And this is when I pointed out to you that I googled Isaiah 53 and picked the first result that came up and copied and pasted the part I wanted into the thread. But hey why take my word for it? Google it (Isaiah 53) and go the the first result and see if it says Offspring or seed. Nonetheless the fact remains that Jesus had no seed/offspring. To assume that its talking of herbal seeds or metaphorical seeds is just guessing at best. The fact it says prolonged days afterwards tells us that it meant LITERAL offspring/seed. Which can mean the same as you know and I do.
I said you attacked me cuz you called me a muslim (though Im obviously not one) and said I changed scripture to say offspring when it said seed (again when I obviously didnt change anything of )
The offering is metaphorical not literal. Which is why it says AFTER he has suffered he will see the light of life. Well how can that be if he is dead after he was made an offering?
Where did I claim the heading of the gospel of matthew was wrong? WHat I did say is that he claimed prophecies that were not prophecies at all along with other places in the NT.
And this is when I pointed out to you that I googled Isaiah 53 and picked the first result that came up and copied and pasted the part I wanted into the thread.
Then maybe it should be a good idea for you to read and understand what you post. In either case you wrote it and then claimed you didn't.