Richard Dawkins Admits...
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
TheCapedCrusader

Montréal, Canada

#63 Sep 19, 2013
Thinking

Royston, UK

#64 Sep 20, 2013
The watch analogy proves you are a fuckwit.
buck wrote:
you know what I don't understand about posts like #51, when commenters reply back to the poster, and like a scientist the reply is dissected line by line. I have seen this in countless other topix. It proves nothing!
What real evidence did Darwin follow, seriously? IT IS ONE MAN'S THEORY
Those that believe " Intelligent Design" follow "SEEN" evidence.
We see the earth and all it contains, the sky, sun, moon, stars, and planets to say the least. All of these things did not just drop out of the clear blue and fall "perfectly into place"; here is where common sense is applied.
The "watch analogy" is a perfect example to prove creation didn't happen with a big explosion. Dawkins is another man with opinions & theories like Darwin and everybody's got opinions don't they.
God is not an opinion or theory, He is truth when you search with all your heart you will find Him.
btw this is not a reply to anyone in particular.
dawkinsisanathie st

AOL

#65 Sep 20, 2013
very childish to call someone a name as you have, just because you don't agree.
Can't wait to see Buck's reply, curious you might say.
I am also curious as to what age you are.
dawkinsisanathie st

AOL

#66 Sep 20, 2013
Thinking wrote:
The watch analogy proves you are a fuckwit.
<quoted text>
your reply proves you have no wit
learn to think outside the box lol
TheCapedCrusader

Dallas, TX

#67 Sep 20, 2013
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
Can't wait to see Buck's reply,
You and "Buck" are the same person.
TheCapedCrusader

Montréal, Canada

#68 Sep 20, 2013
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
<quoted text>
learn to think outside the box
You need to follow your own advice. The "watchmaker" in nature is natural selection. I'm surprised you have not read the Blind Watchmaker. It was written by Professor Dawkins.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#69 Sep 20, 2013
Why? Are you a nonce?
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
I am also curious as to what age you are.
dawkinsisanathie st

AOL

#70 Sep 20, 2013
now you are speaking ignorance and speaking your uk language which does not give you any more brain power in the slightest. I'm through replying to your childish nonsense. You maybe the nonce in this talk.
dawkinsisanathie st

AOL

#71 Sep 20, 2013
TheCapedCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
You and "Buck" are the same person.
You have never surfed forums much have you, the name buck is a common name used. Aol users tend to use AOL to keep location hidden whereas others will say
"location hidden"
TheCapedCrusader

Montréal, Canada

#72 Sep 20, 2013
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
<quoted text>
You have never surfed forums much have you, the name buck is a common name used. Aol users tend to use AOL to keep location hidden whereas others will say
"location hidden"
As well as "Buck" you also use the name "True Evidence".
Thinking

Royston, UK

#73 Sep 20, 2013
I usually refer to my "uk language" [sic] as English.

I have no paedophile tendencies.
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
now you are speaking ignorance and speaking your uk language which does not give you any more brain power in the slightest. I'm through replying to your childish nonsense. You maybe the nonce in this talk.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#74 Sep 20, 2013
Thanks for the heads up.

What is it about religitards and socks?
TheCapedCrusader wrote:
<quoted text>
As well as "Buck" you also use the name "True Evidence".
buck

AOL

#76 Sep 23, 2013
some of you are as ignorant as they come
just look at the things that you all fit about. Believe me there are things of more quality and value in life to discuss
than trying to find out who is who on topix. Maybe some of you all want to steal identities, maybe that is what is behind it all, who knows.
TheCapedCrusader

Montréal, Canada

#77 Sep 23, 2013
buck wrote:
some of you are as ignorant as they come
just look at the things that you all fit about. Believe me there are things of more quality and value in life to discuss
than trying to find out who is who on topix. Maybe some of you all want to steal identities, maybe that is what is behind it all, who knows.
As well as "buck" you also use the names "dawkinsisanathie st" and "True Evidence". No matter how much you bluster this will not change. You are just another cowardly, dishonest, clueless fundie who requires multiple identities to carry out the simplest of conversations.

Since: Aug 08

Somewhere in Ireland

#78 Sep 23, 2013
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
now you are speaking ignorance and speaking your uk language which does not give you any more brain power in the slightest. I'm through replying to your childish nonsense. You maybe the nonce in this talk.
Instead of using so many different names when you post, why not just have one name, one name that really suits you? May I suggest, Wanker!
dawkinsisanathie st

AOL

#79 Oct 3, 2013
no matter what you think about who is who on this forum it doesn't change the fact that DAWKINS IS AN ATHIEST.
and I do not require whatever you propose to be on a forum, maybe you are the one with requirements. I believe you are the real dishonest one, and much more clueless about life's reality and truth. and I hear very loud "Amens" :)
Thinking

Royston, UK

#80 Oct 3, 2013
Define in this context "Atheist".
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
no matter what you think about who is who on this forum it doesn't change the fact that DAWKINS IS AN ATHIEST.
and I do not require whatever you propose to be on a forum, maybe you are the one with requirements. I believe you are the real dishonest one, and much more clueless about life's reality and truth. and I hear very loud "Amens" :)
TheCapedCrusader

Montréal, Canada

#81 Oct 3, 2013
dawkinsisanathiest wrote:
no matter what you think about who is who on this forum it doesn't change the fact that DAWKINS IS AN ATHIEST.
and I do not require whatever you propose to be on a forum, maybe you are the one with requirements. I believe you are the real dishonest one, and much more clueless about life's reality and truth. and I hear very loud "Amens" :)
Have you been drinking the communion wine again?
buck

AOL

#82 Oct 6, 2013
Is there any other logical reason for indivuals like capedcrusader and thinking to be on a christian forum except it be that the devil has planted there here. by their unfruitful words anyone can easily recognize that they are not christians. Those who dissect and pull apart the truth follow in the footsteps of the devil, satan used the same tactics with Eve in the garden.
and after dissection what else is left but to twist and turn the true facts.
and that is all thinking and capedcrusader have done on christian forums.
lol

Welch, WV

#83 Oct 6, 2013
Jammercolo wrote:
<quoted text>
Destiny = No free will!!!
All kinds of free will. Your Destiny was, as a child of God, to have eternal life in heaven with the Father God. But, you blew it somewhere along the way. Your fault.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Scientific Proof Of GOD(for dummies) 2 min Trevor McDonut 1,781
Do you believe in tolerance for Gay Christians? 4 min Atheistgirl 65
News Religion, higher education and critical thinking (Aug '15) 55 min Trevor McDonut 9,181
Proof that Christianity is a lie 1 hr Atheistgirl 117
A God Who Disagrees With The Data 1 hr little lamb 296
Evidence Against God (Jan '16) 2 hr Atheistgirl 4,399
Poll Was Paul a False Apostle? (May '08) 3 hr KAB 5,701
More from around the web