Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Comments (Page 7,409)

Showing posts 148,161 - 148,180 of218,171
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154144
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Your "creator" is a prick.
Your creator creates a fatal condition called Exencephaly, where a babies brain painfully grows abnormally outside of the skull. What kind of god would create such a thing? What kind of "creator" would allow an innocent baby to needlessly suffer like that?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
Everyday in this world your "creator" puts 9 year old girls in harms way and makes it possible for them to continuously get raped by worthless azzholes. Your "creator" turns a blind eye to all of their suffering. What kind of god would induce such a life for a person? What kind of "creator" would allow a child to be put through such hell and suffer like that?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" creates starvation, and all the pain and suffering to goes along with it?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" turns a blind eye to sick and dying children suffering through no fault of their own?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" creates cancer, and then unleashes it on humans?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" creates earthquakes and volcanoes which cause senseless mass destruction?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" condones at least 6000 innocent children to be burned alive in Auschwitz?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
What kind of "creator" does nothing while innocent children are being molested and abused?
I'll say it again, your "creator" is a prick.
But he loves you!
I'm reaching for straws here, but I'm gonna take a gamble & assume that you think God is a prick......

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154145
Feb 14, 2013
 
Dave Nelson wrote:
If the Creator kicked man out the door, then man did all of those things.
If the Creator kicked man out the door, then you don't need to suck his tit 24/7.

Since: Mar 11

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154146
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

And now Dave is quoting genesis! So nice you have confirmed you are a creationist Christian.

Tell your preacher hello this Sunday and don't forget to put some money in the plate. You need to butter him up to do the ceremony for your new chunky bride Buck.
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
The Biblical story is mankind was cast out on his own after he got to big for his britches. The Creator was nice enough to make him some clothes before he threw man and the clothes out the door.
If man is so smart, why doesn't he solve that problem?

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154147
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Well something certainly did, but you have yet to document that your "god" had anything to do with it.
Other than the feeble atheist argument of "You can't prove it", you've got nothing.

All the genius minds in all the world in all of history can't say that they know GOd didn't create the universe OR that God doesn't exist.

I'll take their word over yours.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154148
Feb 14, 2013
 
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you're saying is that non-religious ideas should get a free pass from challenges and criticism. Okay, then stop challenging and criticizing non-religious ideas.
What non-religious ideas am I challenging?
Oh, that's not really what you meant. You meant that only your religion should get to use the 1st Amendment argument to stop other people from criticizing your religion.
Nope. I love the 1st Amendment. I love my right AND your right. I'd die to protect YOUR right to choose religion or to not choose religion.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154149
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Mylan wrote:
If a tradition is broken and based in superstition then it has no place in modern society. It will only hold us back, and that's NOT a good thing.
I said American tradition, HoneyBooBoo, not Christian tradition....

You're so stuck on hating Christianity that you can't think straight.
So do I. But unless you can prove that your morals are better than the next guys then you only get one vote. Like cream, the best ideas should rise to the top, not just old ideas because we did it that way yesterday and the day before.
Agreed. This is why democracy works well.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154150
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
The real issue is abiogenesis. Prove it can be done before preaching it was done. And also prove the universe can appear out of nothing to begin that process.
Evolution is a process of model change. Adaptation to a changing environment. There is absolutely zero proof that an original model was not created by intelligent design that has since been modified, or that the creation of this universe and our emergence was not part of a process initiated by an intelligent design. By the very fact we have emerged from a stabilized system is evidence that such may have occurred.
That American Association for the Advancement of Science statement on evolution is a left handed way of advancing order out of chaos as it infers any opposition to it, such as the theory of intelligent design is strictly religion based, and thus "unscientific" and "objective". Objective system analysis will not support that contention of order out of chaos theory, which is PURE CONJECTURE.
There is no honesty or objectiveness in statements like that.
What, you figure you throw enough crap on the wall, something might stick?

Well, none of your crap does --

1. Abiogenesis is biochemistry. Evolution is biology. I know, over your head. Oh well.

2. Cosmology and astrophysics are also NOT biology. Again, obviously over your head.

3. "order out of chaos" is exactly what happens when you shake up oil and water and then let it settle. So, again, you haven't a clue. If what you are lamely trying to argue is the 2nd law of thermodynamics (or any of them), your question is laughably pathetic and you really should study (a lot) before posting more stupidity.

4. Did you miss the part about rigorously testable being a measure of science? You want ID to be considered, show us the independently verified rigorous tests. Oh that's right, the Design Institute puts all of it's money into mass marketing of stupid ideas and none into testing because they know what the results would be ... and you wouldn't like it.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154151
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't teach it as "pure fact". We have been over this with you repeatedly, so either you are too scientifically illiterate to understand or are purposefully lying.
After over 150 years of research by scientists in all the Earth sciences from all over the world working within all different sociopolitical cultures we have gathered enough evidence for all the different aspect of biological evolution that to withhold tacit approval for this theory would be unreasonable.
Even Baylor University, one of the finest Christian universities in the world, has stated:
"Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence and is accepted by the vast majority of scientists. Because it is fundamental to the understanding of modern biology, the faculty in the Biology Department at Baylor University, Waco, TX, teach evolution throughout the biology curriculum. We are in accordance with the American Association for Advancement of Science's statement on evolution. We are a science department, so we do not teach alternative hypotheses or philosophically deduced theories that cannot be tested rigorously." ~ " http://www.baylor.edu/biology/index.php... ;
I asked a very simple question that you didn't answer.

What part of ToE is evidenced?

There's no evidence of abiogenesis, no evidence of spontaneous life, no evidence of fish transforming to mammals, no evidence of bacteria becoming birds.

