Do you support the California law all...

Do you support the California law allowing gay boys to go in female showers?

Created by Hidingfromyou on Aug 20, 2013

19 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes, sex is for children.

No, privacy is should be perverted.

Not sure. Gays have lost their mind.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#691 Sep 3, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice try but you fail. Homosexuality is an ABOMINATION,, the ACT OF HAVING PERVERSE SEX with one another, man to man and woman to woman. You can't get out of it so you try to clean it up. Won't work so you try to redefine the interpretation. Follow the link..
http://www.christiandoctrine.com/index.php...
Some years ago I had reason to take the editor of the Salvation Army's 'War Cry' to task. He was not very pleased, and huffed and puffed as one does when caught in sin.
In one edition he boldly told a distraught wife that it was okay for her husband to dress like a woman, and that she should show compassion, etc. The issue is currently being added to the foul homosexual movement's 'shopping list' of demands.
So, what does scripture say? It is very specific...
"The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so [are] abomination unto the LORD thy God." (Deut 22:5)
And as for men with men...
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them." (Lev 20:13)
And men or women with animals...
“And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.
And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them.”(Lev 20:15,16)
And Romans 1 says, after speaking of women with women, being unnatural...
“And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; "
The truth is plain - homosexuality is an abomination, deserving only of death.
That is YOUR ignorance showing...

Back when the Bible was written, the only item of clothing that was actually distinct was the female monthly sanitary aid...

What Leviticus ACTUALLY say is that it is <tow'evah> for a man to lay with a <zakhar> as with a woman, and they should be put to death.

Tow'evah is a word translated as "abomination", but it refers to actions that are an abomination BECAUSE they are part of the worship of foreign Gods. These are actions that are perfectly acceptable when they are NOT part of that worship.

Zakhar is a word that refers to a consecrated male. Any species, and God. A Levite priest and a bull about to be sacrificed to Poseidon are both "zakhar".

What Leviticus was talking about was the practice of the worshippers of the Goddess Asherah to use temple prostitutes, both male and female. If you read your Bible, you will find that the prophets were CONSTANTLY having to tell the children of Israel to tear down their Asherah poles and stop those fertility rituals.
lol

Pineville, WV

#692 Sep 3, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
That is YOUR ignorance showing...
Back when the Bible was written, the only item of clothing that was actually distinct was the female monthly sanitary aid...
What Leviticus ACTUALLY say is that it is <tow'evah> for a man to lay with a <zakhar> as with a woman, and they should be put to death.
Tow'evah is a word translated as "abomination", but it refers to actions that are an abomination BECAUSE they are part of the worship of foreign Gods. These are actions that are perfectly acceptable when they are NOT part of that worship.
Zakhar is a word that refers to a consecrated male. Any species, and God. A Levite priest and a bull about to be sacrificed to Poseidon are both "zakhar".
What Leviticus was talking about was the practice of the worshippers of the Goddess Asherah to use temple prostitutes, both male and female. If you read your Bible, you will find that the prophets were CONSTANTLY having to tell the children of Israel to tear down their Asherah poles and stop those fertility rituals.
Betcha got that from a gay commentator.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#693 Sep 4, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
Betcha got that from a gay commentator.
Nope. Got that from a xian minister friend of mine. Didn't actually believe it until I spent the time following up on the translation of each word, and the context of every appearance of the word throughout the Bible.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#694 Sep 4, 2013
Another victory for civil rights: gay prisoners will now be allowed to marry their same sex partners while in prison. Unless it is another prisoner, it has to be someone outside the prison system, and obviously the ceremony will be held in the prison, with no honeymoon vacation.

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#695 Sep 4, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no verse in the Bible that can be accurately translated as saying that homosexuality is a sin. Last I heard, both Conservative and Reform Judaism were marrying same sex partners. Orthodox Jews got hung up on the wording of the traditional prayer, or they would have started performing gay marriages as well. These people all read the Laws of the Bible and study them. In fact, the Conservatives and Orthodox go through the entire Law each year, reading and studying it as part of their weekly services
Well said....NO one studies the bible and its meanings more than the Jews....

