What are your True Feeling on Athiests ?

[Reasoner]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
So in you opinion Mr.'Reasoner' is a BIGOT, correct?

Meh, I wouldn't defend myself too vigorously over that charge. Although my bigotry doesn't involve trying to take away any of your rights like a normal bigot would be in favor of (gay marriage). I just think your beliefs are stupid, and that you are deluded. You may be an otherwise smart cookie. If that makes me a bigot, so be it.

The "idiot" crack I made has nothing to do with your religion, but came from your idiotic comment. I would actually defend your right to believe what you want. I may think it's crazy, and would tell you to keep walking if you ever tried to poison me with it in person, but every person has the right to choose their own beliefs and destiny. And besides, when you give the government power to take away one groups rights, you give them power to take away everyone's rights.

[alohawg]

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
Meh, I wouldn't defend myself too vigorously over that charge. Although my bigotry doesn't involve trying to take away any of your rights like a normal bigot would be in favor of (gay marriage). I just think your beliefs are stupid, and that you are deluded. You may be an otherwise smart cookie. If that makes me a bigot, so be it.
The "idiot" crack I made has nothing to do with your religion, but came from your idiotic comment. I would actually defend your right to believe what you want. I may think it's crazy, and would tell you to keep walking if you ever tried to poison me with it in person, but every person has the right to choose their own beliefs and destiny. And besides, when you give the government power to take away one groups rights, you give them power to take away everyone's rights.

Easy partner, I agree with that last line there.
One man's idiot is anothers genius you know.
I'm not going to open the gay marriage can now but to say does not nature itself teach which parts go together? Now to deny that would be idiotic in my view.

[Jammercolo]

that the world would be far better off if atheist ruled the world.

[Stedfast]

Jammercolo wrote:

that the world would be far better off if atheist ruled the world.

You mean our "Atheist" here in this forum? I think he'd rather be fishing.:)

[Nettiebelle]

Stedfast wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean our "Atheist" here in this forum? I think he'd rather be fishing.:)

or hunting or perhaps camping with his family again.

[Jammercolo]

Stedfast wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean our "Atheist" here in this forum? I think he'd rather be fishing.:)

NO, "atheist" like none believers

[Reasoner]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
Easy partner, I agree with that last line there.
One man's idiot is anothers genius you know.
I'm not going to open the gay marriage can now but to say does not nature itself teach which parts go together? Now to deny that would be idiotic in my view.

Actually, homosexuality occurs in the animal kingdom as well. So actually it's quite natural. How do you account for that?

[Janeebananee]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
The truth is, whether you accept it, like it, believe it, deny it, mock it or whatever. Not my threat btw, I would call your attention to the Holy Bible.

The Truth of anything is always the same for whomever arrives at it. It is an individual INNER-journey, and is not handed to you on a platter. And no one with any knowledge of how to approach the Truth will ever tell you to take their word for it.

[alohawg]

Janeebananee wrote:

<quoted text>
The Truth of anything is always the same for whomever arrives at it. It is an individual INNER-journey, and is not handed to you on a platter. And no one with any knowledge of how to approach the Truth will ever tell you to take their word for it.

If you get hit on the head with falling brick that truth is an outter journey now isn't it?
Now if you suffered a bullet wound that indeed would be an an outter and an inner journey. Sorry, the truth exist regardless of what you think or when you think it, it just is.

[alohawg]

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, homosexuality occurs in the animal kingdom as well. So actually it's quite natural. How do you account for that?

Show an example of an animal that lives an exclusively gay life, not two male dogs meeting in a kennel for the first time and dumb humping.
My female dog has learned to mimmicked my nuetered male and tries to mount him, doesn't prove jack.

[victoria1]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
Show an example of an animal that lives an exclusively gay life, not two male dogs meeting in a kennel for the first time and dumb humping.
My female dog has learned to mimmicked my nuetered male and tries to mount him, doesn't prove jack.

Why does it have to be exclusively gay? Isn't homosexual activity, homosexuality activity even it's mixed in with a little hetero?

Are now saying the being exclusively gay is wrong but here and there it's ok because that's natural?

[Reasoner]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
Show an example of an animal that lives an exclusively gay life, not two male dogs meeting in a kennel for the first time and dumb humping.
My female dog has learned to mimmicked my nuetered male and tries to mount him, doesn't prove jack.

I said homosexual, not gay. Apparently you don't know the difference. Homosexual has to do with the attraction. Gay is the lifestyle of those that have that attraction. But sure, I can point out homosexual behavior in nature.

