Who Is Allah?

Who Is Allah?

There are 253910 comments on the The Brussels Journal story from Aug 24, 2007, titled Who Is Allah?. In it, The Brussels Journal reports that:

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? [...] What does God care what we call him?”

From the desk of Soeren Kern on Fri, 2007-08-24 11:56 Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society. via The Brussels Journal

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brussels Journal.

Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162159 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Will you now list up 150 good things that Jesus did for the Israelites, JesusFreak?
I am all ears.
Jesus reconciled man/woman to God and opened the Gates of Heaven; making it possible for us to become a New Creation in Christ Jesus, adopted children of God, partakers in the life of God, and heirs to the Kingdom of God. What did mohammad do? Enslaved millions of people, slaughtered and raped women and children, murdered millions while conquering a few acres of land.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162161 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
That is true. She has been guarding that Satanic material very well. The smart Protestants reduced it to 66 books.
Didn't she know? How did that happen? What kind of a guardian she was? It should not have happened at all.
Which Evil Spirit suggested that to the Protestants? The alleged Holy Spirit?
The Catholic Church still has the original Holy Bible with all its books intact. Today anyone can edit the Holy Bible and no one in the Catholic Church will kill them for it. The Holy Spirit has taught His Church over the past 2,000 years that we can all live in peace in spite of our differences. God does not care how many books we have in our bibles but how we love Him and our neighbor.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162166 Feb 7, 2013
John Preacher wrote:
Hey Steffano, here's my free book for you, on the end days so you won't be decieved:
www.sharepdfbooks.com/HANMQ56EZYWI/The_Islami...
John MacArthur Sermon
www.youtube.com/watch...
Joel Richardson's website for more books and dvds
www.joelstrumpet.com
Its Supernatural - Joel Richardson interview:
www.sidroth.org/site/News2...
Armageddon News - Mark of the beast Revealed
www.youtube.com/watch...
Finally the Mark of the beast has been revealed as the Mark of the coming Islamic Caliphate of 10 Nations. Please don't take the Mark or bow to the Image of the Islamic Empire.
Read Gods Warning:
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." (Revelation 14:9-11).
E=MC^2 proves that no omnipotent (infinite power/energy) being (Revelation 19:6 KJV) can exist in this universe because you exist.

So no worries. The laws of physics are in place.
Bit of a bummer for the ones that adhere to the theory of omni-potence.

Chaostheory proves that disorder will turn into order sooner or later. So to destroy satan or his realm forever, is a bit of a logical impossibility.

Just a few of those annoying real life facts and actualities.
Sorry for raining on everyones parade.(Goddidit)

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162167 Feb 7, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
The Catholic Church still has the original Holy Bible with all its books intact. Today anyone can edit the Holy Bible and no one in the Catholic Church will kill them for it. The Holy Spirit has taught His Church over the past 2,000 years that we can all live in peace in spite of our differences. God does not care how many books we have in our bibles but how we love Him and our neighbor.
No they don't unless you overlook 70,000 huge and minor differences.
But people love to believe this.
And when faced with the actual book and content, most say that the writers were not yet completely in the knowhow....or whatever nonsense peole come up with when faced with unpalatable facts.
In any case, they like the books they have now best...and truth be damned.

Sad, but that's a general theme.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#162169 Feb 7, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you don't understand what you read.
You also don't own God and don't dictate God's behaviour although like all muztards you think you do.
Do you deny the ability of God to appear in any form He wishes???
Hmm????
No, no!

We understand the New Testament Junk and Stuff very well. That is how, we show all the Horse Shit and explain it to you.

So read again:

We read and understand the New Testament very well. The problem is that Christian ignorant fools like your goodself, do not understand a thing.

Example:

I and the Father are one.

Clueless and Ignorant Fools take this to mean that Jesus was claiming to be the Father. Jesus was not a fool to say that.

When we look into the absurd claim, we find it extremely silly, absurd, idiotic, meaningless and absurd.

