Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Full Story
christianity is EVIL

Halifax, Canada

#156553 Feb 25, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Itís weird, Atheist donít believe in God. Yet they believe all life just magically self created from sterile material and made this crazy run on the earth. We know thatís impossible because scientist have not been able replicate it in this modern era of science.
strawman FALLACY

look it up
Imhotep

United States

#156554 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Gramps must have seen a drive in picture online and is rambling nonstop about them.
Them young uns have those iPhones these days and can instantly watch a movie instead of sitting in the rain and getting bitten by insects! What's the world coming to?!!
Brain damaged elderly people can be funny.:)
<quoted text>
His Dad was atheist and Mom agnostic.
He heard this...
"There are no gods"
"There may be gods"

Oh the horror... a circular argument. ;)

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#156555 Feb 25, 2013
christianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
stay away from Cretinist sites,bud,they make you stupid
read the Truth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
"According to the theory, the Big Bang occurred approximately 13.77 billion years ago,[2] which is thus considered the age of the universe.[3][4][5][6] After this time, the Universe was in an extremely hot and dense state and began expanding rapidly."

What happens when a seed starts to come to life? Should be the same for plants or animals. You need an energy surge to begin the process.

You and a rutabaga have a lot in common.

Become a product of a seed and look back at your very beginning. You would see much the same process.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#156556 Feb 25, 2013
" After the initial expansion, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

All the energy is within the seed. When the growth process starts all of the heat is within it. When it expands it cools, and the process of matter forming and linking programmed in the DNA begins. The above is part of that process.

Modern science describes that. It is also described as the tree of life from long ago. And mustard seeds.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#156557 Feb 25, 2013
Topix atheists are dumb.

Good night.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#156558 Feb 25, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
http://driveintheater.com/
The mosquitoes were free.
Can't remember the name of it, but there was a slot machine I played I loved that was based on the old drive-in concessions stands when you hit winning combos or bonus points. Really camped up woman of the times at the register. Ah, I think it was The Creature From the Black Lagoon.
November 3rd 1973, Louisville KY

Deep Throat

plus

Cousin Pauline

plus.....wait for it.....

Cartoon

I'm lovin it

:-)
blacklagoon

Revere, MA

#156559 Feb 25, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Itís weird, Atheist donít believe in God. Yet they believe all life just magically self created from sterile material and made this crazy run on the earth. We know thatís impossible because scientist have not been able replicate it in this modern era of science.
Then they point at us believing in a myth. But itís acceptable for them to believe in a myth. Even though science does not support their position. They say science will one day will come up with an answer for how it all started.
Science will come up with a time machine way before they figure out the genesis of life.
Why do you limit everything to just TWO possibilities? Why do you automatically rule out panspermia as being valid? It would appear that ANYTHING that doesn't include your God thing is automatically ruled out, why is that? Is it because like all Christians you start with a preconceived idea and then simply fill in around it? Not a very intelligent way to explore the origins of man now is it? Since no one really knows for certain, why limit the choices to a God? Are you incapable of forming other possibilities because you have been so brainwashed into one line of thinking?

Lets explore one such possibility. At some point Mars not only had abundance liquid water but an atmosphere as well. All the ingredient for life. Something bad happened on Mars, but could life or remnants of life have found its way to our planet? We know for a fact that collisions from meteors cast materials far out into space. We also know for a fact that microscopic life can survive in extremely hostile conditions. Could life have been seeded on Earth from Mars? Yeah I know, ridiculous because it casts your God thing completely out of the equation. Could Earth have been seeded by an advanced race, a mere experiment, yeah I know, No God in the equation, lets immediately discard it. As long as any other possibility excluded your God thing, you discard it. That is what is called CLOSE MINDED, and its an affliction that infects all Theists.

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#156560 Feb 25, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Truth: Sometimes a head is really an ass.
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/featured...
That particular caterpillar has really painful sting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddleback_cater...

I've been stung buy all sorts of creatures and at least in my experience, it feels like someone smacked you with a red hot framing hammer.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#156561 Feb 25, 2013
scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>
That particular caterpillar has really painful sting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddleback_cater...
I've been stung buy all sorts of creatures and at least in my experience, it feels like someone smacked you with a red hot framing hammer.
Yeah but was he coming or going?

