Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Comments (Page 8,442)

Showing posts 168,821 - 168,840 of223,319
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Robert Stevens”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175964
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Above is a link to Dr M. Kaku deliver one of his latest THEORIES. For all that watch they will feel as it reinforces his or her beliefs in their faith. Please note that he never claims what he offers is the final answer. With each item he learns he has further THEORIES. In which he looks forward to attempting to prove. This is why Dr Kaku is on the top shelf, and the people that teach you to be close minded do what those that can't do. And that is teach. The highest level does not jump the gun.

Atheist can not prove their claims because they do not have enough knowledge to claim proof that there was and is no creator. That day will never come. Especially if humanity is to become an atheist society. Which is a day that should be avoided, by all means.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175966
Aug 31, 2013
 
Robert Stevens wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =nZiROWO6iVs&feature=youtu .be

Above is a link to Dr M. Kaku deliver one of his latest THEORIES. For all that watch they will feel as it reinforces his or her beliefs in their faith. Please note that he never claims what he offers is the final answer. With each item he learns he has further THEORIES. In which he looks forward to attempting to prove. This is why Dr Kaku is on the top shelf, and the people that teach you to be close minded do what those that can't do. And that is teach. The highest level does not jump the gun.

Atheist can not prove their claims because they do not have enough knowledge to claim proof that there was and is no creator. That day will never come. Especially if humanity is to become an atheist society. Which is a day that should be avoided, by all means.
I love Dr. Kaku!!!! Sometimes he is the only one go can explain something scientific so that I can understand it lol. I wish I could pay home to teach me!!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175967
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Robert Stevens wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =nZiROWO6iVs&feature=youtu .be
Above is a link to Dr M. Kaku deliver one of his latest THEORIES. For all that watch they will feel as it reinforces his or her beliefs in their faith. Please note that he never claims what he offers is the final answer. With each item he learns he has further THEORIES. In which he looks forward to attempting to prove. This is why Dr Kaku is on the top shelf, and the people that teach you to be close minded do what those that can't do. And that is teach. The highest level does not jump the gun.
Atheist can not prove their claims because they do not have enough knowledge to claim proof that there was and is no creator. That day will never come. Especially if humanity is to become an atheist society. Which is a day that should be avoided, by all means.
An "atheist" can't make a claim, period, by their own definition of themselves. Non-belief is passive. Making a claim, or choosing among theories something they consider a truth, isn't.

Classic atheism is a part of the growth process, a questioning that leads to a better understanding. Topix atheists are not of that caliber. They are trained apes looking at other trained apes, and trying to exploit them with high sounding words their very basis of "non-belief" render bullshit. They see only the shiny stuff and think "I want". By the very nature of their imagined existence they can not see beyond themselves. They are pure physical constructs with nothing but self interest. They don't believe in a higher intelligence or morality. They can't.

Theists look at another human being, no matter the color or configuration, or even animals, and see a soul trapped inside a body like themselves making do the best they can with what they have. They still have to function on the physical, but they have an awareness of the higher. It is that sort of belief that unites mankind and gives him a purpose to strive for, like reaching out to this higher force. Topix atheists have nothing to strive for but their own desires. Which made them monkeys on a leash held by smarter monkeys.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175968
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

That song reminds me of several Topix atheists on here. Grasping out of desperation, and confused.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175969
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Another good descriptive song of the Topix atheist mindset.

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175970
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Dave Nelson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =86WggXVN5uE
That song reminds me of several Topix atheists on here. Grasping out of desperation, and confused.
This song reminds me of you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175971
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

