Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against ...

Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?

There are 16097 comments on the news.yahoo.com story from Apr 27, 2009, titled Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?. In it, news.yahoo.com reports that:

The trouble they see is not just an America where general support for gay marriage will have driven a wedge between churches and the world, but between churches themselves.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at news.yahoo.com.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15823 May 28, 2013
Stan53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you will have NO excuse when He judges you as a sinner and condemns you to eternal judgment.
Then it is a good thing that I am without sin.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15824 May 28, 2013
razzmatazz wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, really? show us proof.
Wow. You have not paid any attention to anything that has gone on before, have you?

For a quick answer, go read Deuteronomy. It spells out that the Covenant between the God of the Bible and the children of Israel is an ETERNAL covenant, that the Laws spelled out in the Torah are to be followed FOR EVER, that the children of Israel are to NEVER worship anything in the shape of a man (like Jesus, for example) and several other things that combine to prove that xianity is a complete non-starter.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15825 May 28, 2013
Stan53 wrote:
<quoted text>
The God of Isaac IS the one true God. He manifested Himself, became incarnated, in Jesus Christ, in whom I have the utmost faith, so I guess I'm not an infidel. I KNOW what you obviously don't know or understand.
But He was the God of the children of Israel only. If He had really been the one true God for all mankind, then He would have taught all mankind how to obey Him. Then too, if He was the "One True God" (tm) then He would have had no problem defeating chariots of iron...

Judges 1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15826 May 28, 2013
Stan53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you not claim to be Muslim? If you did then you must know what Muslims believe?
Just because you know some vernacular of logic, obviously does not mean you know HOW to use them. If the Bible is right, nothing else can be. It's called a declarative statement. Basic math knowledge shows this.
"If the Bible is right..."

That is a big "if". Since there are points that clearly demonstrate that the Bible is NOT 100% factual, that brings into question all of the rest. Of course, things like the "new" testament can be dismissed out of hand for contradiction the foundational statements.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15827 May 28, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence God said anything, because first it must be demonstrated that God exists to rationally justify the belief that God said anything.
Bigfoot said you'd respond with something stupid. Go ahead, prove bigfoot right.
If you keep on talking about Bigfoot that way, he's gonna complain to Santa, and you will end up with only coal in your stocking...

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15828 May 28, 2013
Stan53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually I did sweetie and I commented. You obviously are too busy trolling to read responses. What makes you think I care one iota about a religious tolerance group based out of Ontario? They are probably ALL humanists, and further more their opinion is WRONG.
Furthermore, as you don't live by Biblical principles or by God's principles then trying to use them is not just hypocritical but meaningless as far as I'm concerned.
In other words, you have made up your "mind", and reality has no bearing on your opinion...

"A Christian has two options with regard to the Christian Scriptures (New Testament):

1. To accept a favorite English translation as accurately containing the words of the original authors. This is a simple and straightforward approach because biblical passages related to lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender persons and transsexuals (LGBT) in English Bibles are universally condemning. No further effort is needed.

2. To base the interpretation of these passages on the most ancient available Greek manuscripts of 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy. These is as close as we are able to get to the original autograph copies written by the author(s). This option is much more demanding, and made even more difficult because the precise meaning of some of the Greek words are unknown and can only be inferred. Even worse, a convincing case can be made that 1 Timothy was written by a second century forger, many decades after Paul was executed."
From here:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/homarsen.ht...

Only one of these options seeks to know and follow the words and intentions of the author...

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15829 May 28, 2013
Stan53 wrote:
<quoted text>
Acknowledging what God says is WRONG, is NOT judging but of course you don't like God telling you, but you can't tell Him off because you don't accept or believe Him so you do the next best thing. It is meaningless to me as I know I'm NOT judging you, ONLY God judges.
If I see you go through a red light, I can say you are guilty of breaking the law and that doesn't have ANY impact on you until an ACTUAL judge find you guilty. You can deny all you want what I KNOW but you won't be able to deny God. Ultimately He will confirm His Word and laws.
It is obvious you have NO idea what a hypocrite actually is, until you look in a mirror.
The problem here is that going through a red light IS wrong, but the Bible never condemns homosexuality, especially in light of the fact that it actually CELEBRATES the marriage of David and Johnathan.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#15830 May 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The presence of matter is evidence of God.
Everything we know and do is based on the fact that Nature operates by laws. The fact that people deny those laws exist in morality is evidence of evil.
Ah, no. Wrong again...

The presence of matter shows the presence of matter. Quantum physics explains this without any need to appeal to any Deus ex machina.
Thinking

Jackson, GA

#15831 May 28, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Hello my tiny todgered tribute troll, can you explain why your god is so obsessed by the bottoms of our species?
<quoted text>
There is no hope for you, but then again, you don't have a soul.

