Why Marathi Peoples hates Bihari and UP (Bhaiyas)

[Maratha]

Marathi Peoples hate Bihari and UP (Bhaiyas) because they are big fools & Illlitrates.

[Hello]

If you hate people, than you have an evil heart. It is really disgusting how people can hate each other over cultural reasons.

The term "bhaiya" means brother, and it is a shame that fellow Indians don't think of one another as "brothers".

[TLR]

Of late in India there are so many Govt welfare schemes where the local people get benefits without doing any meaningful work. The Poverty removal programs are ill designed and simply siphon off funds. however the local people of rich states like Punjab, Haryana and Maharashtra have stopped doing manual work.
The Bihari, MP, Oriya labour finds it easy to fill the gap and later advance in some better jobs. The resistance then builds up against 'outsiders' which is fanned by local politicians (who else). This is the genesis of Marathi vs Bihari.

[Orthodox Hindu]

Maratha wrote:

Marathi Peoples hate Bihari and UP (Bhaiyas) because they are big fools & Illlitrates.

Marathi people hate not only Bihari and UP (Bhaiyas)but also south indians. i.e. any outsider. REASON : 1.They are not able to compete outsiders.
2. They fear for loosing the jobs / unemployment .

Actually it is not the problem with only marathis.

All other states also think the same.

[Nighty opener]

they are unknown that they are depende on north indian

[Mr alfanso]

Kyoki maharastra mai jitne bhi terror attack hote hai usme shaamil muslim up aur bihar se he hote hai....
We know that...

[Warrior]

Mr alfanso wrote:

Kyoki maharastra mai jitne bhi terror attack hote hai usme shaamil muslim up aur bihar se he hote hai....
We know that...

Lekin fir bhi Marathi Manoos north indian hindus ko nishana banate hain. Dont you think by doing this they are dividing the Hindu community and people like Abu Azmi are winning elections? Please understand that a muslim is a muslim whether from UP, bihar or Maharasthra doesnt matter. They can never be loyal to their country of residence as for them Ummah is the nation.

I am from UP but I would rather vote for Raj Thakrey than endangering me and my fellow Hindus' life by voting for a Muslim candidate.

I have a great respect for Bal Thakrey but see what Marathis did to him. They forgot how Bala Saheb's men saved Hindus lives during riots by giving a befitting reply to the muslim rioters.
They ditched him and sided with Raj Thakrey only becoz he spewed venom against North Indians.

[Warrior]

Maratha wrote:

Marathi Peoples hate Bihari and UP (Bhaiyas) because they are big fools & Illlitrates.

Dear Brother

Please do not generalize. Even marathis are illiterate and fools.

[Orthodox Hindu]

If someone (Muslim) is not loyal to ones nation (India)
then how he may be loyal to Maharastra?

Probably marathi manus forgot that Shivaji maharaj
fight against mugals and saved marathi manus converting into muslims.

[Warrior]

It is the Marathi people who allow Bhosri wala Zakir Naik to openly speak against Hindus and convert ingorant and gullible hindus to Islam. Most of his lectures are organised in Maharashtra but people like Raj thakrey dont have the guts to show their hooliganism against these brain dead vile muslims.
All they can do is target innocent and poor UP and bihari Hindus who are just earning their bread and butter.
Does Raj Thakrey have the guts to enter a Muslim neighbourhood and beat a UPite Muslim?????

[Warrior]

Is there a Marathi Manoos who can reply to my question?????

[Sanjaya Rana]

Warrior wrote:

Is there a Marathi Manoos who can reply to my question?????

They can't
they r full of hateness

[BELIEVER]

Warrior wrote:

It is the Marathi people who allow Bhosri wala Zakir Naik to openly speak against Hindus and convert ingorant and gullible hindus to Islam. Most of his lectures are organised in Maharashtra but people like Raj thakrey dont have the guts to show their hooliganism against these brain dead vile muslims.
All they can do is target innocent and poor UP and bihari Hindus who are just earning their bread and butter.
Does Raj Thakrey have the guts to enter a Muslim neighbourhood and beat a UPite Muslim?????

tRUE Man (dr.zakir) se toa sabki gand fatti he tum logo ke pass truth se fight karne ki power hi Nahi he

[Sanjaya Rana]

BELIEVER wrote:

<quoted text>
tRUE Man (dr.zakir) se toa sabki gand fatti he tum logo ke pass truth se fight karne ki power hi Nahi he

hi,haramkhor
u came here by changing name
at now i am pulling ur mom's nighty

[BurKaOpener]

Yes !