We haven't even cataloged all the existing life on Earth, how is it thought that we know what life existed billions of years ago?

Know it before you preach it.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154152
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Mylan wrote:
Absolutly CORRECT. And I'm surprised that you can understand that, but it's refreshing to see. Baby steps. You're making progress.
Don't go patting yourself on the back for thinking you taught me something I already know.
Too bad for you what you're describing is science, and NOT religion. Welcome to reality.
Too bad for you that you don't understand that science & religion are partners.

Since: Feb 13

Greenfield, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154153
Feb 14, 2013
 
Dave Nelson,

I mostly agree with you. At this point, abiogenesis does not have sufficient evidence to support it. Evolution itself is easily demonstrated through various means. But exactly how life began is still a bit of a mystery.

I am no expert on the topic, however my understanding is that order does at times arise from chaos. There is not yet a rigidly mathematical model of how this occurs, at least so far as I am aware. But there are things like Lorentz attractors, the Mandelbrot set, cellular automata, and so on that shed some light on the subject.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154154
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Hedonist wrote:
The Catholics (lobbying by the Knights of Columbus) changes us from "on nation indivisable" to one nation divided by god. But driving a wedge into our secular government is something Catholics have been wanting to do since our inception.
It's people like you that think we're divided. We ARE one nation - indivisable.

It doesn't matter what an AMerican's religion - or lack thereof - is, we're all Americans and all out for very similar goals.

Stop trying to divide us.

It's a shame you don't see that.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154155
Feb 14, 2013
 
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Meh. the religitards will only start a new thread entitled "Nullafidians require as much faith as religion." They're funny like that.
And the athitards will be knocking at the door saying "Nu-uh!"

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154156
Feb 14, 2013
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
Pascal's wager? Seriously?
Wow this is the best these idiots can do. What happens if you pick the wrong deity? There are only thousands of them and picking wrong is just as bad. Your god is just as invalid to someone of another faith as their god is invalid to you.
<quoted text>
I might have to take you first...

I hope Dave's OK with sloppy seconds.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154157
Feb 14, 2013
 
Well he may have met his new chunky bride, Buck.
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>And yet here you are. Weird.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154158
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
American tradition? When I was born, "god" wasn't in our pledge nor on our money. That's American tradition.
Wow, you're really old....

The first example of "In God We Trust" was on a two cent coin, Congress signed the law on April 22, 1864. It first appeared on the 1864 two-cent coin.

In 1865, the motto was placed on the gold double-eagle coin, the gold eagle coin, and the gold half-eagle coin. It was also placed on the silver dollar coin, the half-dollar coin and the quarter-dollar coin, and on the nickel three-cent coin beginning in 1866.

Since 1938, all United States coins bear the inscription.

THAT is American tradition, son.

“Dont kill innocent people just”

Since: Jul 12

"because they're inconvenient"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154159
Feb 14, 2013
 
Oh. Here, so you athitards know I didn't get that "in God We Trust" coin info from a religious website.

www.treasury.gov Home About Education

Losers.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154160
Feb 14, 2013
 
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, people are emotional creatures. Now provide some scientific evidence that #1.) There is a higher power...and #2) That it created a scheme of any kind. Good Luck with that GODBOT.
Some push buttons some move slides, some press keys, some draw bows, some pluck strings, of course you would know this if you weren't completely illiterate musically, and would never embarrass yourself by claiming all they do is "PUSH BUTTONS. Actually there are very few instruments were buttons are "pushed." Dumb ass!
I never had to march, always either a soloists or in a section. Shit for brains there are no instruments that you PUMP!!! Accordion maybe, but thats a reach, and not in a marching band. You don't know shit about music do you....admit it ands save yourself some serious embarrassment.
You dance, too.:-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_organ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezebox

Was TDY in Joliet, IL where there was a guy that played something called an accordiovox or something in a lounge. One man band. Knocked out some great rock and polkas. Did Proud Mary real well. I did a lot of dancing there. Drunk, usually. Well, always.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154162
Feb 14, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked a very simple question that you didn't answer.
What part of ToE is evidenced?
There's no evidence of abiogenesis, no evidence of spontaneous life, no evidence of fish transforming to mammals, no evidence of bacteria becoming birds.
We haven't even cataloged all the existing life on Earth, how is it thought that we know what life existed billions of years ago?
Know it before you preach it.
No, I answered you. You just couldn't understand it.

What I said was "over 150 years of research by scientists in all the Earth sciences from all over the world working within all different sociopolitical cultures we have gathered enough evidence for all the different aspect of biological evolution that to withhold tacit approval for this theory would be unreasonable."

You want to learn biology, go back to school, and this time pay attention. Considering your level of questions, you should probably start with middle school Earth sciences. Or maybe even a basic class explaining what science really is.

You want me to teach you? No. Unless we spend a few year going through all the evidence, you'll just keep spouting "not enough" BS. There are literally museums full of this evidence, all over the world. Go to school, take classes, pass test, and then, maybe, you'll know enough that at least your questions will make sense.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154163
Feb 14, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I might have to take you first...
I hope Dave's OK with sloppy seconds.
I have no problem with sharing Sweet Cheeks. I wouldn't ride him/her/it bareback.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#154164
Feb 14, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
YOu seem to have missed the central portion of that post...... Here:
You see, that's how democracy works. A ballot or measure or law or something like that is put out there for all the people to vote, if the people vote this way or that, you just have to live with it.
There are plenty of new laws that I do not agree with, but I have to live with them because they are now law.
I didn't miss anything. Your statement that we can't blame people who create bad legislation is flat-out dumb.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 148,161 - 148,180 of218,171
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••