yhwh=ieue=yeshua=jesus

Posted in the Christian Forum

Comments (Page 57)

Showing posts 1,121 - 1,140 of1,168
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1157
Jan 23, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BlackNoble wrote:
<quoted text> IN REFERENCE TO YOUR REV 3:12 STATEMENT. > READING THE ORIGINAL GREEK TEXT OF REVELATIONS.. WHEN JESUS/YAHAWISHI SPOKE AND SAID " MY GOD " IT WAS TRANSLATED FROM " GOD OF ME " MEANING THE GOD WITH IN HIM. I HAVE PROOF OF THIS THAT I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM
4 Pillars. Man, was he an off the chart know nothing. Lets analyse your Greek here. First of all the Greek depends upon which version you use, which further proves that the bible revisions are corrupted and don't match up. Firstly, the phrase of 'the God of me' or 'of my God' are basically and fundamentally the same. They show possession of Christ by another force, which automatically proves corruption and insertion.'Of the' in the Greek is 'tou', which is and article of the genetive masculine singular tense.'God' here is 'Theou' which is a genetive singular masculine noun and 'of me' is 'mou', which is a personal possesive singular pronoun. All of these phrases including 'my God' show possesive properties superceding Christ. Revelation is all about Christ and His rewards. I can assure you that these verses are reworks of the originals by the trinitarian translators, which led to the corruptions of the extant versions, in particular the KJV versions. The original contest no doubt read as such....Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in my temple andhe shall go no more out and I will write upon him my name and the name of my city which is new Jerusalem, which comes down out from heaven and the new name of me. The greek shows discrepancies in the KJV versions relating to the first and last sentence sructires referring to Christ ONLY, but the middle stanzas show possesive sentence constructs relating to this God[Father] superlative. It's quite obvious that 'of my God' are inserted phrases to portray 'trinitarian' slant to the sentences. The sentence structure does not hold up under scrutiny. It's quite obvious.'Of my God' isn't even in the most extant documents. It is the 'God of me'. But, in either case they are insertions to portray plurality.

“Jesus is coming again!”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1158
Jan 24, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty "GOD," The everlasting "FATHER," The Prince of Peace.

