Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 255965 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#159765 Mar 12, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Five atheists in one group is very rare outside an atheist worship service.
I smell bullshit.
"You are looking at reality with blinders on."

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159766 Mar 12, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
You should know, it's you who believes such thing exists.
Why should I know?
If something can assume a human form and then somehow morph out of it, isn't that magic?
To a simple-minded, "freethinker" like you? Sure.
And exactly how do you know this being can take on human form and then change into something else? Have you ever witnessed such an event? Have you only read about it in your immoral holy book?
YOU are the one putting human traits and limitations on God.

Then when I confront you on it, you turn the table back at me.

Very cowardly of you.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159767 Mar 12, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) Souls like spirit is a religious term with no evidence either exists.
2.) Love, hate and jealousy are human emotion and can be detracted by brain waves.
3.) No one has any idea whether aliens exist or not. At this point in time they do not exist.
4.) Science can and has detected black holes, there is NO doubt that they do exist.
And yes, since you stuck out on all of these you DO need to continue!!!!
1. Science can't detect them.
2. Science can't detect them.
3. Science can't detect them.
4. Science can't detect them.

You could've just said: "You're right, RR."

If your ego would allow it.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#159768 Mar 12, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, I know atheists like to play with words and sometimes make up definitions as they go along. But that's not how the rest of the world works (you know, the other 99% of us).
There is no "how do I define dead", there is just the definitions of dead.
On this topic, dead means no longer living.
OK, well, by that definition, Jesus is most certainly dead.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#159769 Mar 12, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not a sentence.
Yes it was.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159770 Mar 12, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
Um, the "cause" of emotional responses are stimuli from the sensory organs combined with neurological chemicals released when specific events occur, a direct result of natural selection, they are survival traits. There, I gave you the cause and the driver as well as the mechanism for emotions.
Great. A child knows that.

Now tell me HOW...

I'll wait.
Alien life on other planets can be detected, we just haven't yet gotten that far yet, we're working on that.
O_o

umm...

Watch:

God can be detected, we just haven't yet gotten that far yet, we're working on that.
Black holes are easy to detect, look for gravity anomalies, there, you found a black hole.
Dark matter is still in it's early stages of understanding, it's a label given to something that we have observed the effects of, sort of like calling something a "thing" until you know what it is, but scientists like to label every "thing" with some relevant label they hope also describes it for easier cataloging.
Neither one has EVER been detected.

Ever.

We think we've found the effects of black holes and dark matter, but they haven't been detected.
Is there anything else you need explained to you again?
No, that covers all the bases.

You're deluded with your indoctrination of the perfection of science.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159771 Mar 12, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>BTW, just because you elect to remain scientifically illiterate doesn't mean that they don't exist. Science HAS detected both, do some research and stop exposing yourself as a dolt!!!
No they haven't.

Ever.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159772 Mar 12, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
See RR? No one can define "soul" or "spirit," and no two descriptions will ever be the same. Before you can even provide a bit of evidence for it, you have to at least define it.
No one, huh?

Soul:

Noun
The spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal.
A person's moral or emotional nature or sense of identity.

Spirit:
Noun
The nonphysical part of a person that is the seat of emotions and character; the soul.

I know I'm no one, so you're probably right.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#159773 Mar 12, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
No Dave, once again your assumptions lead you astray. I don't consider myself an intellectual at all. Maybe you see me that way, I cannot say. And what being gay and enlightened have to do with each other I can't figure out.
As to blinders, well, let's just say I'm not the one trying to find explanations for my pet forgone conclusions.
Sorry, Oscar, I was thrown by your avatar and your asking why this and why that instead of presenting a real argument with reasoning behind it, like some intellectual models I have seen in the past.

Forgive me, we know you are unique and just a seeker of the truth, not a poseur.

What are my foregone conclusions, Oscar?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#159774 Mar 12, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Science can't detect them.
2. Science can't detect them.
3. Science can't detect them.
4. Science can't detect them.
You could've just said: "You're right, RR."
If your ego would allow it.
Why are you lying?