And Christ never said Homosexuality was wrong, either.

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#696 Sep 4, 2013
Liam R wrote:
Another victory for civil rights: gay prisoners will now be allowed to marry their same sex partners while in prison. Unless it is another prisoner, it has to be someone outside the prison system, and obviously the ceremony will be held in the prison, with no honeymoon vacation.
That is a huge human rights success. We keep moving forward...somehow, in all the attempts to undo what the religious right has voted to suppress

“Jesus loves you all!”

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#698 Sep 5, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
<quoted text>Here's your website you quoted

This website shows a simple fact - that Christianity, the expression of a Christian life committed to Christ, is about all of life, not just theology.

We want to apply Biblical precepts to everything we do, whether it is work, play, local church activity, study, politics, or anything else.

It is all very well being pious in an ivory tower... we must show how Christ affects everything, from A to Z. At times this will be shown bluntly if not starkly. It depends on the situation and the urgency. And this will, at times, include naming names, where sin and wickedness are already in the public domain and as a last resort. All of this is firmly bound by scripture and its example.

The theological and Bible articles remain true, and will not budge from scripture. The rest of the content is firmly founded on this basic approach.



© February 2010

---oOo---

Published on www.christiandoctrine.com

Bible Theology Ministries - PO Box 415, Swansea, SA5 8YH
Wales
United Kingdom

Make a Donation to support the work of Bible Theology Ministries

Now, show me where Christ said homosexuality is an abomination...you can't, because he never said it so you really aren't Christian at all.
Show us where Jesus spoke out against bestiality? Sleeping with dead people? Etc

“Jesus loves you all!”

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#699 Sep 5, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
<quoted text>Well said....NO one studies the bible and its meanings more than the Jews....

And Christ never said Homosexuality was wrong, either.
Where did Jesus say homosexuality was right?

“ ILKS r kewl ”

Since: Apr 09

Conch republic

#700 Sep 5, 2013
Phoenix Ascended wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did Jesus say homosexuality was right?
dont play that card. where did Jesus SAY it wasnt? checkmate. you lose.

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#701 Sep 6, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
That is YOUR ignorance showing...
Back when the Bible was written, the only item of clothing that was actually distinct was the female monthly sanitary aid...
What Leviticus ACTUALLY say is that it is <tow'evah> for a man to lay with a <zakhar> as with a woman, and they should be put to death.
Tow'evah is a word translated as "abomination", but it refers to actions that are an abomination BECAUSE they are part of the worship of foreign Gods. These are actions that are perfectly acceptable when they are NOT part of that worship.
Zakhar is a word that refers to a consecrated male. Any species, and God. A Levite priest and a bull about to be sacrificed to Poseidon are both "zakhar".
What Leviticus was talking about was the practice of the worshippers of the Goddess Asherah to use temple prostitutes, both male and female. If you read your Bible, you will find that the prophets were CONSTANTLY having to tell the children of Israel to tear down their Asherah poles and stop those fertility rituals.
Thanks. This is good information. Anyone who tries to apply Jewish history of 2,000 plus years ago to today is revealing their lack of understanding what the bible is.

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#702 Sep 6, 2013
Phoenix Ascended wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us where Jesus spoke out against bestiality? Sleeping with dead people? Etc
Show us where in Jewish law this is allowed. Wasn't he raised Jewish?

If he were raised Jewish, he would follow their laws...and they weren't against homosexuality...so....

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#703 Sep 6, 2013
Phoenix Ascended wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did Jesus say homosexuality was right?
Why would he have to say anything was right? He was here to guide on the followings of Christ. If he didn't speak out against it, why would he speak out promoting it?

He said not to judge.

He said to take care of the least of these, as they represented himj.

He said to love everyone....