bibleuniverse
Daughter of the Most High

Lindale, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1159
Jan 24, 2012
 
Med wrote:
<quoted text>Daughter of the Most High.....Who's the Most High? Anyway, I've heard it all, concerning Paul. If ayone else wants to jump in here, on this topic; have at it. First of all, Genesis 49:27 is a blessing from Jacob, not a denegrating generic curse to get at Paul. Absurd insanity, but some will try to use any analogy to denigrate Paul for their own theological reasonings. TRUE? The verse is stating that Benjamin's tribe will be vicious warriors in warfare, devouring their enemies. That's Benjamin's history. The tribe will be mighty warriors and that is all the verse means. Paul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. He said so himslf. The 'wolf in sheep's clothing' was an adage consistantly used by Paul, referring to the false minsters who called themselves to preach and devour the unsuspecting prosolytes with false doctrine. Hence, they ran, but I did not call them. Paul was DIRECTLY APPOINTED by Christ as an apostle on his way to Damascus to murder more Jesus Name saints, which automatically proves he didn't appoint Himself. Remember, he had just got done murdering Stephen, so why become a self-selected apostle. He liked killing them. But, Christ had other plans for him. And he never contradicted Christ's teaching..he expounded on them. I'd love for someone to give these examples of contradictions, so we can proceed t debate the issue. These are just a few thoughts and facts of mine.
Jesus the Christ is the Most High and my Father med, who else? Thanks brother Med!
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1160
Jan 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Signs of the Times wrote:
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty "GOD," The everlasting "FATHER," The Prince of Peace.
bibleuniverse
I take it that you are trinitarian. TRUE? So, lets have at it. Firstly, this is a parenthetical verse that is commonplace in these type of sentence stuctures. It is inserted between the verse before and after talking about this troublesome time with the Assyrians and Ahaz, Hezekiah's father. The fact is that this particular verse was not necessariy written when Hezekiah was 39 years old dealing with Sennacarib, but prophesied at Hezekiah's birth, which would make more sense. The sentence construct in the KJV is not the same as the Hebrew or any Hebraic versions....hence,'For a child has been born to us, a son hasbeen given us. And authority has settled on his shoulders. He has been named. The Mighty God is planning grace, The Eternal Father, a peaceable ruler'-in token of abundant authority and with peace without limit upon David's throne andkingdom. that it may be firmly established in justice and in equity now and evermore. The zeal of the Lord shall bring this to pass. The Septuagint version has the word 'of' imposed in front 'of' the Mighty God, etc. But, in no case is Jesus Christ referred to in the past, present or perfect/imperfect tense. Some will try and use a process called prophetic perfect tense to denote future prophecy, but prophecy is prophecy and eeds no such 'grammar tool manipulation' to get to its target date. Not to mention that the Ancient and Paleo Hebrew never ever had a future tense or perfect/imperfect tense associate with it until the completion of the Septuagint in 270 B.C. The Aramaic does of which these present documents are written in. They are not original Hebrew at all, nor do they carry the same properties of such. Critics will try and use dispariging arguments of character of this king to rebut its context of a human king, but the fact is that Messianic apellations have been made on numerous kings in Jewish history AND ALL OF THE KINGS CAME UP SHORT , by sin or rebellion of one sort or the other, but the comparisons remain. more to come.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1161
Jan 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Signs of the Times wrote:
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty "GOD," The everlasting "FATHER," The Prince of Peace.
bibleuniverse
Cont......the Wonder Counselor, Mighty God.....phrases are indeed imperial throne epithaphs and names that run together in phrases in the Hebrew, not as the KJV translators split them up by commas and the sort and, especially, verse 7. These thre names are freguently used througout the bible and other cultures denoting God aspects and power characteristics. They are royal titles, like Lord Mayor or your royalness or Supreme Pontiff, etc. The fact of the matter is that all of these dynastic kings were promised lineages established forever, which in the end they all fell short and were severed,[Jeconiah, Hezekiah, their offspring. Look at David of which apellations of Messiah are constantly used,'the throne of David, My son David, etc.' The constant is the word for evermore or forever...will always lead to the final continuum of wich thee humans represented; the Messiah Himself, IN THE END.The sentence construct is both in the perfect/imperfect consecutive tense, meaming an event ias happened with repercussions and prophecy ffor the future, namely the birth and elevation of Hezekiah tto the throne representing God Himself. One last tidbit is the aspect of Jesus Christ. I concur that in the end using 'forever' can't be fulfilled in a dynastic king unless He is immortal, IN THE END, because Christ can't be te Father and the Son, as is portended by the trinitarians. The verses of Isaiah prohibit such analogies for the pluralists TRUE? So, it's obvious that the 'son' is Hezekiah and not Christ, because the trinitarians have a defintie conflict of interest if they try and use or manipulate it.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1162
Jan 26, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Signs of the Times wrote:
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty "GOD," The everlasting "FATHER," The Prince of Peace.
bibleuniverse
I just want to reiterate that fact, again, The trinitarians can't use this verse in Isaiah, because you have this 'son being born', WHO IS REFERENCED AS THE FATHER. Good Luck.
Marc Clint Dion

