Yes, the same goes for you when I call you an idiot. It is not a 100% chance as to that being the reason you LOL all the time. It is the reason I am choosing to proclaim.(just like you)<quoted text>
Yea you have some diagnosis for why I use "lol"
Lol ok God exists prove me wrong...
See thats what you did here. But had I did it, you would have went crazy over it saying that the burden of proof is on ME not you. Especially since I made the statement.
Nice hypocritical stance
10uhsee an atheist with no proof and an argumentative attitude to defend the "ridicules"
See, science proclaims no (current) evidence for god. So you can argue with them on that stance, I just agree because I have never saw any evidence for your god either.
The difference is, mine is factual. You can at any time, show me what science has that proves your god exists or the need for one. However, you cant because you don't have any.
Arguing that your invisible god exists is a totally different story. You have no proof for it while the science also, has no proof for it.
I see what you did there, however... I defend science and a realistic view of life, it can not be dependent on invisible sky fairies and talking vegetation, nor having drunk sex with both of your daughters...