I will open her BurKa.

[Indra-Perun]

Marathas don't hate any hindus!

I'm an eastern-european who lived in Pune for a while.

They are only sometimes embarassed about Biharis because of pathetic politics (Yadavs joining with muslims rather than with Brahmins) and backwardness.

Some other north Indians are partially despised because of dishonest business among many. BUT NOT AS A WHOLE GROUP!

But in Europe it's the same, everyone looks down on Albania, because it's so totally backward.

All people who accept different gods are for me brothers. Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, European "Pagans" etc. But people who believe our gods are not real are the enemies. We know who that is.

[Patiel]

Warrior wrote:

<quoted text>
Lekin fir bhi Marathi Manoos north indian hindus ko nishana banate hain. Dont you think by doing this they are dividing the Hindu community and people like Abu Azmi are winning elections? Please understand that a muslim is a muslim whether from UP, bihar or Maharasthra doesnt matter. They can never be loyal to their country of residence as for them Ummah is the nation.
I am from UP but I would rather vote for Raj Thakrey than endangering me and my fellow Hindus' life by voting for a Muslim candidate.
I have a great respect for Bal Thakrey but see what Marathis did to him. They forgot how Bala Saheb's men saved Hindus lives during riots by giving a befitting reply to the muslim rioters.
They ditched him and sided with Raj Thakrey only becoz he spewed venom against North Indians.

oh hello, there was nothing like this! the shivsena had left the maharashtrian agenda in the early 1970s. It had became hindu-oriented but they only talked about hinduism in maharashtra not the whole india. so the maharashtrians started feeling alone as no one was there to fight for their injustice which inflicted 'inferiority complex' in them. then emerged raj thakre and what he used to say was supported by proofs in papers. so naturally the votes went to mns, and the shivsena (whatever bal thakre said now) was because they felt jealous of mns!!!

[Warrior]

Patiel wrote:

<quoted text> oh hello, there was nothing like this! the shivsena had left the maharashtrian agenda in the early 1970s. It had became hindu-oriented but they only talked about hinduism in maharashtra not the whole india. so the maharashtrians started feeling alone as no one was there to fight for their injustice which inflicted 'inferiority complex' in them. then emerged raj thakre and what he used to say was supported by proofs in papers. so naturally the votes went to mns, and the shivsena (whatever bal thakre said now) was because they felt jealous of mns!!!

You are only partially right my friend. Had shiv Sena continued with Hindutva agenda and informed Marathis and all HIndus about the danger lurking in the form of Islam, I am sure every Hindu would have voted for them. Why is it that Raj Thakrey speaks only for Marathi Manus be it Hindu or Muslim? He even talked of giving preference to Marathi Muslims for Haj subsidy. I think he dreams of becoming a soveriegn by seperating Maharashtra from India.
Answer a simple question of mine my erudite friend.
Can u imaging Mumbai without outsiders?
Business with Gujjus.
Film Industry with Punjabis
Liquor trade with Annas
Fashion Industry with Jats
Class three and four work with Northies
The real issue is not the outsiders friend, it is lack of political will in developing infrastructure. Big cities accross the world infact invite people from other parts to come and settle there and contribute in its growth. Do u think Mumbai will remain as flambuoyant, lively and rich if it seperates from India? Mumbai is Mumbai becoz of this vast country.

[Sans]

Warrior wrote:

<quoted text>
You are only partially right my friend. Had shiv Sena continued with Hindutva agenda and informed Marathis and all HIndus about the danger lurking in the form of Islam, I am sure every Hindu would have voted for them. Why is it that Raj Thakrey speaks only for Marathi Manus be it Hindu or Muslim? He even talked of giving preference to Marathi Muslims for Haj subsidy. I think he dreams of becoming a soveriegn by seperating Maharashtra from India.
Answer a simple question of mine my erudite friend.
Can u imaging Mumbai without outsiders?
Business with Gujjus.
Film Industry with Punjabis
Liquor trade with Annas
Fashion Industry with Jats
Class three and four work with Northies
The real issue is not the outsiders friend, it is lack of political will in developing infrastructure. Big cities accross the world infact invite people from other parts to come and settle there and contribute in its growth. Do u think Mumbai will remain as flambuoyant, lively and rich if it seperates from India? Mumbai is Mumbai becoz of this vast country.

