You prove life can be initiated from raw chemicals first.<quoted text>
What, you figure you throw enough crap on the wall, something might stick?
Well, none of your crap does --
1. Abiogenesis is biochemistry. Evolution is biology. I know, over your head. Oh well.
2. Cosmology and astrophysics are also NOT biology. Again, obviously over your head.
3. "order out of chaos" is exactly what happens when you shake up oil and water and then let it settle. So, again, you haven't a clue. If what you are lamely trying to argue is the 2nd law of thermodynamics (or any of them), your question is laughably pathetic and you really should study (a lot) before posting more stupidity.
4. Did you miss the part about rigorously testable being a measure of science? You want ID to be considered, show us the independently verified rigorous tests. Oh that's right, the Design Institute puts all of it's money into mass marketing of stupid ideas and none into testing because they know what the results would be ... and you wouldn't like it.
They have been trying for thousands of years.