Comments
41 - 60 of 227 Comments Last updated Feb 27, 2013
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Feb 3, 2013
 
Look, there's no comparison between 75,000 illegal canadians and the many millions of illegal mexicans, lol. You can't use them as an example.

And I can't fault anyone for not wanting this to turn into mexico. I don't want to become a latin American country.

I'm a black nationalist--if you wanna know the truth, I'd love for blacks to be given land to create our own country on this continent.

And not all conservatives "look down" on blacks--I know this for a fact from personal experience. White liberals have painted the GOP as the "party of racists" in an effort to keep us on your liberal plantation. I--and many others like myself--have discovered that our values are more similiar to those held by republicans..and you'll see more of us leaving as the black middle/upper classes grow. We rejoiced when it looked like Herman Cain was going to run! Honestly--and I don't say this to offend--many thinking blacks view you guys as useful idiots but have little in common with you. And in the future--when you guys have been reduced well below minority status--your going to see a non-white dominated conservative party emerge. Right now your way of garnering votes is by manipulating the ignorant with hand-outs and the like--but your time is coming.

And, no, I don't "look down" on them--they're not causing ME any problems--no, I've done pretty well in life, however they're causing problems in this country that we don't need right now. We simply don't need them. If they want to com then they should apply for visas and come in legally (like most nations require). Like most race-obcessed/class obcessed liberals, you try to divert attention from the real issues by reducing everything to "racism".

And guess what? Mass immigration from the third-world creates third world conditions here. America didn't magically become rich--no, people made it so. And mexico didn't magically become a corrupt third-world narco-state...no, mexicans made it that way.



And while I do have family in NC, I didn't grow up here--I'm ex-military and live in Fayetteville, NC--home of the 82nd airborne. Liked it here and stayed. While my location reads "Four oaks"( I don't know why it does that), some days it reads "carthage", sometimes "Raeford", other times "Four Oaks"..but I'm in Fayetteville.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Feb 3, 2013
 
Frank wrote:
White liberals have painted the GOP as the "party of racists" in an effort to keep us on your liberal plantation.
Yes, "white liberals" like Collin Powell who recently had this to say:

"There's also a dark vein of intolerance in some part of the party. What do I mean by that? What I mean by that is, they still sort of look down on minorities," Powell said.

Racism taints everything in America.

You hate Mexicans because Mexicans come from a narco-state. They are from a narco-state because the US war on drugs has made certain drugs profitable. For Mexico, that was marijuana. Why is marijuana illegal?

“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”"

That's the reasoning that made weed the same class of drugs as heroine.

Why do many Conservatives support abortion in the case of rape? It's because, and I sh1t you not, when they hear "rape" they think "Big black guy rapes my little white daughter". You know how I know? They've told me to my face.

The Rape exclusion makes so sense in the "Abortion is Murder" argument. It's only there because old white men don't want dark grandkids.

Hell, McCain lost his bid in 2000 against Bush because the Bush camp claimed that McCain had fathered an illegitimate black child.(in fact he has a dark skinned adopted child from Cambodia)

I mean, they even came out and admitted that they were trying to prevent black people from voting in this most recent election, just like they did in 2000.

Understand that for a second. That's not "let's try and win them over". THat's not "let's review our positions on X". No, that's "Don't let the N----s vote."

That's Jim Crow.

You think I'm obsessed with race? You need to open your eyes man. It's real, it's present.

I know. I'm still in the room when the last black guy leaves. I hear what people say.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Feb 3, 2013
 
Frank wrote:
While my location reads "Four oaks"( I don't know why it does that), some days it reads "carthage", sometimes "Raeford", other times "Four Oaks"..but I'm in Fayetteville.
I have the exact same problem. My location has changed six times and NONE of them are my town.
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Feb 4, 2013
 
