No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54739 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

MUQ --ki -bibi

Shanghai, China

#35815 Jan 21, 2013
Beta bura na manana ...terE budhdhey Abbu ki E paidaishi halat haey.....marduA katey lund kE sath hi paida hua tha !
MUQ --ka -bachcha wrote:
Bhosrdiwaley budhdhey.....tuney apney ghar mein kabhi raj kiA jo katu O ki awam par raj karney ki baat karta haey ? Dozen bhar bachchey paida kaar , onki lund kaat ke barbad kaar khud Arabia mein balu fankney bhagg gaya haey...aur raj karney ki baat karta haey !
Tu 100 saal jiey,
taki bardey hou kaar haam tera khun piey !
<quoted text>

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35816 Jan 21, 2013
MUQ wrote:
Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum,(THE SEALED NECTAR, Biography of the Noble Prophet [pbuh], by SAFI UL RAHMAN al-Mubarakpuri
Jamia Salafia - India Translated by Issam Diab Maktaba Dar-us-Salam Publishers and Distributors, Part- 60
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/SM_t...
Compaign of Bani Qainuqa‘
We have already spoken about the treaty that the Prophet [pbuh] signed with the Jews. He was very careful to abide by it to the letter and the Muslims did not show the least violation of any of its provisions. The Jews, however, whose natural disposition is closely linked to treachery, betrayal and covenant-breaching, could not rid themselves of the tradition of theirs, and started a process of intrigues and troublemaking with the aim of producing schism in the growing solid Muslim ranks. Here is a relevant model of their behaviour: Shas bin Qais, an elderly Jew, a terrible disbeliever and a greatly envious man of the Muslims,
..You besmirch an innocent people ....."MUQ"....have no you reason..

Fact) Mohammad conquered all the tribes of the Saudi Peninsula .....

A) Can we assume that every tribe , Mohammad encounter ..turned out to be sneaky and duplicitous

B) Or that Mohammad was a conquer and pirate ..

The Jews are the only tribe demonized ...in Muslim text ...is because Mohammad entered into a treaty with them , which he himself broke ......that looks bad, for posterity ....why, not rewrite history , blame the innocent Jews ...they're not going to complain ....and viola'

Mohammad's crime is buried ..

evidence .....look at the most corrupt countries of the world ..........Israel is missing , Muslim nations own half of the top ten ...

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#35817 Jan 21, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess it is time for you and I to take on each other directly since your clones have failed to create a positive image for you. After all hundreds of clones, you are branded by your own side as "chump change" and me a "monster" ! LOL ! Looks like we both need to work hard to shed such stigmas.
It is no secret that you have defined me someone who has no life, no future, no substance, no character, no education and zero accomplishments. Right?
Just presenting one of such repetitive posts from you
<quoted text>
Then, why in the world you are logged on to my posts? If there is nothing -no substance in my post then why in the world you are so perturbed and burning midnight oil to counter whatever I am writing ? There is a poster called "Yaudhya" to whom you hold in high esteem but I can assure you that for me he is the chutiya most poster ever born on this planet who would fit in to every word you have chosen for me in the post above and I have never told him that. Maybe one or two kick on his ass to get him out of my way but I have not persisted him. It is damn irritating to see him here or even read what he writes. I do not ever read him. The fact is that since I think of all that shit about him, he becomes an automatic repellent for me. How come you don't treat me that way?
I will tell you why? Because whatever I write, it is nothing but the truth or some damn version of the truth. You know it and it burns you up and makes you feel impotent.
Why do you think that I make fun of your posts? Despite of being full of embellishments, vulgar display of unnecessary grammar and phrases it earns you merely a title of Chump change ? Yaudhya earns that title merely by breaking wind with impunity out here? Let me demonstrate as to why I mean such a deal for your posts. Let us take the post to which I am replying to you. Just see what you have quote in there?
As usual, you are praising yourself to the skies with gay abandon. I have no problems if you feel the need to constantly boost your personal ratings, though I wish that I can save time in having to read all that triumphant posturing in your posts. It takes time to cut through all that maze of ego trip in your posts before I can find the actual content.

