Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 239082 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#180996 Oct 22, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.
You constantly go out of your way to lie.
You prove your religion is that of pigs.
My are we sensitive today. Did I hurt your little bitty feelings?

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#180997 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
You believe in ďForrest GumpísĒ theory of abogenesis.
ďSh*t Happens.Ē
Of course you are calling it a naturalistic event which is another way of saying ďsh*t happens.Ē
Iím a little more scientific than that Doctor. I donít believe large span bridges build themselves. The run of life on earth is far too complex to have just ďhappened.Ē
Yes, you are so much more scientific, you adopt the mythical being scooping up a pile of dirt and blowing on it to magically produce a fully formed male, theory. VERY scientific indeed. LOL

Since: Sep 08

Fowler, CO

#180998 Oct 22, 2013
BenAdam wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks proving that you are a clueless moron.
Hmmm...you need your grammar tweaked up.

Did they supply you with a location to send incident reports? You won't get better unless they do.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#180999 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you havenít offered an explanation about how life started on the earth. Thereís no scientific explanation except an old suitcase full of wild guesses.
Even in this very modern and advanced scientific age. Scientist donít have anything but hunches, they call it theories.
Which points to the blind faith Atheist have. They donít know how it happened but just accept it happened.
No scientific experiment has been able to create life from a sterile lifeless environment. Take Mars for example. We have those rovers crawling all over the place on the surface. No seashells, no bones, no plants, nothing but rocks and sand. We know it had water at one time. But no signs of life.
Itís lifeless and sterile. Life is far more complex than to have self created.
Realizing, of course, that none of that has anything to do with not believing in deities.

You're trying to form a link where none exists.

Atheism is not a belief system about how life was created or how the world came to be.

Atheism is a lack of belief in deities - nothing more, nothing less.

This really isn't that complicated.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181000 Oct 22, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>yes, REAL science is grande, but apparently a foreign language to you.
Doctor, why are you so angry all the time? It's like your spring is wound too tight.

Have you been pissed off your entire life?

Chill man, relax.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181001 Oct 22, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>To the uneducated and feeble mind I'm quite sure evolution,as well as any other science, is in fact, unintelligible. Blissfully ignorant is certainly no way to go through life. Evolution is a FACT, it is what 99.9% of ALL scientists worldwide accept as factual. Now if you think you have information that proves evolution to be false, get ready for world-wide fame and a Nobel Prize. Good luck!!!
I would go as far to say 100% of all scientist believe evolution is a fact. Thereís no way to dispute it.

However not everyone embraces every aspect of evolution. Certain aspects yes others not so much.

Now if you are talking about the evolution of mankind. No one can deny that knowledge has been an evolutionary process for man.

But evolution of mankind as saying we mutated from apes. It takes a wild imagination, artist conceptions, and a hell of a lot of speculation.

According to evolution who came first? The male or female or did they just appear together?
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181002 Oct 22, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Realizing, of course, that none of that has anything to do with not believing in deities.
You're trying to form a link where none exists.
Atheism is not a belief system about how life was created or how the world came to be.
Atheism is a lack of belief in deities - nothing more, nothing less.
This really isn't that complicated.
I know what atheism is about. I was raised with an Atheist father. And he was hard core Atheist.

Iím just telling you Atheism requires belief in what is not known. When we delve into the very beginning of all life. The trigger mechanism that started it all. The complexity of DNA and RNA strands to make advance life forms.

Atheist donít know but accept that it happened. Creation of life from a sterile environment all by itself. Itís never been done by science. That should tell you thatís itís not easy to do. Because it has never ever happened all on its own.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181003 Oct 22, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, you are so much more scientific, you adopt the mythical being scooping up a pile of dirt and blowing on it to magically produce a fully formed male, theory. VERY scientific indeed. LOL
No mythical being Doctor. But a real engineer, designer and architect. All in one.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#181004 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what atheism is about. I was raised with an Atheist father. And he was hard core Atheist.
Iím just telling you Atheism requires belief in what is not known. When we delve into the very beginning of all life. The trigger mechanism that started it all. The complexity of DNA and RNA strands to make advance life forms.
Atheist donít know but accept that it happened. Creation of life from a sterile environment all by itself. Itís never been done by science. That should tell you thatís itís not easy to do. Because it has never ever happened all on its own.
You've got me.

