Comments
21 - 40 of 141 Comments Last updated Oct 20, 2013

“ ILKS r kewl ”

Since: Apr 09

Conch republic

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
I am NOT a troll or psychotic
<quoted text>
LMAO Biggest lie this month on topix! hey, talked to your psychiatrist today?

“Third Eye”

Since: Nov 10

You can't get there from here.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>So then Jesus never truly suffered. making all the claims about it worthless.
Oh, HE suffered all right... just not from having a wife... if that were the case, HE never would have made it to the cross...{:-P

“Third Eye”

Since: Nov 10

You can't get there from here.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Troth for Leogere wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO Biggest lie this month on topix! hey, talked to your psychiatrist today?
You prove this line wrong everytime you post...
Really

Jersey City, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Earth Child
I am a Christian and not one thing you can do about it.
I am NOT a troll or psychotic I am here on the CHRISTIAN threads talking about CHRISTIAN issues and you are here arguing with the Christians that makes you the TROLL.
<quoted text>
Why did you post on the gay/lesbian thread? Because you are a troll? You are certifiably psychotic. For someone who claims to be educatedmin mental illness you think you would be able to spell the words.
Really

Jersey City, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Really
YOU DO KNOW that I posted there 3 yrs ago??? I have NOT been on the gay and lesbian threads in a long time. When I was there I was there to warn them of repentance and coming to Christ.
Now why are you calling me names? You a bully? I do not recall calling you names here. I am NOT psychotic so why you lying? So you never made a spelling mistake? Why do you hate me so much you want to pick a fight? Do you have a license to diagnose someone online? Funny the counselor I do see would make an ass out of you proving you a liar.
<quoted text>
As a matter of fact I do. And you know dam well you went to that threat to hurt peop-le and to start trouble. The same reason you post here and argue with Jay, troth and nettie. The first post you made today was a dig on Jay because he was not at work.. Your very first post was an attack, remember . I am not here to fight with you, just to point out what a lying fraud and hypocrite you are. You are the one who wants to fight. That is the only way you can relate to others.. Shame you never grew up.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Feb 21, 2013
 
NDanger wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus was a different person than today's 21st Century Jew
-----

Yes, in the sense that he was much more radical and fundamentalist.
To deny that he was a married man being anointed and kissed by women in the public view one is promoting him as a Jewish Casanova.
Is it in this sense that you claim he was different? If it is you are showing complete lack of knowledge of Jewish culture.

Ben

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Feb 21, 2013
 
NDanger wrote:
Evidence or assertion?
-----

Assertion based on evidences.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Feb 21, 2013
 
Native from Pa wrote:
Jesus was God in the flesh. God was not married.
--------

Jesus was a Jew and not Greek. For a man to be god or son of god, he must be of Greek of Egyptian culture. Have you ever heard about the myth of the demigod? That's the Greek term for a man born of a god with an earthly woman. There is no such a thing in Judaism which was the Faith of Jesus.

Ben

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Seriously__ wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus went against many traditions of His day, so while this may be considered strong evidence by some, it does not *prove* it.
IMO, it is doubtful anyone will find *proof* that Jesus was or was not married at this time. If *proof* actually existed, it likely would have been found and either published or destroyed by now.
The Bible is silent on the issue for a reason, and I believe that reason is that Jesus' marital status is both none of our business and of no consequence.
-----

To get married is not a Jewish tradition but a tradition of all Mankind. The NT is silent about his being a married man because the common thing to do was to be married. His marital status would rather be mentioned if he was not married. In other words, that's an extra evidence that he was a married man.

People who deny that Jesus was married are simply unaware of a terrible sisservice they are paying him. Consider a man on his 30's
hanging around with twelve youngmen for three and a half years and calling one of them his beloved. That would be detrimental to his credibility.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Native from Pa wrote:
It is blaspheme to say Jesus who was God in the flesh was married. God does not need a wife..
-----

Yes, but Jesus was not God in the flesh. He was a Jewish man and a Jew cannot be God in the flesh. There is no such a thing in Judaism
which was the Faith of Jesus.

Ben

“Jesus is Lord”

Since: Aug 11

Greenwood, Indiana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Ben_Masada wrote:
EVIDENCE THAT JESUS WAS MARRIED (1)
Imagine 2000 years ago! Today, the 21st Century, a woman cannot address a religious Jew in public to ask or say anything if she is not his wife. Even being his wife, she must walk a few steps back for the sake of traditional Jewish discretion.
Now, let us read John 11:2. "This Mary whose brother Lazarus and sister was Martha, was the one who anointed Jesus with a very expensive perfume and dried his feet with her hair.(John 12:3) Luke says that Mary even kissed Jesus' feet. If a religious Jew could not even be talked to by a woman in public how could Jesus be anointed and touched by a woman and even kissed if she was not his wife?(Luke 7:38) The only way to refute this assertion is by
denying that Jesus was a Jew at all, let alone that he was a religious Jew.
Ben
There is no place in the Bible that says that Jesus was Married, you are making something out of nothing.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Feb 21, 2013
 
Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have any skin in this game...but - Jesus was affiliating with the lesser folks of his days - living on the fringes with laborers, fishermen, tax collectors...and prostitutes were among them...which would lead us to believe his relationships with women was also different - and his gaining adoration from them likely involved sex at some point. He might have been a Mack Daddy with the chicks...he was after all a man in the flesh, and men do love the flesh of women...
The idea/belief that a "Religious" Jewish male (oooh spooky language) always adheres to all the rules all the time has never been to NYC when the Hasids are leaving work heading home and stopping for a little front seat fella/io on the way...
------

Now, IMHO, you are exaggerating beyond my allowance. While I expect
that people understand that Jesus was a married man, I prefer to stay within the standing morality of the religious Jewish man of his time.