Clubbing other posters with me could have some utility value for you, since that saves you time to come up with new derogatory phrases. I have been watching with amusement as to how you have been attaching the tag of "chump change" on half a dozen respectable posters. Number Four is clearly silent on the gaffe he committed when he uttered the word "chump change."

You might like to think that your posts burns me up and makes me feel impotent. I will not contest you on that score, because I think that is more of a pep talk on your part, something similar to the pep talk which athletes indulge in when they face formidable opponents.

For me there is no difference between Yaudheya and other posters here. All are trying to convey some viewpoint or the other. As far as our interaction is concerned, it was you who fired the first salvo. Right from the beginning you didn't like me for my honest articles on Islam. You came in the form of destroyer to stop me by adopting a carrot and stick policy. But my persistence must have grated on your nerves and you threw all norms of civilized behavior to the wind. The rest is history as they say.
MUQ --ki - bachchi

Shanghai, China

#35818 Jan 21, 2013
Apney thik kaha Ammijan !

E budhdha sudhreGa nahi...is life mein.....! Ekbaar meiney puchchhA ki ' Abbu aap itney saal sE farar hou aur itney mard ghar mein atey jatey rahtey hein.....sabki dharidi laambi, kala chehera saar paar Bra cup- saab apki tarah ! E tou bataO please ki merey abbu kaun haey ?"

Budhdhey nein eK thappard rasid di aur kaha " Merey sath saal hou gaey aaj taak mujhey nahi pata ki merey abbu kaun haey.....aur teri E jurrat ....????..jao Quran padhO saab likha haey wahan .....Mohammad haam saab ka baap haey '
MUQ --ki -bibi wrote:
Apney thik kaha haey bhai sahab (gali mat dena -bhai kaha haey).........
Mein yahan 12 bachchO kE liey jugard lagatey lagatey burdhiA hou gai aur E marduA Raj karney ki baat karta haey !
E budhdha bahut dino sE farar haey....meley tou ooski lungi utah kaar meri tarf sE bhi ek laat lagana !
Khuda hafiz
<quoted text>

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35819 Jan 21, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
Chuy,
To my question
Since you cannot quote exact number of participants it is safe to presume that you have no idea as to what is going on ?
You said
<quoted text>
You are not able to rationalize your actions but are able to make brand people as "chump change", "very very smart" and "monster" !You have no idea how many people are participating here but are able to feel that many of them are my shadows ?
To my question
Now, since you do affirm that Chump Change has three IDs then do name them please! Also name mine too.
You said
<quoted text>
I presume that you have no idea or taking a fifth here?
To my question
While you are at it, do present some posts from chump change where he has specifically convinced you that I am a Pakistani and a Muslim. It is very important to what you have alleged so it is now time for you to walk your talk.
You answered
<quoted text>
If it was my own writing style and not anything claimed by the chump change that convinced you that I am a Pakistani and have nefarious agenda and am using multiple IDs to congratulate myself then why in the world you wrote the following?
<quoted text>
Can you see what I am pointing at? You are disgruntled and biased and not a rational thinker as portray yourself to be.
....From my point of view ...I believe "Dragnet52" to be tossing "you" around like rag doll...

Mostly ,because he doesn't have the need to keep claiming victory .......I have offered "Observer" one of my kidneys ...has he been rubbing "that" in your face .....???

...as, absolutely "you" would be doing ..if the role was reversed ...

You are angry and hurt ..that is evident ..such is life , tomorrow is a different day ..