I secretly believe that a band of magic pixies who live on the back of a unicorn actually created the universe.

Again: all atheism is is the lack of a belief in deities.

Nothing more, nothing less.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#181005 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would go as far to say 100% of all scientist believe evolution is a fact. Thereís no way to dispute it.
However not everyone embraces every aspect of evolution. Certain aspects yes others not so much.
Now if you are talking about the evolution of mankind. No one can deny that knowledge has been an evolutionary process for man.
But evolution of mankind as saying we mutated from apes. It takes a wild imagination, artist conceptions, and a hell of a lot of speculation.
According to evolution who came first? The male or female or did they just appear together?
You need to bone up on your education concerning the evolution of man. Nowhere does it state that man "mutated" from apes. The fact that the great apes are a part of our heritage is a far cry from mutating from apes.

Just a suggestion, you might want to actually do some research on the evolution question you just asked. That way you'll know for sure and won't be relying on someone for information. Please tey and remember this, its extremely important.'To be scientifically literate is to empower yourself to KNOW when someone is full of shit."
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#181006 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Doctor, why are you so angry all the time? It's like your spring is wound too tight.
Have you been pissed off your entire life?
Chill man, relax.
That post was NOT directed at you.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181007 Oct 22, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got me.
I secretly believe that a band of magic pixies who live on the back of a unicorn actually created the universe.
Again: all atheism is is the lack of a belief in deities.
Nothing more, nothing less.
In order to support a building it must have load bearing walls or columns. Atheism needs these load bearing columns. Atheist try to use science or pseudo science to support their belief thereís no deity.

Your attempt to separate yourself from the question that neither science or Atheist can answer. How did life start on the Earth?

Because you canít answer the question. You can only speculate thereís no deity. If science could have easily had life self create in a sterile environment. Then that would put holes in the intelligent design argument, wouldnít it?

What science has shown us. Life is incredibly complicated. And scientist have not been able to recreate simple life forms from a sterile environment. Much less more complex life. Those life forms that have been created were done so with a lot of bioengineering.
Eagle 12

Troy, IL

#181008 Oct 22, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>That post was NOT directed at you.
I realize that but why are you so angry? I mean do you ever have any peace and joy? You are pissed off all the freaking time. Life is short Doctor to be angry all the time.

Since: Sep 08

Fowler, CO

#181009 Oct 22, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>You need to bone up on your education concerning the evolution of man. Nowhere does it state that man "mutated" from apes. The fact that the great apes are a part of our heritage is a far cry from mutating from apes.
Just a suggestion, you might want to actually do some research on the evolution question you just asked. That way you'll know for sure and won't be relying on someone for information. Please tey and remember this, its extremely important.'To be scientifically literate is to empower yourself to KNOW when someone is full of shit."
No, it says we mutated from the ancestors of amoebas. Maybe your brain did.

The correct way to phrase it would be we were assembled from the same things amoebas, and ape ancestors were. Common building blocks of molecules adjusted to match the prevailing environment that then get weathered a bit.

Your linear mutation to go from single celled beasties would require a whole lot of oddities springing up on existing models on a continuing basis that just aren't there. You don't see much in the way of missing links in fossils, and you see defects, not adaptations growing, on existing models.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#181010 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
In order to support a building it must have load bearing walls or columns. Atheism needs these load bearing columns. Atheist try to use science or pseudo science to support their belief thereís no deity.
Your attempt to separate yourself from the question that neither science or Atheist can answer. How did life start on the Earth?
Because you canít answer the question. You can only speculate thereís no deity. If science could have easily had life self create in a sterile environment. Then that would put holes in the intelligent design argument, wouldnít it?
What science has shown us. Life is incredibly complicated. And scientist have not been able to recreate simple life forms from a sterile environment. Much less more complex life. Those life forms that have been created were done so with a lot of bioengineering.
Atheism "needs" nothing - all atheism is is a lack of a belief in deities.