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, "white liberals" like Collin Powell who recently had this to say:
"There's also a dark vein of intolerance in some part of the party. What do I mean by that? What I mean by that is, they still sort of look down on minorities," Powell said.
Racism taints everything in America.
You hate Mexicans because Mexicans come from a narco-state. They are from a narco-state because the US war on drugs has made certain drugs profitable. For Mexico, that was marijuana. Why is marijuana illegal?
“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”"
That's the reasoning that made weed the same class of drugs as heroine.
Why do many Conservatives support abortion in the case of rape? It's because, and I sh1t you not, when they hear "rape" they think "Big black guy rapes my little white daughter". You know how I know? They've told me to my face.
The Rape exclusion makes so sense in the "Abortion is Murder" argument. It's only there because old white men don't want dark grandkids.
Hell, McCain lost his bid in 2000 against Bush because the Bush camp claimed that McCain had fathered an illegitimate black child.(in fact he has a dark skinned adopted child from Cambodia)
I mean, they even came out and admitted that they were trying to prevent black people from voting in this most recent election, just like they did in 2000.
Understand that for a second. That's not "let's try and win them over". THat's not "let's review our positions on X". No, that's "Don't let the N----s vote."
That's Jim Crow.
You think I'm obsessed with race? You need to open your eyes man. It's real, it's present.
I know. I'm still in the room when the last black guy leaves. I hear what people say.
Notice how Colin Powell said in "some part of the party".

I never said that there are no racists in the GOP---however it's not as bad as the left tries to make it seem. I'm not going to reject a political party that I identify with simply because a faction of them are good ole boys..because there's no reasonable alternative. And the fact of the matter is that racist views--to some degree or another--exist amongst all peoples of the earth, including us, arabs, indians, the chinese, Koreans, Israelis, etc., etc., lol.

And if the "old white men" dont want "dark grand kids"--why should I care? Lol, I've told my son time and time again that he better not bring home any women whom aren't black (which has become an unfortunate trend these days)--whats the problem? Like Farrakhan and other black nationalists, I love my people and want to see them advance---not breed themselves out of existence, ya know?

You give white "racism" too much credit---a new age is upon us: I'm not a slave, I own property and make good money, nobody's oppressing me, I refuse to play the role of poor-defenseless-black-in-need -of-white-liberal-salvation... however you will play the race angle until the very end because encouraging racial conflict---along with class warfare---is what liberals do. You want to keep people paranoid, ignorant, and dependent upon the govt as its one of the ways that dems are able to get votes

Listen---as I've said before, there's going to come a time when non-white conservatives start standing up and speaking out...because the reality is that many latinos, blacks, and muslims are conservatives (more than you realize)....the only problem is that the GOP needs a little tweaking. Personally, like Herman Cain has said, I'd like to see a new third conservative party emerge.

You and I aren't going to agree.
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Feb 4, 2013
 
Ahhh! My reply didn't go through!
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Feb 4, 2013
 
2nd attempt

I never said that there are no racists in the gop--however it isn't as bad as you try to make it seem. And I'm not going to abandon a party whose values I identify with simply because a faction of them happen to be good ole boys as there's no good alternative. I don't allow the racism of others to define me.

And if "old white men" don't want dark grand-kids, why should I care? I've told my son time and time again not to bring home any girls whom aren't black, lol. Like Farrakhan and other black nationalists, I love my people and want to see them advance---not breed themselves out of existence.

You give white racism too much credit--a new age is upon us: I'm not a slave, I own property and make good money, I'm not oppressed. I refuse to play the role of poor-defenseless-black-unable- to-take-care-of-himself-and-in -need-of-white-liberal-salvati on that the dems try to force us into.

And you can't blame America for mexico being a narco state! Just because Americans buy a lot of dope doesn't mean that Mexico has to supply it. You act as if mexicans are an inherently stupid people incapable of knowing right from wrong. And I don't "hate mexicans".

You just watch--there's going to come a time when non-white conservatives begin to stand up and speak out as there's more of us than you realize..the only problem is that the gop needs a little tweaking. Personally, as Herman Cain has said, I'd like to see a new third conservative party emerge.

As for you--you guys are going to play the race angle--and encourage class warfare--to the very end because its how you get votes. You want to keep people paranoid, ignorant, and dependant upon the govt in order to stay in power.

You and I aren't going to agree.
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Feb 4, 2013
 
Oops, the first post just went through!

Lol, what the he11?

“ ILKS r kewl ”

Since: Apr 09

Conch republic

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
Oops, the first post just went through!
Lol, what the he11?
operator error. ya f'd up as usual.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuggin wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any "Conservatives" out there who can explain their philosophy about "Conservativism" without just citing what they are for or against.
What is the underlying philosophy of Conservativism? How do Conservative positions stem from that philosophy?
Core Values!