So, we conclude that the man did not say, "I and the Father are one and the same person" and we throw that claim off and dismiss it.

The problem with the NT is that it was written in Greek, a language totally unfit for Scripture. That language is responsible for all the mess, massive confusion and the absurdities, which we see in you guys.

Yes, we deny that.

Can your God come down as a monkey? Jesus as God is pathetic, absurd and hilarious.

Can you name the bloody fools, who said that Jesus is God?

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162170 Feb 7, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you don't understand what you read.
You also don't own God and don't dictate God's behaviour although like all muztards you think you do.
Do you deny the ability of God to appear in any form He wishes???
Hmm????
It comes from Aramaic, and no they are not one.
YHVH has always just been the Elohim.

Why would someone go with the later christian omni-potent and omni-present idea and thus actual appearance/murder/kill g-d when the entire theology over thousands of years was to not go there!!

No son, no g-d appearing, you can only say what G-d is not, thou shalt not kill, and hold g-d above all.

Those Romans really pulled all the stops the get the jews to disappear, G-d and all, and replace with the emperor-god and son-of-god-emperor whose word was like a gods word.

Replacement-theory is big business, but tone down on the claims.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162171 Feb 7, 2013
Kindergarten time here. All the judging going on.
If there were ten options, would they fill them all...
BMZ...stamps of approval thus.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162172 Feb 7, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
No they don't unless you overlook 70,000 huge and minor differences.
But people love to believe this.
And when faced with the actual book and content, most say that the writers were not yet completely in the knowhow....or whatever nonsense peole come up with when faced with unpalatable facts.
In any case, they like the books they have now best...and truth be damned.
Sad, but that's a general theme.
God does not care what book you are carrying around or how many books are in your book. God only cares what you carry around in your heart. Each person will be judged on the content of their hearts and not the content of they book.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162173 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
No, no!
We understand the New Testament Junk and Stuff very well. That is how, we show all the Horse Shit and explain it to you.
So read again:
We read and understand the New Testament very well. The problem is that Christian ignorant fools like your goodself, do not understand a thing.
Example:
I and the Father are one.
Clueless and Ignorant Fools take this to mean that Jesus was claiming to be the Father. Jesus was not a fool to say that.
When we look into the absurd claim, we find it extremely silly, absurd, idiotic, meaningless and absurd.
So, we conclude that the man did not say, "I and the Father are one and the same person" and we throw that claim off and dismiss it.
The problem with the NT is that it was written in Greek, a language totally unfit for Scripture. That language is responsible for all the mess, massive confusion and the absurdities, which we see in you guys.
Yes, we deny that.
Can your God come down as a monkey? Jesus as God is pathetic, absurd and hilarious.
Can you name the bloody fools, who said that Jesus is God?
The Jews who wanted to stone Jesus heard Him say He was God.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162174 Feb 7, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
God does not care what book you are carrying around or how many books are in your book. God only cares what you carry around in your heart. Each person will be judged on the content of their hearts and not the content of they book.
If you actually acted to that tenet, you would be able to acknowledge that you might not have investigated the matter on the books closely enough.
Now your words sound like a sanctimonious copout.

Goodmorning. WV?

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#162175 Feb 7, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
The Jews who wanted to stone Jesus heard Him say He was God.
No they thought he was calling for the prophet.
And no we are not going to do a retake on all the version, in all the old languages and bibleversions.
We did that twice allready.

Just because BMZ adheres to islam, does not mean he is wrong all the time.
So don't project your ignorance.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#162176 Feb 7, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus was tempted in all things, but never sinned. He found favor with the Father. The Father, God, witnessed to Jesus, God, and told everyone to listen to Him.
Jesus should not have been sent to Satan at all. It shows that the Father was not sure about his alleged son. And the Father thought Satan was the best person to judge and certify Jesus fit for preaching.

The mother of all questions is: Why did Jesus obey Satan and went with him to the highest point of the temple?

Obeying Satan was his biggest sin and that is why his mission flopped.

