Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158648 Mar 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
"Storing information" is processing the information. You are just trying to be funny now, no one can be this stupid.
No, it isn't. That is where yo go south in your thinking.

Reading is a motor skill. It just translates symbols into words. It takes "thinking" to turn those words into concepts or knowledge. Some things can be processed on the fly, and others take some consideration. Depends on the complexity of the info.

You have sure taken aptitude and other tests in school. Maybe you recall the sections called "reading and comprehension"? Yours probably had something like a 45% percentile next to it, just to jog your memory.

Note the two different words? Are you capable of grasping the significance of that extra word comprehension?

Think about it.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#158649 Mar 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
"Storing information" is processing the information. You are just trying to be funny now, no one can be this stupid.
Dave can.

Buck too.

That's why they make such a perfect couple.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158650 Mar 6, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>"smart enough NO to question you.....really!!!
OH, hey. Nice "correction" there...

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158651 Mar 6, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>No, this a plea for you to educate yourself on the facts of evolution so we can at least have something on the verge of an intelligent conversation. Right now it alike having a dialog with a hard boiled egg!!
What is that like? To "it alike having a dialog with a hard boiled egg" ??

O_o

Since: Mar 11

Chicago, IL

#158652 Mar 6, 2013
Actually Dave specifically said the best way to learn is to hurt yourself, suffering body breaking injuries not books is the way to learn.
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
I think he meant storing 'data' to be processed into 'information' at a later date.
Data is useless to us until processed into information.
35 billion bees
6 geese
25 platypus
x3:y5
G = 7.32/f

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158653 Mar 6, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
Easy as 1-2-3
1. Keep your religion out of our lives..
2. Keep religious dogma out of government.
3. Cease attempting to force your beliefs on others.
You will never never hear about atheism again.
1. If religion is in your life, that's your choice.

2. No. Learn to live with it.

3. "force"? It cannot be forced.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#158654 Mar 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
1. If religion is in your life, that's your choice.
2. No. Learn to live with it.
3. "force"? It cannot be forced.
2 and 3 are contradictory.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158655 Mar 6, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Actually Dave specifically said the best way to learn is to hurt yourself, suffering body breaking injuries not books is the way to learn.
<quoted text>
Books are virtual reality. Broken bodies are the real thing.

You are too stupid to understand that. That is why you rely on acting the smart ass, deflecting from the real you.

That happens often from young and immature brains ingesting more drugs than their young and immature brains can handle, thereby freezing them into a set pattern. Around 14, right?
Tiago

Canoas, Brazil

#158656 Mar 6, 2013
LiddySays wrote:
But in my opinion, if there were nothing after life, then life itself is meaningless. And there is a reason for everything. IDK, if this came out the way I intended(I'm half drunk)=) But if you can find any living thing on this planet that does not have a purpose, then my theory is debunked!
What bullshít. You can't find any meaning in life if you don't go on forever? Get over yourself.

As for having a "purpose", how do you judge whether something has one or not? Are there any moderately objective criteria for judging that? What is the "purpose" of malaria? How about guinea worm, or for the dwarf planet Ceres? Can you conclude that there's some intent behind any of these in a way that isn't utterly contrived?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158657 Mar 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it isn't. That is where yo go south in your thinking.
Reading is a motor skill. It just translates symbols into words. It takes "thinking" to turn those words into concepts or knowledge. Some things can be processed on the fly, and others take some consideration. Depends on the complexity of the info.
You have sure taken aptitude and other tests in school. Maybe you recall the sections called "reading and comprehension"? Yours probably had something like a 45% percentile next to it, just to jog your memory.
Note the two different words? Are you capable of grasping the significance of that extra word comprehension?
Think about it.
Um, wow ... you know nothing about anything. Let's look at technology:

When you enter information that information must be processed into bytes, then stored into a database which much process it further to create classifications and unique identification markers.

When you read, or "store information" of any sort into the brain, it has to be processed into a complete concept, a language used by the brain itself, before it can be stored into the neurons. This process, yeah, it's a process, is often called memorization. Very little of what you read is actually memorized for this reason, that is why repetition is required to learn everything in a single paragraph by the vast majority of biological organisms. The information has to be broken down first, then those concepts in the information that are already present are then linked in an intricate network, the neural network, and offered "weights" based on how relevant that information is to the other parts. Then the language breaks the other parts down further into concepts and patterns which the brain can then process faster when called. These are also assigned neurons, which are also connected to other neurons with more "weights" determining their relevance to those other portions of information. By the time the brain memorizes even one word, a few thousand more neural connections are established and a few hundred more neurons are assigned to specific concepts contained within that one single word. The language the brain utilizes for breaking down information is so elaborate that even the concept of zero uses several hundred neurons.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158658 Mar 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave can.
Buck too.
That's why they make such a perfect couple.
It's mind boggling to see such naivete in people. How adults can become less intelligent than children is one of those conundrums that supports the notion that our species is not meant to live past 30 years of age.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158659 Mar 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Books are virtual reality. Broken bodies are the real thing.
You are too stupid to understand that. That is why you rely on acting the smart ass, deflecting from the real you.
That happens often from young and immature brains ingesting more drugs than their young and immature brains can handle, thereby freezing them into a set pattern. Around 14, right?
Ironically, "virtual reality" is what has allowed us to develop some pretty beneficial medicines.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#158660 Mar 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
2 and 3 are contradictory.
No they're not. Religious dogme being in government and forcing religion on folks are two different things.

