You haven't really read what you wrote.
Read it again and you just might notice this:
1928: They are referring to SCRIPTURE.
They are referring to the WATCHTOWER magazine, not scripture.
Where is the claim for infallibility?
You are watching for a limping - you can't find any, so you make them up, just as you made up that stuff about banning.
Wilson is an example of a Sincere JW that wants to defend the WT Editorial staff of writers and what they say
in order to do so typically a jw literally must try to REWRITE, revise or re-explain WHAT THE WT HAS SAID even though anyone can read it for themselves
so to help him we will go point by point
first off i stated:
"the wt speaks out BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTH"
and then i stated the reason why
"just to cover themselves"
so what that means is you will find the wt saying one thing one day and another thing the next
So i cited some examples of what the WT EDitorial staff has said about its published material
re chap. 2 p. 9 The Grand Theme of the Bible ***
Interpreting the Scriptures
"It is not claimed that the explanations in this publication are infallible"
Now the above sound very reasonable and logically considering that they are going to provide "commentary" on material that follows
now most folks who publish any kind of publication would find the wt quote in good taste and reason
they are letting their readers know up front that our conmentary merely reflects OUR VIEWS, OUR UNDERSTANDING -
therefore disagree with what we have published merely means you are disagreeing with the WT Editorial staff of writers
most folks understand that point in regards to any group, organization, company, etc that puts out printed material
NOW NOTICE THE COMPLETE REVERSAL
"The writer does not give his opinion. No human interpretation of scripture is advanced." (Reconciliation, 1928, p. 6)
NOW real bible students understand that there are ONLY TWO types of interpretations
1. Ones from Men - which is subject to be completely wrong
2. Ones from God - NEVER SUBJECT TO BE WRONG as in the case of David- the cupbear and the king
so when a publisher of religious genre material states that NO HUMAN INTERPRETATION is going to be presented, then WHOSE INTERPRETATION is it going to be from ???? God
now it gets worse
"The Watchtower is not the instrument of any man-
or set of any of men,-
nor is it published according to the whims of men.
No man's opinion is expressed in the Watchtower.
(Watchtower, Nov. 1 1931 p. 327)
now for everyone who lives OUT SIDE OF THE MAKE BELIEVE WORLD OF JW
they fully understand what any publisher of any material is claiming when they make the claimes above..
any book produced by an American Publishing company that claims its publication is NOT THE INSTRUMENT OF MAN, has gone off the deep end by claiming ITS FROM GOD and if it is from God then by DEFAULT IT WILL BE INFALLIBLE
THE WT is published ENTIRELY at the whim of the WRiting dept and as for NO MAN OPINION is expressed in the WT
who are they kidding
so the poster is trying so hard to RE-EXPLAIN WHAT THE WT HAS SAID
so on one day they say what we publish ain't infallible the next they claim it is from God and on human opinions are in it
yes wt speaks out both sides of their mouth all the time
holding 2 opposing views at the same time