The problem with "evolution" is that it a contrived term.<quoted text>
Your limited faculties prevent you from understanding that evolution is a result of a process, and not a process itself.
That means on the physical level evolution is caused, and there must be a mechanism for the causation and process that turns into that purely descriptive word you accept as some "natural" force or process.
Quit reading and start thinking to complete your education.
It's primary purpose is a rhetorical one, serving as a propaganda tool to bolster a particular ideology.
RM + NS = DWM is the basic.
(random mutation plus natural selection equals descent with modification)
No informed person resists this as "evolution".
But then the informed person, by association, is supposed to accept a more God-like power quality such as universal common descent, or that this God-like propensity for design and execution is purely accidental, and if that nucleotide tries long enough, it has to get it right.
No. One claim is modest and scientific. The other is tentative.
Some people like to control the knowledge template.