Its the bedrock foundation that made America what it is today. Take it away, and you no longer have America. If thats what you want, fine. Vote it in, etc... Just dont pretend its something its not. Call it something else like France or England...

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Feb 4, 2013
 
Troth for Leogere wrote:
<quoted text>operator error. ya f'd up as usual.
Everybody makes mistakes now and then Frank so dont sweat it! troth here caught because, well he is just a big mistake. An expert in the subject of f'd up, a born natural f'd'r.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Feb 4, 2013
 
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>
Notice how Colin Powell said in "some part of the party".
I never said that there are no racists in the GOP---however it's not as bad as the left tries to make it seem.
No one is saying that _everyone_ in the GOP is racist.

But, during the football game last night, former head of the SC GOP tweeted: "This Superbowl sucks more dick than an adult Travon Martin would for drug money"

That's the former _HEAD_ of the SC GOP. That's not some idiot at a Tea Party rally. That's someone who should know better.

But he doesn't. You know why? Because he's surrounded by people who all think the same way.

This is HARDLY a unique incident. This sort of stuff keeps happening.
And if the "old white men" dont want "dark grand kids"--why should I care? Lol, I've told my son time and time again that he better not bring home any women whom aren't black (which has become an unfortunate trend these days)--whats the problem? Like Farrakhan and other black nationalists, I love my people and want to see them advance---not breed themselves out of existence, ya know?
The difference is this:

You are saying, "Son, don't mess with any white girls."
They are saying, "I reserve the right to kill an unborn black baby."

I don't know you position on abortion, but for the sake of argument I'm going to say you are pro-life.

If your son came home and said, "I got a white girl pregnant." You would tell him that he has to convince her to get an abortion because you are against abortion.

If one of these GOP guys has his white daughter come home and say, "I slept with a black guy and now I'm pregnant", he's taking her to the clinic tomorrow morning.

For them abortion is sort of wrong. Having a black kid is worse.
You give white "racism" too much credit---a new age is upon us: I'm not a slave, I own property and make good money, nobody's oppressing me, I refuse to play the role of poor-defenseless-black-in-need -of-white-liberal-salvation
No one is asking you to.

However, the GOP made is clear that their intention was to deny African Americans their constitutional right to vote.

That's not an insignificant thing for a political party to do. That's not subtle racism, or soft racism, or treating minorities with kid gloves to keep them needy.

No, that's full on Jim Crow, don't let the blacks vote.

That's a VERY big deal.
...however you will play the race angle until the very end because encouraging racial conflict---along with class warfare---is what liberals do. You want to keep people paranoid, ignorant, and dependent upon the govt as its one of the ways that dems are able to get votes
You are smarter than this.

First of all, "Class warfare" has been going on for decades. You make it sound like the rich people haven't been abusing the system. Haven't been bankrupting working americans, stealing their 401ks and skating on their taxes.

Second, I'm not encouraging racial conflict. I'm stating flat out - BLACK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE. You are backing the party that disagrees. If you think they have solid policies, then they should be trying to ENCOURAGE black people to vote FOR them, not prevent them from voting altogether.

Third, the GOP is opposed to education. Saying that the progressives want to keep people ignorant is simply dishonest. Find me a single democrat backed "Creationism in schools" initiative. Hell, find me a Democrat in Congress who's making speeches about how evolution is a lie. There are SEVERAL Republicans who are doing it.
the reality is that many latinos, blacks, and muslims are conservatives (more than you realize)....the only problem is that the GOP needs a little tweaking.
"Little"? Come on.

The party's criticism of Obama is that he's a secret Muslim.
Half the GOP rejected Romney because he "wasn't a Christian."

The Republican party sold its soul to the radical racist right.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Feb 4, 2013
 