YOu can't do those, then you aren't getting Christ.

He never said homosexuality was a sin.
nc resident

Charlotte, NC

#704 Sep 6, 2013
Liam R wrote:
Another victory for civil rights: gay prisoners will now be allowed to marry their same sex partners while in prison. Unless it is another prisoner, it has to be someone outside the prison system, and obviously the ceremony will be held in the prison, with no honeymoon vacation.
I don't believe anyone should be allowed to marry while incarcerated, gay, straight, what ever.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#705 Sep 6, 2013
nc resident wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe anyone should be allowed to marry while incarcerated, gay, straight, what ever.
Okay, I can sort of agree with that. The down side is that it is punishing the non-incarcerated partner as well as the felon.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#706 Sep 6, 2013
Phoenix Ascended wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did Jesus say homosexuality was right?
Matthew 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

Those "eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb" would have included both those men born with genital birth defects and those that were purely gay.

Do try to remember that the term "homosexual" is a modern term, dating only to the end of the 19th century. Prior to that, people just did not understand that some people had a sexual orientation that precluded sex with members of the opposite sex. For lesbians, there was no real option but to marry at their parent's order and lay there, praying that the night's ordeal would be over soon. Gay men would not have had that option.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#707 Sep 6, 2013
Oh! I found the site that gives the historical background for what I just posted above. Woot!

http://www.well.com/~aquarius/cardiff.htm
The Ancient Roman and Talmudic Definition of Natural Eunuchs


Presented at a conference on Eunuchs in Antiquity and Beyond held at Cardiff University on July 27, 1999

Ya'll can go read it. I don't feel like copying and pasting all that data.

Since: Sep 08

Anderson, IN

#708 Sep 6, 2013
Liam R wrote:
Oh! I found the site that gives the historical background for what I just posted above. Woot!
http://www.well.com/~aquarius/cardiff.htm
The Ancient Roman and Talmudic Definition of Natural Eunuchs
Presented at a conference on Eunuchs in Antiquity and Beyond held at Cardiff University on July 27, 1999
Ya'll can go read it. I don't feel like copying and pasting all that data.
Great find...thanks.

“Jesus loves you all!”

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#709 Sep 6, 2013
Troth for Leogere wrote:
<quoted text>dont play that card. where did Jesus SAY it wasnt? checkmate. you lose.
Jesus adhered to Torah so He wouldn't condone bestiality or homosexuality.

“Jesus loves you all!”

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#710 Sep 6, 2013
Cookie_Parker wrote:
<quoted text>Show us where in Jewish law this is allowed. Wasn't he raised Jewish?

If he were raised Jewish, he would follow their laws...and they weren't against homosexuality...so....
He obeyed Torah. He was from tribe of Judah.

“Jesus loves you all!”

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#711 Sep 6, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>Matthew 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

Those "eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb" would have included both those men born with genital birth defects and those that were purely gay.

Do try to remember that the term "homosexual" is a modern term, dating only to the end of the 19th century. Prior to that, people just did not understand that some people had a sexual orientation that precluded sex with members of the opposite sex. For lesbians, there was no real option but to marry at their parent's order and lay there, praying that the night's ordeal would be over soon. Gay men would not have had that option.
I will look up Hebraic terms in regards to what you state.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Here is My Spiritual Dilemma ... 2 min dollarsbill 187
Did Adam And Eve Ever Get Married? (Apr '09) 3 min princeofdarknessi... 280
Do Jews need to believe in Jesus? (Jan '15) 4 min princeofdarknessi... 27
News UNICEF calls for shock at plight of child refug... 5 min princeofdarknessi... 3
News Religion, higher education and critical thinking 7 min little lamb 257
Mark 4:11 – Should Christians follow the Bible? 8 min princeofdarknessi... 485
4,70,000 errors, mistakes, contradictions in bible 30 min princeofdarknessi... 535
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 54 min WasteWater 8,460
More from around the web