Victoria, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1163
Jan 27, 2012
 
Yes it would appear that Jesus and ieue are one and the same, yet this does not mean that Jesus is the Father who Jesus often spoke of. Very few people from the scripture could tell if they were speaking to an Angel or THE GOD. When the "Prince of you people", the Angel Micheal referred to himself as ieue, Jesus, he was not taking credit for being THE GOD. This is what happened over time to our belief system. Pronunciations were lost when the scattered children of Israel, scattered over and over again. Letters were subtly changed over time as people were required to transcribe everything by hand for each new copy, sometimes no doubt, hastily. When this Angel referred to Himself as "God" he meant it the sense which was given to us in Exodus.7.1->"And 'ieue' said unto Moses, See, I have made you as God to Pharaoh; and Aaron your brother will be your prophet." Because neither Pharaoh nor Aaron could see this Angel, It was Moses who appeared as God to them. Moses was the only living being that the other two could see. To Moses, the Angel was God and Moses was His prophet. But from what 'eiue' says as a man when he he was later born as Jesus Christ, we know that even though He appears as God to us there is another who is invisible to us yet very present. God the Father, the one Jesus refers to over and over again, he also hints at another vulnerable and very loved member of their Family of Gods, none other than the Holy Spirit, His Mother and wife of our Father, the Ones who made us in their image both male and female. Just because Paul refers to the Holy spirit as male does not mean he was right, Paul said that long hair on men is an abomination to nature and that anyone with common sense knows this. I seem to remember Sampson had long hair, aside from his bad taste in woman there was not much to imply Sampson was not every bit a man of God as any one else. Here is a quote"Judges.13.(24)ķAnd the woman bare a son, and called his name Samson: and the child grew, and the Lord blessed him.(25) And the Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times in the camp of Dan between Zorah and Eshtaol. Jesus was very upset when people were saying the Spirit who moved Him was an evil spirit, he said this in response.-->>32 And whoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age, or in the age to come<<--- Usually when males get this upset it is protectiveness on behalf of a female. It could very well be that Jesus Christ really is the Father but Jesus seems to have gone to such elaborate lengths to make a distinction between Himself and His Father that I am prone to believe Jesus Christ when He repeatedly says that He is the Son of God, not THE GOD, His parents! Yes God is a married unit-->> 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh<---To our Parents it is natural to think of a married couple as singular, One God. She has always been silent and her name is Holy.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1164
Jan 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marc Clint Dion wrote:
Yes it would appear that Jesus and ieue are one and the same, yet this does not mean that Jesus is the Father who Jesus often spoke of. Very few people from the scripture could tell if they were speaking to an Angel or THE GOD. When the "Prince of you people", the Angel Micheal referred to himself as ieue, Jesus, he was not taking credit for being THE GOD. This is what happened over time to our belief system. Pronunciations were lost when the scattered children of Israel, scattered over and over again. Letters were subtly changed over time as people were required to transcribe everything by hand for each new copy, sometimes no doubt, hastily. When this Angel referred to Himself as "God" he meant it the sense which was given to us in Exodus.7.1->"And 'ieue' said unto Moses, See, I have made you as God to Pharaoh; and Aaron your brother will be your prophet." Because neither Pharaoh nor Aaron could see this Angel, It was Moses who appeared as God to them. Moses was the only living being that the other two could see. To Moses, the Angel was God and Moses was His prophet. But from what 'eiue' says as a man when he he was later born as Jesus Christ, we know that even though He appears as God to us there is another who is invisible to us yet very present. God the Father, the one Jesus refers to over and over again, he also hints at another vulnerable and very loved member of their Family of Gods, none other than the Holy Spirit, His Mother and wife of our Father, the Ones who made us in their image both male and female. Just because Paul refers to the Holy spirit as male does not mean he was right, Paul said that long hair on men is an abomination to nature and that anyone with common sense knows this. I seem to remember Sampson had long hair, aside from his bad taste in woman there was not much to imply Sampson was not every bit a man of God as any one else. Here is a quote"Judges.13.(24)ķAnd the woman bare a son, and called his name Samson: and the child grew, and the Lord blessed him.(25) And the Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times in the camp of Dan between Zorah and Eshtaol. Jesus was very upset when people were saying the Spirit who moved Him was an evil spirit, he said this in response.-->>32 And whoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever shall speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this age, or in the age to come<<--- Usually when males get this upset it is protectiveness on behalf of a female. It could very well be that Jesus Christ really is the Father but Jesus seems to have gone to such elaborate lengths to make a distinction between Himself and His Father that I am prone to believe Jesus Christ when He repeatedly says that He is the Son of God, not THE GOD, His parents! Yes God is a married unit-->> 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh<---To our Parents it is natural to think of a married couple as singular, One God. She has always been silent and her name is Holy.
One more rendition of a trinitarian spin job. Christ and the Father are not portrayed as angels. Angels may REPRESENT them, but that's it. Jesus most assuredly is the Father. IEUE can only be translated to Jesue[s] in the Hebrew. It's obvious that you have not read this forum or you wouldn't be making such uneducated theories. READ IT.'His mother and wife of our Father' you say..........more superimposed trinitarianism from Plato-Gnostic/Kaballist pantheism. Mary is dead, brother. Dead as a Mackeral and she had to get saved according to Acts 2:38, just like the rest of the saints do. pal. SHE WAS IN THE UPPER ROOM AND HAD HER SINS DEALT WITH IN JESUS NAME BAPTISM just as Peter authorized. Mariolatry, pal. A manmade invention of the Catholic church. Get Real. What a joke.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1165
Jan 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