The Bonobo Chimpanzee is the easiest example to point out. But homosexuality occurs between many more species. Both male and female. I mean, you can't deny that it happens. What you will need to do is explain it to yourself to make it fit your religious bigotry against gay people.

I'm not so naive as to believe that you will have a eureka moment and realize that homosexuality is as natural as breathing. Believers excel at compartmentalizing and dismissing things that they don't want to hear. But I just like to point out how unaware most believers are of the world around them.

[alohawg]

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
I said homosexual, not gay. Apparently you don't know the difference. Homosexual has to do with the attraction. Gay is the lifestyle of those that have that attraction. But sure, I can point out homosexual behavior in nature.
The Bonobo Chimpanzee is the easiest example to point out. But homosexuality occurs between many more species. Both male and female. I mean, you can't deny that it happens. What you will need to do is explain it to yourself to make it fit your religious bigotry against gay people.
I'm not so naive as to believe that you will have a eureka moment and realize that homosexuality is as natural as breathing. Believers excel at compartmentalizing and dismissing things that they don't want to hear. But I just like to point out how unaware most believers are of the world around them.

Sorry, let me be more clear, my female dog has learned to hump my male dog, get it? Why would she be attracted to his butt??? I know it occurs, BUT animals do not stay that way and exclusively engage in homosexual behavior, that would be unnatural and even they know it. The animals return to the opposite sex and procreate. Only humans have the mind to consciously practice a perverted behavior as a matter of 'lifestyle' choice

Gay is the perverted lifestyle of those that have that perverted attraction.

{Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)- Cite This Source - Share This
per·vert·ed Audio Help /p&#601;r&#712;v&# 604;rt&#618;d/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[per-vur-tid] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. Pathology. changed to or being of an unnatural or abnormal kind: a perverted interest in death.
2. turned from what is right; wicked; misguided; distorted.
3. affected with or caused by perversion.}

I'm not so naive as to believe that you will have a eureka moment and realize that homosexuality is an unnatural perversion. Unbelievers excel at compartmentalizing and dismissing things that they don't want to hear. But I just like to point out how unaware most unbelievers are of the world around them.

{Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)- Cite This Source - Share This
un·nat·u·ral Audio Help /&#652;n&#712;næt& #643;&#601;r&#601;l,- &#712;næt&#643;r&# 601;l/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uhn-nach-er-uhl, -nach-ruhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. contrary to the laws or course of nature.
2. at variance with the character or nature of a person, animal, or plant.
3. at variance with what is normal or to be expected: the unnatural atmosphere of the place.
4. lacking human qualities or sympathies; monstrous; inhuman: an obsessive and unnatural hatred.
5. not genuine or spontaneous; artificial or contrived: a stiff, unnatural manner.
6. Obsolete. lacking a valid or natural claim; illegitimate.}
Same arguments can be utilized to justify any sexually perverted behavior. Disagree with that, then explain why they could not be used.

[Reasoner]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, let me be more clear, my female dog has learned to hump my male dog, get it? Why would she be attracted to his butt??? I know it occurs, BUT animals do not stay that way and exclusively engage in homosexual behavior, that would be unnatural and even they know it. The animals return to the opposite sex and procreate. Only humans have the mind to consciously practice a perverted behavior as a matter of 'lifestyle' choice
Gay is the perverted lifestyle of those that have that perverted attraction.
{Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)- Cite This Source - Share This
per·vert·ed Audio Help /p&#601;r&#712;v&# 604;rt&#618;d/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[per-vur-tid] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. Pathology. changed to or being of an unnatural or abnormal kind: a perverted interest in death.
2. turned from what is right; wicked; misguided; distorted.
3. affected with or caused by perversion.}
I'm not so naive as to believe that you will have a eureka moment and realize that homosexuality is an unnatural perversion. Unbelievers excel at compartmentalizing and dismissing things that they don't want to hear. But I just like to point out how unaware most unbelievers are of the world around them.
{Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)- Cite This Source - Share This
un·nat·u·ral Audio Help /&#652;n&#712;næt& #643;&#601;r&#601;l,- &#712;næt&#643;r&# 601;l/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uhn-nach-er-uhl, -nach-ruhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective 1. contrary to the laws or course of nature.
2. at variance with the character or nature of a person, animal, or plant.
3. at variance with what is normal or to be expected: the unnatural atmosphere of the place.
4. lacking human qualities or sympathies; monstrous; inhuman: an obsessive and unnatural hatred.
5. not genuine or spontaneous; artificial or contrived: a stiff, unnatural manner.
6. Obsolete. lacking a valid or natural claim; illegitimate.}
Same arguments can be utilized to justify any sexually perverted behavior. Disagree with that, then explain why they could not be used.

Wrong.

