No Muslim can think of profaning holy...

No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf

There are 54734 comments on the Daily Times story from Jan 11, 2011, titled No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (PBUH): Altaf. In it, Daily Times reports that:

'Even minorities living in Pakistan cannot blaspheme against the holy Prophet , hence I appeal to religious leaders of every shade of religious persuasion to stop their demonstrations after clear assurances from Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani that no amendment is being made in the blasphemy law,' Altaf said while talking to an assembly of MQM ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Times.

DAK-

Mumbai, India

#34521 Jan 3, 2013
Dear Suar in Chaddi,
Why are you trying to prove that you are suffering from delusions of Mark (John Lenon’s killer)? I mean after failing HK test questions, you still try to call urslf a Muslim ? It was clear from history that in two steps (1857 and 1947) all Muslims were routed out from Delhi…..then how come u are Dehliwala…..unless u are a Abdul Puncturewala, Kaluu Kasai or Mufti kabab wala (selling kabab on rerdhi)? And what is point in trying to woo Harminder Ji for ur sisi saying u are khandani Dehliwala ? You know Harminder Ji is a Khandani Sikh , if he comes to know your lies he will just use his 18 inch sword to make a chastity belt on ur and ur khandaan’s phuddi to stop ur phuddi peddling once for all ! You have already posted the samples !

You are neither Dehliwala nor Londonwala- you are just a plain kata lullywala Kattu !

And after calling me Sindhi Papard, Thus-kia-ni, Paadmaster ……..you call me friend ? Bhosrdi K meri Paad sungh kE maadhosh hou gaya haey ……tery munh mein goo-shakkkar Gandoo!
With Laat, Thappard, Ghunsa
DAK
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have forwarded you the news link from the most respectable indisputable newspaper in the world - The New York Times. If you know India well and travel there often then you shall have no trouble in realizing how backward is India despite of all the embellishments that have been added lately. There is nothing to do once you are in a city except have a get together and hog adulterated food and fall sick or get bitten by some angry mosquito that would send you to some hospital back home with some kind of quarantine restrictions.
I have pondered over this on many occasions. You can have a great 5 - 6 days meeting with your relatives and friends and feel good in contrast seeing them so down and out (an average Indian, no matter how high he is money wise)still looks down due to surroundings. I don't even feel that happiness anymore as I pity them - they don't even realize it. Some time ago I wrote on issue about the Indian IQ and they being low by the world's average - this is because of the "vibrant" press to blame as they don't correct them at all. They keep coming up with lies lies lies and as a result we don't realize that our high time amounts to discussing a Busrape for weeks on national headlines and prime time news as there is nothing else to talk about.
You maybe do not realize it but a lot is expected out of India since it is a democracy and has been so since 66 years but hardly any development has taken place to uplift the human misery. I sent you an article where a woman was drilled so that she could wear a chastity belt and her "man" of a husband could go to work in peace knowing that no one would be able to fcuk her. Things like this are very very rampant so the question is how do we get rid of all this?
Only education would remove this evil from us followed by more and more organized atheism. Hinduism should be banned in India and protestants dealt with as General Reginald Dyer would want for the people who defied him.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#34522 Jan 3, 2013
Dak-original wrote:
<quoted text>
Chuddis return to using my ID!
Now see the funny side of this. Someone is forewarning you to stop using your intelligence, lest you come to the right conclusions. He is saying that you should not use your innate intelligence to come to the right conclusions, otherwise you will be accused of having been influenced by me.

This vagabond has been loitering on this forum for hours on end, writing senseless posts. What's this vagabond doesn't realize is that decent polite people like you don't get into a slanging match with the likes of him because doing so would be below your dignity. Your curt replies are fitting for people of his lowly class and standard.
Oldie Goldie

Mumbai, India

#34523 Jan 3, 2013
Your dilemma reminds me of a MUQ episode. Poor MUQ used to go for taking dump with an old water-dabba with hole. Water used to leak out by the time he finshed his shtng busness, and he had to return without washing his gaand. Pareshan MUQ takes advise from Muslim Ulemma and next day comes back smiling from railway patri…….surprised Chaddi asks :” Mia bahut khush hou , kya baat haey ?”