One other bit of information to pass on, elaborating on this Mariolatry imposition in the trinity. As Marc Dion has stipulated, that the mother of Jesus, who is the wife of he Father is a direct offshoot from the 'elohim' pantheon levels of Godhead dieties of the Kaballist Sephiroth pantheon. There are 4 levels of triad gods and the goddess 'Shekinah' referred to as the Holy Spirit by Marc Dion. That is where this trinity reference of such comes from, the Jewish Kaballists, Study it as it is quite fascinating of the orgy to produce the spirit and natural world. I heard a Catholic bigshot called brother Groeschel state out iof his own mouth that Mary is bethrothed to the Shekinah glory, which is another brand of this Kaballist theology, referenced as the Holy Spirit. The apostle Paul has it right as the Holy Spirit is male, because it is the VERY SPIRIT CALLED JESUS CHRIST. He is the Holy Ghost, not some separated independent entity from the Holy Ghost. The Holy Ghost is Christ's own Spirit. Just as our spirit is us, living in a body. So is Christ living in His own body. In Catholicism Mary has been completely transposed as the superimposition of the Holy Ghost [Shekinah]. Just think, as the Catholics portray it, Christ is the offspring of a diefied goddess called Mary his mother in carnal flesh. Mar is always in carnal flesh and at no time is she anything but mortal. Now they have made a DEAD WOMAN, as interceding for the saints between Christ and the Father. Rediculous delusions of a NUTCASE THEOLOGY.
I belong to Jesus

Lindale, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1166
Feb 29, 2012
 
Hi brother Med! Something interesting has come up in our law class and thought you could possibly share your thoughts on it. One student asked that if you had to choose whether or not to obey God or man, which would it be? He also mentioned that this "God" as he put it loves for people to be obedient to the non-godly authority that currently exists. He put down these verses as his way of saying God likes slavery and we must obey those in authority no matter what, either that or these verses are not quite translated correctly.

If you could expound a bit more brother Med,I'd appreciate it much! Take care, Virginia

"Ephesians 6:5-8: Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ, not only when being watched, as currying favor, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, willingly serving the Lord and not human beings."

"Colossians 3:22-25, 4:1: Slaves, obey your human masters in everything, not only when being watched, as currying favor, but in simplicity of heart, fearing the Lord. Whatever you do, do from the heart, as for the Lord and not for others, knowing that you will receive from the Lord the due payment of the inheritance; be slaves of the Lord Christ. For the wrongdoer will receive recompense for the wrong he committed, and there is no partiality. Masters, treat your slaves justly and fairly, realizing that you too have a Master in heaven."

"1 Timothy 6:1-5: Those who are under the yoke of slavery must regard their masters as worthy of full respect, so that the name of God and our teaching may not suffer abuse. Those whose masters are believers must not take advantage of them because they are brothers but must give better service because those who will profit from their work are believers and are beloved. Whoever teaches something different and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the religious teaching is conceited, understanding nothing, and has a morbid disposition for
arguments and verbal disputes. For from these come envy, rivalry, insults, evil suspicions, and mutual friction among people with corrupted minds, who are deprived of the truth, supposing religion to be a means of gain."

"Titus 2:9-10: Slaves are to be under the control of their masters in all respects, giving them satisfaction, not talking back to them or stealing
from them, but exhibiting complete good faith, so as to adorn the doctrine of God our savior in every way."

"1 Peter: 2:18-20: Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence,not only to those are good and equitable but also to those who are
perverse. Foe whenever anyone bears the pain of unjust suffering because of consciousness of God, that is a grace. But what credit is there if you are patient when beaten for doing wrong? But if you are patient when you suffer for doing what is good, this is a grace before God."
I belong to Jesus

Lindale, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1167
Mar 1, 2012
 
One other thing I fogot to ask..........why is it that people believe the roman catholic church to have given us the Word of God?

