First Prev
of 4
Next Last
Blodewedd

Barcelona, Spain

#1 Sep 16, 2016
Christianity, having become a large Church, totally forgot its roots broke its connections with Judaism, and passed entirely into the Greek and Roman world. A world rife with mythological gods and pagan rites, how much of these did it absorb within its bosom.

Crumbling empires efforts to hold on to its power whose principles denied religious associations a place in the State, changed its policy and under Constantine, inverted the position of the most free and most spontaneous religious movement into an official worship, subject to State control, and in its turn persecutor.

The book of Enoch, in particular, and the Assumption of Moses, were much read in the circle of Jesus. Some expressions imputed to Jesus belonged to Enoch, epistle of Barnabas.
The collection of the Sibylline verses needs to be regarded in the same light; but the
latter is more easily established.

The Gospels are legendary is quite evident, inasmuch as they are full of miracles and of the supernatural; but there are legends and legends

The first, emphasis should bear on the founder his personality. The second should treat of the Apostles and their immediate disciples, or rather, of the revolutions which took place in religious thought. Around the year 100, when the last friends of Jesus were just dead.

The third state of early Christianity is its development, its waging of an almost permanent war against all form of culture, government and people.

Philo was sixty-two years of age when the prophet of Nazareth had reached the highest point of his activity, and he survived him at least ten years.

Josephus works, it appears that the hand of a Christian has retouched the fragment, and has added to it passages.
crocklane

United States

#3 Jan 28, 2017
TN, IL is full of fake ministers, especially Townsend.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#4 Feb 14, 2017
Blodewedd wrote:
Christianity, having become a large Church, totally forgot its roots broke its connections with Judaism, and passed entirely into the Greek and Roman world. A world rife with mythological gods and pagan rites, how much of these did it absorb within its bosom.

Crumbling empires efforts to hold on to its power whose principles denied religious associations a place in the State, changed its policy and under Constantine, inverted the position of the most free and most spontaneous religious movement into an official worship, subject to State control, and in its turn persecutor.

The book of Enoch, in particular, and the Assumption of Moses, were much read in the circle of Jesus. Some expressions imputed to Jesus belonged to Enoch, epistle of Barnabas.
The collection of the Sibylline verses needs to be regarded in the same light; but the
latter is more easily established.

The Gospels are legendary is quite evident, inasmuch as they are full of miracles and of the supernatural; but there are legends and legends

The first, emphasis should bear on the founder his personality. The second should treat of the Apostles and their immediate disciples, or rather, of the revolutions which took place in religious thought. Around the year 100, when the last friends of Jesus were just dead.

The third state of early Christianity is its development, its waging of an almost permanent war against all form of culture, government and people.

Philo was sixty-two years of age when the prophet of Nazareth had reached the highest point of his activity, and he survived him at least ten years.

Josephus works, it appears that the hand of a Christian has retouched the fragment, and has added to it passages.
There should be no doubt to the honest searcher that changes have been made to "Scripture" that reflect the revisions of the Original Yeshua to the paganized Jesus. Rome devised it's Canon carfully - with a deliberate purpose to obscure the core truth to then believe in the magical powers of their pretended invention - and the fruits exhibited by the founding Roman Church shows to all the evil contained in her heart - in spite of all claims otherwise.

Yeshua said his disciples are to abide in his words from the Father and also honor the commandments of God. With Yeshua it was about doing the will of God - living by His every word.

With the pretenders, it's about the magic cross, the magic wafer, or pretending that the love of God is unconditional and that He loves His enemies - none of which is true...In truth, "Christians" now rely on blood sacrifice far greater than the Jews of Ezekiel or Jeremiah's days - which God soundly refuted to be a lie, and that other things mattered far more to Him.

Yeshua taught and exampled the proper interpretation and application of the Torah, Psalms and Prophets - and could not have case aside or done away with what God called Instructions in Righteousness that man was created to find joy and blessing to do as He said.

What gospel account has been left untouched by the Roman Church and her littel whores?