There is no point arguing with a troll about a book they dont belive in yet they choose to come on a forum for Christians whine and b!tch about it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15832 May 28, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. One was the legal practices of today's secular society. The other was, according to the Bible, the legal practices handed down to the Hebrews by God himself. Man came up with one, God came up with the other. Which is morally superior? For that matter, if you can't bring yourself to admit that it's morally repugnant to marry one's daughter to her rapist after accepting a few bucks from the guy, at least you can admit that your God should have been capable of giving them la..those horrible prejudices and practices.
<quoted text>
Wrong. I showed up your ignorance of your own holy book. And, now you don't have the stones to admit it. You admitted error, but you can't admit that I demonstrated any greater degree of knowledge or understanding of it than you have. Your dick won't shrink just because you admit your ignorance. How can you claim to believe everything in a book that you don't even know the contents of?
<quoted text>
Wrong. The presence of matter is a fact, and our understanding of the laws of physics explains the presence of matter. If you think it's evidence of the existence of God, you have to first define your God, then explain how the presence of matter serves as evidence of God's existence without employing logical fallacies or making shit up. Good luck with that.
<quoted text>
Nature doesn't operate by laws. Nature is, and the way nature works is described by man in mathematical and scientific terms by laws, and explained by theories. Conflating scientific laws and legal laws is a logical fallacy called equivocation. Please learn how to form a logical argument. PLEASE.
You act as if that was God's only guidance regarding sex. Marriage is God's ideal. Everything else is dealing with the consequences of violating that ideal. For it's time, it was the perfect morality for the reasons I stated.

Moreover, a 'dowery' was not ownership.

Even more idiotic is your twisted condemnation of the honor God's law established in the face of rape. If modern morality is so much more effective, why did sexual assault increase 30% last year in our disciplined military (40% were male assualts)? Are you really wanting to compare the view and value of females in our society with the view then?

What you clearly show is not just bigotry, but also the ignorance it is rooted in. That is not just about the Bible, but also about sexuality.

I didn't dispute the presence of matter, I noted how it could exist out of nothing. I surmise that the presence of anything denotes a 'presence'. How do surmise the presence of anything?

As to nature's laws, you simply sounded like a contradicting idiot. Nor was I talking about legal laws, however, that is another area you seek to manipulate while denying the existence of moral laws.
Thinking

Poole, UK

#15833 May 28, 2013
Hello my tiny todgered tribute troll, if I have no soul, then how can religitard perverts like you punish me in their twisted alleged afterlife?

Suck on that.
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no hope for you, but then again, you don't have a soul.
There is no point arguing with a troll about a book they dont belive in yet they choose to come on a forum for Christians whine and b!tch about it.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15835 May 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that a culture exists as long as Judaism, has survived the consistent, concentrated abuse, and has done so distinguishing itself so profoundly, is clear evidence that the Alien who gave the Laws and predicted the result, represents a god in the true sense of the word.
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
How long did the Greeks have their pantheon of gods? Until their Gods were supplanted by someone else's deity or deities, would that long run have proven that their gods were true? The Greeks were the founders of civilization. Doesn't that prove that their gods were the real deal? They brought about grand and novel concepts, like democracy, and the body politic, and physics, and advanced mathematics, and philosophy to degrees never before known. How can you deny this as proof that their gods were real?
That's your argument. Stuff happened, therefore God. When you have something substantive to offer, let us know. You're too full of logical fallacies to take seriously. Unfortunately, that doesn't disqualify people from being able to vote.
Greece lasted 1300 years.

Judaism began long before and still exists.

Moreover, the differences between Greek gods and Jehovah are numerous. Greek gods were nothing more than glorified humans with all their faults and frailties.

But even more important, Judaism produced far greater results, and still does to this day, compared to any culture.

As to the things you list, they did develop previous concepts to a new level. They then distorted them in practice and ceased to exist.

You conclude with 'stuff happens'. Wow.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15836 May 28, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Then it is a good thing that I am without sin.
Except for lying.

For one.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15837 May 28, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem here is that going through a red light IS wrong, but the Bible never condemns homosexuality, especially in light of the fact that it actually CELEBRATES the marriage of David and Johnathan.
The only marriage the Bible celebrates is between a man and woman.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15838 May 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The presence of matter is evidence of God.
Everything we know and do is based on the fact that Nature operates by laws. The fact that people deny those laws exist in morality is evidence of evil.
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, no. Wrong again...
The presence of matter shows the presence of matter. Quantum physics explains this without any need to appeal to any Deus ex machina.
I wasn't referring to how matter operates, I was referring to where it came from.

However, the laws that dictate the behavior of matter and everything that evolves is also a indication of a Presence.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#15839 May 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The only marriage the Bible celebrates is between a man and woman.
The first amendment protects churches from being forced to perform same sex marriages, even if they are legalized for civil marriage.