MUQ: AhhhhhA ….maza a gaya……E dabba deli dhoka deta tha …..waqt pe khali hokar……aj is beh’n chod kou meiney chutiya bana diya……..sht marney kE pahley hi gaand dho li !!!! Ha….ha……Quran mein saab likha haey !
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
In every reply you have been inserting abuses for me and I tried to answer you back by adding few from my side. I need to stop that as I have just realize that the one who abuses incessantly has a reason to get angry and your every post is a product of frustration.
Here is some more.
Let me explain you about St. Columba's - they have a quota of about 80% of catholic Christian students. And rest of the entry is for non Christians. Rich people of Chanakya Puri send their kids to DPS, Modern, Vasant Valley, Birla and the last choice they have is St Columba's. I find it highly unbelievable that anyone from Malcha Marg would send their kids to St Columba's in the first place and then let their kids jump over the secured walls of the Government buildings.
One interesting part I forgot to ask you? Did you carry this "jal" (holy water) in a katori or your built-in bladder below your kidneys while you were jumping over those high walls.
Dak-original

Kings Langley, UK

#34524 Jan 3, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have forwarded you the news link from the most respectable indisputable newspaper in the world - The New York Times. If you know India well and travel there often then you shall have no trouble in realizing how backward is India despite of all the embellishments that have been added lately. There is nothing to do once you are in a city except have a get together and hog adulterated food and fall sick or get bitten by some angry mosquito that would send you to some hospital back home with some kind of quarantine restrictions.
I have pondered over this on many occasions. You can have a great 5 - 6 days meeting with your relatives and friends and feel good in contrast seeing them so down and out (an average Indian, no matter how high he is money wise)still looks down due to surroundings. I don't even feel that happiness anymore as I pity them - they don't even realize it. Some time ago I wrote on issue about the Indian IQ and they being low by the world's average - this is because of the "vibrant" press to blame as they don't correct them at all. They keep coming up with lies lies lies and as a result we don't realize that our high time amounts to discussing a Busrape for weeks on national headlines and prime time news as there is nothing else to talk about.
You maybe do not realize it but a lot is expected out of India since it is a democracy and has been so since 66 years but hardly any development has taken place to uplift the human misery. I sent you an article where a woman was drilled so that she could wear a chastity belt and her "man" of a husband could go to work in peace knowing that no one would be able to fcuk her. Things like this are very very rampant so the question is how do we get rid of all this?
Only education would remove this evil from us followed by more and more organized atheism. Hinduism should be banned in India and protestants dealt with as General Reginald Dyer would want for the people who defied him.
Dichotomies in social and material (plus opinion!) abound in India in every which way. However, India is not a fully developed nation yet but on its way. It is up to the young politicians to chart the future by steering away from bad norms and accepting new ones.
India is slowly progressing and there will be teething problems due to issues such as "sentiments","b eliefs" and expectations of the masses.
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#34525 Jan 3, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
Chuy, in one of his tantrums, and angry on me, taunted me for never being hugged enough. I never commented on it and went on with my posts. Today, unprovoked on any political issue (he was pissed as I uncovered his facade of living in Malcha Marg) he issued following post
<quoted text>
Harminder also says that he lost his mother at the age of 10. Now going by the fact that he has been lying on everything it is fair to presume that her mother sits on a "chakla" and has fed him on "chandni bar" type of income.
@Chuy ! Do you think harminder was hugged (maybe by pedophiles or Hindus)!! LOL !
..ahhh....I try to avoid "harminder" .....As he will kill me halal style ...
Pskak

Ashburn, VA

#34526 Jan 3, 2013
Sher e Panjab wrote:
<quoted text>
he was an arab of the quraysh
thats why he was an outcaste or MALECHA 4 pure aryan hindus.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#34527 Jan 3, 2013
harminder wrote:
<quoted text>
i am not muslim therefore never ever came in touch with pedophiles and inbreds
heh heh heh
BUT YOU ARE A HINDU!!! weren't all of your gods married to child brides?

Enforced by the Brahmins, this custom destroyed the very life-soul of the non-Brahmins. Child marriage of daughters as young 5-6 y old was common during the Brahmanic Dark Ages due to the custom of dowry [ Nand 17 ][ Bash.167-8 ][ Yad 70 ][ Alt.16 ][ Ban.70 ]. Lawbooks prescribe that the best partner for a man in one-third his age. Thus a man 18 year old should marry a girl 6 years old! This is the wonderful wisdom of the most authoritative Hindu law-book -

Manu.IX.94 : " A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl of eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would otherwise be impeded, he must marry sooner."

One of the reasons for such early marriage of girls was to prevent any scandals. Narada states that some of the defects to be avoided in brides are if they already had a relationship with another man or have their minds set on another, they should not be selected [Sheth 67]. This shows that non-virgin girls could not be married, a custom similar to Church-ruled medieval Europe.

