You'll never see proof to the extent that you want because you want to SEE with your own eyes. You may never get that till afterlife.<quoted text>Atheism is not the SAME type of Belief as is one in Gods. No more than faith in a car operating properly is the same as Faith in a God, or even faith in a loved one. There are gradations to faith.
I disbelieve that Gods and/or anything supernatural has been proved. Could it possibly exist...? Sure. But nothing that has been put forth as "proof" convinces me. And the biggest weight on that scale is the complete lack of any hard evidence for either Gods, or the supernatural. Calling something unexplained or mysterious, or divine is not now or ever has been hard, solid proof of any Gods or the supernatural.
You claim existence, I say no. Only the completely stupid dont see the huge difference in the two - and why the onus is always on the one making a claim of existence.
I say Im invisible. You cant see me can you? My claim is proof by your logic.
There are people on TV who call themselves BigFoot Hunters. I call them idiots running thru the woods. Why? Because no one has ever hunted one down! You cant call yourself a Hunter of an imaginary creature and demand all the claims are true - without driving into town with a BigFoot tied across your truck!
Same holds for Believers in Gods.
You claim "theres no existence" therefore (just like me) the claim is on you to prove. I know I cannot provide the proof that you want. I mean, I would say that proof is order but again I know thats not the type of proof you seek. But as I cannot PROVE existence to the extent you want, you cannot prove the NONEXISTENCE to the extent I want. It doesnt lie on one side but not the other. If you say "He doesnt exist" than you must prove that if you say that I must prove it for saying "He does exist". Thats FAIR.