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#35820 Jan 21, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
A. Banu Quraizah:
If you do not have knowledge about some thing, is it not better to seek it before handing out "Your judgment".
Like we see so many people being killed in Kashmir at the hands of Indian army. If we were to pronounce "judgment" based on this bit of information only and put all the blame on Indian army, will it be justice and fair play?
First learn about the Banu Quraizah conflict from start to finish. What was their crime and why such extreme measures were taken against them. The way prophet dealt with them was an "exception" and not rule.
Banu Quraizah committed the treachery at the "most critical period" during the "survival fight" against the outside enemy. They stabbed Muslims in the back and they deserved "exemplary punishment"
And the punishment handed out to them was as per "their own book", so why should they complain? Will any Muslim complain if he / she be punished according to Islamic laws?
I have written a monograph on Banu Quriazah on why they were made an example.
Would you like me to post it on this thread?
B. Rape of Captured Women:
As least as an Indian you should not complain about rapes of captured women.
With news papers fill with cases of rapes and gang rapes of "free women" of every age, what right you have got to complain about rapes of "captured women".
If Hindu women performed Johar from "fear of Muslims" how come so many Hindu women were living in India after 1000 years of Muslim rule?
Do you mean to say they were "coward enough" to omit Johar and were "content" to be raped by Muslims?
In which light you are presenting your mothers and grandmothers, I cannot understand.
You seem to present "Modern days Hindus as warriors and brave and chaste" while you pretend that your ancestors were "cowards and timid and could be treated in any way any one wanted"….how come you "brave people" emerged from those cowardly ancestors?
I'm surprised to see that your standards are falling. How can you support Islam, which in your own words is perfect, with such a weak analogy of rapes occurring due to mismanagement of temporal affairs? You cannot use the standards of ordinary human behavior while measuring the worth of religions. Aren't religions supposed to set standards that are a cut above the rest when it comes to human behavior?

The exemplary punishment of Banu Quraizah smacks of vendetta arising out of a deep personal insult, rather than being prompted by a deep spiritual impulse. This seems to me to be an islamic version of corollary damage. If you can justify in this fashion, then Americans can well justify the civilian deaths in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#35821 Jan 21, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
A. Banu Quraizah:
If you do not have knowledge about some thing, is it not better to seek it before handing out "Your judgment".
Like we see so many people being killed in Kashmir at the hands of Indian army. If we were to pronounce "judgment" based on this bit of information only and put all the blame on Indian army, will it be justice and fair play?
First learn about the Banu Quraizah conflict from start to finish. What was their crime and why such extreme measures were taken against them. The way prophet dealt with them was an "exception" and not rule.
Banu Quraizah committed the treachery at the "most critical period" during the "survival fight" against the outside enemy. They stabbed Muslims in the back and they deserved "exemplary punishment"
And the punishment handed out to them was as per "their own book", so why should they complain? Will any Muslim complain if he / she be punished according to Islamic laws?
I have written a monograph on Banu Quriazah on why they were made an example.
Would you like me to post it on this thread?
B. Rape of Captured Women:
As least as an Indian you should not complain about rapes of captured women.
With news papers fill with cases of rapes and gang rapes of "free women" of every age, what right you have got to complain about rapes of "captured women".
If Hindu women performed Johar from "fear of Muslims" how come so many Hindu women were living in India after 1000 years of Muslim rule?
Do you mean to say they were "coward enough" to omit Johar and were "content" to be raped by Muslims?
In which light you are presenting your mothers and grandmothers, I cannot understand.
You seem to present "Modern days Hindus as warriors and brave and chaste" while you pretend that your ancestors were "cowards and timid and could be treated in any way any one wanted"….how come you "brave people" emerged from those cowardly ancestors?
Don't you think that it is better to stick to Dak's line that religions are inventions of human minds? That saves you a lot of trouble when you are asked to justify aspects of popular religions that militates against logic and ethics.

When you constantly say that Islam is a revealed religion, when you constantly say that Islam is so perfect that it needs no reform, aren't you setting up yourself for ridicule? Just look at one statement from koran, the surah 3:54 where it is mentioned that Allah is the greatest of all deceivers. If muslims like you think that it is okay to accept this as part of a perfectly revealed religion, and not only that, but also lay the charge of blasphemy against people who question this, then what kind of standards is Islam setting?