Ben

“Jesus is Lord”

Since: Aug 11

Greenwood, Indiana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Punisher wrote:
<quoted text>So then Jesus never truly suffered. making all the claims about it worthless.
You are like 15th you make up so many lies you think they are real. But to tell you the truth I haven't seen one comment of your that got the truth in it. So this must mean most of your comments comes from the pit of hell. "Get a life".........

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Ben
Jesus is the long awaited Messiah the Jews have been waiting for. Many JEWS are now becoming MESSIANIC JEWS who now see that.
----------

Native, It does not make any sense at all for the Messiah to be an individual. The individual is born, lives his span of life and dies. Are we supposed to expect a new Messiah in every generation? Obviously not. The Messiah cannot die. He must remain as a People in the context of Immanuel before the Lord forever.(Jer. 31:35-37) Messiah by definition is the anointed of the Lord. According to Habakkuk 3:13, "The Lord comes forth to save His People; to save His Anointed one." And Isaiah identified Immanuel with Judah in Isaiah 8:8.

Regarding Jews who are converting to the Christian faction of "Messianic Jews" the reason is lack of knowledge; as Hosea says: "My People perish for lack of knowledge." (Hos. 4:6)

Ben

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

ThePreacherman01 wrote:
<quoted text>There is no place in the Bible that says that Jesus was Married, you are making something out of nothing.
--------

Is there a place in the whole of the NT where it says that Jesus was NOT married? No, there is not. Reason why? Because to be married was the common thing to do at that time even from the years
of being a Teenager. You would find that Jesus was NOT married if he had not beenso.

Ben

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Ben
Jesus was NOT any man HE WAS GOD in the flesh so what you are saying is GOD got married. That is pure blaspheme.
<quoted text>
---------

What you are succeeding to tell me is that Jesus was a Greek man and not Jewish. According to Judaism which was his Faith there is no such a thing as a man being god. Only in Greek Mythology.

Ben

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Feb 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ThePreacherman01 wrote:
<quoted text> You are like 15th you make up so many lies you think they are real. But to tell you the truth I haven't seen one comment of your that got the truth in it. So this must mean most of your comments comes from the pit of hell. "Get a life".........
------

Superstions never cease amazing me!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Feb 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Ben
The Bible says Jesus is God
Philippians 2
5 You must have the same attitude that Christ Jesus had.
6 Though he was God,[a]
he did not think of equality with God
as something to cling to.
7 Instead, he gave up his divine privileges[b];
he took the humble position of a slave[c]
and was born as a human being.
When he appeared in human form,[d]
8 he humbled himself in obedience to God
and died a criminal’s death on a cross.
ALSO John 1 proves Jesus is God in the flesh
In the beginning the Word already existed.
The Word was with God,
and the Word was God.
2 He existed in the beginning with God.
Now look at verse 14
14 So the Word became human[d] and made his home among us.
Jesus is the WORD that became human and verse 1 says THE WORD WAS GOD. So Jesus was God IN the flesh.
<quoted text>
Circular logic

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Feb 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Native from Pa wrote:
Ben
The Bible says Jesus is God
Philippians 2
5 You must have the same attitude that Christ Jesus had.
6 Though he was God,[a]
he did not think of equality with God
as something to cling to.
7 Instead, he gave up his divine privileges[b];
he took the humble position of a slave[c]
and was born as a human being.
When he appeared in human form,[d]
8 he humbled himself in obedience to God
and died a criminal’s death on a cross.
ALSO John 1 proves Jesus is God in the flesh
In the beginning the Word already existed.
The Word was with God,
and the Word was God.
2 He existed in the beginning with God.
Now look at verse 14
14 So the Word became human[d] and made his home among us.
Jesus is the WORD that became human and verse 1 says THE WORD WAS GOD. So Jesus was God IN the flesh.
<quoted text>
------

You mean, the NT. Jesus never even dreamed that the NT would ever been written. Therefore, the NT was not the Bible for him. It was added later unto the Bible against the injunction in Deuteronomy 4:2 which forbids to add or to subtract from what has been written.
Therefore, the idea that Jesus was God in the flesh is pure idolatry, according to Isaiah 46:5.

Ben

“Third Eye”

Since: Nov 10

You can't get there from here.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Feb 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Circular logic
I figured it would be more like crickets going off in your head...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••