If you see the Ten Commandments at a courthouse, are you now forced to obey them?

When you see gargoyles perched on a building, are you forced to fear them?

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158661 Mar 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, wow ... you know nothing about anything. Let's look at technology:
When you enter information that information must be processed into bytes, then stored into a database which much process it further to create classifications and unique identification markers.
When you read, or "store information" of any sort into the brain, it has to be processed into a complete concept, a language used by the brain itself, before it can be stored into the neurons. This process, yeah, it's a process, is often called memorization. Very little of what you read is actually memorized for this reason, that is why repetition is required to learn everything in a single paragraph by the vast majority of biological organisms. The information has to be broken down first, then those concepts in the information that are already present are then linked in an intricate network, the neural network, and offered "weights" based on how relevant that information is to the other parts. Then the language breaks the other parts down further into concepts and patterns which the brain can then process faster when called. These are also assigned neurons, which are also connected to other neurons with more "weights" determining their relevance to those other portions of information. By the time the brain memorizes even one word, a few thousand more neural connections are established and a few hundred more neurons are assigned to specific concepts contained within that one single word. The language the brain utilizes for breaking down information is so elaborate that even the concept of zero uses several hundred neurons.
Uh, you just pretty much said what I said. Except you think all of the organization is done on the fly. With no checksums.

But here the utter reality. Those words and brain processes have to be turned into "reality", meaning physical processes you can identify with, like the ones that created us and we live in? Otherwise you have a bunch of random firing neurons with no where to go.

Go break a finger, it will do you some good. Get a good grasp of what momentum and mass is. Banging your head against the wall may be of significant value to you. If done hard enough.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158662 Mar 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, you just pretty much said what I said. Except you think all of the organization is done on the fly. With no checksums.
But here the utter reality. Those words and brain processes have to be turned into "reality", meaning physical processes you can identify with, like the ones that created us and we live in? Otherwise you have a bunch of random firing neurons with no where to go.
Go break a finger, it will do you some good. Get a good grasp of what momentum and mass is. Banging your head against the wall may be of significant value to you. If done hard enough.
Um ... what? Memorization requires the processing of the information, therefore you are incorrect in assuming that reading is without processing. I provided an explanation of why you are wrong, you just continue to make the blind assertion that you are correct in spite of this, that is a sign of delusion, you are incapable of admitting you are wrong.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158663 Mar 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Um ... what? Memorization requires the processing of the information, therefore you are incorrect in assuming that reading is without processing. I provided an explanation of why you are wrong, you just continue to make the blind assertion that you are correct in spite of this, that is a sign of delusion, you are incapable of admitting you are wrong.
You are too dense and pigheaded to communicate with.

There is a huge difference between constructing machines and programs, and using those things to draw kittens. Your creative desires are giving you tunnel vision. You just think you know how the things operate you use as tools. This is not uncommon, in fact, it is how most work gets done by everyone. You learn enough to use it, and take it for granted you understand it completely.

Now, I need to go offline and take this stupid laptop apart and try to find what is overheating it. It isn't dust blocking. It is likely a bad sensor which will be beyond doing field repair on it.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#158664 Mar 6, 2013
The Dave method of learning shown again.

From the ignorance level of his recent posts it seems he has been ahem studying with the wall a lot lately.
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh...
Go break a finger, it will do you some good. Get a good grasp of what momentum and mass is. Banging your head against the wall may be of significant value to you. If done hard enough.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#158665 Mar 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are too dense and pigheaded to communicate with.
There is a huge difference between constructing machines and programs, and using those things to draw kittens. Your creative desires are giving you tunnel vision. You just think you know how the things operate you use as tools. This is not uncommon, in fact, it is how most work gets done by everyone. You learn enough to use it, and take it for granted you understand it completely.
Now, I need to go offline and take this stupid laptop apart and try to find what is overheating it. It isn't dust blocking. It is likely a bad sensor which will be beyond doing field repair on it.
Did any of this make any sense to anyone else? If so, please translate it to English for me so I can respond.

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#158666 Mar 6, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Actually Dave specifically said the best way to learn is to hurt yourself, suffering body breaking injuries not books is the way to learn.
<quoted text>
The experiential method is effective but has too many drawbacks for my tastes.

I prefer to learn from other's mistakes whenever possible.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#158667 Mar 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Did any of this make any sense to anyone else? If so, please translate it to English for me so I can respond.
You proved a point there. Not that you and similar minds can understand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr macumazahn 14,717
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 3 hr thetruth 1,502
Our world came from nothing? (Jul '14) 3 hr thetruth 1,262
why? 4 hr thetruth 60
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 7 hr Mikko 23,494
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 15 hr woodtick57 2,848
The Consequences of Atheism 18 hr ChristineM 85
More from around the web