why buddha rejected the authority of vedas?

Posted in the Buddhism Forum

Comments
1 - 10 of 10 Comments Last updated Mar 18, 2014
Tongu

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Mar 13, 2014
 
one hindu said
because buddha wanted to start his own philosphy he rejected vedas..!
it is easier to discard and difficult to explain anything

can anyone prove him wrong?
Hello

Flushing, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Mar 13, 2014
 
One should ask the Hindus,

1) You say your Hindu Vedas comes from the 4 heads of Brahma
2) did Shiva not curse this Brahma for lying about seeing the end of the fiery pillar?
3) thus your Vedas is a cursed Vedas since it comes from a cursed Brahma.

Buddha rejected this cursed Vedas of the Hindus.

However, Buddha shows us the True Vedas, uncursed:

Buddha distinguished the Tri-Vedas of the Brahmins (I.e today's Hindus) from the Tri-Vedas of the Aryans(Buddhists) in suttas such as the "Tevijja Sutta" as well as many other suttas.

"well brahmin, this description of a brahmin who has the threefold lore (Tevijja) is one thing. The description of him who has the threefold lore in the discipline of the Ariya is quite another thing." (Anguttara Nikaya:3:6 The Brahmins:Tikanna)[38]

Buddha further describes the Buddhist Triveda discipline (Pali: ariyassa vinaye tevijjo) as being the following three knowledges:

1)Knowledge of past births across cycles of ages (contractions and expansions of the universe).
2)Knowledge of heavens and hells.
3)Knowledge of the destruction of defilements (asavas) which cause rebirth (obtainment of Nirvana).
Tonga

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Mar 13, 2014
 
shall i give u link? will you prove him wrong?
Hello

Flushing, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Mar 13, 2014
 
Tonga wrote:
shall i give u link? will you prove him wrong?
It really depends on what kind of Hindus they are. If they do not have reason and are nationalist Hindutvadis, it will be a waste of time. If they seem like sincere spiritual seekers, the time might be worth it.

Do they seem reasonable and open to discussion about the Hindu scriptural contradictions which also state that the Brahmin caste in Kaliyuga is cursed and will not know the Vedas (Varaha Purana)?

It is the Hindus who have rejected the highest Vedas, it is the Buddhists who preserve the highest or Ariya Vedas.
Tonga

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Mar 14, 2014
 
Hello wrote:
<quoted text>
It really depends on what kind of Hindus they are. If they do not have reason and are nationalist Hindutvadis, it will be a waste of time. If they seem like sincere spiritual seekers, the time might be worth it.
Do they seem reasonable and open to discussion about the Hindu scriptural contradictions which also state that the Brahmin caste in Kaliyuga is cursed and will not know the Vedas (Varaha Purana)?
It is the Hindus who have rejected the highest Vedas, it is the Buddhists who preserve the highest or Ariya Vedas.
he is on islam forum
who is allah?
is the thread
Tonga

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Mar 14, 2014
 
his name is Truth Seeker
Hello

Flushing, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Mar 14, 2014
 
Tonga wrote:
his name is Truth Seeker
Posted.
Tonga

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Mar 15, 2014
 
Thanks bro
Hello

Flushing, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Mar 15, 2014
 
Tonga wrote:
Thanks bro
No problem.
bhiksuni Ratana

Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Mar 18, 2014
 
There is not one single answer, there are many answers as to why Buddha rejected much of what the Veda taught. But generally he used the Veda as point of reference, to allow new notions about the sacred and the profane.
One such anwers was given by Dr. Ambedkar, the early 20th cent. thinker who lead the Untouchables out of the Hindu fold and into that of the Buddha. He said:
" You must take the stand that Buddha took. You must take the stand which Guru Nanak took. You must not only discard the Shastras, you must deny their authority, as did Buddha and Nanak. You must have courage to tell the Hindus, that what is wrong with them is their religion— the religion which has produced in them this notion of the sacredness of Caste."

Guru Nanak was the foundig father of Sikhism. The Shastras are among the sacred scriptures of the Hindus.
Today we hesitate calling the Hindu religion wrong, just as we hesitate calling other religions wrong. But Ambedkar belonged to the oppressed people of India and it is more or less understandable that he used strong language, too strong for our times.

Basically Buddha taught us to be independent of vested religious practices or the authority of priests who mediate between the sacred and man. He wished his followers to stand firmly on their own feet, to think for themselves, and act for themselves.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••