No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54734 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#35955 Jan 23, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
1. So you think that "partial redressal during past 60 odd years have washed out the sins of Hindu caste system for thousands of years"?
2. If you read my posts, it is not us versus them, I said that ALL major religions started as revelation from God Almighty. Then most got changed and corrupted at the hands of their followers.
This is the much broader outlook than what you have said about my position.
3. Why Oil Rich Saudi Arabia settle Palestinians in their country and leave the Palestine to Jews? Why cant India call back all Hindus from Kashmir and give that land to Pakistan?
Is that your way to solve international problems? Why cant all Jews be shipped back to USA and enjoy life there and there is peace and tranquility in Palestine?
04. If there is no "justification" for God talking to someone, then is there any "justification" for God to let humans wander in search of truth and there be no guidance?
Would that be handiwork of a Merciful God or a Sadistic God?
Obviously you people do not think before you write your posts.
05. Most of killings in past 200 years have been due to non religious issues than religious issues, you have no idea of world's conflicts and wars in past 200 years.
Your jihadist agenda shows through your own post. Your basis is about muslims ruling the world and to use poor Palestinians in that aim! If religions are important then Jews have far more stronger claim on Jerusalam than muslims. If vengeance is vital as you quote vengeance tales of 1400 years ago, then would Jews demand to be returned to Medina? LOL!

I believe the real GOD will punish likes of you. All religions have proved to be work of humans. Evolution of Specis is a fact that no religion mentioned. I believe Real GOD would be "smiling benignly" or how GOD do at the folly of humans.

Reasons for for are not always religions but religions should never ever be the reason for laying one's life or to kill others.#religions are mere beliefs. OH! MUQ!
Allah-

Shanghai, China

#35956 Jan 23, 2013
ChhaliA mera naam, Chhalna mera kaam,
Hindoo Muslim Sikh Isai, saab merey liey saman !

Since: Aug 12

Wakefield, U.K.

#35957 Jan 23, 2013
Whoops wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! How can a sane man even attempt to waste hid time thus? Soniaji Gandhi and Manmohanji Singh cannot be said to represent Hindus or even their own personal faith or faith of their birth!
You do not understand secular governance to which the vast majority of India have subscribed to for the past 65 years. You better cross the border and that would at the least teach you the difference.
I hope your parents are not reading your posts or else they should/would be truly ashamed of you.
instead of wasting time like this why don't you dig the net and give us the proof that Bhanot is a Hindu and he attended the wedding in the capacity of a Hindu and not OBE. I have looked everywhere - all possible bad sites good sites but no where it says that he is a Hindu.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

May the Force be with You .

#35958 Jan 23, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So now you are picking on Akbar the Great!!
I have no problem because he is not a role model for Muslims!!
PS:
As an analogy I can say that since Thousands of Anti Muslims riot took place in the reign of "Every Prime Minister of India for past 60 years"…. so each and every Prime Minister of India was a Murderer of Muslims.
Perhaps this would drive some sense into your "inferiority complex filled mind"
What have the Muslims done in India to warrant such death ?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#35959 Jan 23, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. We are not "free" to interpret religious scriptures in ANY way we like. It is the job of experts and they should give proofs as to why they chose any particular interpretation.
02. Islam has a fully recorded history starting from our prophet to the modern time. Any interpretation one wants to take must match with actions and sayings of prophet and his companions and earliest muslims. We are not "free" to choose any interpretation we can based on Dictionary.
An alternate meaning is taken when it does not concern any fundamentals of islam and which was not known at that time, because Quran has sufficient flexibility to cover all periods.
03. So now you are trying to teach me Arabic, are you.
The Arabic word used for Allah is that "He is KHAIRUL MAKIREEN" to translate as "Biggest deceiver" is itself wrong?
Does KHAIR means big? In which dictionary you find that KHAIR means Big?
The correct translation is therefore "Allah is the BEST of deceivers" The adjective "Best" itself shows that it is to be used in positive sense and not in negative sense.
MAKR in Arabic means "secret planning" also, the Quranic verse says that "Enemies of Islam" make secret plans to defeat propagation of Islam , and Allah also made a "secret plan to defeat the plan of Enemies of Islam" and Allah's plan succeeded because "He is the Best of Secret Planners"!!
The enemies "Plan to defeat Islam is to be taken in negative sense" and "Allah's plan to defeat is to be taken in Positive sense"!!
It is not in your purview to teach me Arabic by using a dictionary!!
How you explain this Doha from Bihari:
KANAK KANAK TE SAU GUNI MADAKTA ADHIKAYE
WA KHAYE BAURAI HAI, YA PAYE BURAYE.
You should use a single word for translating KANAK in both places!!
You know something, for all your attempts to put a positive spin on that passage, the writer of that passage must have wanted to convey a more mundane message that is far removed from the sublime interpretations of later day islamic apologists. It's not as if during the days of Koranic compilation the arabic language was very primitive leaving writers with a limited choice of words. Even you will agree that arabic language during the times of koranic compilation possessed sufficient vocabulary and content to convey clear unambiguous messages.

