I'm Sick of Evolution Lies. We Are NOT Animals!

[Roku Roku Roku]

Thinking wrote:

Excellent quote. I've seen Tim live twice now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
<quoted text>

:-(
Maybe someday I'll be lucky to see him once. I know he was in the southeast last summer. In the video "Religion" where is mentions Evolution as being right, he does a good job of pointing out the backward religious reactions of some Americans. "Pause......RIGHT..and duck!
" http://www.youtube.com/watch... ;

[Roku Roku Roku]

Thinking wrote:

Superb clip. Bill Bailey's great live too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
<quoted text>

LOL!! I think that's the best version I've ever heard of that song. Thanks!

[Focus_On_Reality]

Serah wrote:

<quoted text>Ditto to your first comments..... GOD is ~ I would leave nothing to an invisible imaginary being, so agree with you there. We cannot hold within us hatred and anger, it draws on our own energy, and this is what I was referring to when I said some things are better left with GOD. Sorry to hear that you have not had any inluencing Spiritual experiences.... and I hope that you do soon, but if you are turning a deaf ear on your insight, you will probably miss that which you should have felt.!!

The closest thing in reference to a spiritual experience would be Jackie Evancho.( http://www.youtube.com/bugnutsrunnels )

This spiritual occurrence is defined from a real listening experience from a real person and referenced from real space and time. It would certainly be an interesting occurrence if there were something outside our spatial frame of reference that could influence our reality, but it would have to manifest itself in a way that was demonstrable and discreet from our everyday experience, and then allow itself to be recognized as such.

[Prophet Abdullah]

You christians will have to answer to God someday for your blasphemy. Allah could have all the half human children he wants. He just doesnt want any.
Your religion is part Abrahamic and a mix of the old Roman God family with your father, son, holy ghost, mother mary, saints and all that nonsense. Polytheism pure and simple. There is only one god and his name aint Jehovah.
You want to teach religion in school, ok, teach the right one and in the right way so all of us are on the same page. Christian beliefs are all over the spectrum of beliefs with fundamentalism being the most ignorant.

[FREAKS]

Prophet Abdullah wrote:

You christians will have to answer to God someday for your blasphemy. Allah could have all the half human children he wants. He just doesnt want any.
Your religion is part Abrahamic and a mix of the old Roman God family with your father, son, holy ghost, mother mary, saints and all that nonsense. Polytheism pure and simple. There is only one god and his name aint Jehovah.
You want to teach religion in school, ok, teach the right one and in the right way so all of us are on the same page. Christian beliefs are all over the spectrum of beliefs with fundamentalism being the most ignorant.

Is it that time of the year..time of the year for the lunatic appear out the wood works?
Have a nice day, Cousin IT

[Liam R]

Prophet Abdullah wrote:

You christians will have to answer to God someday for your blasphemy. Allah could have all the half human children he wants. He just doesnt want any.
Your religion is part Abrahamic and a mix of the old Roman God family with your father, son, holy ghost, mother mary, saints and all that nonsense. Polytheism pure and simple. There is only one god and his name aint Jehovah.
You want to teach religion in school, ok, teach the right one and in the right way so all of us are on the same page. Christian beliefs are all over the spectrum of beliefs with fundamentalism being the most ignorant.

By all the Gods that have ever been worshipped, YES let's teach have the right religion taught throughout the world. No more christianity, no more is-lame. What a wonderful place we could have without either of those two false faiths.

And of course, the Theory of Evolution would be taught in every biology class.

[Serah]

Focus_On_Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
The closest thing in reference to a spiritual experience would be Jackie Evancho.( http://www.youtube.com/bugnutsrunnels )
This spiritual occurrence is defined from a real listening experience from a real person and referenced from real space and time. It would certainly be an interesting occurrence if there were something outside our spatial frame of reference that could influence our reality, but it would have to manifest itself in a way that was demonstrable and discreet from our everyday experience, and then allow itself to be recognized as such.

These things happen regularly, F_O_R ~ too many times to be counted....

[Lord Righteous Judge]

Seen Is Awesome wrote:

<quoted text>
Sounds like your Christian "god".

May the Lord Righteous Judge condemn you to a level 1,000 times hotter in the bowels of Hell:)

[Lord Quiggy]

Lord Righteous Judge wrote:

<quoted text>
May the Lord Righteous Judge condemn you to a level 1,000 times hotter in the bowels of Hell:)

Kisadio's got a brand new bag.