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#159775 Mar 12, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I know, that's all you atheists do is twist the Bible to mean whatever you want it to mean.
Yeah, Christians never do THAT!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159776 Mar 12, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>We, of superior intelligence, always enjoy exposing the childish ignorance of the religiously blinded. Usually accompanied by a picture of one with fingers in ears singing as loud as possible..."Science is wrong, science is wrong....la la la laaaaaa laaaaaaaa." Pitiful example of our spices!!!!
HA HA HA HA !!!

You're such a cocky f_ck.

"We, of superior intelligence".....

--------

"Eventually theorists came up with three sorts of explanations."

Maybe it was a result of a long-discarded version of Einstein's theory of gravity"

"Maybe there was some strange kind of energy-fluid that filled space"

"Maybe there is something wrong with Einstein's theory of gravity"

"Theorists still don't know what the correct explanation is, but they have given the solution a name. It is called dark energy."

http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-ar...

-----

THEM - of superior intelligence - admit that dark matter & dark energy are only theories.

They are not fact.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159777 Mar 12, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, well, by that definition, Jesus is most certainly dead.
Prove it.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#159778 Mar 12, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Electricity and chemicals? That's the "soul?" Well we know what happens with all that, it returns to the eco system when we die. So there you have it, science has detected the "soul," but why you choose to use a word from mythology to describe it is beyond me.
As a collection of chemicals and electricity, with the certain knowledge yours is not quite infallible because it is influenced by everything about it, and thus limited by that exposure, why are you on here so absolute in your knowledge there is nothing more than that?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#159779 Mar 12, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you lying?
Nice rebuttal!

Here, have a cookie.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#159780 Mar 12, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Great. A child knows that.
Now tell me HOW...
I'll wait.
<quoted text>
O_o
umm...
Watch:
God can be detected, we just haven't yet gotten that far yet, we're working on that.
<quoted text>
Neither one has EVER been detected.
Ever.
We think we've found the effects of black holes and dark matter, but they haven't been detected.
<quoted text>
No, that covers all the bases.
You're deluded with your indoctrination of the perfection of science.
First, I did tell you how.

Second, the difference is we know life exists in the universe, so it's safe to assume that it might exist on other worlds as well. We don't know, and have no evidence, that any gods exist, thus, it is safe to assume your god doesn't exist either.

Third, we have found them. Do you have a better explanation for the effects on gravity, light, and time in those regions of space?
Thinking

Winsford, UK

#159781 Mar 12, 2013
Can plastic truly die?
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Jackson is still dead?

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#159782 Mar 12, 2013
His findings were published in 1993, Hollywood didn't take notice until 2005. There's that reading comprehension problem you so often display.

And just to spike the football.... Again....

http://www.gizmag.com/supermassive-black-hole...

Seriously you should know by now not to try to debate with your intellectual betters.

Thanks for the laughs. Now dance for us puppet! Dance!
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, I wonder why he's promoting lies?
Oh wait, I know. I just had to peruse your link.
"Kip Thorne, professor emeritus at California Institute of Technology, offered some ideas in his 1993 book, "Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy," which made him famous in black hole circles.
"He's actually working on a Hollywood movie right now with Steven Spielberg,"
---
Looks like ol' Kippy's got his eyes on the prize instead of facts.
Moron.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#159783 Mar 12, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>We, of superior intelligence, always enjoy exposing the childish ignorance of the religiously blinded. Usually accompanied by a picture of one with fingers in ears singing as loud as possible..."Science is wrong, science is wrong....la la la laaaaaa laaaaaaaa." Pitiful example of our spices!!!!
Poor Loony.

When the song is over and he discovers he was just part of a visualization of Buckethead doing Soothsayer he will feel crushed. Shattered.

Me? I would say that was fun, Again?

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#159785 Mar 12, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
OK. Jesus is no longer alive.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 3 min thetruth 24,072
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 54 min thetruth 40,472
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 57 min thetruth 16,001
For Atheists: Why do You Call Theories "Scient... 1 hr Thinking 229
News "Being an atheist does not mean being anti-Chri... (Dec '14) 6 hr Patrick 51
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 6 hr Patrick 4,657
A Universe from Nothing? 10 hr u196533dm 56
More from around the web