Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 255320 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180596 Oct 19, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
The Empire was run by an evil Sith lord dictator, that must be why you like it.
No I don't like it, however it is better than atheism. You guys are like in the basement. Dead last place for pleasantries. Because Vader had a soul in the end he changed, Stalin had no soul, therefore.
Imhotep

Sevierville, TN

#180597 Oct 19, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not to brag, or advertise, but there IS a church where you will be welcomed, accepted and celebrated.
And the dress is informal.
How informal?

Two band aids and a cork?
What style of fig leaf is in this fall?

Since: Sep 08

Alamosa, CO

#180598 Oct 19, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
You're poor knowledge of history is appalling!
Please sell your "Encyclopedia Moronica".
I would say yours is sadly lacking in depth.

Yours consists of the topical buzzwords for the advancement of an idiotology.

You don't seem to understand real people.

Since: Sep 08

Alamosa, CO

#180599 Oct 19, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Haz lo que vieras: Do what you see (others doing).
When in Rome....
A hah!!

I was right!

Usually am. Or something like that.

Pretty good comprehension and association skills, eh? Went strictly by IANS Google translation.

You should listen to me, Catcher.

You're an idiot.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180600 Oct 19, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
In America we are free to have people who do not agree with religion.
Different people have different ideas and thoughts and opinions, so if the religious people can use different names to distinguish the difference in opinion to start with then I don't see why other people cannot. You seem to be much more intolerant to things than you once portrayed yourself to be.
I don't agree with you that I am not tolerant. I do not claim you should not have your church. I am not against you voicing your opinion here, although overall I do think it is asinine, to attempt to convert others, or to question someone to prove what they all ready told you was their faith. I only question yours because you would claim it as proven, which by all means I know is not true and you are delusional for claiming it is.

I don't even question your claims, I just understand your truth is different from mine, and that is even excluding the curves quantum physics may offer.

The fact I would never vote for an atheist is pure political opinion. It would be very nice if I was to have a Buddhist option, but that never seems to happen.
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#180601 Oct 19, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
... Make no mistake about it, I view you as sub human for having your beliefs....
And
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
...I view atheism as more of an evil cult than Christianity.
Page 8662.

An atheist is simply someone who believes in one fewer god than you.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180602 Oct 19, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a default answer that you know is incorrect when you type it, and you simply look to stir emotion from it. Factually, you have no solid proof for a god, you only hope, and believe, or have "faith" that there is one.
I disagree with you. I do have solid proof of God you just refuse to recognize it. As I refuse to recognize your stories of a God that is not perfect. You are confused because your made up God that is not perfect has no proof. Why would you wish to promote a culture of people that can't be inspired, and have no souls? It is no wonder the Japanese use to beat The Chinese like red headed step children, and although Russia took Finland the Finnish killed 10+ to 1 Russians. The art scene of these sinkholes. I am sure a soul may occasionally be inspired to create, but overall those places suck.

Since: Sep 10

Springfield, VA

#180603 Oct 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you say that to everyone that doesn't agree with you, Catcher. Even little old ladies.
Then you will sue them, take their house and and social security checks, and then dump them on the street.
You will show them the price of not being righteous like you.
No, it's your habit of patronizing, and demeaning.

Especially women.

Since: Sep 10

Springfield, VA

#180604 Oct 19, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
How informal?
Two band aids and a cork?
What style of fig leaf is in this fall?
Anything goes in The Holy Church of Catcher.

We even have our own thread.
Imhotep

Sevierville, TN

#180605 Oct 19, 2013
In recent weeks, a spate of especially appalling jihadist attacks occurred—one on a shopping mall in Nairobi, where non-Muslims appear to have been systematically tortured before being murdered; one on a church in Peshawar; and one on a school playground in Baghdad, targeting children.

Whenever I point out the role that religious ideology plays in atrocities of this kind—specifically the Islamic doctrines related to jihad, martyrdom, apostasy, and so forth—I am met with some version of the following:“Bad people will always do these things. Religion is nothing more than a pretext.” This is an increasingly dangerous misconception to have about the human mind.