“IAM4YHWH”

Since: May 08

Richmond, Indiana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1168
Dec 3, 2012
 
Med wrote:
<quoted text>Long Time, FER. I think you need to get another book to read. The one you have is obviously a forgery. I still like the way you use all of those phony god-names, even after this forum without doubt proves them to all be man made imaginary spinoffs. The name of God/Father is Jesus [Geez'oo in the Hebrew]. He is the Son of Man Messiah, not a pagan pantheistic son of god. God doesn't have a son, except in mythology, like yours. TRUE?
"The name of God/Father is Jesus [Geez'oo in the Hebrew]."? What a laugh! And in what stupid book did you get that false infrmation?
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1169
Dec 10, 2012
 
Franklin Eugene Rhoads wrote:
<quoted text>
"The name of God/Father is Jesus [Geez'oo in the Hebrew]."? What a laugh! And in what stupid book did you get that false infrmation?
Long time pal. I see you are having great trouble with this fact or you miss my company. TRUE? By the way, no book, just Paleo/Ancient Hebrew vocative fact. Like I said before friend, the Massorites completely eliminated the J/G sound from their alphabet when they redacted their alphabet in 875 A.D. Why? To get rid of the Name Jesus/Jeez'oo in the Hebrew, not this present day Aramaic that they use, which carries the 'Y' for the 'I'. All bogus linguistics. Jesus, not Yeshua or its' phony derivatives. Later.
I belong to Jesus

Lindale, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1170
Dec 11, 2012
 
Blessings to you brother Med!!! Long time no hear. I just got an email that someone posted.....good to know you still come here :-) Stay strong brother. Virginia

“IAM4YHWH”

Since: May 08

Richmond, Indiana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1171
Dec 12, 2012
 
Med wrote:
<quoted text>Long time pal. I see you are having great trouble with this fact or you miss my company. TRUE? By the way, no book, just Paleo/Ancient Hebrew vocative fact. Like I said before friend, the Massorites completely eliminated the J/G sound from their alphabet when they redacted their alphabet in 875 A.D. Why? To get rid of the Name Jesus/Jeez'oo in the Hebrew, not this present day Aramaic that they use, which carries the 'Y' for the 'I'. All bogus linguistics. Jesus, not Yeshua or its' phony derivatives. Later.
The trouble that I have is with your speading lies and you certainly are not a friend of mine and you certainly do not keep me company. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is not "The name of God/Father" as you have previously stated. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is thge name of the FATHER/Yahweh's SON. Any simplton knows that one can not be their own father and that one can not be their own son. There is also no word "Geez'oo" in Hebrew.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1172
Dec 13, 2012
 
Franklin Eugene Rhoads wrote:
<quoted text>
The trouble that I have is with your speading lies and you certainly are not a friend of mine and you certainly do not keep me company. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is not "The name of God/Father" as you have previously stated. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is thge name of the FATHER/Yahweh's SON. Any simplton knows that one can not be their own father and that one can not be their own son. There is also no word "Geez'oo" in Hebrew.
We've been over this before pal. The Jews of today don't speak or write Paleo or Ancient Hebrew. It's Aramaic, pal. Yor Aramaic of today is the lie. The Jews have inserted the 'Y' for the 'I" letter to do just that. GET RID OF THE J/G SOUND. Their 'Y' substitution is the lie and you know it. The Ancient/Paleo Hebrew never had a 'Y' in their alphabets and still don't even though they are dead languages. The Jews speak and write an invented form of Aramaic via Yehuda. Iesu/Jesu is the name of the Father/God, pal. The tetragrammaton was and is all VOWELS, NOT CONSONANTS. That's another Massorite fraud substitution stemming out og Egypt. Heck, the Babylonian tarot cards have YHWH on one of the cards as a false god. Yeshua and YHWH are invented frauds, pal. You and those like you are duped. I SPEAK TRUTH AND HAVE GOT ALL OF YOU AND THOSE LIKE YOU CORNERED IN FRAUD AND DELUSIN. Good Luck, with you pervert andorogenous Egyptian god/goddess Jahshua.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1173
Dec 13, 2012
 