Now let's take your version of that passage where Allah comes out smelling of roses from this whole deception game. You say that Allah's deception is to tilt the balance in favor of good, as opposed to the deception of evil doers. To put it in a more flattering tone, it can even be said that Allah possess far greater intelligence than anybody and so he can outwit and hoodwink better than anybody else. So then what is my problem with such an understanding?

My problem is that either way this interpretation doesn't do justice to the character of God. The apologist islamic version of Allah fails to lift him from the human sphere into the divine sphere, even though his behavior may be the best in the human sphere. When you agree that God is the creator of this universe, then don't you think that there needs to be a more sublime understanding of his character? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say that God counters deception with transparency and not greater or better deception, counters darkness with light and not greater or better darkness. The statement, "Man proposes and God disposes" is much more nearer to a truer understanding of God's character.

I could discern a tint of anger and irritation when you asked me whether I'm trying to teach you arabic. Well, I have no time to learn arabic, leave alone teach it to anybody. But being a stalwart defender of Islam, people expect to see you putting a far more credible defense than the one you have put up now.

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

May the Force be with You .

#35960 Jan 23, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Your jihadist agenda shows through your own post. Your basis is about muslims ruling the world and to use poor Palestinians in that aim! If religions are important then Jews have far more stronger claim on Jerusalam than muslims. If vengeance is vital as you quote vengeance tales of 1400 years ago, then would Jews demand to be returned to Medina? LOL!
I believe the real GOD will punish likes of you. All religions have proved to be work of humans. Evolution of Species is a fact that no religion mentioned. I believe Real GOD would be "smiling benignly" or how GOD do at the folly of humans.
Reasons for for are not always religions but religions should never ever be the reason for laying one's life or to kill others.#religions are mere beliefs. OH! MUQ!
So that means that the Jews are entitled to the lands that Muhammad new of when he was alive.
How much area would that cover and who is living there ?
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35961 Jan 23, 2013
Dragnet52 wrote:
<quoted text>You know something, for all your attempts to put a positive spin on that passage, the writer of that passage must have wanted to convey a more mundane message that is far removed from the sublime interpretations of later day islamic apologists. It's not as if during the days of Koranic compilation the arabic language was very primitive leaving writers with a limited choice of words. Even you will agree that arabic language during the times of koranic compilation possessed sufficient vocabulary and content to convey clear unambiguous messages.
Now let's take your version of that passage where Allah comes out smelling of roses from this whole deception game. You say that Allah's deception is to tilt the balance in favor of good, as opposed to the deception of evil doers. To put it in a more flattering tone, it can even be said that Allah possess far greater intelligence than anybody and so he can outwit and hoodwink better than anybody else. So then what is my problem with such an understanding?
My problem is that either way this interpretation doesn't do justice to the character of God. The apologist islamic version of Allah fails to lift him from the human sphere into the divine sphere, even though his behavior may be the best in the human sphere. When you agree that God is the creator of this universe, then don't you think that there needs to be a more sublime understanding of his character? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say that God counters deception with transparency and not greater or better deception, counters darkness with light and not greater or better darkness. The statement, "Man proposes and God disposes" is much more nearer to a truer understanding of God's character.
I could discern a tint of anger and irritation when you asked me whether I'm trying to teach you arabic. Well, I have no time to learn arabic, leave alone teach it to anybody. But being a stalwart defender of Islam, people expect to see you putting a far more credible defense than the one you have put up now.
...Damn it...."Dragnet52" ..!!...Why, must you always used facts and logic ..to scuttle our arguments ...???
The Phoenix Riseth