IMI2000 has made no secret of his sympathies for Islam. So it is excusable if he wants to drown anti islamic criticism by a cacophony of anti hinduism statements. But it definitely is not excusable for someone like you who swears by the perfection of Islam day and night. How can God even deceive, when he is supposed to the repository of knowledge and truth? What need is there for him to deceive his own creation?

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35823 Jan 21, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Death is the beginning
...hmmmm..??...Very nihilistic "Neville Thompson".....are you, perchance a Vampire ...??

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35824 Jan 21, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>

Hindutva is hardly known to a person on the streets as it was a brain fart of a weak man who has been patronized by limelight hungry Maharashtrians who would even idolize a donkey if his bray sounded lille bit like Marathi !
My advise to you is that get busy with your Bible that at least has amendments (new testament) and keeps removing obvious follies out of its pages than get in to a freakshow that we call Hinduism.
<quoted text>
India.
.."Hindutva is hardly known to a person on the streets ."........ergo.....Most Hindus are actually quite intelligent , and have not fallen for a .."brain fart of a weak man."

How can you now claim Hindus are stupid ...if at the same time you are claiming none of them hold to Hindutva ...

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

May the Force be with You .

#35825 Jan 21, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>...hmmmm..??...Very nihilistic "Neville Thompson".....are you, perchance a Vampire ...??
Do you want a there after ?

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35826 Jan 21, 2013
Dak-original wrote:
<quoted text>
Humans were a staple diet of some animals until few thousand years ago and they were still vulnerable as opportune delicacy until the guns of recent few hundred years gave humans an upper hand in many environments.
..."staple diet" ....surely, you jest ....large carnivores have eaten primitive man ...but, as a staple .....inconceivable !!!...unless , you mean bedbugs and lice ....

“Free Speech in a Free World ”

Since: May 10

May the Force be with You .

#35827 Jan 21, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..."staple diet" ....surely, you jest ....large carnivores have eaten primitive man ...but, as a staple .....inconceivable !!!...unless , you mean bedbugs and lice ....
Try India and Africa and Europe,there were large carnivores roaming all over picking off humans at their will
Chhutta Chillar

Ardsley, NY

#35828 Jan 21, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>...Well ,it appears as though ,there is "no" consensus ....for the name "Hindu Killer" .....
the final word is encyclopedia brittanica as per stupid chaddi IMI and it was given. Now he dances, changes tunes, pants down.
Chhutta Chillar

East Brunswick, NJ

#35829 Jan 21, 2013
number four wrote:
<quoted text>....From my point of view ...I believe "Dragnet52" to be tossing "you" around like rag doll...
Mostly ,because he doesn't have the need to keep claiming victory .......I have offered "Observer" one of my kidneys ...has he been rubbing "that" in your face .....???
...as, absolutely "you" would be doing ..if the role was reversed ...
You are angry and hurt ..that is evident ..such is life , tomorrow is a different day ..
Tomorrow is the SAME day for this utter failure. More of the same old same old. Failures like him NEVER learn and continue barreling on the path to nowhere.
Chhutta Chillar

East Brunswick, NJ

#35830 Jan 21, 2013
Filthy Muslim,

More lies, half truths and misinformation being propagated by you as usual. Hang on to your chaddi as I rip these apart and reveal your failed persona.
1. Jaswant Singh book: created a lot of controversy and katus all over India, specially in your Pak where your katus were ecstatic. JS was expelled from the BJP, was invited by Pak media on a frenzy of media interviews and speaking circus. After JS's 15 minutes of fame in Pak where he made some loose change Pakis threw at him out of US aid selling his book, he returned to India, shunned by the BJP remained in hibernation for sometime then went back to BJP leadership, got slapped around, did uthak baithak as ordered by BJP leadership and sckd dcks to be let back in the party. It all ended as a ripple in the teacup with the chastised JS firmly roped in. Yet you filthy Muslim keep making your usual big deal and deliberately neglecting to mention pertinent facts.
2. Gandhi movie: In the movie it was abundantly clear where Richard Attenborough was going with Jinnah in the movie. Jinnah was portrayed as the scoundrel and a betrayer Muslim who wanted partition for his own selfish ambitions. It's an absolutely true portrayal of Jinnah. Another lie of yours busted here. Jinnah's legacy today is Pakistan, one of the most maligned and hated nations in the world. Chutmaran Chaddi IMI kya bolta tu?

