Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 242968 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Anon

Lakewood, OH

#159433 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Those old electric blues guys all sound the same. Go boring a long tim eago. Buckethead adds another dimension to it, and other styles. A good bit of his work is very listenable. He can play faster than lightning and very slow, and it all just flows. Can't say I like the shredding stuff so much, but I have hours of his stuff you can listen to nonstop. In fact, you can miss it if it is not playing.
Aaahhh. Buddy Guy is boring? You find badass Chicago blues boring? I still get a chill down my spine while listening to this stuff. KFChead doesn't stir my soul at all. Besides, whites can't do blues. Yeah, I know, I said soul. Seems appropriate...

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#159434 Mar 10, 2013
You deny Christians wear crosses? You know what Jesus was said to be executed on? If your brother was killed by a truck would you wear a necklace with a little truck trinket on it to remember your brother?

It's okay that I scare you chump. You never had a chance.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What?!?
<quoted text>
Dude.
Lay off the sauce.
kaplan man

Abbeville, LA

#159435 Mar 10, 2013
GOD please forgive them for they are blinded by the evil one satan they no not what they are saying.They will call upon your name one day LORD for mercy when the judgement day comes.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159436 Mar 10, 2013
Anon wrote:
<quoted text>
Aaahhh. Buddy Guy is boring? You find badass Chicago blues boring? I still get a chill down my spine while listening to this stuff. KFChead doesn't stir my soul at all. Besides, whites can't do blues. Yeah, I know, I said soul. Seems appropriate...
I'm a fan of Chris Barber, Mr. Acker Bilk, and Monty Sunshine. British trad. They played it better than the home boys.

Anon

Lakewood, OH

#159437 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
He did.
It was probably a bartender trying to wake you up so he could close...

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#159438 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!
Thanks for proving my point that atheists can only think of God as a human magician that's invisible.
FYI - You spelled invisible wrong.
You can't prove otherwise, so invisible magician is just as probable.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#159439 Mar 10, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What?!?
<quoted text>
Dude.
Lay off the sauce.
Maybe I can give you a better analogy.

Let's say jesus came back today, and was accused, tried, convicted, and executed.

Would his followers now wear, on a necklace, instead of a cross, a syringe? Or a little gas chamber room? or a tiny chair with a little electric cord on it?
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#159440 Mar 10, 2013
Law is odd like that.

In EU law, carrot was made an honorary fruit because although EU jam must not contain vegetables, Portuguese people incorporate carrots in jam.

Meanwhile, back in the real world...
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism was deemed to be religion for the express purpose of allowing atheists to form study groups in prison.
I believe it was extended to include the military.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#159441 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
You would think the gravitational force would, too, meaning the field it resided in.
I thought the nucleus had a lot to do with gravity per modern physics.
Something in flares , whether it is particle based or some unknown mechanism , influences radioactive decay rates.
In fact it is a adjustment to rates that had to be made.
The reason is beyond the scope of science atm, but poly most likely wrote the reason ,(particle bombardment). Other than that it can't really be called random or caused. As the causes are rather probabilistic than deterministic. Only deterministic that flares do cause, but this cause and any other is at frequencies that are probabilistic and beyond the scope of determination.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#159442 Mar 10, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Law is odd like that.
In EU law, carrot was made an honorary fruit because although EU jam must not contain vegetables, Portuguese people incorporate carrots in jam.
Meanwhile, back in the real world...
<quoted text>
What the courts have said is not that atheism is religion, but that atheism is entitled to First Amendment protection equivalent to the protection given to religion. It is only in that sense that the parallel has been made.

With a little intellectual dishonesty, these court holdings have been twisted by those with an agenda.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159443 Mar 10, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe I can give you a better analogy.
Let's say jesus came back today, and was accused, tried, convicted, and executed.
Would his followers now wear, on a necklace, instead of a cross, a syringe? Or a little gas chamber room? or a tiny chair with a little electric cord on it?
If he came back today there would be no accusing, trial, or punishment.

For him.

You come up with some stupid stuff.
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#159444 Mar 10, 2013
Venus in flares.

Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Something in flares , whether it is particle based or some unknown mechanism , influences radioactive decay rates.
In fact it is a adjustment to rates that had to be made.
The reason is beyond the scope of science atm, but poly most likely wrote the reason ,(particle bombardment). Other than that it can't really be called random or caused. As the causes are rather probabilistic than deterministic. Only deterministic that flares do cause, but this cause and any other is at frequencies that are probabilistic and beyond the scope of determination.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#159445 Mar 10, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Something in flares , whether it is particle based or some unknown mechanism , influences radioactive decay rates.
In fact it is a adjustment to rates that had to be made.
The reason is beyond the scope of science atm, but poly most likely wrote the reason ,(particle bombardment). Other than that it can't really be called random or caused. As the causes are rather probabilistic than deterministic. Only deterministic that flares do cause, but this cause and any other is at frequencies that are probabilistic and beyond the scope of determination.
Uncertainty and a host of factors seem to be at play.
Adherence to thermodynamics over an uncertain amount of time is the only sure thing that can be known.
Anon

Lakewood, OH

#159446 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a fan of Chris Barber, Mr. Acker Bilk, and Monty Sunshine. British trad. They played it better than the home boys.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =u2DfTs063GQXX
I can't play it on my iPad. Some vids are restricted on mobile devices, this is one of them. I don't know if the feud between Apple and YouTube is the reason or what. Don't own a PC at the moment. iPad and iPhone are all I have, and other than small snags like this, they're more than sufficient. Too bad, I'm open to hearing it.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#159447 Mar 10, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What the courts have said is not that atheism is religion, but that atheism is entitled to First Amendment protection equivalent to the protection given to religion. It is only in that sense that the parallel has been made.
With a little intellectual dishonesty, these court holdings have been twisted by those with an agenda.
It said that in "one persons mind" , so it is protected that way.
Whether it actually was in that persons mind is debatable, but the "court" defined it was . It's a loose definition, which means religion is nothing more than an importance "in the mind of the beholder".
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#159448 Mar 10, 2013
That's the analogy I was trying to put forward: carrots are not fruit- but someone could quote a court record and say they were.
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What the courts have said is not that atheism is religion, but that atheism is entitled to First Amendment protection equivalent to the protection given to religion. It is only in that sense that the parallel has been made.
With a little intellectual dishonesty, these court holdings have been twisted by those with an agenda.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#159449 Mar 10, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
What the courts have said is not that atheism is religion, but that atheism is entitled to First Amendment protection equivalent to the protection given to religion. It is only in that sense that the parallel has been made.
With a little intellectual dishonesty, these court holdings have been twisted by those with an agenda.
Atheism is a religious belief. It deals only with religion. It is a viewpoint of religion.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#159450 Mar 10, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Venus in flares.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5tw4VNKXDhcXX
<quoted text>
Interesting something like dogwood but the colour of wisteria. Wisteria is a gargantuan survivor , like kudzu
it has a strong will for survival. But what was that tree? A Venus tree?

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#159451 Mar 10, 2013
Japanese maple?
blacklagoon

Revere, MA

#159453 Mar 10, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Buckethead, he doesn't follow your musical doctrine. The boy is going to Hell for sure.
My musical doctrine?......ha ha ha, you've got to be kidding. Every time you try and pretend you know anything about music you implode, I just love it.

It's not MY doctrine it has to do with the history of the blues numbnuts. You can't have any kind of appreciation for an art form until you know the history. Blues got its origins from black slaves doing "call" and "response" out working in the fields. A 2 measure statement followed by a 2 measure answer. like "I've been working, sweatin all day"......(answer) "I've been working sweatin all day." 2 more bars of question and answer gets you 8 bars. then a 1 bar phrase and answer --"workin all day" (answer) "working all day" then another 1 bar phrase, followed by another. That a total of 12 bars. All blues are in this form unless its a hybrid form. Later the black musicians stole western or church harmonies to add to this form. They used the church cadences they heard I IV V I or C chord for 4 bars.... F chord for 4 bars......G chord for 2 bars.......and the cadence back to the C chord for 2 bars.

Isn't education a wonderful thing, so as you can see, It has nothing to do with MY doctrine but everything to do with the history of the art form.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 36 min ChristineM 9,154
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) 3 hr lozzza 6,160
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 hr Chimney1 19,739
Should atheists have the burden of proof? 21 hr Thinking 15
Atheists have morals too! Sun par five 3
News Atheism 101: The anti-intellectualism of religion Sun QUITTNER Jne 28 2015 53
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Sun thetruth 2,280
More from around the web