The custom of child-marriage and child-molesting has divine sanction in Hinduism. The `great god' Rama was 16 years old when he married Sita, and Sita was only 14 years old [ Ram.wh 69 ]. However, the age of Sita is now known to be a forgery; it is almost certain that she was, as per the Manuid laws, one-third of his age, namely 5 years old. It is inconceivable to imagine that `great' Rama could have dated to violate the Vedic laws of Manu. Besides being a child-molester,`holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, for Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister :

" In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama , son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line."
[ Chandra, p.156 ]

Mr. Chandra, who has given the passage cited above, then claims that this incriminating passage was `infiltrated' by the Buddhist nastikas. This objection, however, can be discounted immediately. Firstly, it would not be possible for Buddhists to `distort' a Hindu scripture. Secondly, Chandra himself is a Brahminist, so his statements in defence of Brahmanism can be discounted as being the result of religious fanaticism. The fact is, that the extant Buddhist tales are much older than the Hindu versions, and this episode was deleted from the later falsified Ramayanas. This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, the Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas :

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#34528 Jan 3, 2013
" In the Anabattha Sutta and the Mahavastu Avadana we are told that the Ikshvaku princes, who were banished by their father and took shelter on the slopes of the Himalayas, and from whom the Sakyas traced their descent, married their own sisters in order to maintain the purity of their line."
--[ Chandra, p.155 ]

Hence, it is virtually certain that Sita was Rama's sister, and that it is certain that such an `upright astik Hindu' as he would not have let his sister grow beyond the age limit of 8 years prescribed by Aryan law.

Now, what was the main reason for the Brahmins enforcing child marriage and incest upon the subject populations ? The answer is that these activities led to the permanent genetic degradation of the non-Brahmin races. It is well known that consanginuous marriage leads to genetic mutations in the offspring and eventually ends in the extermination of the blood lineage concerned. Incest and child marriage has a high risk of leading to irreversible hereditary defects in the second generation which are then passed on to succeeding generataions. These were hence convenient methods for the Brahmins to annihilate the non-Brahmins and establish a pure Brahmavarta ! Even to this day one finds the process of genetic deterioration occurring in non-Brahmin children inhabiting Brahmin-ruled regions. These are entirely the result of Brahmin-enforced child-marriage and Brahmin-inflicted incest.

Here check this out!!! You people are the biggest child molester's of the Human Race!!!!

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2012/June/In ...

So when did you get married at the age of 5 ?
Sher e Panjab

Ivanhoe, Australia

#34529 Jan 3, 2013
Pskak wrote:
<quoted text>thats why he was an outcaste or MALECHA 4 pure aryan hindus.
Pure aryan hindus please most hindus r fking habshis

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#34530 Jan 3, 2013
please check out your profile-
http://www.harekrsna.org/gurupoison/support/j ...

maybe you should open up a pedophile ring init?
http://www.harekrsna.org/jayapataka-hist.htm

NOW WHY ARE YOU CUSSING OTHER PEOPLES RELIGION, SINCE YOU BROUGHT IT UP, I SUPPOSE I MUST RETALIATE.

KINDLY REFRAIN FROM YOUR VULGARITY!!!
harminder

Mumbai, India

#34531 Jan 3, 2013
The Bengal Tiger wrote:
<quoted text>
BUT YOU ARE A HINDU!!! weren't all of your gods married to child brides?
Enforced by the Brahmins, this custom destroyed the very life-soul of the non-Brahmins. Child marriage of daughters as young 5-6 y old was common during the Brahmanic Dark Ages due to the custom of dowry [ Nand 17 ][ Bash.167-8 ][ Yad 70 ][ Alt.16 ][ Ban.70 ]. Lawbooks prescribe that the best partner for a man in one-third his age. Thus a man 18 year old should marry a girl 6 years old! This is the wonderful wisdom of the most authoritative Hindu law-book -
Manu.IX.94 : " A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl of eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would otherwise be impeded, he must marry sooner."
One of the reasons for such early marriage of girls was to prevent any scandals. Narada states that some of the defects to be avoided in brides are if they already had a relationship with another man or have their minds set on another, they should not be selected [Sheth 67]. This shows that non-virgin girls could not be married, a custom similar to Church-ruled medieval Europe.
The custom of child-marriage and child-molesting has divine sanction in Hinduism. The `great god' Rama was 16 years old when he married Sita, and Sita was only 14 years old [ Ram.wh 69 ]. However, the age of Sita is now known to be a forgery; it is almost certain that she was, as per the Manuid laws, one-third of his age, namely 5 years old. It is inconceivable to imagine that `great' Rama could have dated to violate the Vedic laws of Manu. Besides being a child-molester,`holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, for Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister :
" In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama , son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line."
[ Chandra, p.156 ]
Mr. Chandra, who has given the passage cited above, then claims that this incriminating passage was `infiltrated' by the Buddhist nastikas. This objection, however, can be discounted immediately. Firstly, it would not be possible for Buddhists to `distort' a Hindu scripture. Secondly, Chandra himself is a Brahminist, so his statements in defence of Brahmanism can be discounted as being the result of religious fanaticism. The fact is, that the extant Buddhist tales are much older than the Hindu versions, and this episode was deleted from the later falsified Ramayanas. This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, the Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas :
am not a hindu