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#156562 Feb 25, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow a science nut admitting that GR is not a 100% working scientific theory.
Wikipedia:
If anyone finds a case where all or part of a scientific theory is false, then that theory is either changed or thrown out.
A scientific theory in one branch of science must hold true in all of the other branches of science.
From Nova:
"For decades, every attempt to describe the force of gravity in the same language as the other forces‚ÄĒthe language of quantum mechanics‚ÄĒhas met with disaster
S. JAMES GATES, JR.: You try to put those two pieces of mathematics together, they do not coexist peacefully.
S. JAMES GATES, JR.: The laws of nature are supposed to apply everywhere. So if Einstein's laws are supposed to apply everywhere, and the laws of quantum mechanics are supposed to apply everywhere, well you can't have two separate everywheres.
RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: In the years since, physics split into two separate camps: one that uses general relativity to study big and heavy objects, things like stars, galaxies and the universe as a whole...
LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE:...and another that uses quantum mechanics to study the tiniest of objects, like atoms and particles. This has been kind of like having two families that just cannot get along and never talk to each other...
LEFT SIDE BRIAN GREENE: There just seemed to be no way to combine quantum mechanics...
RIGHT SIDE BRIAN GREENE:...and general relativity in a single theory that could describe the universe on all scales.
So here's the question: if you're trying to figure out what happens in the depths of a black hole, where an entire star is crushed to a tiny speck, do you use general relativity because the star is incredibly heavy or quantum mechanics because it's incredibly tiny?
Well, that's the problem. Since the center of a black hole is both tiny and heavy, you can't avoid using both theories at the same time. And when we try to put the two theories together in the realm of black holes, they conflict. It breaks down. They give nonsensical predictions. And the universe is not nonsensical; it's got to make sense.
You know like you...the Taliban rejects science too.
You fundies hate science, because it shows you how wrong you are.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#156563 Feb 25, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
I am making perfect sense.
Account for absolute truth.
Can you account for absolute truth?
Provide one "absolute" truth.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#156564 Feb 25, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Well he was the only one there at the time so I'll take his word for it.
Besides God doesn't lie why would he?
But, you are not taking any god's word for it, you are taking the word of the people who first wrote it down, then those who translated it, then those who edited it, then those who proof-read it, and finally those who print it.

You are taking the word of a lot of humans who could have, for any reason, said whatever they wanted.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#156565 Feb 25, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Itís weird, Atheist donít believe in God. Yet they believe all life just magically self created from sterile material and made this crazy run on the earth. We know thatís impossible because scientist have not been able replicate it in this modern era of science.
Then they point at us believing in a myth. But itís acceptable for them to believe in a myth. Even though science does not support their position. They say science will one day will come up with an answer for how it all started.
Science will come up with a time machine way before they figure out the genesis of life.
You are projecting. Natural explanations are not magic, magic is a non-answer such as saying "god done it."

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156566 Feb 25, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
They contain absurdities and are written in a legendary manner.
<quoted text>
He did have witnesses. Do you propose Islam was formed out of thin air?
<quoted text>
Apostles are not peer-reviewed evidence. They are biased cult members.
<quoted text>
In that most of the events of the OT can't even be documented by outside sources? That no contemporary historian of the time, like Philo, bothered to mention it? That no one noticed a bunch of Saints rising from graves? I'd think zombies would be a noteworthy occurrence.
<quoted text>
What's the difference? They had two possible arguments to use: "no, he didn't", or "yeah, he did, but it was sorcery". Given the superstitious era, it's no surprise they chose the latter.
<quoted text>
How would they go about noting that they were lying?
<quoted text>
That's just plain false. Joseph Smith had numerous eyewitnesses who all wrote firsthand about their experiences with him. They're called "The 8 Witnesses".
<quoted text>
The beliefs were not all intact, there was variation among groups. It's the entire reason that Christians had to get together to form creeds and determine canon.
<quoted text>
Of course it flies. Documents full of absurdities should be rejected without greater evidence.
Were you to be on a jury and the defense told you that the defendant could fly, you wouldn't believe that. You wouldn't believe it even if a couple friends of his testified to it.
What we know now in science would be deemed absurd by ancients. Legendary manner? There is no such thing.

No, I propose that Islam came from one man with no witnesses to his claims.

You don't get to accuse the dead of anything. You have the burden to prove they were lying, or even biased.

Almost all of the OT has been confirmed by outside sources and archaeology.

