A pogrom is a planned massacre. Massacres in 1947 were ad hoc or "localised progroms" (tit for tat revenge) or opportunistic destabilisation to accommodate refugees from each side. All wring and regrettable but Nehru was worried about such eventualities long before 1947.<quoted text>
Massacre (pogrom) is what was organized in Gujarat. Rest of the conflicts between hindu and muslims are due to riots. There is a big difference in riots and pogroms. Riots in Gujarat and Bihar were started by Hindus as in 1947 too.
In Gujarat, there were few in government who chose to neglect to let the Police control riots promptly. However, riot is the right word since 30% of victims were not muslims. Culprits who interfered with the Police and even a politician who made inflammatory speech once riots were under way have all been sentenced in India. Also, those who planned attack on the jingoistic kar sevaks of the BJP have been sentenced. Now, likes of you want one-sided victim hood whilst supporting the jihadist agenda are the real flies in the ointment.
If Islam gives up jihadism then muslims and others of other faiths or no faith can get along better to develop future of all. Since all religions are nothing but invention of human minds, why can any religion not be subject to reformation?