So know you're saying animals can sin? Is there an animal hell? Many males retain a life long bond with their same sex partner. Anyway, what's the fucking difference if they are bi-sexual? I never said they couldn't procreate.

You just don't know what you are talking about. You just don't. You're a deluded Christian bigot that wouldn't believe a thousand books of evidence that contradicted you. I just told you how it is, and you just drift off into more ignorant blatherings.

Don't bother replying if you don't have something intelligent to say, because I'll just mock your stupidity.

[alohawg]

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong.
So know you're saying animals can sin? Is there an animal hell? Many males retain a life long bond with their same sex partner. Anyway, what's the fucking difference if they are bi-sexual? I never said they couldn't procreate.
You just don't know what you are talking about. You just don't. You're a deluded Christian bigot that wouldn't believe a thousand books of evidence that contradicted you. I just told you how it is, and you just drift off into more ignorant blatherings.
Don't bother replying if you don't have something intelligent to say, because I'll just mock your stupidity.

Come on now mr. reasoner, live up to your name there and be reasonable. This is an open forum where different people have differing views. Are you not capable of tolerating an opinion contrary to yours without resorting to cursing? I think it's you who needs to drop the stupidity in your replies.

"... because I'll just mock your stupidity..."
Grow up wise guy.
Cursing is a verbal crutch for the linguistically challenged, not to mention it shows a definite lack of self conrol. So don't bother to reply yourself if you must curse in order to do so.

[bmz]

Atheist wrote:

Hello...
Just wondering what Your True Feelings are About Atheists..
Are they good or bad?
Can they be a Healthy part of Communities and Society in General?
Or are they an Anchor on Society ?
Feel Free to Be Honest
Thanks
Atheist

In the SEA region, where I live, most of the Chinese are free thinkers or atheists. They are fine people and just do not believe in God.

In my humble opinion, Christians should avoid criticising atheists.

I think it was Thomas Paine who said this:

"As to the Christian system of faith, it appears to me as a species of Atheism -- a sort of religious denial of God. It professes to believe in a man rather than in God. It is a compound made up Chiefly of Manism with but little Deism, and is an near Atheism as twilight is to darkness. It introduces between man and his Maker an opaque body, which it calls a Redeemer, as the moon introduces her opaque self between the earth and the sun, and it produces by this means a religious, or an irreligious eclipse of light. It has put the whole orbit of reason into shade."

At least the atheists do not blaspheme.

Cheers

[Reasoner]

alohawg wrote:

<quoted text>
Come on now mr. reasoner, live up to your name there and be reasonable. This is an open forum where different people have differing views. Are you not capable of tolerating an opinion contrary to yours without resorting to cursing? I think it's you who needs to drop the stupidity in your replies.
"... because I'll just mock your stupidity..."
Grow up wise guy.
Cursing is a verbal crutch for the linguistically challenged, not to mention it shows a definite lack of self conrol. So don't bother to reply yourself if you must curse in order to do so.

No sorry, I like to use profanity, it helps to get my point across. And there's nothing wrong with my language skills.

So do you have anything sensible to say about the subject at hand or not?

[Raastee]

bmz wrote:

<quoted text>
In the SEA region, where I live, most of the Chinese are free thinkers or atheists. They are fine people and just do not believe in God.
In my humble opinion, Christians should avoid criticising atheists.
I think it was Thomas Paine who said this:
"As to the Christian system of faith, it appears to me as a species of Atheism -- a sort of religious denial of God. It professes to believe in a man rather than in God. It is a compound made up Chiefly of Manism with but little Deism, and is an near Atheism as twilight is to darkness. It introduces between man and his Maker an opaque body, which it calls a Redeemer, as the moon introduces her opaque self between the earth and the sun, and it produces by this means a religious, or an irreligious eclipse of light. It has put the whole orbit of reason into shade."
At least the atheists do not blaspheme.
Cheers

I just love Thomas Paine. He was way before his time.
I have often said that religious people (most of them) by their actions tell us they do not really believe in an omnipotent god, but rather demi-gods. They (the believers) must do what they claim their demi-gods do such as imposing state legislation that is purely religious.

[Logical Butterfly]

Gods warrior wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, why? Does he need some kindling?

blah..blah..blah...why...does he blah blah need some blah kindling...(mocking GW in such a demeaning manor w a mean face on.)

[Lil Ticked]

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
No sorry, I like to use profanity, it helps to get my point across. And there's nothing wrong with my language skills.
So do you have anything sensible to say about the subject at hand or not?

I agree with you there .. using profanity can bring a point home as long as it is not used too liberaly . I personally don't use it very ofter so when I do people know that I mean Forkin' business.