My pick for the most terrifying and depressing phenomenon on earth: A smart, capable, compassionate, and honorable person grows infected with ludicrous ideas about a holy book and a waiting paradise, and then becomes capable of murdering innocent people—even children—while in a state of religious ecstasy.

Needless to say, this problem is rendered all the more terrifying and depressing because so many of us deny that it even exists.
To imagine that one is a holy warrior bound for Paradise might seem delusional, but we live in a world where perfectly sane people are led to believe such floridly crazy things in the name of religion.
This is primarily a social and cultural issue, not a psychological one. There is no clear line between what members of the Taliban, al Qaeda, and al Shabab believe about Islam and the “true” Islam.

In fact, these groups have as good a claim as any to being impeccable Muslims. This presents an enormous threat to civil society, which apologists for Islam and secular liberals can now be counted upon to obfuscate.

Their determination that “moderate” Islam not be blamed for the acts of “extremists” causes them to deny that genuine (and theologically justifiable) religious beliefs can inspire psychologically normal people to commit horrific acts of violence.

Take a moment to consider the actions of the Taliban gunman who shot Malala Yousafzai in the head. How is it that this man came to board a school bus with the intention of murdering a 15-year-old girl? Absent ideology, this could have only been the work of a psychotic or a psychopath.

No doubt the assassin who tried to kill her believed that he was doing God’s work. He was probably a perfectly normal man—perhaps even a father himself—and that is what is so disturbing.

The fact that otherwise normal people can be infected by destructive religious beliefs is crucial to understand—because beliefs spread. Until moderate Muslims and secular liberals stop misplacing the blame for this evil, they will remain part of the problem. Yes, our drone strikes in Pakistan kill innocent people—and this undoubtedly creates new enemies for the West. But we wouldn’t need to drop a single bomb on Pakistan, or anywhere else, if a death cult of devout Muslims weren’t making life miserable for millions of innocent people and posing an unacceptable threat of violence to open societies.

Malala did not win a Nobel prize this week, and it is probably good for her that she didn’t. She absolutely deserved it—far more than several recent recipients have—but this recognition would have made her security concerns even more excruciating than they probably are already. Her nomination is said to have noticeably increased anti-Western sentiment in Pakistan—a fact that deserves some honest reflection on the part of Islam’s apologists. If for nothing else, we can be grateful to the Taliban for reminding us of what so many civilized people seem eager to forget: This is both a war of ideas and a very bloody war—and we must win it.

- See more at: http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/no-ordinar...

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180606 Oct 19, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
Because those are the sub-topics that were brought up in this thread.... and if the title of this thread were in question form, the answer would be "No, it does not." I do not need much faith to understand what science has told me about the universe thus far and none of that points to a creator as of yet. If they show me some sign of a creator, or if someone else may be able to show me some sign of a creator, then it would take as much faith as religion.
There lies your problem, if you admitted you did need faith, THEN you could move on, and question those that claim they do not require faith. All these post are off topic. The truth is do to Atheist poor comprehension skills every single message tread any where, with any title has to be changed into "Intelligent design" and even then you turn it into strictly Christian Fundamentalist vs Atheist non believers/Fundamentalist. It makes me wonder if poor comprehension to a level of not recognizing you have a soul, is part of your religion.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180607 Oct 19, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
Your loss.
I would feel the same way about you, but I think an atheist society sucks so much, you'd have tears and beg to come back here. It would be worse than burning in hell.

Since: Sep 08

Alamosa, CO

#180608 Oct 19, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's your habit of patronizing, and demeaning.
Especially women.
I patronize?

Are you serious?

You are describing yourself, you egotistical, self righteous product of indoctrination. I know you can't help it, but you should really try harder to be a real and caring human being instead of a morality mouther for profit.