But, hey, keep swinging away if it somehow buttresses your wavering faith.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#181011 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would go as far to say 100% of all scientist believe evolution is a fact. Thereís no way to dispute it.
However not everyone embraces every aspect of evolution. Certain aspects yes others not so much.
Now if you are talking about the evolution of mankind. No one can deny that knowledge has been an evolutionary process for man.
But evolution of mankind as saying we mutated from apes. It takes a wild imagination, artist conceptions, and a hell of a lot of speculation.
According to evolution who came first? The male or female or did they just appear together?
I'm here to help you, please believe me. When you ask me "according to evolution who came first male of female." Means you do not know the meaning of evolution. You're talking about abiogenesis, how life came to be, evolution is simply hereditary changes in a population over long period of time, thats it, nothing more. Evolution does not address the origins of life, nor of the universe as many Theists try and propose. Change over time, plain and simply.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#181012 Oct 22, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it says we mutated from the ancestors of amoebas. Maybe your brain did.
The correct way to phrase it would be we were assembled from the same things amoebas, and ape ancestors were. Common building blocks of molecules adjusted to match the prevailing environment that then get weathered a bit.
Your linear mutation to go from single celled beasties would require a whole lot of oddities springing up on existing models on a continuing basis that just aren't there. You don't see much in the way of missing links in fossils, and you see defects, not adaptations growing, on existing models.
Being scientifically illiterate must be a horrible thing.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#181013 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
In order to support a building it must have load bearing walls or columns. Atheism needs these load bearing columns. Atheist try to use science or pseudo science to support their belief thereís no deity.
Your attempt to separate yourself from the question that neither science or Atheist can answer. How did life start on the Earth?
Because you canít answer the question. You can only speculate thereís no deity. If science could have easily had life self create in a sterile environment. Then that would put holes in the intelligent design argument, wouldnít it?
What science has shown us. Life is incredibly complicated. And scientist have not been able to recreate simple life forms from a sterile environment. Much less more complex life. Those life forms that have been created were done so with a lot of bioengineering.
And because science can't as yet answer that question you feel perfectly ok with inserting an imaginary being as the cause. No proof, no hypothesis, no actual science, just insert this God thing as factual. At least science will speculate, draw a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, move on when new information is found. Do you do any of that? No, you simply assert that your favorite delusion is the answer.

Science has created the building blocks of life from non-life, so we KNOW it is entirely possible for life to come from non-life. We know this because science has tested and retested and applied different approaches. You have done, no testing, have no explored other approaches, you just sit back and proclaim your God is the cause.

Life forms were not created, they EVOLVED to become more complex. From simple to complex, thats how evolution operates, there was and is no need for a "bioengineer" Where is your proof for this bioengineer? I can produce proof for evolution, I guess that makes my answer much more valid than yours.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#181014 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
In order to support a building it must have load bearing walls or columns. Atheism needs these load bearing columns.
What?
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheist try to use science or pseudo science to support their belief thereís no deity.
Which atheists? Can you name them?
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your attempt to separate yourself from the question that neither science or Atheist can answer. How did life start on the Earth?
Who cares?
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you canít answer the question. You can only speculate thereís no deity. If science could have easily had life self create in a sterile environment. Then that would put holes in the intelligent design argument, wouldnít it?
What intelligent design argument?
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
What science has shown us. Life is incredibly complicated. And scientist have not been able to recreate simple life forms from a sterile environment. Much less more complex life. Those life forms that have been created were done so with a lot of bioengineering.
What does that have to do with atheism?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#181015 Oct 22, 2013
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bob, did you ever spray for roaches?
Wow.... you just cannot get enough put downs, can you?

So very Jesus of you it is, too.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 8 min DebraE 7,313
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 4 hr NoahLovesU 7,453
why Atheists believe in incest,pedophilia and b... 4 hr hpcaban 30
News Phil Robertson talks against Atheists 16 hr thetruth 101
News .com | What hope is there without God? May 20 Kaitlin the Wolf ... 26
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) May 20 thetruth 2,171
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) May 19 Kathleen 19,031
More from around the web