heh heh heh

why u tellin me all this

save it

heh heh heh

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#34532 Jan 3, 2013
harminder wrote:
<quoted text>
am not a hindu
heh heh heh
why u tellin me all this
save it
heh heh heh
THEN YOUR A PUNJABI BUTT SIEKH (WHICH USED TO BE A PART OF FCKISTAN)THEN WHICH IS AN INBRED OF ISLAM AND HINDUISM ENTWINED TOGETHER, SO YOU ARE DOUBLE THE INBRED!!!
NOW DON'T REFLECT YOUR OWN INBRED RELIGIOUS BELIEF ON A RELIGION THAT YOU KNOW SHIT ABOUT!!!
Sher e Panjab

Ivanhoe, Australia

#34533 Jan 3, 2013
The Bengal Tiger wrote:
<quoted text>THEN YOUR A PUNJABI BUTT SIEKH (WHICH USED TO BE A PART OF FCKISTAN)THEN WHICH IS AN INBRED OF ISLAM AND HINDUISM ENTWINED TOGETHER, SO YOU ARE DOUBLE THE INBRED!!!
NOW DON'T REFLECT YOUR OWN INBRED RELIGIOUS BELIEF ON A RELIGION THAT YOU KNOW SHIT ABOUT!!!
Butts as far as I know are only a muslim community.
harminder

Mumbai, India

#34534 Jan 3, 2013
lMl2000 wrote:
<quoted text>
In every reply you have been inserting abuses for me and I tried to answer you back by adding few from my side. I need to stop that as I have just realize that the one who abuses incessantly has a reason to get angry and your every post is a product of frustration.
Here is some more.
Let me explain you about St. Columba's - they have a quota of about 80% of catholic Christian students. And rest of the entry is for non Christians. Rich people of Chanakya Puri send their kids to DPS, Modern, Vasant Valley, Birla and the last choice they have is St Columba's. I find it highly unbelievable that anyone from Malcha Marg would send their kids to St Columba's in the first place and then let their kids jump over the secured walls of the Government buildings.
One interesting part I forgot to ask you? Did you carry this "jal" (holy water) in a katori or your built-in bladder below your kidneys while you were jumping over those high walls.
muslim inbred pig

the "jal seva " is the seva to distribute amrit in the gurdwara premises

bangla sahib gurdwara has a well with water which has healing powers

this water is distributed by voluntary sevadaars (almost all of them punjabi hindus) at the main entrance corner of the gurdwara .The KadaaPrasaad is distributed at the exit point of the gurdwara main hall by khalsa sewadaars.

the sevadaars need not carry it out or carry any water in

as i said come out of the madrassa mindset

all delhites, mainly the punjabi speaking population whether sikh or not WILL know this fact and u dont know it

columbas HAS a quota , but the quota is generally not fulfilled , therefore non catholics are admitted.Delhi has a low christian population.(YOU shud know as u claim to be a delhitie)

whereever whoever, columbas has a first choice even today

AFTER that it is modern , dps and others

even today i jump over the low red walls and have tea with the delhi police guarding the VIP locations.

heh heh heh

.
harminder

Mumbai, India

#34535 Jan 3, 2013
The Bengal Tiger wrote:
<quoted text>
THEN YOUR A PUNJABI BUTT SIEKH (WHICH USED TO BE A PART OF FCKISTAN)THEN WHICH IS AN INBRED OF ISLAM AND HINDUISM ENTWINED TOGETHER, SO YOU ARE DOUBLE THE INBRED!!!
NOW DON'T REFLECT YOUR OWN INBRED RELIGIOUS BELIEF ON A RELIGION THAT YOU KNOW SHIT ABOUT!!!
get an education

come out of the madressas …u wasted towel head

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#34536 Jan 3, 2013
Sher e Panjab wrote:
<quoted text>
Butts as far as I know are only a muslim community.
Obviously you are MUSLIM as you seem too know alot of Muslims with Punjabi Butts,so how many times did Alexander (the great)stick his dick up YOUR BIG FAT ARSE THEN?,did he rape you vigorously?