.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180609 Oct 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you keep bringing it up, among other reasons. Here you are bringing it up again. It's also relevant to any discussion on religion or atheism.
<quoted text>
Then you consider a discussion of deities to be off topic in a thread about religion and faith? I don't.
<quoted text>
That is correct. It's also correct that there is no need to.
<quoted text>
Man evolved from ancestral apes. That is beyond debate except among people defending creation myths, who, like all other non-evolutionary scientists, have no say in the debate. Christian evolution deniers are not taken seriously outside of their own circles.
<quoted text>
Why do you keep posting things like that? You're having a little trouble staying on topic.
Ok don't ask about The Christian God. Tell the atheist that ask. No ****, I had one atheist who ask me all about my God, then ball me out for not answering his questions, later ball me out for answering someone else's questions. Saying "I was off Topic" The 2nd time this worm meat did this, I actually predicted it would happen. The truth is we all have faith, until mankind knows all, that is just the way it is.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180611 Oct 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll just have to get over it. It's a dominant theme in Western culture at this time, and the purpose of these threads. You seem to disapprove. I can easily imagine why, but I'll let you speak for yourself if you care to.
<quoted text>
You've said that before - just before you rejected my claim that I advocate for democracy, political freedom, peace, and tolerance, and lumped me with brutal authoritarians.
<quoted text>
Why point that out? Who's requesting you or anybody else to go down my road? Choose whatever road make sense to you. What I do is help others make better decisions in that department by pointing out the failuresand hypocrisies of Christianity.
In regards to your last response. Please stop acting so stupid. Why else would you want to challenge someone after they confessed they have faith not absolute proof. It makes all else you say so under handed. See you go beyond being anti-religion when you do that. Now you are trying to persuade, attempt to claim the absolute proven answer. That my friend is a religious movement. It is exactly why I would understand someone being anti-religion. In my book you offer the worse part of religion, without any of it's good. That is why I would never vote for someone of your sort. When you know what hits the fan, your sort will not be able to maintain their populist. You bitch about GW, and I never voted for him, but now you could see how good of a job he did keeping his populist quiet.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180612 Oct 19, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
In what sense? Don't you reject science's position on the evolution of the universe and the evolution of life on earth?
You appreciate science the way I appreciate Christianity.
You are assuming I do believe in evolution and it does not prove that there is no God. The truth is the best answer is, the human race was created by an advance race. This could be so hard on some fans of science, that they deny there is a God period.

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

#180613 Oct 19, 2013
EdSed wrote:
<quoted text>
And
<quoted text>
Page 8662.
An atheist is simply someone who believes in one fewer god than you.
Not really. 1st off. You could be anti-religious and believe in God. 2nd I do believe in every single God, therefore which God is the one you don't believe in?

Perhaps you do worship a God. It is the soul crusher. An effort to evolve into a lesser being without a soul.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#180614 Oct 19, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
You are assuming I do believe in evolution and it does not prove that there is no God. The truth is the best answer is, the human race was created by an advance race. This could be so hard on some fans of science, that they deny there is a God period.
As usual, defeated creationists have a lot of ignorant opinions to share, but NO proof of god.

When will these bitter losers realise that opinions never convert anyone but FACTs do?

And the fact is that you're liars with no proof of god. It always comes back to this undeniable fact.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#180615 Oct 19, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I patronize?
Are you serious?
You are describing yourself, you egotistical, self righteous product of indoctrination. I know you can't help it, but you should really try harder to be a real and caring human being instead of a morality mouther for profit.
.
Creationist loser who wants us all to believe that jesus rode on the backs of dinosaurs while keeping a straight face.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#180616 Oct 19, 2013
Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really. 1st off. You could be anti-religious and believe in God. 2nd I do believe in every single God, therefore which God is the one you don't believe in?
Perhaps you do worship a God. It is the soul crusher. An effort to evolve into a lesser being without a soul.
There is no such thing as anti religious, because there is no such thing as god in the first place.

Atheists are not anti-religious - we just ignore the mentally ill ramblings of disproven crap which you've been peddling for years with ZERO results and evidence.

You find the truth insulting because your cult has brainwashed you into believing you are right, when you have no evidence whatsoever and are lying.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 16 min ChristineM 9,742
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 21 min ChristineM 51,164
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 31 min ChristineM 13,419
Majority of Scots now have no religion 39 min Amused 17
News Millionaire Entrepreneur Wants to 'Make Atheism... 40 min kuda 82
News Why I quit atheism 1 hr Eagle 12 5
News Your atheism isn&#x27;t going to keep your... (Apr '14) 3 hr Eagle 12 21
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 hr ChristineM 31,433
More from around the web