Mumbai, India

#35963 Jan 23, 2013
Dragnet52 wrote:
<quoted text>You know something, for all your attempts to put a positive spin on that passage, the writer of that passage must have wanted to convey a more mundane message that is far removed from the sublime interpretations of later day islamic apologists. It's not as if during the days of Koranic compilation the arabic language was very primitive leaving writers with a limited choice of words. Even you will agree that arabic language during the times of koranic compilation possessed sufficient vocabulary and content to convey clear unambiguous messages.
Now let's take your version of that passage where Allah comes out smelling of roses from this whole deception game. You say that Allah's deception is to tilt the balance in favor of good, as opposed to the deception of evil doers. To put it in a more flattering tone, it can even be said that Allah possess far greater intelligence than anybody and so he can outwit and hoodwink better than anybody else. So then what is my problem with such an understanding?
My problem is that either way this interpretation doesn't do justice to the character of God. The apologist islamic version of Allah fails to lift him from the human sphere into the divine sphere, even though his behavior may be the best in the human sphere. When you agree that God is the creator of this universe, then don't you think that there needs to be a more sublime understanding of his character? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say that God counters deception with transparency and not greater or better deception, counters darkness with light and not greater or better darkness. The statement, "Man proposes and God disposes" is much more nearer to a truer understanding of God's character.
I could discern a tint of anger and irritation when you asked me whether I'm trying to teach you arabic. Well, I have no time to learn arabic, leave alone teach it to anybody. But being a stalwart defender of Islam, people expect to see you putting a far more credible defense than the one you have put up now.
BRILLIANT!!!

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#35964 Jan 23, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Chump change,
Our in-house pansy has been on record to admit that he is biased against Muslims and for him, I happen to be a Muslim. What does a biased ones do? To lean towards something because they don't like something else, or they like something more than something else. Goes hand in hand with discrimination and prejudice.
The fdgepaker has also admitted, when asked to highlight any of your posts that he thought outdid me, that there was none and those were my own posts that gave him an impression that I was a Paki and a Muslim. So, cool off buster ! Even your own can not compliment you properly and without making it look highly questionable.
Now if this effeminate personality says something that happens to be degrading for you then it is to be taken for facts as to how he/she is literally thinking about you in his mind and if he says something that happens to be a praise for me then it is due to his true inner feelings. Overtly he would say things to support your cause and downplay my impact.
Calling you a numskull or not so intelligent were a part of his thoughts that this fagg0t couldn't control and said it loudly here. This is pretty common with such guys. A typical example of this guy is Armand (pink shirt) of bird cage movie. He is the one you can easily identify in the clip enclosed. enjoy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =nVe057Sm1kUXX
Again, look at the contents of your above post in question - only jugglery going on - kaam ki saali koi baat nahin. Like you, your talk is all BS.
Rag Doll,

There is one thing for which I should give you full marks. You know how to construct high philosophy around petty squabbling. You know how to dramatize a petty squabble with interesting details and this makes you look like a poor man's playwright.

Your irritation and anger is easily discernible in your posts, so much so that, others think that you are an easy game. You think that your name calling is having a great effect on your opponents, which is why you persist with this despite all evidence to the contrary. Your name calling is more like a rocket being launched from its launcher with a lot of smoke, sound and fury, but failing to explode upon landing on its target. I would suggest that you stop firing dud rockets and write something more substantive. As for BS, please show us what is the antonym of BS with real examples .
The Phoenix Riseth

Mumbai, India

#35966 Jan 23, 2013
Dragnet52 wrote:
<quoted text>Rag Doll,
There is one thing for which I should give you full marks. You know how to construct high philosophy around petty squabbling. You know how to dramatize a petty squabble with interesting details and this makes you look like a poor man's playwright.
Your irritation and anger is easily discernible in your posts, so much so that, others think that you are an easy game. You think that your name calling is having a great effect on your opponents, which is why you persist with this despite all evidence to the contrary. Your name calling is more like a rocket being launched from its launcher with a lot of smoke, sound and fury, but failing to explode upon landing on its target. I would suggest that you stop firing dud rockets and write something more substantive. As for BS, please show us what is the antonym of BS with real examples .
BRILLIANT AGAIN!!!
Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#35967 Jan 23, 2013
steadyfreind wrote:
<quoted text>
instead of wasting time like this why don't you dig the net and give us the proof that Bhanot is a Hindu and he attended the wedding in the capacity of a Hindu and not OBE. I have looked everywhere - all possible bad sites good sites but no where it says that he is a Hindu.
Poor Whoops! Was not supposed to post on this thread! Anyhow, these silly games are not my reason to post here.