Oh, one other thing Rhoads is the 'vocative' form of IEUE/IESU is indeed Jeez'oo. Any linguist will tell you that. Vocative is how its pronounced. The Paleo/Ancient Hebrew ALWAYS IN EVERY CASE PRONOUNCED THE 'I' AS A J/G SOUND WHEN FOLLOWED BY A VOWEL. Yeshua is a hybrid fraud and its properties will never equal IEUE/IESU, never ever. We've been over this a dozen times already and you continue to bring no proof to the contrary, but innuendo and self delusion. TRUE?
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1174
Dec 13, 2012
 
Franklin Eugene Rhoads wrote:
<quoted text>
The trouble that I have is with your speading lies and you certainly are not a friend of mine and you certainly do not keep me company. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is not "The name of God/Father" as you have previously stated. Yahshua (Yeshua, Jesus) is thge name of the FATHER/Yahweh's SON. Any simplton knows that one can not be their own father and that one can not be their own son. There is also no word "Geez'oo" in Hebrew.
Oh, and another thing, with all of you pluralist Father/ Son delusion. That's all of you talking. Jesus is the God/Father. That Son crap is all bogus. All of that 'Son' talk is messianic inventions of the Jews and the Christians. There are no terms with Jesus, as Christ or Messiah. These are manmade connotations added decades after Jesus advent and resurrection.'Christ' is traceable back to pagan rites in Egypt and Messiah comes out of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews. MAN-MADE CONCEPTS. Jesus is no Son. He's God Almighty the Father, pal. Choke on it brother.
Med

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1175
Dec 18, 2012
 
Med wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, and another thing, with all of you pluralist Father/ Son delusion. That's all of you talking. Jesus is the God/Father. That Son crap is all bogus. All of that 'Son' talk is messianic inventions of the Jews and the Christians. There are no terms with Jesus, as Christ or Messiah. These are manmade connotations added decades after Jesus advent and resurrection.'Christ' is traceable back to pagan rites in Egypt and Messiah comes out of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews. MAN-MADE CONCEPTS. Jesus is no Son. He's God Almighty the Father, pal. Choke on it brother.
Well, good job Med. Looks as though no one wants to touch this Christ/Messiah mythology. Because it destroys Christianity in its tracks. All of those 'Son' analogies in the Old Testament via New Testament corruptions are all bogus and all refer to other Jewish entities and personages, except for the very few that refer to the Father returning, in person, to deliver Israel. Revelation of truth is what is coming on the world scene. Correction of false doctrine and false god worship. Enough is enough with playing around with these bogus Christ/Messiah appendages, for the Lord God/Father Jesus. Lets get on with it.

“IAM4YHWH”

Since: May 08

Richmond, Indiana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1176
Dec 21, 2012
 
Med wrote:
<quoted text>Well, good job Med. Looks as though no one wants to touch this Christ/Messiah mythology. Because it destroys Christianity in its tracks. All of those 'Son' analogies in the Old Testament via New Testament corruptions are all bogus and all refer to other Jewish entities and personages, except for the very few that refer to the Father returning, in person, to deliver Israel. Revelation of truth is what is coming on the world scene. Correction of false doctrine and false god worship. Enough is enough with playing around with these bogus Christ/Messiah appendages, for the Lord God/Father Jesus. Lets get on with it.
Talk about choke ... Your busted! You used the wrong username to compliment and agree with yourself! LOL! I had a feeling all along that you were complimenting and agreeing with yourself on your own posts to this forum under a different username, since no one that has knowledge of the truth of Scripture and languages would ever believe and agree with the garbage that you spew.

For those who want to know the truth of this topic and not falling for Meds made-up crap that no true scholar would agree with, please see my web page at: http://frank4yahweh.tripod.com/ByAndThrough.h...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,121 - 1,140 of1,168
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

62 Users are viewing the Christian Forum right now

Search the Christian Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Stealing the Keys to Heaven (Dec '12) 2 min Palehorse 76,893
Did Jesus die on Good Friday??? Nope 5 min Ant 2
Ask a Black Hebrew 8 min Qan-kara 176
JESUS DID NOT TAKE YOUR PLACE on THE CROSS 25 min comment 41
Cookie's Place 39 min -Lea- 1,764
Christians, please explain this to me... 1 hr The truth works 2,938
God created satan. 1 hr susanblange 1,971
Does God exist? (Aug '11) 2 hr Mr Ironhart 5,768
•••
•••
•••
•••