HipGnosis wrote:
Again, I think you presume far more than was revealed in my little post. I've got no problem with the Bible, as a work of historical literature. I believe Isaiah is one of the most fascinating of ancient works, with it's playful use of acrostics and chiasms, not to mention the national longing revealed in the lovely song cycles, although it's sad how Christianity crassly sliced and diced them into shards of self-serving "prophecy". Ecclesiastes is a seminal work of existential philosophy and has always been a personal favorite. Song Of Solomon contains some of the most kinky images outside of The Penthouse Letters. You presume much when you say I hate the Bible., just as you also presume as to my knowledge thereof, without even doing me the courtesy of inquiring. I suspect I've read my Bible as much as any layman, certainly more than the vast majority of "Christians" I've run across, but I don't say that as a brag, merely because I find myself accused with no evidence. Such is the way in conversing with a defensive Christian, ain't it? That reckless attitude would have fit right in with the Court of Assizes in 1690 Salem.
All i am seeing here is all hat and no cattle claims along with a lot of attitude. Bloviating. If you have any knowledge of Scripture then it should be demonstrated. All i am seeing is regurgitated crap and hostile assumptions. You like Isaiah and Songs Oh well. Throw us a bone.
In truth, you Completely missed my point. I don't care how "regulated" the crime of slavery was in the Bible.
Naturally. You don't care about context history or anything! Your hostility over Scripture overrides them all! You only care about slavery as regulated in the Old and ignore it everywhere else! Never mind they lived under totally different circumstances and there were certain practices which appear barbaric to us. You just swoop back 3000 years and say ain't it awful. There is a logic fallacy in there somewhere. It is the Bible that is the crime! Why don't you just admit it! In a world without God why is slavery a crime? You statement presupposes slavery is a crime at all times in all places but you only highlight slavery as depicted in the Bible and ignore it everywhere else! Again, that means your problem is with the Bible and not with slavery.
What I said was, it's alleged to be a Word direct from God.
Some parts yes. Certainly not Ecclesiastes.
A Word Of God would surely demand man rise above his depravities, not concede and seek to "regulate" them.
Well that is what happens. Man keeps messing up and God works within the system to bring about results. Over and over again. There is a concession for divorce within the New brought about by Moses. God works with Israel when they are dragged off into captivity through Daniel, Esther. This i fricken rudiment and off the top of my head.
Imagine a parent acting that way. For instance, a child is naturally selfish and hurtful. By this "God's" standard, we wouldn't hold them to a higher standard to think beyond themselves and learn compassion.
More God bashing. A God you do not believe exists given your extremely limited understanding of what you are actually talking about? It is just so frustrating to deal with this invincible ignorance. It is like trying to teach a student how to perform a simple task. Demonstrating again and aging and they still don't get it.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175972
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> All i am seeing here is all hat and no cattle claims along with a lot of attitude. Bloviating. If you have any knowledge of Scripture then it should be demonstrated. All i am seeing is regurgitated crap and hostile assumptions. You like Isaiah and Songs Oh well. Throw us a bone.
<quoted text> Naturally. You don't care about context history or anything! Your hostility over Scripture overrides them all! You only care about slavery as regulated in the Old and ignore it everywhere else! Never mind they lived under totally different circumstances and there were certain practices which appear barbaric to us. You just swoop back 3000 years and say ain't it awful. There is a logic fallacy in there somewhere. It is the Bible that is the crime! Why don't you just admit it! In a world without God why is slavery a crime? You statement presupposes slavery is a crime at all times in all places but you only highlight slavery as depicted in the Bible and ignore it everywhere else! Again, that means your problem is with the Bible and not with slavery.<quoted text> Some parts yes. Certainly not Ecclesiastes. <quoted text> Well that is what happens. Man keeps messing up and God works within the system to bring about results. Over and over again. There is a concession for divorce within the New brought about by Moses. God works with Israel when they are dragged off into captivity through Daniel, Esther. This i fricken rudiment and off the top of my head.
<quoted text> More God bashing. A God you do not believe exists given your extremely limited understanding of what you are actually talking about? It is just so frustrating to deal with this invincible ignorance. It is like trying to teach a student how to perform a simple task. Demonstrating again and aging and they still don't get it.
Idiot theists lack the evidence for any meaningful conversation about the lies they tell regarding god.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175973
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =86WggXVN5uE
That song reminds me of several Topix atheists on here. Grasping out of desperation, and confused.
The only desperate people here are the creationists in the atheism forum, lying about a god they know they cannot prove.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175974
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a 5 incher.
Your NDE experience. More details on it. I seem to remember you having a dream where you were in another place totally removed from what was actually occurring to you. Everything was symbolic. You are basing your belief on that dream. Recollection of the details of your thinking at the time would be nice. Were you aware you just died?
I was highly aware of just what happened in my case, and the immediate surroundings. That scene I was about to step into may have been a "dream" like this one I had woken up from.
If you are a material conscious only thinking being the death process is not going to be so nice adrifitng off into sweet dreams. You have the circuitry of your thought process breaking down piecemeal. Your higher thought and control will be overridden by the Klaxon horns set off by your lower level brain circuitry, the more autonomic ones. They MAY be what initiates those "dreams" with chemicals, but you have to consider there is no reason for nature to have developed such a clean way to go, and that those dreams do require a lot of organization to even occur. A few seconds of seeming coherency is an awful lot of structured EM resulting in "thought". Especially when the machine producing it is failing.
Talking about NDEs does NOT explain why your cult lie again and again and produces no evidence for its claims, angina and again.