..Or Bhanot is a muslim who lied to infiltrate the Hindu Council!LOL! Is it you? What a pride sake chaddi, you are!.Only if MUQ like have their way will likes of you regret playing "taqiya! games whilst living non-musli9ms lives! BTW, I did meet Bhanot once at a civic reception once.(:
Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#35968 Jan 23, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
What have the Muslims done in India to warrant such death ?
MUQ was implying that Hindus died in Moghul times due to their own fault. If only all of them had accepted Islam, then some die hard Hindu posters here would not be blaming the rulers of those era!!!
OH! MUQ!
Dak-Original

Southampton, UK

#35969 Jan 23, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means that the Jews are entitled to the lands that Muhammad new of when he was alive.
How much area would that cover and who is living there ?
I am not saying such things but if a Jewish person avails to MUQ's convoluted "logic" then a he/she can make those demands, too.

Since: Aug 12

Wakefield, U.K.

#35970 Jan 23, 2013
Dragnet52 wrote:
<quoted text>Rag Doll,.........

Your irritation and anger is easily discernible in your posts, so much so that, others think that you are an easy game. You think that your name calling is having a great effect on your opponents, which is why you persist with this despite all evidence to the contrary. Your name calling is more like a rocket being launched from its launcher with a lot of smoke, sound and fury, but failing to explode upon landing on its target. I would suggest that you stop firing dud rockets and write something more substantive. As for BS, please show us what is the antonym of BS with real examples .
How about you, Bhen ke lund ? Speaking about name calling - aren't you doing just the same? At least you are letting your state known that you are highly irritated and easily discernible and like a dud rocket with lot of smoke, sound and fury, but failing to explode upon landing on its target.

I am not making this up but letting you know how anyone with common sense would make out about your state of mind. You look visible shaken now.

“Kradvanto Viswam Aryam ”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#35971 Jan 23, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So now you are picking on Akbar the Great!!
I have no problem because he is not a role model for Muslims!!
PS:
As an analogy I can say that since Thousands of Anti Muslims riot took place in the reign of "Every Prime Minister of India for past 60 years"…. so each and every Prime Minister of India was a Murderer of Muslims.
Perhaps this would drive some sense into your "inferiority complex filled mind"
Write the name of that prime minister with proof who ever ordered to kill the Muhammadans otherwise shut up because you never say any logical thing with solid proof . We are discussing this matter on solid historical proofs not on baseless stories .

Since: Aug 12

Wakefield, U.K.

#35972 Jan 23, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Bhanot is a muslim who lied to infiltrate the Hindu Council!LOL! Is it you? What a pride sake chaddi, you are!.Only if MUQ like have their way will likes of you regret playing "taqiya!
Be balanced. look on the other side how one man is all the way taqia. He comes under a new name hourly but you are simply OK.
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text> BTW, I did meet Bhanot once at a civic reception once.(:
how did you find him?
Pskak

Ashburn, VA

#35973 Jan 23, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Parhtey jaiyee, kabhi na kabhi to khatam hogi. Web site per ja kar dekh lijiye abhi kitne episode aur hain. Kyon na aap lambi chutti per chale jaiyen?
janab apke islam ke hisab se kisi nek insan ko BORE kerne ki kya saza dega ALLALH?
Chump Change

Ardsley, NY

#35974 Jan 23, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Whoops! Was not supposed to post on this thread! Anyhow, these silly games are not my reason to post here.
..Or Bhanot is a muslim who lied to infiltrate the Hindu Council!LOL! Is it you? What a pride sake chaddi, you are!.Only if MUQ like have their way will likes of you regret playing "taqiya! games whilst living non-musli9ms lives! BTW, I did meet Bhanot once at a civic reception once.(:
... and Bhanot was wearing his OBE outfit with a humongous cross on a chain reading out Bhagwad Gita..!!!:):)
Dak-original

Ashburn, VA

#35975 Jan 23, 2013
yaudheya wrote:
<quoted text>We are discussing this matter on solid historical proofs not on baseless stories .
ye bta bhosdi ke,ye proofs mila kaise tjhe?were u alive at that time to witness it?

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

May the Force be with You .

#35977 Jan 23, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not saying such things but if a Jewish person avails to MUQ's convoluted "logic" then a he/she can make those demands, too.
If the logic is correct then the Jewish presence would be legitimate going on their ancestral homelands that were acknowledged by Muhhumud.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Islam Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Postal survey: gay Muslims shake off conservati... 1 hr Prosperity Fundie... 50
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 3 hr chazmo 520,647
Evil speech by Trump at UN 6 hr T-bag 17
News Headscarf issue in mug shot illuminates conflic... Tue Seatbelt Dongbutter 7
News Ted Cruz: Excluding Muslims from presidency is ... (Sep '15) Tue Khan 17
Just to make muslims mad Tue Bankster 6
News Muslim group slams #Trump on mosque closing (Oct '15) Tue Tooboo4u 10
More from around the web