ARE YOU GAY? THIS EXPLAINS THE BIG FAT BUTTS!!!
THATS WHY YOU PEOPLE HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF HIV CASES OUT OF ALL OF ASIA (including China don't just assume India is the only Asian country)!!!
Sher e Panjab

Ivanhoe, Australia

#34538 Jan 3, 2013
The Bengal Tiger wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously you are MUSLIM as you seem too know alot of Muslims with Punjabi Butts,so how many times did Alexander (the great)stick his dick up YOUR BIG FAT ARSE THEN?,did he rape you vigorously?

ARE YOU GAY? THIS EXPLAINS THE BIG FAT BUTTS!!!
THATS WHY YOU PEOPLE HAVE THE HIGHEST RATE OF HIV CASES OUT OF ALL OF ASIA (including China don't just assume India is the only Asian country)!!!
Alright, my ancestors fought Alexander the Great, I am not a Butt I am a Jatt.
Dabang

Ashburn, VA

#34539 Jan 3, 2013
The Bengal Tiger wrote:
<quoted text>
BUT YOU ARE A HINDU!!! weren't all of your gods married to child brides?
Enforced by the Brahmins, this custom destroyed the very life-soul of the non-Brahmins. Child marriage of daughters as young 5-6 y old was common during the Brahmanic Dark Ages due to the custom of dowry [ Nand 17 ][ Bash.167-8 ][ Yad 70 ][ Alt.16 ][ Ban.70 ]. Lawbooks prescribe that the best partner for a man in one-third his age. Thus a man 18 year old should marry a girl 6 years old! This is the wonderful wisdom of the most authoritative Hindu law-book -
Manu.IX.94 : " A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl of eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would otherwise be impeded, he must marry sooner."
One of the reasons for such early marriage of girls was to prevent any scandals. Narada states that some of the defects to be avoided in brides are if they already had a relationship with another man or have their minds set on another, they should not be selected [Sheth 67]. This shows that non-virgin girls could not be married, a custom similar to Church-ruled medieval Europe.
The custom of child-marriage and child-molesting has divine sanction in Hinduism. The `great god' Rama was 16 years old when he married Sita, and Sita was only 14 years old [ Ram.wh 69 ]. However, the age of Sita is now known to be a forgery; it is almost certain that she was, as per the Manuid laws, one-third of his age, namely 5 years old. It is inconceivable to imagine that `great' Rama could have dated to violate the Vedic laws of Manu. Besides being a child-molester,`holy' Rama was also guilty of incest, for Sita is referred to in the oldest surviving Ramayanas as his own sister :
" In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as the wife of Rama , son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line."
[ Chandra, p.156 ]
Mr. Chandra, who has given the passage cited above, then claims that this incriminating passage was `infiltrated' by the Buddhist nastikas. This objection, however, can be discounted immediately. Firstly, it would not be possible for Buddhists to `distort' a Hindu scripture. Secondly, Chandra himself is a Brahminist, so his statements in defence of Brahmanism can be discounted as being the result of religious fanaticism. The fact is, that the extant Buddhist tales are much older than the Hindu versions, and this episode was deleted from the later falsified Ramayanas. This is confirmed by anthropological research showing that incest was institutionalised in Rama's race, the Ikshvaku dynasty of Aryan Kshatriyas :
teri ma chod dunga behan ke laude chaddi chor. Roj naam badal badal ke aata hai bhonsdi ke. Ghatiya kitabe padh ke faltu baate post kar raha hai. Jin arbo ne tumhare bujurgo ki gand mar ke tumhe musalman banaya unhi ki tarif karo aur terrorist aur rapist Muhammad ka lund haath me lekar naacho.
number four

Since: May 12

Las Vegas, NV

#34540 Jan 3, 2013
Neville Thompson wrote:
<quoted text>
And since then ?
...Since then..!!!...Phffftt...!!..Aust ralia has become a beacon of hope and prosperity ,for the many nations of the Indian and Western Pacific Ocean....
Sher e Panjab

Ivanhoe, Australia

#34541 Jan 3, 2013
harminder wrote:
<quoted text>get an education

come out of the madressas …u wasted towel head
First thing that u have posted which I have agreed on, Puth Jattan de

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Islam Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 25 min Nina 518,540
Why do Muslim girls enjoy swallowing sperm? (Oct '11) 31 min Fact 4
Poll Does Ahmad Adil perform cunnilingus ??? (May '10) 3 hr Fact 9
News Anti-racism rally planned in Vancouver to prote... 3 hr Fact 2
There are No Muslim Artists 4 hr Fact 16
White House in total DISARRAY ! 4 hr Fact 30
Muslim HATE CLUB Surah 5:51-DO NOT TAKE Xtians ... 6 hr Maria 6
More from around the web