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
No one is saying that _everyone_ in the GOP is racist.
But, during the football game last night, former head of the SC GOP tweeted: "This Superbowl sucks more dick than an adult Travon Martin would for drug money"
That's the former _HEAD_ of the SC GOP. That's not some idiot at a Tea Party rally. That's someone who should know better.
But he doesn't. You know why? Because he's surrounded by people who all think the same way.
This is HARDLY a unique incident. This sort of stuff keeps happening.
<quoted text>
The difference is this:
You are saying, "Son, don't mess with any white girls."
They are saying, "I reserve the right to kill an unborn black baby."
I don't know you position on abortion, but for the sake of argument I'm going to say you are pro-life.
If your son came home and said, "I got a white girl pregnant." You would tell him that he has to convince her to get an abortion because you are against abortion.
If one of these GOP guys has his white daughter come home and say, "I slept with a black guy and now I'm pregnant", he's taking her to the clinic tomorrow morning.
For them abortion is sort of wrong. Having a black kid is worse.
<quoted text>
No one is asking you to.
However, the GOP made is clear that their intention was to deny African Americans their constitutional right to vote.
That's not an insignificant thing for a political party to do. That's not subtle racism, or soft racism, or treating minorities with kid gloves to keep them needy.
No, that's full on Jim Crow, don't let the blacks vote.
That's a VERY big deal.
<quoted text>
You are smarter than this.
First of all, "Class warfare" has been going on for decades. You make it sound like the rich people haven't been abusing the system. Haven't been bankrupting working americans, stealing their 401ks and skating on their taxes.
Second, I'm not encouraging racial conflict. I'm stating flat out - BLACK PEOPLE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE. You are backing the party that disagrees. If you think they have solid policies, then they should be trying to ENCOURAGE black people to vote FOR them, not prevent them from voting altogether.
Third, the GOP is opposed to education. Saying that the progressives want to keep people ignorant is simply dishonest. Find me a single democrat backed "Creationism in schools" initiative. Hell, find me a Democrat in Congress who's making speeches about how evolution is a lie. There are SEVERAL Republicans who are doing it.
<quoted text>
"Little"? Come on.
The party's criticism of Obama is that he's a secret Muslim.
Half the GOP rejected Romney because he "wasn't a Christian."
The Republican party sold its soul to the radical racist right.
SO whats the latest scoop on batboy? I figured you would know since you must get your news info here:

https://www.google.com/search...

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Feb 4, 2013
 
Huntington Guy wrote:
<quoted text>Core Values!
Its the bedrock foundation that made America what it is today. Take it away, and you no longer have America. If thats what you want, fine. Vote it in, etc... Just dont pretend its something its not. Call it something else like France or England...
I consider the right to vote a bedrock foundation of America.

The Conservatives engaged in a large scale effort to prevent people from voting in the last election, as they had in the one before that and the one before that.

Do Conservatives not think that the right to vote is a "core value" for Americans?

I consider fairness to be a core value and a bedrock of America. Romney went 10 years without paying any taxes thanks to a special banking account he set up through his church. His current tax rate is lower than that of working Americans and much of his income is hidden in offshore tax shelters. Is that fair?

Should someone who is excessively wealthy be allowed to avoid paying taxes altogether simply because they don't want to, while someone who is middle class must pay a much larger share?

Do Conservatives not think that fairness is a "core value" for Americans?

I consider personal freedom to be a "core value". That freedom would include the freedom to practice whatever religion I choose, or to not practice any.

Conservatives have tried passing numerous laws which require Judeo-Christianity. Further, they take offense if someone dares to acknowledge that other holidays from other religions occur.

Is personal freedom not a "core value" for Conservatives?

I consider "small government" to be a core value for America.

A small government would not concern itself with such petty matters as who is allowed to live with whom, or which couples can or can not get married to one another. A small government would not insist on dictating which medical procedures a doctor and patient can decide on and which they are required to do.

And most agregiously, a small government would never pass a Congressional Law which gives the medical decision making power over an individual American's life to the family of the President.

Do Conservatives not think that "small government" is a bedrock value?

You see, Conservatives seem to talk a lot of trash about what they want, but they always seem to be doing the exact opposite of what they say.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Feb 4, 2013
 
