept us to Eu , because if they removed visas many Turks will move to Europe, will increase the speed of propagation of Islam , and Europe will be Turk :) so the door are closed :D fear.
It's not that as much as it is that no one wants to live around filthy Turks. They are all liars and thieves.
SANTA-BANTA

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

@Ashkar

Why did Mo talk of sex with a donkey ?

Was he a pervert

“Freedom, NOT islam.”

Since: Feb 11

Birmingham UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Jan 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

B_Girl_Turco wrote:
Yes France will be muslim country inshallah, and Denmark and England and Usa and Germany , all of them :) all world
Id love to know what your imam has been drinking, or smoking for him to tell you that load of old cods-wallop. Tell us all BGT, are YOU prepared to die to make your imams fantasy a reality? Because I am more than prepapred to die to prevent it from ever happening. I grant you, the French are a law unto themselves, but the Germans and the Danes are willing to die for their freedom too.
The moment the trouble starts, you will probably wet your knickers and run the other way. Which would be the most sensible thing you can do. After all, there wont be many muslims left alive when its all over.
Buford

Hurricane, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Jan 18, 2013
 
Wasn't Mohamad in truth a highway robber, a murderer, and a rapist? I mean, Muslims like to spin the history that they've received from those who knew their "prophet" Mohammad best, but there's no getting around the fact that if this cock-sure Arabian were alive today and tried to pull off what he got away with back then, he'd be arrested and charged with multiple crimes. He'd probably also have to undergo a psychiatric evaluation to determine whether or not he was even sane enough to stand trial!

Since: Dec 12

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Jan 18, 2013
 
ashkarlives4ALLAH wrote:
The Prophet’s saliva
Muslims drew blessing and miracles via the Prophet’s saliva (by the will of Allah) in such desert conditions so much so that the Prophet even used to spit in the mouths of suckling children in order to satisfy them until nightfall [4].
It is hard to believe that the prophet used to suckle the mouth of toddlers to quench their thirst! If that was the case surely their mothers could have done that

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 61 - 77 of77
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

63 Users are viewing the Islam Forum right now

Search the Islam Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Who Is Allah? (Aug '07) 3 min STEFANO COLONNA 198,564
new Quran website 10 min Onelawforall 15
JJ: Has Israel gone INSANE ? 16 min Kareem O Wheat 21
'Islamic State' Jihadists Reportedly Mowing Dow... 17 min Faith 15
Was Rama’s wife Sita a willing prostitution? 20 min hindu gandu 3
Get rid of the white kids 20 min Me_the ICONIC unbanneable 6
Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 24 min Faith 352,780
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••