You certainly enjoy showing showing all your discontent that your partner was ever married and had a husband who fathered her children and how she regardless of what you post will ALWAYS have a connection to the father of THEIR children. You surely are trying to be clever but it proves to all what a true moron you are to go on and on trying to twist this to be about past tense ect... but as I have stated I have no issue pointing out your stupidity to all reading.<quoted text>
My wife had been married and divorced before marrying me, that you were right about.....however, there is a difference between "HAVING" a Husband and "HAD" a Husband........my wife "HAD" a Husband at one time in her life.......she doesn't "HAVE" a husband now.....see the difference, have would be PRESENT or CURRENTLY......."HAD " would be PAST TENSE......hopefully this explanation clears that issue up for you!!!!
Now on to the father part, her "EX-HUSBAND" did father their children, but all that would mean is that he would remain a part of their lives, IF he so desired to......that is between him and his children, it doesn't mean that my wife and him are in contact with each other, so in that regard.....you'd be wrong with your response!!!
Where did I ever make a comment stating that I could? Again, I'm well aware of the requirements to conceiving a child.....but you comments certainly are somewhat entertaining......lol!!!
It is obvious to me personally you and your partner have bullied the father to no ends but that is on you and certainly lends to the idea you are not a person of faith but most already see that. You are truly a moron who's only interest is to bully heterosexuals in to believing your way of life is "special" but society sees that very differently and you are just to stupid to see that.
Just to clarify you infer you partners children who were fathered by her husband are yours biological and of course all know just how ignorant that idea truly is.