No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54670 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

Roger

Ashburn, VA

#36559 Feb 1, 2013
The Phoenix Riseth wrote:
<quoted text>
Sally? Seriously?
ROTFLMAO!!!
Your online (fe)MALE escort could have come from here

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asi...
Roger

Ashburn, VA

#36560 Feb 1, 2013
The Phoenix Riseth wrote:
<quoted text>
Ours, their's, number increasing/decreasing, butter knives, solo dancing, Dragnet, no Dragnet, Chump Change?????
You are confused and stressed. It's all your fckdup imagination. This is cyber space dumbo!!!
Grow up MORON!!!
ROFL!!!!
heh heh heh heh heh
Why are you interested in stuff like Loch Ness ? Just wrap yourself in some blanket and go off to sleep, Moron.
Vibrator

Tokyo, Japan

#36562 Feb 1, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
sally = she male?
What is going on old man? Itching for some fist fights? Do you know what a fistfcuk is? There was a tramp like you I met in bay area SF and he was obstinate like you but after I gave him a fistfcuk ...... he goes on a wheelchair to take a dump. Needs special taxi to reach a railway station.
Robert Mckinsey

Ireland

#36565 Feb 1, 2013
A third world's army deserves this !

Weeks before hostilities erupted between Indian and Pakistani troops in the Kargil sector in 1999, Gen Pervez Musharraf crossed the Line of Control in a helicopter and spent a night at a location 11 km inside Indian territory, a former aide to the military ruler has said.

Col (retired) Ashfaq Hussain, who was a senior officer in the Pakistan Army's media arm, said Musharraf flew across the LoC on March 28, 1999 and travelled 11 km into the Indian side.

Musharraf, who was accompanied by Brig Masood Aslam, then commander of 80 Brigade, spent the night at a spot called Zikria Mustaqar, where Pakistani troops commanded by Col Amjad Shabbir were present.

Musharraf, who was then army chief, returned the next day.

V K Singh praises Musharraf's 'courage'

Former Pakistan military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf on Friday received praise for coming deep into Indian territory in Kargil in 1999 from former Army chief Gen V K Singh, who said it showed the "courage" of a military commander.

Singh, who headed the Indian Army from 2010 to 2012, said there were "mistakes" on the Indian side that allowed Pakistani troops to cross over into Indian territory and let Musharraf go back safely.

"As far as General Musharraf is concerned, I would like to put it in two ways. One, as a military commander, I would commend Gen Musharraf for coming 11 km (inside Indian territory) to stay with his troops for a night. It is the courage of a military commander that he came so far knowing that there was danger," Singh told reporters here.

"Second, what was happening on our side you all know and facts are before you. Why did we allow him to go? Why did we allow them to enter? I would only say that there were some mistakes, which need to be rectified," he said.

Singh was commenting on the revelation by a senior retired officer of Pakistan Army that Musharraf had stayed for a night inside Indian territory with his troops before the three-month conflict erupted in Kargil in 1999. The former Army chief said the revelation was just a confirmation that Pakistan had started the Kargil war. "What happened in 1999, we including the Indian Army know that Pakistan Army had started the Kargil war. There is nothing new in it," Singh said.
Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#36566 Feb 1, 2013
Vibrator wrote:
<quoted text>
What is going on old man? Itching for some fist fights? Do you know what a fistfcuk is? There was a tramp like you I met in bay area SF and he was obstinate like you but after I gave him a fistfcuk ...... he goes on a wheelchair to take a dump. Needs special taxi to reach a railway station.
Sally = vibrator!
Vibrator

Tokyo, Japan

#36567 Feb 1, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Sally = vibrator!
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Sally = vibrator!
Do you deny the following sequence of events?

You wrote:-
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Sally= Man?
NB: Hindi "Kamal" is from Sanskrit and Sanskrit is the mother of all Ind0 Arayan languages.
Sally replied
SaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
I can't show you my Dik from here so for now take my word for it.
You coaxed again due to your itch
Dak-Original wrote:
sally = she male?
How do you want to understand that fcuking around with us will not be tolerated. You will get what you seek for. Understood?
Roger

Ashburn, VA

#36568 Feb 1, 2013
Reacting to the ban on Vishwaroopam, an angry Anupam Kher says our leaders are indulging in 'appeasement politics'

Anupam Kher is furious and he is making every effort possible to show his anger and frustration to put across his message that we Indians are responsible for the sorry state of affairs that surround us. While addressing the issue of creative gagging by political parties and self-appointed religious leaders - the case in point being that of Vishwaroopam - Anupam said, "We Indians are responsible for our sorry state. We are used to slavery and taking nonsense from all - Mughals, British and now our own people."