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
I consider the right to vote a bedrock foundation of America.
The Conservatives engaged in a large scale effort to prevent people from voting in the last election, as they had in the one before that and the one before that.
Do Conservatives not think that the right to vote is a "core value" for Americans?
I consider fairness to be a core value and a bedrock of America. Romney went 10 years without paying any taxes thanks to a special banking account he set up through his church. His current tax rate is lower than that of working Americans and much of his income is hidden in offshore tax shelters. Is that fair?
Should someone who is excessively wealthy be allowed to avoid paying taxes altogether simply because they don't want to, while someone who is middle class must pay a much larger share?
Do Conservatives not think that fairness is a "core value" for Americans?
I consider personal freedom to be a "core value". That freedom would include the freedom to practice whatever religion I choose, or to not practice any.
Conservatives have tried passing numerous laws which require Judeo-Christianity. Further, they take offense if someone dares to acknowledge that other holidays from other religions occur.
Is personal freedom not a "core value" for Conservatives?
I consider "small government" to be a core value for America.
A small government would not concern itself with such petty matters as who is allowed to live with whom, or which couples can or can not get married to one another. A small government would not insist on dictating which medical procedures a doctor and patient can decide on and which they are required to do.
And most agregiously, a small government would never pass a Congressional Law which gives the medical decision making power over an individual American's life to the family of the President.
Do Conservatives not think that "small government" is a bedrock value?
You see, Conservatives seem to talk a lot of trash about what they want, but they always seem to be doing the exact opposite of what they say.
Looks alright on paper, only problem is none of it is true.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Feb 4, 2013
 
Huntington Guy wrote:
<quoted text>Looks alright on paper, only problem is none of it is true.
I will admit that I mispoke on one part. It was the Republicans in the Florida Senate which passed the law giving the President's family the right to decide the medical treatment for a single Florida woman in opposition to her husband's wishes.

How do you justify that as "small government".

Or for that matter, how do you justify trying to prohibit black people from voting as a election strategy?

Or trying to decide for people who is or is not fit to marry who?

Basically, as always, the Conservative position is: "It's okay for me, just not for you."

I suggest you watch the recent segment the Daily Show did about Glenn Beck's fascist community planning and see exactly what the "Conservatives" have in store for you
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Feb 5, 2013
 
That remark of his was in bad taste...but why should I care about what someone says about Trayvon? Is he a martyr of some sorts? And while we're on this subject, the handling of the Trayvon Martin case was an excellent example of how the left tries to intentionally create racial strife via the media. Remember how NBC edited the 911 call in order to make people think that this was some sort of racially motivated hate crime? Remember how they tried to portray Zimmerman as a white guy even though he's mixed? I've learned never to trust the media!

And this habit of quoting repubs in order to make them look racist or bad doesn't affect me in the least-- I can copy and paste such things from all different kinds of people.

And sure I'm pro-life but not totally against abortion--sometimes a situation requires it.

Basically, you're stereotyping an entire group of people even though liberals claim to be against such things--a bit hypocritical, don't you think?

Basically, you're using the basic stock issues that libs bring up in order to get people all riled up, that's all.

And it's like this--while the gop isn't perfect, as far as I'm concerned they are the lesser evil until another conservative party comes along. Don't get the wrong idea, you can't put me in any sort of category, I don't support everything that the repubs do or believe in. But like I said--they're the lesser evil.

Simply put, I've met way too many lunatic lefties and I generally dislike them. If you go to Chapel Hill NC (where my son goes to college) or Asheville, NC ( which is often referred to as the "San Francisco of the South")---you'll see exactly what I'm talking about. These are hot-beds of liberalism and many of the people are insane radicals...no thanks!

I've said--and I'll continue to say---the left wingers encourage a kind of slave mentality and government dependence amongst some blacks. You try to encourage a victim-menatality and help-lessness, you encourage them to continue to play the blame-game and this is all counter-productive and diverts attention from the real issues.

Whereas I--and others like myself--try to teach black kids/people self-empowerment, a kind of do-for-self philosophy. We try to teach them that we and only we have the power to change our destinies and that there's no need to wait on white people or anyone else to come and save us. We try to address the cultural problems that exist amongst our communities...whereas libs exploit blacks and other people of color and their situations in order to stay in power, encouraging them to allow things that happened decades ago to define them today. I oppose this.

You don't understand where I'm coming from.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Frank wrote:
That remark of his was in bad taste...but why should I care about what someone says about Trayvon?
Because it goes to the frame of mind of the person uttering it.

It would still be in bad taste but less telling if it was a week after the shooting. Or if this guy was from Florida.

However, this is a guy who's making remarks about Trayvon growing up to "suck dick for drugs" one year later and _two days before he would have turned 18_.

Why? What possible reason could this _head of the GOP_ have for citing Trayvon Martin in comments about the quality of the superbowl?