When cornered about this fact, creationists continue to lie or change the subject away from producing proof of god.

When creationists become brave instead of stupid, they will finally admit they have been lying and stop ruining people's lives with their cult.

This will either happen when social pressure becomes large enough ( as it is already ). Or when regulation kicks in and theism is classed as the mental illness that it is.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175975
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>
This song reminds me of you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
:-)

It has always amused me how North Carolina as*holes were the very first to call others as*holes for whatever reason. More so than any place else in the South. A very sanctimonious crowd that lives there. Or quite the collection of as*holes. Or both.

May a green caterpillar kiss your as*hole, as*hole.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175976
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
:-)
It has always amused me how North Carolina as*holes were the very first to call others as*holes for whatever reason. More so than any place else in the South. A very sanctimonious crowd that lives there. Or quite the collection of as*holes. Or both.
May a green caterpillar kiss your as*hole, as*hole.
Creationist Theists will always look stupid for never producing any evidence of e gods they lie about so shamelessly.

What separates creationists is that they try to argue back with more lies! Definition of dumb!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175977
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Creationist Theists will always look stupid for never producing any evidence of e gods they lie about so shamelessly.
What separates creationists is that they try to argue back with more lies! Definition of dumb!
Yeah, they need a reason and have to work hard to look so stupid.

They ain't naturally blessed like you.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175978
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>don;t worry about it Bob you won't be there... because that would make it hell
Booby is a walking talking hell.

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175979
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
:-)
It has always amused me how North Carolina as*holes were the very first to call others as*holes for whatever reason. More so than any place else in the South. A very sanctimonious crowd that lives there. Or quite the collection of as*holes. Or both.
May a green caterpillar kiss your as*hole, as*hole.
I made an extended trip to NC just a few weeks back and went to some places I've always wanted to explore.

I thought the people from there were great. Really nice. I had no complaints.

Maybe the problem you experienced had to do with you, and not them.

It's sorta like when someone gets a speeding ticket, and says they really weren't speeding. You tend to give the benefit of the doubt.

But once they get a bunch of speeding tickets, you tend to think its a problem they have, and not - "thoseassholecops".

See?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175980
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

T-Town Clown wrote:
<quoted text>I have a good Christian doc that knows evolution is a lie
Funny how these dolts think.

Because we don't buy into their three big myths they want us to stop using computers, tv's, and modern medicine.
Like None of them could not exist if evolution wasn't true.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175981
Aug 31, 2013
 
followerofSatan wrote:
<quoted text>oh, ok...now have your cookies and milk, say your prayers and have mommy fondle you...

make sure you have a new diaper on ......bwhahahhahahahahah....

( I will call the National Academy of Science and tell them you consider them dumb...bwaahahahhahahahhaha).. ....92% of them don't believe in any gods...
Takes all kinds.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175982
Aug 31, 2013
 
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>Your match making doesn't always work you know? After all Dave and Buck got a divorce. heheheh
Where is Buck?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175983
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>That you are too poorly endowed to consider yourself a real one is rather unfortunate... for you.
You ever figure out where Pluto is yet?

Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>What percentage of the time is that wrong?
Nearly 50%.
So I don't really think you're an authority on "Pluto's place", twart.

50%. LMFAO

What a dolt!

"Is Pluto sometimes closer to us than Neptune?

Because Pluto has an orbit around the sun which is very elliptical, there are times when it crosses Neptune's orbit and is actually closer to the sun than Neptune. This happened recently during a twenty year period from 1979 to 1999. For now, Pluto is back to being farther away from the sun than Neptune. It will be more than 230 years before Pluto and Neptune trade places again. Pluto slips inside of Neptune's orbit once every 248 Earth years for a period of twenty years."

That's less then 10%.

What a nut job.

Oh and it will be 230 more years that I'm right with my comment.

Ya you sure showed me. Bawhahaha

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175984
Aug 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is Buck?
Getting 3 squares a day back at the Gray Bar Hotel?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 168,821 - 168,840 of223,319
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••