The actor, speaking at a press meet in Delhi, further said, "I'm very sad to hear that in UP, the Samajwadi Party is mulling over banning the Hindi version of Vishwaroopam. Today it is religion, tomorrow it could be anything. No matter what kind of films you make - aap dharmik filmein banaye ya samaajik filmein, if people have to point out something, they will do it in any case. And because we're giving power to them, by paying heed to what they are saying, tomorrow anyone can stand up and say 'why do you have this song in the film?' Or 'why is the woman dressed in a certain dress?'"

Terming the controversy "ridiculous", Anupam said, "We, as the people of India are shamelessly spineless. As a former Censor Board chief, I condemn the banning of Vishwaroopam. We have a body called the Censor Board that takes care of all such things - if they have cleared the film, I don't see what the problem is in releasing it? Why should a director send scripts to ten different people for approval? That is not right, and it feels we are going back to the Dark Ages. Earlier, movies were viewed as a source of entertainment - now, they are dissected on the basis of religion and caste and what not, and the government actually listens to such people! This is bizarre. I'm sorry, but then I'll have to say that our leaders are indulging in appeasement politics. And because of them, we have to please such people."
Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#36569 Feb 1, 2013
Vibrator wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Do you deny the following sequence of events?
You wrote:-
<quoted text>
Sally replied
<quoted text>
You coaxed again due to your itch
<quoted text>
How do you want to understand that fcuking around with us will not be tolerated. You will get what you seek for. Understood?
vibrator = jfv = sally
DAK-Original

Danielson, CT

#36573 Feb 1, 2013
Observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Yo Old fart ! Dak means = Dallo Koi meri gand mein
So, shall we work on your ass since you are literally pleading to come to our game? Or you want to be left untouched, scum?
What game? Gulli danda, kabaddi or your favorite sleep shadow boxing??
LMAOROFL !!!!!
DAK-Original

Danielson, CT

#36574 Feb 1, 2013
Vibrator wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Do you deny the following sequence of events?
You wrote:-
<quoted text>
Sally replied
<quoted text>
You coaxed again due to your itch
<quoted text>
How do you want to understand that fcuking around with us will not be tolerated. You will get what you seek for. Understood?
Tolerated? You sound like a frustrated kindergarten school teacher chiding his toddler kid students.
Get back in the gutter where you belong, Sally!

Sally come on in
Sally shut the door
Hop onto the bed
Or I'll fck you on the floor
Ya Mustafa, Ya Mustafa
Ya Mustafa, Ya..........

Heh heh heh heh heh

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#36576 Feb 1, 2013
Sally is most popular name of Randis in Brazil....so much so that if you name ur daughter Sally , schools will groom her up for rock-chick randi automaticaly!

So much so that if you marry a Sally, invariably every moring you will leave 20 USD under her pillow.......

Ha.....ha....And Chaddi oos Sally ka bhi chaddi chura liya !

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36579 Feb 1, 2013
Robert Mckinsey wrote:
A third world's army deserves this !
Weeks before hostilities erupted between Indian and Pakistani troops in the Kargil sector in 1999, Gen Pervez Musharraf crossed the Line of Control in a helicopter and spent a night at a location 11 km inside Indian territory, a former aide to the military ruler has said.
Col (retired) Ashfaq Hussain, who was a senior officer in the Pakistan Army's media arm, said Musharraf flew across the LoC on March 28, 1999 and travelled 11 km into the Indian side.
Musharraf, who was accompanied by Brig Masood Aslam, then commander of 80 Brigade, spent the night at a spot called Zikria Mustaqar, where Pakistani troops commanded by Col Amjad Shabbir were present.
Musharraf, who was then army chief, returned the next day.
V K Singh praises Musharraf's 'courage'
Former Pakistan military ruler Gen Pervez Musharraf on Friday received praise for coming deep into Indian territory in Kargil in 1999 from former Army chief Gen V K Singh, who said it showed the "courage" of a military commander.
Singh, who headed the Indian Army from 2010 to 2012, said there were "mistakes" on the Indian side that allowed Pakistani troops to cross over into Indian territory and let Musharraf go back safely.
"As far as General Musharraf is concerned, I would like to put it in two ways. One, as a military commander, I would commend Gen Musharraf for coming 11 km (inside Indian territory) to stay with his troops for a night. It is the courage of a military commander that he came so far knowing that there was danger," Singh told reporters here.
"Second, what was happening on our side you all know and facts are before you. Why did we allow him to go? Why did we allow them to enter? I would only say that there were some mistakes, which need to be rectified," he said.
Singh was commenting on the revelation by a senior retired officer of Pakistan Army that Musharraf had stayed for a night inside Indian territory with his troops before the three-month conflict erupted in Kargil in 1999. The former Army chief said the revelation was just a confirmation that Pakistan had started the Kargil war. "What happened in 1999, we including the Indian Army know that Pakistan Army had started the Kargil war. There is nothing new in it," Singh said.
...Please .."UNDERSTAND"..!!.. .Muslims leaders are prone to exaggeration ...Every one talks big , claims victory ...yada yada yada ....