3. You state with absolute confidence with complete disregard to facts: "Even when the latest Royals got married in London - Prince William and Kate Middleton - none of the Hindus were invited to the wedding but many Muslim clerics were there on the list of the invitees."
R E.A L L Y???
This is a blatant lie Chaddi! Check the list below of Hindus, the first 2 of whom are absolutely confirmed Hindus. Let me know your latest excuse on this blatant LIE.You brazenly said "none". Your lie exposed again.
1. Anil Bhanot (General Secretary of the Hindu Council UK)
2. Shriman Maharaj Sahib Shri Raghav Raj Singh Shisodia, 8th Maharaj Sahib of Shivrati (friend of Prince William's) and his wife Shailja
3. His Excellency Nalin Surie (Indian High Commissioner)
My note: Nalin Surie is a Hindu name most likely a Hindu Punjabi though I cannot say this with 100% accuracy if he is one. My odds are 50/50 for Nalin being a Hindu.
4. Sir Yogendra Pasupalati (Mustique-based physician)
My note: same as my note for Nalin on this one.
5. Hinesh Parmar (friend of the bride and groom)
My guess he is a Hindu

As you can see the lies the misinformation and material facts being held back from his long posts. It's clear now why he writes such long posts. He knows no one really reads them so many will not notice the inaccuracies and falsehoods this chamar katu then goes around and proudly claims as "facts". You are despicable and have no self-respect to continually resort to outright lies.

Kya bolta katu?
This is the second time in as many days you have been caught in promoting blatant lies.
I see you running with your green chaddi leaking running towards the same quicksand flailing your arms and legs doing your Krav Maga shit. ROFL!!!!
Failures like you never learn. At least hang a rope around a nearby tree to pull yourself out of the quicksand instead of repeatedly running into it to take a dump. Better still hang a rope around yourself in shame and let the quicksand take care if the rest. How dumb are you really?
Be a man and at least acknowledge your deliberate inaccuracies.

Chumped and Chillared again!!!
ROFL!!!!!!!
Chhutta Chillar

Anonymous Proxy

#35831 Jan 21, 2013
Chhutta Chillar wrote:
Filthy Muslim,
1. Anil Bhanot (General Secretary of the Hindu Council UK)
2. Shriman Maharaj Sahib Shri Raghav Raj Singh Shisodia, 8th Maharaj Sahib of Shivrati (friend of Prince William's) and his wife Shailja
3. His Excellency Nalin Surie (Indian High Commissioner)
My note: Nalin Surie is a Hindu name most likely a Hindu Punjabi though I cannot say this with 100% accuracy if he is one. My odds are 50/50 for Nalin being a Hindu.
4. Sir Yogendra Pasupalati (Mustique-based physician)
My note: same as my note for Nalin on this one.
5. Hinesh Parmar (friend of the bride and groom)
Although this list has been cut pasted from wikipedia page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wedding_...
that warns people under a sign of yellow broom - indicating that Article needs to be cleaned up as the contents are murky and unreliable.

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35832 Jan 21, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you want a there after ?
..That, is a very good ...question ......"honestly" ..........no .

but, that is like asking ..."Do you ,want to grow old ?"

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#35833 Jan 21, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
Try India and Africa and Europe,there were large carnivores roaming all over picking off humans at their will
...when, we where young ...we lived in trees , to avoid predators , maybe (reptiles) snakes and insects ate "us" ..........but, once we became intelligent, and left the trees ....the wolves and large cats ,did "not" make us staples of their diet ...We taste bad ...

Don't stick up for "Dak-Oringinal"...wh en he is wrong ..
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#35834 Jan 21, 2013
Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum,(THE SEALED NECTAR, Biography of the Noble Prophet [pbuh], by SAFI UL RAHMAN al-Mubarakpuri
Jamia Salafia - India Translated by Issam Diab Maktaba Dar-us-Salam Publishers and Distributors, Part- 61
http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/SM_t...

Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf, killed

Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf was the most resentful Jew at Islam and the Muslims, the keenest on inflicting harm on the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] and the most zealous advocate of waging war against him. He belonged to Tai’ tribe but his mother to Banu Nadeer. He was a wealthy man known for his handsomeness, and a poet living in luxury in his fort south east of Madinah at the rear of Banu Nadeer’s habitations.

On hearing the news of Badr, he got terribly exasperated and swore that he would prefer death to life if the news was true. When this was confirmed he wrote poems satirizing Muhammad [pbuh], eulogizing Quraish and enticing them against the Prophet [pbuh]. He then rode to Makkah where he started to trigger the fire of war, and kindle rancour against the Muslims in Madinah. When Abu Sufyan asked him which religion he was more inclined to, the religion of the Makkans or that of Muhammad [pbuh] and his companions, he replied that the pagans were better guided. With respect to this situation, Allah revealed His Words:

"Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture? They believe in Jibt and Taghût, and say to the disbelievers that they are better guided as regards the way than the believers (Muslims)." [Al-Qur'an 4:51]

He then returned to Madinah to start a fresh campaign of slanderous propaganda that took the form of obscene songs and amatory sonnets with a view to defaming the Muslim women.

At this stage, the situation became unbearable and could no longer be put up with. The Prophet [pbuh] gathered his men and said: "Who will kill Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf? He had maligned Allah, and His Messenger." Thereupon, Muhammad bin Maslamah,‘Abbad bin Bishr, Al-Harith bin Aws, Abu ‘Abs bin Hibr and Salkan bin Salamah, Ka‘b’s foster brother, volunteered to do the job.

… The Prophet [pbuh] heard them and realized that they had killed the enemy of Allah. As they saw him, he said: "Cheerful faces are yours." In reply, they said: "And yours O Messenger of Allah." They handed the head of the tyrant over to him. He entertained Allah’s praise for their success. He then applied his saliva to Al-Harith’s wound and it healed on the spot.[Ibn Hisham 1/51-57; Sahih Al-Bukhari 1/341, 425, 2/577; Za'd Al-Ma'ad 2/91' and Sunan Abu Da'ud with 'Aun-ul-Ma'bood 2/42,43]

When the Jews learned about the death of their tyrant, Ka‘b bin Al-Ashraf, they were scared and even their stonelike hearts were in the grip of inexpressible panic. They realized that the Messenger of Allah [pbuh] would thenceforth never hesitate to use force when good words and admonition failed. They remained silent and resigned, and faked adherence to covenants.

Now the Prophet [pbuh] was free to collect his thoughts and give himself up to resolving foreign affairs, and facing dangers that could be carried with hostile wind blowing again from Makkah.

“FREEDOM OF MIND & SOUL-”

Since: Aug 08

MILKY WAY

#35836 Jan 21, 2013
Dear Chaddi & MUQ,
please confirm if you would like to read and educated more about treacery , traitors Muslims ....which makes them unwanted sht in India. I can start with some interesting stories of Maharaja Ranjit Singh's era.

Bhag ya chhup maat Chaddi- face the truth and garv sE bolo- Haam saab Kattu harami, traitor , fifth column aur Gandoo hein....Allah hou Akbar Insha Allah !
Luv
HK

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Islam Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 3 min EOKA 508,341
News Islam shares long tradition in Toledo area (Jun '16) 1 hr Barros chingon 382
Torture & Sexual Harassment of Hindu women. 3 hr Khan 2
Can muslims say Gazwa e Hind Hadiths are wrong? 5 hr Dawn of Reality 1
News All around the city, New Yorkers are protesting... 5 hr Dawn of Reality 8
News Is Obama's Legacy Among World's Muslims Tarnished? 7 hr Cordwainer Trout 6
Why is Khan's racism allowed? 7 hr Old Pom 25
More from around the web