Do tell.
Blodewedd

Granada, Spain

#5 Feb 17, 2017
Barmsweb wrote:
<quoted text>

There should be no doubt to the honest searcher that changes have been made to "Scripture" that reflect the revisions of the Original Yeshua to the paganized Jesus. Rome devised it's Canon carfully - with a deliberate purpose to obscure the core truth to then believe in the magical powers of their pretended invention - and the fruits exhibited by the founding Roman Church shows to all the evil contained in her heart - in spite of all claims otherwise.

Yeshua said his disciples are to abide in his words from the Father and also honor the commandments of God. With Yeshua it was about doing the will of God - living by His every word.

With the pretenders, it's about the magic cross, the magic wafer, or pretending that the love of God is unconditional and that He loves His enemies - none of which is true...In truth, "Christians" now rely on blood sacrifice far greater than the Jews of Ezekiel or Jeremiah's days - which God soundly refuted to be a lie, and that other things mattered far more to Him.

Yeshua taught and exampled the proper interpretation and application of the Torah, Psalms and Prophets - and could not have case aside or done away with what God called Instructions in Righteousness that man was created to find joy and blessing to do as He said.

What gospel account has been left untouched by the Roman Church and her littel whores?

Do tell.
Sorry I cannot tell, for I do not understand scripture. I do not see the bible as a history book nor Yeshuah as a historical figure.

What do you mean that Christians rely on blood sacrifice? Are you referring to the so-called sacrifice of Yeshuah?

Did Abel do a blood sacrifice, which was accepted?
Why did the Earth open its mouth and swallowed up Abels blood, was the earth helping Cain to cover-up the murder? Gn 4-11

When did blood sacrifice enter scripture and why? How did it happen that the life-blood is considered holy and God institute blood sacrifice as necessary to faith, especially Abrahams
Blodewedd

Granada, Spain

#6 Feb 17, 2017
ROMAN chapter 5
12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned

13 sin was indeed in the world before the law, but sin is not reckoned when there is no law.

14 Yet death exercised dominion from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sins were not like the
transgression of Adam, who is a type of the one who was to come.

WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#7 Feb 17, 2017
Blodewedd wrote:
ROMAN chapter 5
12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned

13 sin was indeed in the world before the law, but sin is not reckoned when there is no law.

14 Yet death exercised dominion from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sins were not like the
transgression of Adam, who is a type of the one who was to come.

WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS.
I don't believe Paul was anyone to listen to and have found much of his teachings to be lies.

jesuswordsonly.com
bottlecap

Clearwater, FL

#9 May 8, 2017
Blodewedd wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry I cannot tell, for I do not understand scripture. I do not see the bible as a history book nor Yeshuah as a historical figure.

What do you mean that Christians rely on blood sacrifice? Are you referring to the so-called sacrifice of Yeshuah?

Did Abel do a blood sacrifice, which was accepted?
Why did the Earth open its mouth and swallowed up Abels blood, was the earth helping Cain to cover-up the murder? Gn 4-11

When did blood sacrifice enter scripture and why? How did it happen that the life-blood is considered holy and God institute blood sacrifice as necessary to faith, especially Abrahams
Jesus explaines...

Matthew 26:27-28. "Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying,“Drink from it, all of you. 28 For this is My blood of the new[c] covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins."

Jesus is offering to form a blood covenant with his disciples. A blood covenant is the ONLY partnership that is more sacred then marriage. And EVERY Possession of the parties become co-owned, and for Jesus that includes the sinful nature of any and all who enter into that partnership., making Jesus LITERALLY responsible for those sins, which He paid off at Calvery.

Hebrews 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.

Abel was a prophet whose sacrifice foreshadowed that of God's Christ, aka the Lamb of God.

As to Abraham, it is obvious. What GOD was asking Abraham was truly incredible, and very few would even consider it and certainly my faith would not be strong enough, ie to offer your son as a sacrifice for sin. But Abraham was willing to do so...

Gen 22:12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said.“Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

GOD was willing to offer HIS SON , Jesus, as a sacrifice for sin, and he choose to enter into an agreement with someone that met that same level of commitment. Of course, Isaac's death was unnecessary and the LORD provided a substitute...But Jesus HAD to die.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#10 May 9, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>

Jesus explaines...