Musharraf has "only" seen India ,from a "map" ..!!

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36580 Feb 1, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
vibrator = jfv = sally
..."Dak-original" ....Do you remember that Autistic poster ...???.."caca is how you say shit in Spanish" ..."I like being Autistic"..??

They, have incredibly "wicked sharp" minds ...just, very odd personalities ....

I think this is "one" person ..He having ,me jump at shadows ...

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36581 Feb 1, 2013
Sher e Panjab wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont know y we cannot just be friends and settle it with a few peghs in the back of the pind.
brown noser ...show some pride ...tell "harminder" where to get the f**k off ..

He's a f**king asshole ...He knows it ...!!..and, He's okay with it too ...

He really believes Islam is Satanic ...must be stopped , and never to be trusted ........He doesn't kill anybody , though ..

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36582 Feb 1, 2013
Roger wrote:
Reacting to the ban on Vishwaroopam, an angry Anupam Kher says our leaders are indulging in 'appeasement politics'

Terming the controversy "ridiculous", Anupam said, "We, as the people of India are shamelessly spineless. As a former Censor Board chief, I condemn the banning of Vishwaroopam.
..nein..nein..nein..!!..You are "not" spineless ,neither is "yauheyda" ,nor "HAJI KAJI" ,nor "MUQ",nor "Tyr Bloodaxe"...and "harminder"..forget about it ..

Anupam does not know the Indians I know ..

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36583 Feb 1, 2013
Neutral Judge wrote:
<quoted text>
You Sir are the greatest. I admire you for your courage and totally unbiased posts. Carry on and keep up the good work. As a Pakistani Muslim I salute you and offer my Salaams.
I really don't deserve this ..!!!..But, you are welcome "neutral"...stay brown ...!!

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#36584 Feb 1, 2013
HAJI KAJI wrote:
I wonder why a**hole are fighting over Kashmir or POK or IOK? I have a map of India where whole Pakistan is shown as KOI (Kattu occupied India)!
Probably next war will be over that ! Why to worry ? India need to just open the dams on river ...or close the tap, and Pakistan will be No Mans Land with wet ammunition, and nukes ......!
BTW Israel's entry in Syrian game makes the game interesting.....warana kattu vs Kattu annihilation is loosing charm day by day ! sala ...dead kaatu head count stopped making headlines even !
Trust me , someday Chaddi and MUQ will be missing from forum forever....without any clue ! b'henchod E kallu Islam ke thekeydaar ankrda ban-ney ki haisiet bhi nahi rakhtey hein !
F**K THAT.!!..THINGS ARE GETTING SCARIER ...."not" INTERESTING ...

Another War ...a Big One "too"......!!..Where nobody knows who are the combatants and who are the innocents ..

All for Oil...blood for oil ...mankind is doing just "great" ..!!
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#36585 Feb 1, 2013
IM2000 wrote:
1

(1)

Dear Muq,




(2)
@ Muq

About this Book, The Sealed Nectar - It has been written for the Islamic world and is meant to strengthen the views of the followers of Islam and I am of the opinion to avoid reading completely biased biographies either too-Muslim or anti-Muslim and in this case the author has made Mohammed literally walk on water while there are many, who on the other hand, paint him as a thug. I avoid falling in to such a bracket.

...to continue in total 4 parts....

3.

(3)

@ Muq

If at all I ever get interested in Mohammed and Islam, I would rather read more balanced biographies on your prophet from the likes of Karen Armstrong, Martin Lings or Tarik Ramadan.

My intention was not hurt you because if you read all points with a cool mind, the prophet has not been insulted at all.

...... to be concluded in the next part ...
Ans.

To Brother IM 2000

Thank you for your reply. I do not doubt your intentions.

But I do not like this practice of "learning about life of our prophet from Non Muslim sources to start with".

Because the purpose of these Non Muslim writers is to create confusion and doubt in minds of people.

They make mountain out of molehills and molehills out of mountains.

Like our prophet's marriage to Lady Aiysha, it was a very normal marriage, about which no one in contemporary Arabia raised any objection. But to our Modern day Western Writers this has become a "Bomb Shell".

Reason, they "just discovered" that age of Lady Aiyesha is some book has mentioned as 9 years, now this has given them a WMD to beat Muslims with.

Before reading any book, you should read the preface, what is the purpose of the person writing any book.

These western writers use Islamic sources , but whenever it goes against their "own theories" they circumvent it and insert their own views into it.