If Satan comes to you and tells you to follow him, will you go with him?
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162177 Feb 7, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually acted to that tenet, you would be able to acknowledge that you might not have investigated the matter on the books closely enough.
Now your words sound like a sanctimonious copout.
Goodmorning. WV?
Show where God will judge one on the number of books in their bibles?
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#162178 Feb 7, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
No they thought he was calling for the prophet.

And no we are not going to do a retake on all the version, in all the old languages and bibleversions.
We did that twice allready.

Just because BMZ adheres to islam, does not mean he is wrong all the time.
So don't project your ignorance.
Thank you, Maat.
John

Brisbane, Australia

#162179 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
blah blah blah
Yes, we deny that.
blah blah blah
Then you deny the divinity and power of God.
Just because allah your counterfeit god is powerless doesn't mean that the real God is powerless.
Just because allah your counterfeit god has never come to you does not mean that the real God has not walked among us.
John

Brisbane, Australia

#162180 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus should not have been sent to Satan at all. It shows that the Father was not sure about his alleged son. And the Father thought Satan was the best person to judge and certify Jesus fit for preaching.
The mother of all questions is: Why did Jesus obey Satan and went with him to the highest point of the temple?
Obeying Satan was his biggest sin and that is why his mission flopped.
If Satan comes to you and tells you to follow him, will you go with him?
WTF are you drivelling about now?
You waffle so much bullshit deliberately.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162183 Feb 7, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
No they thought he was calling for the prophet.
And no we are not going to do a retake on all the version, in all the old languages and bibleversions.
We did that twice allready.
Just because BMZ adheres to islam, does not mean he is wrong all the time.
So don't project your ignorance.
They wanted to stone Him for saying He was God.

John 10:33 "We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162185 Feb 7, 2013
bmz wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus should not have been sent to Satan at all. It shows that the Father was not sure about his alleged son. And the Father thought Satan was the best person to judge and certify Jesus fit for preaching.
The mother of all questions is: Why did Jesus obey Satan and went with him to the highest point of the temple?
Obeying Satan was his biggest sin and that is why his mission flopped.
If Satan comes to you and tells you to follow him, will you go with him?
Jesus was fully man and had to be tempted and not sin, to set an example for all of us that we too can resist the tempter and overcome him.
Paul WV

Beckley, WV

#162186 Feb 7, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
No they thought he was calling for the prophet.
And no we are not going to do a retake on all the version, in all the old languages and bibleversions.
We did that twice allready.
Just because BMZ adheres to islam, does not mean he is wrong all the time.
So don't project your ignorance.
A broken clock is right twice a day.
bmz

Since: Mar 08

Singapore

#162188 Feb 7, 2013
Paul WV wrote:
<quoted text>
The Jews who wanted to stone Jesus heard Him say He was God.
No!

That is another lie. Jesus never said that.

Jesus was quoting Psalms 82. In order to understand what he said, you must refer to Jewish translations done by Jews for their own Scripture. You cannot trust Christian translations.

This translation in John 10:34 is very poor, ridiculous and perverted.

"Jesus answered,“It is written in your law that God said,‘I said, you are gods."

The actual translation is: "I said: Ye are godlike beings, and all of you sons of the Most High."

The story in John 10 is absurd and was written long after Jesus was gone to show some absurd divinity, which he never claimed.

I don't know how can you accept foolish statements from those, who did could not even differentiate between a godly person or a godly man or godlike AND God's Son.

God's Son simply means God's son. Why don't you write God's children as God's Children.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Roman Catholic Church Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 min Just Think 653,711
News Remembering a Christian and a Jew who traced an... 9 hr rabbee yehoshooah... 11
News Pope Francis wades into transgender debate, lam... 11 hr South Knox Hombre 2
Greek God of astrology 19 hr just asking 1
News CSAN comments on racial inequality report Tue little lamb 2
Gay marriage is not a sin! Mon South Knox Hombre 2
Saint of the Day thread (May '10) Aug 21 MichelleMC 2,780
More from around the web