[Lord Quiggy]

Hardie-Har-Har wrote:

<quoted text>
Hardie-Har-Har,
sorry, LRJ, but that wish is not possible and it would destroy
Satan's Hellish Domain, for the following reasons:
Fire and brimstone frequently appear as agents of divine wrath throughout the Book of Revelation culminating in chapters 19–21, wherein the devil and the ungodly are cast into a lake of fire and brimstone as an eternal punishment:
"And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet ... These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." (Revelation 19:20, KJV).
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." (Revelation 20:10, KJV).
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." (Revelation 21:8, KJV).
Later Bible translations (like NIV) refer instead to "sulfur" instead of "Brimstone."
Sulfur is the 10th most prevalent substance in the universe. Stars, etc. spit it out in abundance. Evidently, that is why Satan employs so much sulfur in his domain. He runs a sulfur production factory.
But he must handle the manufacture, storage and transport with kid gloves, and in accord with its physical requirements. Once it gets dumped into Hell then Satan says it should be heated and maintained to 666-degrees F.
Satan sees to it that all of Hell's agencies in charge with the handling of sulfur observes the following scientific principles and rules:
&#56256;&#56377; 95% of all the sulfur handling must be in the molten state
&#56256;&#56377; Most customers are using sulfur in its molten state so it is more economical to receive sulfur in the molten form and pump it directly into a storage tank or pit
&#56256;&#56377; Sulfur solidifies at about 238degF, and become very viscous above 320degF. The successful handling of molten sulfur in the molten state depends upon restricting the temperature to 260-300degF
&#56256;&#56377; For economical reasons, most pipelines and pumps handling sulfur are heated with steam at pressures between 35 and 85 psig. Either steam jacketing or steam tracing is used.
&#56256;&#56377; Sulfur is a very poor conductor of heat, and is very difficult to reheat in piping once the temperature has dropped below 240 deg F. So temperature above that must be maintained.
&#56256;&#56377; The most common material of construction for pipe, valves and pumps in sulfur service is steel or ductile iron.
&#56256;&#56377; Pumps moving molten sulfur must be steam jacketed. Also, as a result of the high specific gravity (1.78), larger motors are required.
&#56256;&#56377; Large quantities of molten sulfur are stored in tanks, which are usually made of steel. For small quantities, pits are used which are generally rectangular. A steam jacketed sump pump should pump the molten sulfur out of the tanks or pits.
http://www.peerlesspump.com/Application%20New...
Therefore, heating to your "1000-times-hotter" just ain't gonna happen!
Hardie-Har-Har
ps: The breath of God is compared to Brimstone (Sulfur): "The Breath of Jehovah, like a stream of Brimstone, doth kindle it." - Isaiah 30:33

Here is Kisadio (Hardie-Har-Har), talking with Kisadio. This 80 year old man likes to talk with his own posts to make people think it's not him. I think that may have worked once. Them days are long over, little child threatening dwarf.

This new persona is a floater out of the gate. Now it can join your "World's Greatest Lover" puppet, 80 year old man.

Now if you don't mind, Dirty's gonna handle Lord Quiggy's Roman Candle. She's working for expired soup coupons today.

[Lucan]

Saved And Forgiven wrote:

Of course we are not animals. Only the atheistic evolutionist think such a thing. Ever notice most animals? They will eliminate waste in public and it doesn't matter to them who might see. They will have sex in public and do not care who might see. Why? They are animals. God plainly made a distinct difference between man and animal. We are not an animal, no matter how much some people act like one.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

Agreed, the COLLOQUIAL definition of the word "animal" does not apply to humans. You're arguing against a claim that nobody ever made.

[Lucan]

Has anyone ever attemped to come up with an argument for excluding humans from the BIOLOGICAL definition of the word "animal"? I've never seen any attempt to do this.

[FREAKS]

Lord Righteous Judge wrote:

<quoted text>
May the Lord Righteous Judge condemn you to a level 1,000 times hotter in the bowels of Hell:)

God damn you, talking nonsense again.
Have a nice day.

[ANAMERICAN]

ScienceRules wrote:

<quoted text>
Correct, we are animals. This isn't up for debate, idiot.
<quoted text>
What about them? ANd scientists do understand the reasons for the differences. Are you godbots opposed to any knowledge at all outside of the babble?l
<quoted text>
Many animals think and reason at quite a high level, in many cases surpassing the levels of babies or young children. Birds compose and sing music. ARe you a real fence post or just trying to pass for one?
<quoted text>
What about the differences that we would like to have? Regrowing limbs, diving thousands of feet under the ocean by holding our breath, flying as high as Everest by flapping our arms, running 60 mph?
S.O.H

So what do you do, bark, oink, moo, meow, grunt, chirp,or maybe you howl.Just trying to figure out what kind of animal you came from.Somebody might oughta call the pound I think you might have rabies.Better get off here try to get my dog to talk for me.Already got him walking on his hind legs, it's going to be alittle bit tougher to get him to speak but I'll work on it.