If the reader is not fully aware of the situation, he gets confused.

So the best way is first to study Quran and life of prophet from the True Islamic sources and if you get any doubt, ask Muslims first.

And then you can read these books written by Non Muslims and if you are sincere and honest, you will see their mistakes.

No Single Western Writers is able to present one Model for our prophet. They post as if he was made of "many personalities" and was switching between one to other.

Such a human can only exist in their imaginations and not in reality.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#36586 Feb 1, 2013
harminder wrote:
<quoted text>
when defeated in logic and military action….this muslim becomes philosophical. THATS the quality of a few Indian Muslims ))
India evicted the pakistani forces who had occupied the kargil heights at night times
))
the Indian forces got the land back from typical greedy land encroaching muslims
))
they were not unauthorised people
they had the full material and logistical backing of the pakistan armed forces AND had pakistani army regulars in their ranks commanding and guiding them
this is ADMITTED by the then paki army chief musharraf and paki pm nawaz sharif
Cursing like an old lady, are you?

What India really won at Kargil, I am still unable to understand?

How come the "intruder" came and occupied Indian land and no one observed it?

Then India made so much hue and cry as if sky was to fall, to cover up their own negligence.

And now trumpets like you are displaying your failures as "A Big Victory".

Talk logic my dear, do not get emotional.

And to top it all, there was coffin scandal, and the same Bofors guns that were declared as full of holes and corruptions came to India's rescue.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#36587 Feb 1, 2013
Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum,(THE SEALED NECTAR, Biography of the Noble Prophet [pbuh], by SAFI UL RAHMAN al-Mubarakpuri
Jamia Salafia - India Translated by Issam Diab Maktaba Dar-us-Salam Publishers and Distributors, Part- 65
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/SM_t...

The Battle of Uhud (Contd.)

The Messenger of Allah [pbuh] implants the Spirit of Bravery among his Armed Forces

The Messenger of Allah [pbuh] forbade the Muslims to start the fight without having an order from him. He, then, wore two armours — a front armour and a back one. He urged his Companions to fight and spurred them to show stamina and steadfastness at fight. He started to implant the spirit of boldness and bravery in them. To wage and inflame his Companions and in order to standfast in the fight…

Recruitment of the Makkan Army

The idolaters applied the rows system in the mobilization of their army. The general leadership of the army was entrusted to Abu Sufyan Sakhr bin Harb, who would be in the centre-position of the army. Khalid bin Al-Waleed was on the right wing; whereas ‘Ikrima, the son of Abu Jahl was on the left. Safwan bin Omaiya was in charge of infantry men. The archers were under the command of ‘Abdullah bin Abi Rabi‘a.

As for the standard, a squad of Bani ‘Abd Ad-Dar were in charge to bear it. Thus was the distribution of the posts of the army ever since ‘Abd Munaf had already assigned them. This assignment had been inherited from Qusai bin Kilab — as we have previously alluded to in an early phase of this book. No one had the right to compete them with it. It was consistent with their traditions that they had inherited from their ancestors….

Political Manoeuvres of Quraish

A little time before the break out of the battle, Quraish made some endeavours to sow the seeds of discord and dispute among the Muslims. First, Abu Sufyan sent to the Helpers a message saying: "Leave us alone to fight our cousins and do not interfere. If you stand aside, we will not fight you; for fighting you is not a target of ours." But that attempt proved to be fruitless. What could such a wicked scheme do to those whose Faith was as solid and firm as mountains?! The Helpers reply was undoubtedly disappointing and contrary to Abu Sufyan’s expectations.…


The effort of Quraishite Women at waging the Zeal of Men
Quraishi-women participated in the battle led by the wife of Abu Sufyan, Hind bint ‘Utbah. They wandered among the rows of the idolaters, tapped on tambourines, encouraged men to fight, inflamed the emotions of heroes, lancers, swordsmen and brave fighters.

"If you fight (bravely), we will embrace
and unfold mats to welcome you.
But if you flee from the battlefield, we leave you,
Desert you and no more love you."

(Abridged
Contd.)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Islam Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 4 min Smiling Kat 453,452
News Who Is Allah? (Aug '07) 37 min J RULES 225,382
Why do muslims drink camel pee? 1 hr Truth is truth 31
Coalition Air Strike Gets Another Top IS Comman... 1 hr bmz 22
What's happening in Angola? 2 hr supersonic boom 4
News Malaysian Islamic body bans yoga for Muslims (Nov '08) 3 hr laskar shalahudin 4,189
Prophet MUHAMMAD (Sep '12) 3 hr Dawn of Reality 1,890
Jesus Christ was a Palestinian Muslim. 4 hr Mujahid 540
The Biggest Lie: Holocaust. 6 hr Baron44 790
More from around the web