1) There is nothing that he is dreaming about separating maharashtra from india. He just wants to provide mere justice to the local marathi ppl living here. Its all the media which is trying to fool u. Go hear his speeches! You'll understand what he wants to say. It is unfortunate that the hindi media tries to block it calling it a hate speech but the marathi media exclusively shows it.
2) What do you mean by Mumbai without outsiders? Hello, it is the right to any citizen to move and settle within any part of the territory of India. Raj thackeray is not against that. However, it is also said in the constitution that it is the duty of every citizen to embrace the local culture, language, ppl and laws of the area in which he lives. But unfortunately, this isnt happening in mumbai dude. Everyone tries to keep a distinct cultural identity of their own and do not become a part of the local ppl. This is totally wrong na. If it keeps on happening on an unprecedented rate, then wont the ppl living there become angry? I understand that raj thakre shows this anger for votes but if u catch any local citizen, even he would've the same feelings.
MUMBAI, GOING FORWARD AS THE FINANCIAL CAPITAL OF INDIA, HAS TOTALLY LOST ITS ORIGINAL MAHARASHTRIAN CULTURE AND HAS BECOME A DHARMASHALA(GUEST HOUSE).

[Warrior]

Sans wrote:

<quoted text>
1) There is nothing that he is dreaming about separating maharashtra from india. He just wants to provide mere justice to the local marathi ppl living here. Its all the media which is trying to fool u. Go hear his speeches! You'll understand what he wants to say. It is unfortunate that the hindi media tries to block it calling it a hate speech but the marathi media exclusively shows it.
2) What do you mean by Mumbai without outsiders? Hello, it is the right to any citizen to move and settle within any part of the territory of India. Raj thackeray is not against that. However, it is also said in the constitution that it is the duty of every citizen to embrace the local culture, language, ppl and laws of the area in which he lives. But unfortunately, this isnt happening in mumbai dude. Everyone tries to keep a distinct cultural identity of their own and do not become a part of the local ppl. This is totally wrong na. If it keeps on happening on an unprecedented rate, then wont the ppl living there become angry? I understand that raj thakre shows this anger for votes but if u catch any local citizen, even he would've the same feelings.
MUMBAI, GOING FORWARD AS THE FINANCIAL CAPITAL OF INDIA, HAS TOTALLY LOST ITS ORIGINAL MAHARASHTRIAN CULTURE AND HAS BECOME A DHARMASHALA(GUEST HOUSE).

Dear Friend

I said that he wants to become a soveriegn becoz in one of his speeches he threatened the central government of severance of Maharasthra from India. It is a recorded fact.
He can never provide justice to Marathis by thrashing poor Hindus be it Biharis, UPites or Annas. Instead he needs to tell the marathis of their past and how they fought for the country and not only for Maharashtra and how can Marathis become better marathis by protecting other hindus from Muslim b'turds.
Yes, I have heard his speeches, half of his speeches are dedicated towards cursing and abusing Bhaiyas just the way more than half of the quran id dedicated in abusing Kafirs.
The Hindi media which you mentioned is actually not Hindi media, its infact urdu media, notice their usage of words and u'll come to know.
Regarding your second question, all i have to say is that you accepted christians as a part of Maharashtra and dont tell me that these followers of dirty Abrahamic religion speak marathi though they have been living here since centuries and most of them have marathi blood. Mumbai celebrates Christmas more enthusiastically than any other hindu festival except Ganpati festival.
Tell me very honestly....have these christians embraced your culture? Do I need to discuss Islam as well? I dont think so as everybody knows how well they have adopted Marathi culture. But nobody has the balls to speak against them.
The beauty of any cosmopolitan city is its diversity. In Delhi people celebrate Guru Nanak Yayanti, Holi, Diwali, Dussehra, Ganesh Chaturthi and even Christmas with same enthusiasm and that makes the city more beautiful. Do u want to turn Maharashtra in Saudi Arabia where nothing which is non islamic is accepted?
How can u say that northies have not become a part of Mumbai? I am from UP and was transferred to Mumbai two years back. Now I consider Mumbai my home as long as I am here. I spend everything I earn in Mumbai. Am I not contributing in the growth of this city?

My only concern is that we cannot afford to divide hindus just for the sake of votes even after knowing the real danger in the form of Islam. Look at the muslims here in this forum and you'll come to know of their mentality. They feel proud of being products of rape and thus all they can think of is sex, rape, pedophillia, incest etc.