[Roland_Deschain]

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text> So what do you do, bark, oink, moo, meow, grunt, chirp,or maybe you howl.Just trying to figure out what kind of animal you came from.Somebody might oughta call the pound I think you might have rabies.Better get off here try to get my dog to talk for me.Already got him walking on his hind legs, it's going to be alittle bit tougher to get him to speak but I'll work on it.

The poster 'ScienceRules' has not commented on Topix for quite some time now. Did you bother to look at the date of his post prior to responding to it?

As for humans being animals, of course we are.

http://anthro.palomar.edu/animal/table_humans...

[ANAMERICAN]

Roland_Deschain wrote:

<quoted text>
The poster 'ScienceRules' has not commented on Topix for quite some time now. Did you bother to look at the date of his post prior to responding to it?
As for humans being animals, of course we are.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/animal/table_humans...

Well then you answer the question then which do you do? Well I'm still trying to get my dog to talk, he just won't say anything.Could it be that he's an animal and not a human.Everyone knows that animals can't talk.So therefore we aren't animals.But if you want to claim to be animal then that's find just don't expect others to believe their an animal.

[Roland_Deschain]

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text> Well then you answer the question then which do you do? Well I'm still trying to get my dog to talk, he just won't say anything.Could it be that he's an animal and not a human.

I agree, dogs cannot talk. It's because they don't have a developed (evolved) voicebox like we do. However, they are still able to communicate and have their own language.

http://www.whitewaterdogpark.org/what-does-ba...

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text>
Everyone knows that animals can't talk.

There is a talking snake and a talking donkey mentioned in the bible. Are you saying it is wrong?

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text>
So therefore we aren't animals.

Fact indicates otherwise.

"In constructing an evolutionary tree of life, scientists have granted themselves and the rest of us humans a genus, Homo, all to ourselves. But there’s no getting around the fact that we’re in the same family with chimpanzees and other primates.

The genetic codes of chimps and humans are 99 percent identical. Measured by differences in DNA, the chimp, Pan troglodytes, is the closest living relative to our own species, Homo sapiens. The comparison to an ape might make a few people squirm, but researchers now are happily comparing chimps and humans more closely than ever before."

http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2010/06/5993/what-ma...

[Nettiebelle]

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text> Well then you answer the question then which do you do? Well I'm still trying to get my dog to talk, he just won't say anything.Could it be that he's an animal and not a human.Everyone knows that animals can't talk.So therefore we aren't animals.But if you want to claim to be animal then that's find just don't expect others to believe their an animal.

In an October 22, 1996, address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Blessed John Paul II updated the Church's position to accept evolution of the human body:

"In his encyclical Humani Generis (1950), my predecessor Pius XII has already affirmed that there is no conflict between evolution and the doctrine of the faith regarding man and his vocation, provided that we do not lose sight of certain fixed points.... Today, more than a half-century after the appearance of that encyclical, some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a hypothesis. In fact it is remarkable that this theory has had progressively greater influence on the spirit of researchers, following a series of discoveries in different scholarly disciplines. The convergence in the results of these independent studies—which was neither planned nor sought—constitutes in itself a significant argument in favor of the theory."[31]

In the same address, Pope John Paul II rejected any theory of evolution that provides a materialistic explanation for the human soul:

"Theories of evolution which, because of the philosophies which inspire them, regard the spirit either as emerging from the forces of living matter, or as a simple epiphenomenon of that matter, are incompatible with the truth about man."

[15th Dalai Lama]

ANAMERICAN wrote:

<quoted text> Well then you answer the question then which do you do? Well I'm still trying to get my dog to talk, he just won't say anything.Could it be that he's an animal and not a human.Everyone knows that animals can't talk.So therefore we aren't animals.But if you want to claim to be animal then that's find just don't expect others to believe their an animal.

Everyone does not agree that animals can't talk. There are lots of animals with lots bigger brains than yours.

[15th Dalai Lama]

Lucan wrote:

Has anyone ever attemped to come up with an argument for excluding humans from the BIOLOGICAL definition of the word "animal"? I've never seen any attempt to do this.

Carl Linneius shared your concern in 1747.

But I seek from you and from the whole world a generic difference between man and simian that [follows] from the principles of natural history. I absolutely know of none. If only someone might tell me a single one! If I would have called man a simian or vice versa, I would have brought together all the theologians against me. Perhaps I ought to have by virtue of the law of the discipline.
-- Carl Linnaeus, Letters, 1747
-- http://linnaeus.c18.net/Letters/display_txt.p...