Matthew 26:27-28. "Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying,“Drink from it, all of you. 28 For this is My blood of the new[c] covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins."

Jesus is offering to form a blood covenant with his disciples. A blood covenant is the ONLY partnership that is more sacred then marriage. And EVERY Possession of the parties become co-owned, and for Jesus that includes the sinful nature of any and all who enter into that partnership., making Jesus LITERALLY responsible for those sins, which He paid off at Calvery.

Hebrews 12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.

Abel was a prophet whose sacrifice foreshadowed that of God's Christ, aka the Lamb of God.

As to Abraham, it is obvious. What GOD was asking Abraham was truly incredible, and very few would even consider it and certainly my faith would not be strong enough, ie to offer your son as a sacrifice for sin. But Abraham was willing to do so...

Gen 22:12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said.“Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

GOD was willing to offer HIS SON , Jesus, as a sacrifice for sin, and he choose to enter into an agreement with someone that met that same level of commitment. Of course, Isaac's death was unnecessary and the LORD provided a substitute...But Jesus HAD to die.
You likely don't realize it, but you are drawing a cover over the Scripture - what it really says - and then imagining something is under the cover that really isn't there at all.

If "fallen man" is unable to help himself, and therefore God sacrificed His Only Begotten Son to restore man to his former relationship - why did God tell Cain that if he improved himself that he would be accepted/forgiven?

What sin had Abraham done that he needed to "sacrifice the fruit of his flesh for the sin of his soul"?

Where is any indication given that this was indicated - Isaac being a sin sacrifice?

If sacrifice was so important - why did God tell Israel they relied too much on their sacrifices and failed to do as He instructed - and that because they had spurned His instruction that their sacrifice and such were a stench in His nostrils that He would bear no more? He cautioned them to repent and do His works or else - their sacrifice was totally useless.

So if Christians think Jesus saves anyone, it is only those who repent to do the will as given by God - to honor Him as God and show their love for Him through the keeping of the Everlasting Covenant.

The prayer of Jesus was altered by Rome. Pre-Roman texts of Matthew in Aramaic have Y'shua saying his blood was for renewing the covenant - not to establish a new covenant.

Satan knows how little one needs to change the words of God or a true prophet to deceive those who know not the word of God or of His faithfulness to His word, covenant and promises.

If God failed to be true to His promises to Abraham and Isreal - what makes you think you are better than Abraham?

The fact is that God was testing Abraham and that Abraham passed the tests through his faithfulness to God.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#11 May 9, 2017
Blodewedd wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry I cannot tell, for I do not understand scripture. I do not see the bible as a history book nor Yeshuah as a historical figure.

What do you mean that Christians rely on blood sacrifice? Are you referring to the so-called sacrifice of Yeshuah?

Did Abel do a blood sacrifice, which was accepted?
Why did the Earth open its mouth and swallowed up Abels blood, was the earth helping Cain to cover-up the murder? Gn 4-11

When did blood sacrifice enter scripture and why? How did it happen that the life-blood is considered holy and God institute blood sacrifice as necessary to faith, especially Abrahams
The Genesis account is often obscured by Christians to make cover for their misbeliefs about the cross or blood of Jesus. A Christain hymn line explains their need for Jesus' blood: What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus. What can make me whole again? Nothing but the blood of JEEE _ ZUES. OH PRECIOUS is the FLOW, that makes me WHITE AS SNOW!! No other fount I know. NOTHING BUT THE BLOOD OF GEEE-ZUS.

And lies tend to grow the longer they have been told - which explains too much that I don't think you'd understand or appreciate.

God has always been willing to show His kindness and favor towards those who turn from evil to do as He instructed man to live by doing justly, loving charity and walking humbly with Him in their life, and towards others as a reflection of their relationship to Him as the Father/Creator.

Jesus came to turn mankind from iniquity to do the will of God and give God the praise and honor He alone is due.
bottlecap

Clearwater, FL

#12 May 9, 2017
Barmsweb wrote:
<quoted text>

You likely don't realize it, but you are drawing a cover over the Scripture - what it really says - and then imagining something is under the cover that really isn't there at all.