This, like the "some women just rape so easy" comment gives insight into how the leadership of the GOP thinks.
Remember how they tried to portray Zimmerman as a white guy even though he's mixed?
From what I recall, he was always portrayed as Hispanic. Though I may have that wrong, and I admit that "Zimmerman" isn't a particularly Hispanic sounding name.
Basically, you're using the basic stock issues that libs bring up in order to get people all riled up, that's all.
Seriously? You honestly don't think that FoxNews brings up stock issues. Google "Fox News War On" and see how many different hits you come up with.
I've said--and I'll continue to say---the left wingers encourage a kind of slave mentality and government dependence amongst some blacks. You try to encourage a victim-menatality and help-lessness, you encourage them to continue to play the blame-game and this is all counter-productive and diverts attention from the real issues.
Except that that simply isn't true.

Trying to get funding for an inner city school is not "making them victims". It's acknowledging that school systems get their money from property taxes and that the inner city has a high population density and lower tax base compared to the suburbs.

Therefore, funding is uneven for schools which causes uneven opportunity in the future.

That's not encouraging victim mentality. It's basic economics and an adjustment made to try and correct that problem.

Otherwise you have a pocket of kids getting a substandard education
simply because they were unlucky enough to be born to parents who themselves got a substandard education.
Whereas I--and others like myself--try to teach black kids/people self-empowerment, a kind of do-for-self philosophy. We try to teach them that we and only we have the power to change our destinies and that there's no need to wait on white people or anyone else to come and save us. We try to address the cultural problems that exist amongst our communities...whereas libs exploit blacks and other people of color and their situations in order to stay in power, encouraging them to allow things that happened decades ago to define them today. I oppose this.
You don't understand where I'm coming from.
Your argument seems to be this:

Liberals try and fix problems therefore they are bad.
Conservatives don't think black people should be allowed to vote, therefore they are good.

You're right, I don't understand where you are coming from.

How can you support a party that wants to prohibit you from voting for their candidate?
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Feb 5, 2013
 
You can twist it however you like but it doesn't change anything--do you think that I've never looked into these issues and weighed the good and the bad?

For me its principles before personalities. And, unfortunately, this is a two-party system which means that I'll be forced to vote repub until something better comes along--it is what it is.

I'd rather roll with the gop than the gay-parade crowd and feminazis any day.

Stop exploiting blacks and treating us like defenseless pets...inject a little common sense into the party and then we'll talk.

peace

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Frank wrote:
I'd rather roll with the gop than the gay-parade crowd and feminazis any day.
Stop exploiting blacks and treating us like defenseless pets...
Hold up.

So, you're basically saying that because you don't like gays and women, you are okay with blacks losing the right to vote.

That's pretty messed up.

It's not "exploiting" blacks to allow them to participate in the electoral process. It's called enfranchisement.

There is no act more repugnant for a political party than trying to prevent people from being allowed to vote.

And I find it particularly hilarious that you don't believe the GOP harboring bigotry, but you joined them because you are bigoted against homosexuals and women.

Seriously?
Frank

Fayetteville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Feb 5, 2013
 
No, you're saying that I don't like gays and women---I'm saying that I oppose the radical homosexual agenda and the modern feminazi movement..and the cultural marxism...and the anything goes and all things are equal philosophy...and the anti-Americanism...and the rest of the garbage that the modern left stands for.

The reasons for why I'm not a liberal are too many to list.

While I'm the first to admit that I'm not the brightest, I'm not the kind of poor and ignorant minority that is easily manipulated with liberal talking points or by dangling a carrot either.

It is what it is, we're not going to agree.

Modern Liberalism has this tendecy to produce empty and useless human beings amongst the common folk whom stand for nothing and need the govt for everything. That's not me.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Christianity is a Cult of good and evil. 22 min dollarsbill 65
Time is Coming! Are you ready for it? 36 min dollarsbill 24
intelligent debate 38 min dollarsbill 38
Scripture cancels Rapture lottery 43 min Hell-Sucks 88
Dollarsbill Is Still Quick To Condemn 52 min dollarsbill 1,151
Michael Brown was a Christian??? 1 hr dollarsbill 236
Hamas executes 11 more Palestinians suspected o... 1 hr dollarsbill 32
Cookie's Place (Oct '13) 1 hr -Lea- 13,659
Take America Back 4 hr Passing thru 986
Are World Events Pointing to End Times 6 hr Armed Dangerous 394
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Christian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••