So it's wrong because it's "unnatural"? That's clearly circular reasoning. As for whether it's genetic or not, how do you know it's not? Have you presented your scientific paper on the subject for peer-review and publication yet? And even if it were purely choice, what difference would that make? You still haven't established why homosexuality is bad, except to say that it's wrong because it's wrong.<quoted text> The rationale for deeming homo beahvoir should be obvious , its unnatural. Man wasn't created do do that. There is no homo gene, its a choice and derives from family dynamics and being given over to delusion.
And since you claim it's a choice, does that imply that you could choose to be gay? How is it you know how being gay works better than gay people themselves? I'd be very interested to learn how that works.
So slavery is OK if there are even more immoral things afoot? Wha?Define slavery? I see slaves everywhere especially psychic slaves. In those days they didn't have bankruptcy laws or governements that print money . A slave may have had it better off than to try and eke out his own living.
Women are of less worth than men? What's the rationale for that?I don't think to many people have sold a daughter into slavery however they are up till this day the weaker sex and of less worth.
I see. So it would be beneficial for you to be sold as a slave if your owner was wealthier than you, correct?A cow is still worth more than a baby girl in Vietnam for instance. Do I have to tell you about female fetuses in Chinas? Is a daughter sold in slavery necessarily having a bad life? I think not, could even be a better life. Only people with plenty of money could buy a female slave.