If "fallen man" is unable to help himself, and therefore God sacrificed His Only Begotten Son to restore man to his former relationship - why did God tell Cain that if he improved himself that he would be accepted/forgiven?

What sin had Abraham done that he needed to "sacrifice the fruit of his flesh for the sin of his soul"?

Where is any indication given that this was indicated - Isaac being a sin sacrifice?

If sacrifice was so important - why did God tell Israel they relied too much on their sacrifices and failed to do as He instructed - and that because they had spurned His instruction that their sacrifice and such were a stench in His nostrils that He would bear no more? He cautioned them to repent and do His works or else - their sacrifice was totally useless.

So if Christians think Jesus saves anyone, it is only those who repent to do the will as given by God - to honor Him as God and show their love for Him through the keeping of the Everlasting Covenant.

The prayer of Jesus was altered by Rome. Pre-Roman texts of Matthew in Aramaic have Y'shua saying his blood was for renewing the covenant - not to establish a new covenant.

Satan knows how little one needs to change the words of God or a true prophet to deceive those who know not the word of God or of His faithfulness to His word, covenant and promises.

If God failed to be true to His promises to Abraham and Isreal - what makes you think you are better than Abraham?

The fact is that God was testing Abraham and that Abraham passed the tests through his faithfulness to God.
There are TWO Distinct Covenants with the God of the Bible. It is written...

John 1:17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

"The prayer of Jesus was altered by Rome. Pre-Roman texts of Matthew in Aramaic have Y'shua saying his blood was for renewing the covenant - not to establish a new covenant."

The covenant of GRACE actually pre-ceded the Covenant of the LAW, so the word "new" was a false and mis-leading Roman addition. It should be noted that although GRACE was God's Plan from day 1, it did not take effect until Jesus died at Calvery.

Yes, absolutely, GOD wants you to lead a righteous life whether one is under GRACE or under the. LAW. But if God sent His Son into the World to...

John 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

----then I would say, Yes, GRACE is 100% necessary to have the best relationship possible with the Almighty.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#13 May 10, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>

There are TWO Distinct Covenants with the God of the Bible. It is written...

John 1:17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

"The prayer of Jesus was altered by Rome. Pre-Roman texts of Matthew in Aramaic have Y'shua saying his blood was for renewing the covenant - not to establish a new covenant."

The covenant of GRACE actually pre-ceded the Covenant of the LAW, so the word "new" was a false and mis-leading Roman addition. It should be noted that although GRACE was God's Plan from day 1, it did not take effect until Jesus died at Calvery.

Yes, absolutely, GOD wants you to lead a righteous life whether one is under GRACE or under the. LAW. But if God sent His Son into the World to...

John 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

----then I would say, Yes, GRACE is 100% necessary to have the best relationship possible with the Almighty.
So God had no grace, spoke no truth?

Read to the end of John 3. Did John the Baptist speak truth?

Read Exodus 20 from a Hebrew to English translation - God has no less grace today than then, and those are the conditions of the Everlasting Covenant that He has sworn to uphold and remain true to. If Jesus taught to live by every word of God and said not to even think he came to loosen or destroy it - the fact is that no one who rejects the instructions of God has a leg of grace to stand upon.
(from the age of accountability)

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#14 May 10, 2017
(fyi - the disciple/apostle John is most likely not the author of the Gospel of John - if John were a simple fisherman, he would not be writing in high level Greek - perhaps another person wrote it - and internal evidence is strong that it may have been Lazarus)
bottlecap

Clearwater, FL

#15 May 10, 2017
Barmsweb wrote:
<quoted text>

So God had no grace, spoke no truth?

Read to the end of John 3. Did John the Baptist speak truth?

Read Exodus 20 from a Hebrew to English translation - God has no less grace today than then, and those are the conditions of the Everlasting Covenant that He has sworn to uphold and remain true to. If Jesus taught to live by every word of God and said not to even think he came to loosen or destroy it - the fact is that no one who rejects the instructions of God has a leg of grace to stand upon.
(from the age of accountability)
Jesus taught the LAW, no doubt, and advocated it. Why not? It was His Father's Word.