Philo does mention it.

What is a superstitious era? Prove it.

Exactly. Who would you go about proving the dead were liars?

Joseph Smith also has no witnesses. You now clearly show a lack of historical knowledge and the fundamental differences of the major religious claims.

Variations among the groups is evidence of the overall truth. Had they all been exact, that would have been suspicious.

Should be rejected without greater evidence? By what authority? By whose standards?

If your very dead great grandfather was accused of pedophilia, is the matter open for discussion? No, the dead are immune from accusations of falsehood, as they cannot defend themselves. The evidence must be overwhelming that any new accusations later in history are valid.

You are accusing the ancients of lying. Only you have the burden of proof, otherwise you are a fraud and liar yourself.

Nor does the truth of something depend upon us believing it. Your analogy of flying is absurd, of course I PERSONALLY would not believe in something that did not sound truthful. But if hundreds of witnesses testified to it, and a major social reform followed? Then my opinion has no weight ... and neither does yours now.

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156567 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
There are no contemporary witnesses to your Jewsus. We have no historical proof he even existed.
<quoted text>
Yes there are. You obviously have no researched the matter yourself. Simply look up secular evidence of Jesus, there is plenty.

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156568 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Yes we have knowledge and reasoning that those ancient sheep kissers could have only dreamt of. You are living in a fantasy world not reality.
If Jesus had existed Joseph would have likely been thighing him, Jesus would have wiped his @ss with his bare hand and they didn't exactly have anti microbial soaps back then. The world at that time was dark and disease filled. You were lucky to reach adulthood.
<quoted text>
LOL!

No, they had knowledge of science that only WE could dream of. There are still countless mysterious that cannot yet be explained. You are the one living in a fantasy world if it is your opinion that we have a monopoly of all knowledge throughout all history.

And yes, they did have anti-microbial soaps. First, anti-microbial is a scam. Soap has been around 3000 years, and was strong enough to remove hair when made with too much lye. Your ignorance of even the basic technological knowledge of the ancient worlds testifies to you ignorance ... and arrogance.

Dark and diseased filled indeed. We have more diseases and darkness today, then ever the ancients could imagine. We would be total barbarians compared to them, by any standard.

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156569 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Porn is not intended for children be it sexual or Jesus on a cross.
<quoted text>
Right.

If it's not intended for children, usually that means society is ashamed of it.

Thus, my point.

What is goof enough for children is actual a universal moral standard. Sociology 101. There is a reason why evolution makes us feel "ashamed" by certain actions.

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156570 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Again the majority were deluded and mistaken. Certainly there were some liars, frauds, rapists, murderers, thieves, hookers, child molesters and others mixed in with the deluded sheep.
You're welcome
<quoted text>
Prove it.

The burden still remains with you, an anyone that makes these claims. The dead do not have to defend themselves. You have to defend your accusations of those that cannot speak for themselves.

“Fear is the Mind-Killer”

Since: Jun 08

Albuquerque, NM

#156571 Feb 25, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
I am proud of the charity work I have done, are you proud of Hitler helping your bible statement about Israel returning? This is what you stated before yes? You celebrated all those innocents killed at the command of Hitler because in your words it helped return the state of Israel.
So Hitler in his own way was doing the work of your god yes?
<quoted text>
Typical ignorance.

Christianity 101. All that is evil can only exist by an act of free will. This does not negate the power God may exercise to make something good emerge from a tragedy.

Just as family members who might lose a loved one to cancer, to make something good turn out of it by starting a new cancer-aware program.

A logical atheists would know this, and would not make this error. A rational atheists takes the time to learn the theology, before making such foolish remarks.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#156572 Feb 25, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why?
Absent love, there's me reason to want to fall in love.
Absent sex, there's me reason to want to have sex.
Absent beer, there's no reason to want to drunk one.
But we all do.
Okay, I know you're literate enough to know what "absent" means in the context in which I used it.
Don't be obtuse.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 41 min woodtick57 2,403
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 2 hr _Bad Company 23,198
Islam is the Enemy (Sep '12) 6 hr Pahu 33
God' existence 6 hr Carchar king 63
A New Kinder, Gentler Atheism 6 hr Carchar king 138
Yes, atheists can be fundamentalists 13 hr Crazy Mess 1
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Thu thetruth 1,442
More from around the web