The Bible is utterly irrelevant to civil law. You see, the first amendment allso forbids laws respecting an establishment of religion.
Thinking

Poole, UK

#15840 May 28, 2013
You seem obsessed.

I'm totally fine with consensual gay and straight people.

Why aren't you?
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey [email protected], we all know what you su:ck on, and it's not your thumb.
ROFLMFAO

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15841 May 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You act as if that was God's only guidance regarding sex. Marriage is God's ideal. Everything else is dealing with the consequences of violating that ideal. For it's time, it was the perfect morality for the reasons I stated.
Moreover, a 'dowery' was not ownership.
Even more idiotic is your twisted condemnation of the honor God's law established in the face of rape. If modern morality is so much more effective, why did sexual assault increase 30% last year in our disciplined military (40% were male assualts)? Are you really wanting to compare the view and value of females in our society with the view then?
What you clearly show is not just bigotry, but also the ignorance it is rooted in. That is not just about the Bible, but also about sexuality.
I didn't dispute the presence of matter, I noted how it could exist out of nothing. I surmise that the presence of anything denotes a 'presence'. How do surmise the presence of anything?
As to nature's laws, you simply sounded like a contradicting idiot. Nor was I talking about legal laws, however, that is another area you seek to manipulate while denying the existence of moral laws.
WOW!

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15842 May 28, 2013
LowellGuy wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. One was the legal practices of today's secular society. The other was, according to the Bible, the legal practices handed down to the Hebrews by God himself. Man came up with one, God came up with the other. Which is morally superior? For that matter, if you can't bring yourself to admit that it's morally repugnant to marry one's daughter to her rapist after accepting a few bucks from the guy, at least you can admit that your God should have been capable of giving them laws that weren't morally repugnant. Your God was capable of telling them to do something other than marrying their daughter to her rapist in exchange for money, or telling them not to own other people as property. You must admit that your God was capable of these things, yes?
<quoted text>
Irrelevant. Was your God capable of issuing MORALLY PERFECT laws? Were people too stupid to obey God's laws if they were perfect, and they could only manage to follow morally reprehensible laws? What, exactly, was the point of giving them laws that, at best, would have only been marginally better than the slightly more savage shit the other societies nearby were doing? God couldn't just tell them to do things they REALLY ought to do, and instead saw fit only to give them laws that were incrementally a bit better than those of their neighbors? REALLY? Your God couldn't hold them to a standard any higher than just a little better than the savages next door?
<quoted text>
Right. So, your God didn't bother telling them, "Hey, guys, you've got to stop acting as though a female's only value is between her legs. Women are people, too. For that matter, so are people of other societies, and you should treat them all like equals." No...instead, your God merely perpetuated the morally deficient misogyny and xenophobia and slavery that were already part of that society. Almost as if it wasn't some morally superior source that was giving the laws, but rather a post hoc rationalization and justification for those horrible prejudices and practices.
<quoted text>
Wrong. I showed up your ignorance of your own holy book. And, now you don't have the stones to admit it. You admitted error, but you can't admit that I demonstrated any greater degree of knowledge or understanding of it than you have. Your dick won't shrink just because you admit your ignorance. How can you claim to believe everything in a book that you don't even know the contents of?
<quoted text>
Wrong. The presence of matter is a fact, and our understanding of the laws of physics explains the presence of matter. If you think it's evidence of the existence of God, you have to first define your God, then explain how the presence of matter serves as evidence of God's existence without employing logical fallacies or making shit up. Good luck with that.
<quoted text>
Nature doesn't operate by laws. Nature is, and the way nature works is described by man in mathematical and scientific terms by laws, and explained by theories. Conflating scientific laws and legal laws is a logical fallacy called equivocation. Please learn how to form a logical argument. PLEASE.
*Yawn*

The only problem with your long winded post, is at the end of the day, you cant prove or disprove anything!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#15843 May 28, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
The first amendment protects churches from being forced to perform same sex marriages, even if they are legalized for civil marriage.
The Bible is utterly irrelevant to civil law. You see, the first amendment allso forbids laws respecting an establishment of religion.
I wasn't seeking to impose morality on a reprobate.

I was simply exposing the desecration attempt.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.

They clearly don't equate to marriage.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Majority of women in prison have been victims o... 2 hr Frindly 33
The tree of life and tree of good and evil 2 hr Frindly 35
Battling Life Threatening Flesh Eating Sex Demo... 2 hr Frindly 10
Prayer is WORTHLESS, and I can prove it (Dec '08) 2 hr Frindly 2,680
The end times started when Jesus walked this ea... 2 hr Frindly 45
Are Your Beliefs TRUE? 7 hr proveyourgod 860
DID DOLLARSBILL HAVE a STROKE and DIE? 8 hr proveyourgod 92
More from around the web