The parable of the Rich Man reveals much about the LAW vs GRACE dichotomy. What is rarely discussed in telling that story was that the Lord's disciples were 100% on the side of the Rich Man.

Mark 10:17-31King James Version (KJV)

17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.

20 And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.

21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.

22 And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.

23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!

24 And the disciples were ASTONISHED at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!

25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

26 And they were Astonished Out Of Measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved?

27 And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
=====
The most important question asked in the Bible..."Who then can be saved???" The Answer...With Men it is impossible. "but not with God, for with God all things are possible.
bottlecap

Clearwater, FL

#16 May 10, 2017
To your point, in the above parable, the Rich Man was a faithful practionaire of the LAW.

His Roadblock was that his Faith was in Riches, not in the Lamb of God.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#17 May 11, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>

Jesus taught the LAW, no doubt, and advocated it. Why not? It was His Father's Word.

The parable of the Rich Man reveals much about the LAW vs GRACE dichotomy. What is rarely discussed in telling that story was that the Lord's disciples were 100% on the side of the Rich Man.

Mark 10:17-31King James Version (KJV)

17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.

20 And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.

21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.

22 And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.

23 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!

24 And the disciples were ASTONISHED at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!

25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

26 And they were Astonished Out Of Measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved?

27 And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
=====
The most important question asked in the Bible..."Who then can be saved???" The Answer...With Men it is impossible. "but not with God, for with God all things are possible.
According to what the author of "Mark" said, but Mark also said "these signs will follow (accompany) those who believe" - and the account is wildly variant to any other gospel account. In fact, the disharmony of the gospels shows Matthew to be many levels above any report from Mark or Luke or John.

With God - are all things possible? Is it possible that God set His word aside to now love those who hate Him and despise His good word?

What Jesus taught is actually more in accord with the words of God to Cain - and that forgiveness is abundant to those who repent to do His will - to improve themselves by believing and doing what He declared good and acceptable. This fits with the accounts of Nineva and Sodom, as it does with the instructions of Daniel to the Gentile king or the words of other prophets to Jews and Gentiles.

In fact, in the Law, God repeatedly declared upon repentance and doing what He instructed on the matter: "And so he shall be forgiven". And when God has forgiven, do we ever place ourselves above what God declared? Or if we fail to do what God said is required to be forgiven - should we believe we are forgiven? I have yet to find anywhere in Matthew that this isn't the case - even though there are a number of alterations that are fairly easy to resolve.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#18 May 11, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
To your point, in the above parable, the Rich Man was a faithful practionaire of the LAW.

His Roadblock was that his Faith was in Riches, not in the Lamb of God.
You might get the Hebrew to English Holy Scriptures and study what the Prophets declared about the "kingdom of God" and the Messiah.
bottlecap

Clearwater, FL

#19 May 11, 2017
Barmsweb wrote:
<quoted text>

According to what the author of "Mark" said, but Mark also said "these signs will follow (accompany) those who believe" - and the account is wildly variant to any other gospel account. In fact, the disharmony of the gospels shows Matthew to be many levels above any report from Mark or Luke or John.

With God - are all things possible? Is it possible that God set His word aside to now love those who hate Him and despise His good word?

What Jesus taught is actually more in accord with the words of God to Cain - and that forgiveness is abundant to those who repent to do His will - to improve themselves by believing and doing what He declared good and acceptable. This fits with the accounts of Nineva and Sodom, as it does with the instructions of Daniel to the Gentile king or the words of other prophets to Jews and Gentiles.

In fact, in the Law, God repeatedly declared upon repentance and doing what He instructed on the matter: "And so he shall be forgiven". And when God has forgiven, do we ever place ourselves above what God declared? Or if we fail to do what God said is required to be forgiven - should we believe we are forgiven? I have yet to find anywhere in Matthew that this isn't the case - even though there are a number of alterations that are fairly easy to resolve.
Jesus LOVED the Law and Preached It and Taught it. Repentence and well doing were a delight for God. And, as Christians, we should try to live our lives as best we can.

NEVERTHELESS, if salvation was possible thru our actions, however noble, then Jesus had no reason to die at Calvery. Study the Old Testament and it is filled with the sacrifice of THOUSANDS of Animals to cover the Sins of the Hebrews, which was a foreshadowing of Jesus, aka, "The LAMB of GOD"

Why did God accept Abel and reject Cain?

Hebrews 11:4

4 "By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh
==========
Yes GOD is the witness that Abel is RIGHTEOUS.

Why? In that he accepted his gift.

The gift was a slain lamb....ring a bell

Abel had "Faith in his offering, Faith in the Lamb.

FAITH in the Lamb and he is called RIGHTEOUS by God.

"...he(Abel), being dead, yet speaketh.

Barmsweb

“onediscipletoano ther.org”

Since: Aug 16

Fresno, OH

#20 May 11, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>

Jesus LOVED the Law and Preached It and Taught it. Repentence and well doing were a delight for God. And, as Christians, we should try to live our lives as best we can.

NEVERTHELESS, if salvation was possible thru our actions, however noble, then Jesus had no reason to die at Calvery. Study the Old Testament and it is filled with the sacrifice of THOUSANDS of Animals to cover the Sins of the Hebrews, which was a foreshadowing of Jesus, aka, "The LAMB of GOD"

Why did God accept Abel and reject Cain?

Hebrews 11:4

4 "By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh
==========
Yes GOD is the witness that Abel is RIGHTEOUS.

Why? In that he accepted his gift.

The gift was a slain lamb....ring a bell

Abel had "Faith in his offering, Faith in the Lamb.

FAITH in the Lamb and he is called RIGHTEOUS by God.

"...he(Abel), being dead, yet speaketh.
Until you explore the messianic prophecies in the Hebrew to English translations from the Jews, then note where the NT absolutely defies them - you won't understand that we've been fed a lie.

Keep ringing your bell, but you'll be advised to hear the word of God and the true prophets and Psalms as actually given - not perverted by Rome.

Since: Oct 17

Miami, FL

#24 Oct 29, 2017
Blodewedd wrote:
ROMAN chapter 5
12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death came through sin, and so death spread to all because all have sinned

13 sin was indeed in the world before the law, but sin is not reckoned when there is no law.

14 Yet death exercised dominion from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sins were not like the
transgression of Adam, who is a type of the one who was to come.

WHO CAN EXPLAIN THIS.
my friend the first law wasn't written with God fingers yet. This is the first law.God said to Adam:" Genesis 2:17. That was the only law,and that means obedience to God. And also God didn't lett them with doubts. God says the day you eat of it.... Now you can see that the LAW of God was first and the LAW will stay till Jesus return. Mathew 5:17:20. Ask questions I'm ready to give all answered. Thanks

Since: Oct 17

Miami, FL

#25 Oct 29, 2017
bottlecap wrote:
<quoted text>

There are TWO Distinct Covenants with the God of the Bible. It is written...

John 1:17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

"The prayer of Jesus was altered by Rome. Pre-Roman texts of Matthew in Aramaic have Y'shua saying his blood was for renewing the covenant - not to establish a new covenant."

The covenant of GRACE actually pre-ceded the Covenant of the LAW, so the word "new" was a false and mis-leading Roman addition. It should be noted that although GRACE was God's Plan from day 1, it did not take effect until Jesus died at Calvery.

Yes, absolutely, GOD wants you to lead a righteous life whether one is under GRACE or under the. LAW. But if God sent His Son into the World to...

John 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

----then I would say, Yes, GRACE is 100% necessary to have the best relationship possible with the Almighty.
My friends this is the major problems of the Christians that believe that they will be saved just by believing in Jesus. They cannot seen what Jesus says with his own mouth. Please read carefully Mathew 5:17-22. Also Revelation 12:17, 14:12. Ask questions you got answers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Topics regarding Christianity and other religions Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Aseneth. (Dec '17) Dec '17 Mr goody two shoes 1